Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:40:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 [360] 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
Sigals
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 06:58:03 PM
 #7181


Quote
One change in the new SM will be especially consequential for certain customers—and possibly for the entire GPU market. Maxwell restores a key execution resource that was left out of Kepler: the barrel shifter. The absence of this hardware doesn't seem to have negative consequences for graphics, but it means Kepler isn't well-suited to the make-work algorithms used by Litecoin and other digital currencies. AMD's GCN architecture handles this work quite well, and Radeons are currently quite scarce in North America since coin miners have bought up all of the graphics cards. The barrel shifter returns in Maxwell, and Nvidia claims the GM107 can mine digital currencies quite nicely, especially given its focus on power efficiency.

Would really like to hear Christians thoughts on this.

1714765209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714765209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714765209
Reply with quote  #2

1714765209
Report to moderator
1714765209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714765209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714765209
Reply with quote  #2

1714765209
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714765209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714765209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714765209
Reply with quote  #2

1714765209
Report to moderator
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:12:00 PM
 #7182

The Barrel shifter is not present on 3.0 cards like the GTX760, but is already on 3.5 Titans. You can see that on Wikipedia.

I may be wrong since I don't program CUDA neither I have a 750Ti in hand, but my impression is that NVidia catched up and fixed it's own problems, not surpassed (by much) the already efficient ATI design. Turning the tables would depend in impressive engineering feat by NVidia but also ATI sloppiness in it's current line, which nobody managed to point out yet. Perhaps high latency on memory accesses is the only thing holding ATI back on mining.

Then there's always the physical limit of using the same TSMC silicon and 28nm technology.

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
relm9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:18:41 PM
 #7183

The Barrel shifter is not present on 3.0 cards like the GTX760, but is already on 3.5 Titans. You can see that on Wikipedia.

I may be wrong since I don't program CUDA neither I have a 750Ti in hand, but my impression is that NVidia catched up and fixed it's own problems, not surpassed (by much) the already efficient ATI design. Turning the tables would depend in impressive engineering feat by NVidia but also ATI sloppiness in it's current line, which nobody managed to point out yet.

Then there's always the physical limit of using the same TSMC silicon and 28nm technology.

I'd be happy if both are on an even playing field , that would likely normalize prices, unless even Nvidia and AMD combined can't meet demand from miners (which I doubt).
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:19:03 PM
 #7184

A pretty good review of the actual Maxwell architecture changes can be found here:

http://techreport.com/review/26050/nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-maxwell-graphics-processor
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:22:44 PM
 #7185

The Barrel shifter is not present on 3.0 cards like the GTX760, but is already on 3.5 Titans. You can see that on Wikipedia.

I may be wrong since I don't program CUDA neither I have a 750Ti in hand, but my impression is that NVidia catched up and fixed it's own problems, not surpassed (by much) the already efficient ATI design. Turning the tables would depend in impressive engineering feat by NVidia but also ATI sloppiness in it's current line, which nobody managed to point out yet.

Then there's always the physical limit of using the same TSMC silicon and 28nm technology.

I'd be happy if both are on an even playing field , that would likely normalize prices, unless even Nvidia and AMD combined can't meet demand from miners (which I doubt).
Indeed. That's exactly what I hope for.

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
ils
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:29:43 PM
 #7186

hello, newbie here
i'm using cudaminer to mine LTC using my GTX 760 and so far no problem

however i just bought Bioshock Infinite and want to play it
i'm using -i 1 as option, but the game only ran @ 10-20 fps

is there any other option i can use to increase my fps?
or telling cudaminer to "only use remaining GPU power"? because Bioshock only use 50% GPU power to maintain 60 fps
i'm hoping to use remaining 50% to mine coins Smiley

Thank you Smiley
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:34:23 PM
 #7187

hello, newbie here
i'm using cudaminer to mine LTC using my GTX 760 and so far no problem

however i just bought Bioshock Infinite and want to play it
i'm using -i 1 as option, but the game only ran @ 10-20 fps

is there any other option i can use to increase my fps?
or telling cudaminer to "only use remaining GPU power"? because Bioshock only use 50% GPU power to maintain 60 fps
i'm hoping to use remaining 50% to mine coins Smiley

Thank you Smiley

On your Config take a alook at reducing the "SMX" number:

ex. -l K7x32

You can try dropping the 7 to something lower. This can sometimes help. Some games just can't really deal well with sharing gfx. BF4 or BF3 are a great example... my Titan has more then enough power to play them but not with CUDAMiner running at even super low settings. While League of Legends I can just use my normal config and switch it to  -i 0 and boom frame rate loss but well within playable.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:46:12 PM
 #7188

I wanna see Christian DO A BARREL SHIFT!!! LOL  Grin

nVidia calls it a funnel shifter.

Christian
ils
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:47:15 PM
 #7189

On your Config take a alook at reducing the "SMX" number:

ex. -l K7x32

You can try dropping the 7 to something lower. This can sometimes help. Some games just can't really deal well with sharing gfx. BF4 or BF3 are a great example... my Titan has more then enough power to play them but not with CUDAMiner running at even super low settings. While League of Legends I can just use my normal config and switch it to  -i 0 and boom frame rate loss but well within playable.

Thanks! Smiley
but not working Sad
still got 10-20 fps using K1x32 (i use K6x32 as default)
reducing it to K1x16 makes no difference in fps too
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:55:18 PM
 #7190


Quote
The barrel shifter returns in Maxwell, and Nvidia claims the GM107 can mine digital currencies quite nicely, especially given its focus on power efficiency.

Would really like to hear Christians thoughts on this.

the funnel shifter is already present in GT 780, 780 Ti, Geforce Titan, Geforce GT 630 (GK208), Geforce GT 635 OEM (GK208), Geforce GT 640 (GK208). It helps with power efficiency and mining speed, but its instruction throughput is very limited compared to e.g. floating point instructions. When you've been mining with the T kernel, you've already used the funnel shifter.

Christian

Sigals
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 07:59:51 PM
 #7191

Ah, makes sense. So the performance boost on the 750ti due to this new instruction is already accounted for by using the T kernel Smiley

Bearclaw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 08:04:04 PM
 #7192

What clocks are you running? Cheesy

I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!)

Well stock on my card is 1189 base / 1268 boost and upped that by 36.
Memory stock is 5400 and I upped that by 516... And this morning I had it up to 660 or so...
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 08:09:40 PM
 #7193

What clocks are you running? Cheesy

I bet you can do better with some more time and of course, after Mr Buchner improves cudaminer for Maxwell cards. (looking forward to that!)

Well stock on my card is 1189 base / 1268 boost and upped that by 36.
Memory stock is 5400 and I upped that by 516... And this morning I had it up to 660 or so...

Nice, looking forward to getting one.
Laerik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 08:18:10 PM
 #7194

Do anyone know a good cudaminer config for a Gigabyte 780 Ti OC?
linuxbman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 08:35:31 PM
 #7195

I see some people complaining about performance decrease with the new nvidia driver, but I have found the opposite.  I have a pair of Gigabyte 770 OC 4GB and I am getting 40-60 KH/s more per card with the update. 
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2014, 09:28:36 PM
 #7196

Do anyone know a good cudaminer config for a Gigabyte 780 Ti OC?
What do you want to mine exactly ? (configuration depends of the algo which is used)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 09:30:03 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2014, 09:44:25 PM by cbuchner1
 #7197

I present a friend's first nVidia-only rig. Six 750Ti from Gigabyte (WindForce with 6 Pin power). Yes, we've built it into a suitcase.
Call it a "travel rig" if you want.



Currently this runs Linux and we are getting 3kHash/s Yacoin performance per card with the factory overclock.
We may have to switch to Windows for better overclocking possibilies.

The cards run cool at 56 deg C, even the ones that have almost no air breathing room.


Yacoin could be interesting in the future. Today was a price spike to triple the usual price.
https://bter.com/trade/yac_btc

Also Yacoin is back on cryptsy.com now.

I am supposed to be remote administering this rig. But at the moment we do not know how  (he's behind one router and one WLAN repeater, making this tricky). Maybe that's the final straw that will make me put a remote administration/monitoring API into cudaminer Wink

Christian
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 09:37:08 PM
 #7198

I'm mining both yac and pts... Cheesy

Nice results, looking forward to higher clocks. Why no h81 btc pro with risers and 6 750tis?
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 09:39:24 PM
 #7199

I'm mining both yac and pts... Cheesy

Nice results, looking forward to higher clocks. Why no h81 btc pro with risers and 6 750tis?

So far we have no experience with risers, and I've seen reports that nVidia cards have been crashing on risers.
No experiments. Wink  We wanted to get mining fast.

An extension to 10 GPUs is a possibility, there are currenty 2 unused PCI-x x16 slots on each mainboard.
This will require some risers.

Christian
Jayjay04
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 09:39:36 PM
 #7200

In two days the gtx 750 ti is gonna reach 200$ for sure... so abusive... already gone up on amazon !!

                    ▄▄▄
                   █████
             ▄▄▄    ▀▀▀       ▄▄████╕
            █████          ▄▄███████▌
     ▄▄▄     ▀▀▀        ╓████████▀▀
    █████               ██████▀▀       ▄███▄
     ▀▀▀        ▄███▄    ▀▀▀           ▀███▀
                ▀███▀        ▄▄████╕
       ▁▄▄███▄           ▄▄████████▌
   ▁▄▆████████       ▄▄█████████▀▀       ▄███▄
 ▄█████████▀▔    ▄▄█████████▀▀           ▀███▀
▐██████▀▀▔   ,▄█████████▀▀        ▄▄▄
 ▔▀▀▀▔    ▄▄████████▀▀           █████
      ▄▄████████▀▀       ▄▄██▄    ▀▀▀
   ▄█████████▀       ▄▄███████▌       ▄▄▄
  ▐██████▀▀      ▄▄█████████▀▔       █████
   `▀▀▀      ▂▄█████████▀▀    ,▄▄µ    ▀▀▀
          ▂▆████████▀▀    ,▄██████▌
          ██████▀▀     ▄█████████▀
           ▔▀▀        ███████▀"
                      "▀▀▀╙
Hello!
STAKER
.The Next Proof-of-Stake.
KSmart Contract Tokene.














Pages: « 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 [360] 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!