dUCiLe
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 18, 2017, 02:36:08 AM |
|
cryptopia closed btc/infl bad news  dosent matter much, price is less than 0.1 sat, so BTC/IFLT tradeing pair is not needed actually, As Price will rise, they will restore tradeing pair hope so, its a good coin, in last few months ive turned 100usd into 4200 so far |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kabarbogor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2017, 07:51:15 AM |
|
cryptopia closed btc/infl bad news dosent matter much, price is less than 0.1 sat, so BTC/IFLT tradeing pair is not needed actually, As Price will rise, they will restore tradeing pair hope so, its a good coin, in last few months ive turned 100usd into 4200 so far dev when the price is growing up ? |
|
|
|
|
Klo-Sa3uf3r
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
|
December 18, 2017, 09:03:02 AM |
|
cryptopia closed btc/infl bad news first page: algo x11 ?!?!? |
|
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 19, 2017, 09:13:57 AM |
|
cryptopia closed btc/infl bad news Why is this bad news? It is just at the present point of time worth less than 1 BTC-Satoshi. So it's not tradeable, so they disabled it and use the resources for something useful for the time being. You can use other exchange currencies if you want to trade. |
|
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 19, 2017, 09:16:32 AM |
|
which pool is working and stable?!
Install the IFLT wallet on your computer, download the blockchain, encrypt the wallet. Then you buy a couple of million IFLTs and send them to your wallet. Unlock it for POS and there you go. Staking will start 24h after the coins are mature. So more you have so more and faster you can stake. |
|
|
|
|
thetevfik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 01:33:53 PM |
|
IFLT needs dev action. Otherwise it will be dead soon. You cannot sell IFLT coins even for 0.1 satoshi. The volume is poor either  |
|
|
|
|
zincra
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 343
Merit: 304
You arent Insane yet, get Insane to go Insane!
|
|
December 19, 2017, 02:08:57 PM |
|
IFLT needs dev action. Otherwise it will be dead soon. You cannot sell IFLT coins even for 0.1 satoshi. The volume is poor either How about community action instead of dev action, devs work in their own tempo, and no coin have ever died in slow development, but some coins are died of wanton coin owners who wish to earn only trade money and dont give shit about coin. |
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 20, 2017, 11:55:37 AM |
|
Why would it die? It is a very active coin, there is even active development going on. Not many shitcoins in this price league have any, lucky if there is even anyone left in charge or taking at least a bit care of it.
I don't think IFLT is a shitcoin at all, even though it is currently at its bottom in terms of price. Time to accumulate and stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gost111
|
|
December 20, 2017, 12:11:48 PM |
|
Believe that the way it is , and while hoarding coins  |
|
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 20, 2017, 01:26:31 PM |
|
Believe that the way it is , and while hoarding coins Seriously, there is nothing wrong with being a multi millionaire  |
|
|
|
|
|
btc00
|
|
December 20, 2017, 07:18:16 PM |
|
is this coin need masternodes ) and go to the moon
|
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 21, 2017, 02:30:05 AM |
|
is this coin need masternodes ) and go to the moon
Why would that be? And please go away with that "to the moon" shit. Only clueless idiots use that. |
|
|
|
|
|
legion_miracle
|
|
December 21, 2017, 08:43:42 AM |
|
is this coin need masternodes ) and go to the moon
Why would that be? And please go away with that "to the moon" shit. Only clueless idiots use that. Because masternodes would help secure the longevity of this coin, and reduce the circulating supply. |
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 21, 2017, 11:05:39 AM
Last edit: December 21, 2017, 01:04:52 PM by MadMac |
|
Because masternodes would help secure the longevity of this coin, and reduce the circulating supply.
You don't need masternodes for this, it's wide spread and a stable network. Masternodes are for the few greedy who still want more stakes without helping the coin at all. Sure you need to buy in and burn some coins for this. But nothing substantial to gain from it. And why would anyone need to reduce the supply? It's one of the main advantages of IFLT to have a huge supply. I wrote that already. Look at IOTA for instance. If you want to do real world applicable business, you need a huge supply of coins. Bitcoin with it's strict limitations on the other hand is the complete negative example of unusability. We don't need that. Let the coins prosper. |
|
|
|
|
zincra
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 343
Merit: 304
You arent Insane yet, get Insane to go Insane!
|
|
December 21, 2017, 01:51:36 PM |
|
Because masternodes would help secure the longevity of this coin, and reduce the circulating supply.
You don't need masternodes for this, it's wide spread and a stable network. Masternodes are for the few greedy who still want more stakes without helping the coin at all. Sure you need to buy in and burn some coins for this. But nothing substantial to gain from it. And why would anyone need to reduce the supply? It's one of the main advantages of IFLT to have a huge supply. I wrote that already. Look at IOTA for instance. If you want to do real world applicable business, you need a huge supply of coins. Bitcoin with it's strict limitations on the other hand is the complete negative example of unusability. We don't need that. Let the coins prosper. He told circualtion supply, that mean how much coins are avaible to trade everyday. I thin Masternodes with 80 stakeing rates are not good idea, maybe at 8% or 4 %. But Instasend or Darksend features would be cool, but i belive Admins wait That Litecoin update to impleate that. |
|
|
|
zincra
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 343
Merit: 304
You arent Insane yet, get Insane to go Insane!
|
|
December 21, 2017, 02:03:03 PM |
|
My idea is to have core grupp with major holders, who can speaks on coin development. Not they control any but have thought to be considered and info what will be avaible them before others. And maybe have suggestion tree for votes where major overs can vote by using their coin, few other coins have had similar systems. Like BITB, POSW and few others
|
|
|
|
mineru
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
https://forum.cryptoinfo.net/
|
|
December 21, 2017, 09:56:57 PM |
|
My idea is to have core grupp with major holders, who can speaks on coin development. Not they control any but have thought to be considered and info what will be avaible them before others. And maybe have suggestion tree for votes where major overs can vote by using their coin, few other coins have had similar systems. Like BITB, POSW and few others
You mean governance mechanisms/features? Not easy to implement. Its hard work but worth the effort for sure. Something to put on the list maybe. Problem as always is who will implement that, how and when. |
|
|
|
zincra
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 343
Merit: 304
You arent Insane yet, get Insane to go Insane!
|
|
December 22, 2017, 01:04:58 AM |
|
My idea is to have core grupp with major holders, who can speaks on coin development. Not they control any but have thought to be considered and info what will be avaible them before others. And maybe have suggestion tree for votes where major overs can vote by using their coin, few other coins have had similar systems. Like BITB, POSW and few others
You mean governance mechanisms/features? Not easy to implement. Its hard work but worth the effort for sure. Something to put on the list maybe. Problem as always is who will implement that, how and when. In technological way its rather Big step, but as a idea it not have to be hard. I BITB there is, like People had to prove they own atlest 1% of coin to become memeber of core team. And they donated 250K BITBs as they joined and 50K monthly to pool, where funds were used on development procress and Givaways. For core membership they can direct development, but not controll it as its stll for dev deap right POSW coin have same non technologiacl way. Need to have 100K+ POSW to join whale group where members can get all development info and market info first, as Pump info also. For starting IFLT could do similar non tech governance mechanics. And maybe later in 10 years if coin is survived and developed enough could find a way to make it tech. Just ideas! |
|
|
|
|
MadMac
|
|
December 22, 2017, 02:40:42 AM |
|
I see 2 camps here. One that want to maximize their profit, thus burn coins, reduce supply and make masternodes to get higher stakes. Not good! And the other one that looks into practical applicability of the coin. I see myself in the second camp. I'm happy to see a huge amount of tiny coins floating around. I said already that micro financing would be a great application and IFLT would be right sized for just that. Not too few coins that would be too expensive (forget about satoshis, count full numbers) and not too many that look inflationary for that purpose (like IOTA would be, but they have another target).
So, again, I think we need to discuss strategy here, not marketing, technicalities or short term rubbish. Rebranding would be an important part, if the strategy is decided. And I would like to see it going into micro payment direction. And we have an Android wallet for this already, of course it would need major rework, but the basics are there already.
|
|
|
|
|
zincra
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 343
Merit: 304
You arent Insane yet, get Insane to go Insane!
|
|
December 22, 2017, 03:09:30 AM |
|
I see 2 camps here. One that want to maximize their profit, thus burn coins, reduce supply and make masternodes to get higher stakes. Not good! And the other one that looks into practical applicability of the coin. I see myself in the second camp. I'm happy to see a huge amount of tiny coins floating around. I said already that micro financing would be a great application and IFLT would be right sized for just that. Not too few coins that would be too expensive (forget about satoshis, count full numbers) and not too many that look inflationary for that purpose (like IOTA would be, but they have another target).
So, again, I think we need to discuss strategy here, not marketing, technicalities or short term rubbish. Rebranding would be an important part, if the strategy is decided. And I would like to see it going into micro payment direction. And we have an Android wallet for this already, of course it would need major rework, but the basics are there already.
On micropaymants you mean? Like pico, nano, micro, milli, kilo, mega, tera? Like send 1M IFLT, You send 1Mega IFLT or i miss undrestand? |
|
|
|
|
