djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 02, 2014, 12:17:08 AM |
|
I wanted to see how much the new version improves Yacoin performance on my 660Ti. But I can´t seem to get it to mine at an acceptable rate. With the older versions I was getting about 3.2kHash. (my card is highly oc´d and used only for mining) But now i can´t seem to get near that.
Earlier I used --interactive=0 --hash-parallel=1 --launch-config=K7x23 --texture-cache=0 --single-memory=0 --lookup-gap=3 Now that same launch config doesn´t start and via autotune I only get around 1.7kHash. I´ve tried several combinations of the other options, but nothing helps. (also batchsize doesn´t seem to change anything for me.)
BTW I want to report a small bug: --batchsize=x isn´t recognized correctly. Only -b x works.
You should try to increase even more the look-up gap value
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
RustyShackleford
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 12:48:48 AM |
|
Nevermind. Had libcurl5 installed, needed 4
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 02, 2014, 01:30:02 AM |
|
Earlier I used --interactive=0 --hash-parallel=1 --launch-config=K7x23 --texture-cache=0 --single-memory=0 --lookup-gap=3 I´ve tried several combinations of the other options, but nothing helps. (also batchsize doesn´t seem to change anything for me.)
BTW I want to report a small bug: --batchsize=x isn´t recognized correctly. Only -b x works.
You should try to increase even more the look-up gap value --launch-config=K7x23 should be k27x3 and it's probably --batch-size=... Christian
|
|
|
|
|
gazzamc
|
|
March 02, 2014, 03:25:10 AM |
|
@anyone
Hey guys I registered just to ask this... I've got 2 gigabyte 750ti's and one is kinda acting strange.. i have one OC'd @ +100 core & +500 Memory which yields me 295 kh/s roughly... But my second card keeps on crashing whether it's OC'd or not..
Should I RMA that card? as I even tried Underclocking it and it still crashed.
The error has something to do with memory, Is it VRam or Ram? As i could always add more.. If it helps i'm on Win7 x64..
I hope someone could help as this is kind of irritating me..
Appreciate any replies, Thanks
|
|
|
|
whitesand77
|
|
March 02, 2014, 03:39:29 AM |
|
@anyone
Hey guys I registered just to ask this... I've got 2 gigabyte 750ti's and one is kinda acting strange.. i have one OC'd @ +100 core & +500 Memory which yields me 295 kh/s roughly... But my second card keeps on crashing whether it's OC'd or not..
Should I RMA that card? as I even tried Underclocking it and it still crashed.
The error has something to do with memory, Is it VRam or Ram? As i could always add more.. If it helps i'm on Win7 x64..
I hope someone could help as this is kind of irritating me..
Appreciate any replies, Thanks
Swap the cards in the PCI-E slots and see if the same card gives you issues.
|
|
|
|
cvax
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2014, 04:39:46 AM |
|
@anyone
Hey guys I registered just to ask this... I've got 2 gigabyte 750ti's and one is kinda acting strange.. i have one OC'd @ +100 core & +500 Memory which yields me 295 kh/s roughly... But my second card keeps on crashing whether it's OC'd or not..
Should I RMA that card? as I even tried Underclocking it and it still crashed.
The error has something to do with memory, Is it VRam or Ram? As i could always add more.. If it helps i'm on Win7 x64..
I hope someone could help as this is kind of irritating me..
Appreciate any replies, Thanks
Sounds like a busted card to me, but try it as a single card only first.
|
BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta | YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM 8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
|
|
|
guzzzi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:41:47 AM |
|
So 350/360kh/s each gtx780ti is max for this Card? All other settings i done cudaminer gets me error or not enough memory msg. or the nvidia drivers breaks.
|
|
|
|
jstabb
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:45:07 AM |
|
Hi, I'm new to the forums and crypto mining in general. But I thought I'd share the performance results of some riser testing I did.
Specs: EVGA GTX 750Ti FTW (has 6 pin power connector) Intel G3220 on ASRock Fatil1ty Z87 Killer
Conservative overclock: +50 GPU, +500 Memory
And the results (scrypt): Baseline (plugged straight into x16 slot): 290-299 kh/s
Non-powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 270-280 kh/s Powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 272-282 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 270-277 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 1): 266-269 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 2): 288-295 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 3): 288-297 kh/s Non-powered x16-x16 riser: 292-297 kh/s
As you can see, there's not much penalty for the riser as long as you're able to plug into a gen2+ x16 slot. If you're plugging into an x1 or gen1 x16 slot, there's a 10-15% performance penalty.
I hope this information proves useful.
Edit: Command line was: cudaminer.exe -H 2 -i 0 -m 1 -l T5x24 --benchmark
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 02, 2014, 10:07:44 AM |
|
Just donated 1 LTC to you, keep your great work on cudaMiner.
Thank you very much! The same goes to the anonymous donor with the 2.0795371 LTC donation
|
|
|
|
ollyweg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 11:21:52 AM Last edit: March 02, 2014, 11:50:56 AM by ollyweg |
|
Earlier I used --interactive=0 --hash-parallel=1 --launch-config=K7x23 --texture-cache=0 --single-memory=0 --lookup-gap=3 I´ve tried several combinations of the other options, but nothing helps. (also batchsize doesn´t seem to change anything for me.)
BTW I want to report a small bug: --batchsize=x isn´t recognized correctly. Only -b x works.
You should try to increase even more the look-up gap value --launch-config=K7x23 should be k27x3 and it's probably --batch-size=... Christian Ok I tried the settings, but K27x3 only gets me "result does not validate". I have to increase lookup-gap to 9 in order for it to run, but then it only gets me around 1kHash. I´ve already tried other launch-configs (autotune) with higher lookup-gap, but the higher I go the lower my hashrate. When autotuning on some settings, it crashes my driver. And somehow any configuration never uses a lot of ram. For example autotune found K14x2, it works but only uses 1295MB of vram on lookup-gap 3. EDIT: seems to be the same with the older version I was using before. (2014-02-09). I last used scrypt-jane when the feature was in beta. (i think 2014-01-22) With that version and my old config I now only get 0.5kHash. Also I found out that -batchsize=x is recognized as a command (only one -). However this prevents cudaminer from starting to mine. It stops at: This is version 2014-02-28 (beta) based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler Cuda additions Copyright 2013,2014 Christian Buchner LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4 [2014-03-02 12:24:05] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt-jane' algorithm. [2014-03-02 12:24:05] Nfactor is 14 (N=32768)! [2014-03-02 12:24:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 660 Ti with compute capability 3.0 [2014-03-02 12:24:05] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0 [2014-03-02 12:24:05] GPU #0: 32 hashes / 14.2 MB per warp. [2014-03-02 12:24:05] GPU #0: using launch configuration K27x3
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 02, 2014, 12:22:41 PM |
|
Ok I tried the settings, but K27x3 only gets me "result does not validate".
swap the upper case K against a lower case k. It's probably best to auto-tune the lower case k kernel with various lookup gap settings and pick the best one. Christian
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 02, 2014, 12:41:39 PM |
|
I looked a bit into bus usage (with AB), not sure if it is very helpful here what I found:
On scrypt; scrypt:2048 with H2: The bus usage is around 14% On scrypt-jane, it is 2% The strange thing is when using autotune (on scrypt-jane), this one is all over the place going up to 100%
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ollyweg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 12:50:28 PM Last edit: March 02, 2014, 01:22:12 PM by ollyweg |
|
swap the upper case K against a lower case k.
It's probably best to auto-tune the lower case k kernel with various lookup gap settings and pick the best one.
Christian
Okay I didn´t know that makes a difference. Trying it out right now. Already looks better. Thanks! EDIT: For some reason my graphics driver crashes when autotuning with higher lookup-gaps. Not immediately, but when it´s almost done.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 02, 2014, 02:19:21 PM |
|
swap the upper case K against a lower case k.
It's probably best to auto-tune the lower case k kernel with various lookup gap settings and pick the best one.
Christian
Okay I didn´t know that makes a difference. Trying it out right now. Already looks better. Thanks! EDIT: For some reason my graphics driver crashes when autotuning with higher lookup-gaps. Not immediately, but when it´s almost done. the crashing is due to a time-out... haven't found a way to solve it yet. Use the -D option to at least get some readings before the crash. Christian
|
|
|
|
cdogster
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 03:32:41 PM |
|
Specs: EVGA GTX 750Ti FTW (has 6 pin power connector) Intel G3220 on ASRock Fatil1ty Z87 Killer
Conservative overclock: +50 GPU, +500 Memory
And the results (scrypt): Baseline (plugged straight into x16 slot): 290-299 kh/s
Non-powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 270-280 kh/s Powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 272-282 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x1 slot: 270-277 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 1): 266-269 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 2): 288-295 kh/s USB powered x1-x16 in x16 slot (gen 3): 288-297 kh/s Non-powered x16-x16 riser: 292-297 kh/s
Thanks for this info. I was expecting more from these cards. Did you try any higher overclocking? And how many cards did you try at one time?
|
|
|
|
Takashi267
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 03:45:24 PM |
|
I can check my 780 on pci 3 x16 if you guys want those results
That would help tremendously. What kind of risers do you have? Can you try a 16x to 16x riser or even a 1x to 16x in that PCI-E 3.0 versus the card being put into the slot directly? Thanks. I missed the riser part sorry. Would test it but it means ripping my water cooler apart :-( Ah, no worries. Would still be curious if 3.0 slots yield any benefit versus 2.0 slots for cudaminer if there was any way you had a means of doing that without messing up the water cooling. While I dont have any risers laying around my motherboard has PCI-E 2.0 x16 slot running at x2 and a heavily overclocked GTX 780. Here is my config for my GTX 780: cudaminer.exe -q -i 0 -m 0 -H 2 -l T12x24 PCI-E 3.0 x16: ~715Khash/s with a bus usage of ~13% PCI-E 2.0 x16(x2): ~685Khash/s with a bus usage of ~40-50% (I forgot the exact number) If you have any more questions feel free to ask.
|
|
|
|
CodyF86
|
|
March 02, 2014, 04:23:28 PM |
|
First post so hi everyone!!!
Just wanted to say thank you for this awesome miner!
Zotac Nvidia Geforce 670 @ 1267 Core & 3416 Memory - 375 kh/s!
cudaminer.exe -H 1 -d 0 -i 0 -m 1 -l auto -o stratum+tcp://etc.etc:etc -O pass
|
|
|
|
heajin5921
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2014, 04:35:24 PM |
|
I wiil try my 780ti for this. thanks
|
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
|
March 02, 2014, 04:54:40 PM |
|
For some reason my graphics driver crashes when autotuning with higher lookup-gaps. Not immediately, but when it´s almost done.
the crashing is due to a time-out... haven't found a way to solve it yet. Use the -D option to at least get some readings before the crash. The timeout settings can be changed in the registry: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/display/wddm_timeout.mspx
|
|
|
|
|