▂▃▅▆▇⫷[🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰]⫸⫷[!Paying 10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸▇▆▅▃▂

[Leass]

Today is Sunday , why not payouts?

Last payout of Sunday is when we the clear-out type of payout (more than 0.0015 BTC)

I hope this would help You You WILL get paid, on LAST payout today.

[guytechie]

Today is Sunday , why not payouts?

Last payout of Sunday is when we the clear-out type of payout (more than 0.0015 BTC)

I hope this would help You You WILL get paid, on LAST payout today.

I know.  That's what  I said.

[guytechie]

I'm still waiting for payments from zpool XMG - like living! -> https://prnt.sc/gau4sa

Yeah, me too.  Although it looks like we're finally getting paid.  Just shortly before the "last" Sunday payoff, I see a sharp incline in the green graph.  I hope that means that's the XMG being paid out.  I don't know how to confirm since the web stat page only shows the last 50 blocks found (about 3 hours worth).  All of them say "Immature" and 3 orphaned.

[RainDestiny]

I would like to mine Monetary Unit, I set password: c=MUE and start to mine. But when I go to my wallet-last 50 earnings then I see there not only mue coins but also other x11 coins. Why?
Or did I misunderstand something?

[nsummy]

I would like to mine Monetary Unit, I set password: c=MUE and start to mine. But when I go to my wallet-last 50 earnings then I see there not only mue coins but also other x11 coins. Why?
Or did I misunderstand something?

You can't mine a specific coin, you can only mine a specific algo.  the c=MUE would mean that you want to be paid in Monetary Unit Coins.  You should probably change it to BTC.

[nsummy]

Is the "24 Actual Payout" for X11 in MH or GH?  The footnote claims the that only blake and sha256 are listed in GH, but it doesn't seem like that is accurate.

[crackfoo]

Is the "24 Actual Payout" for X11 in MH or GH?  The footnote claims the that only blake and sha256 are listed in GH, but it doesn't seem like that is accurate.

fixed. missed a couple spots for that. it is in GH

[pginvest]

m7m is offline and algo not liested...

[crackfoo]

m7m is offline and algo not liested...

their coin forked again. I'm not sure yet if I'll ever bring it back.

[guytechie]

m7m is offline and algo not liested...

their coin forked again. I'm not sure yet if I'll ever bring it back.

Why is it that whenever you remove or disable an algo, the miners do not fail over to another algo?  I have a script written out like how you suggest in the site, but when it fails the m7m, it would try xevan next, but then gets disconnected, then yescrypt, but then gets disconnected, then goes back to m7m (which fails), and repeats itself.

[2017-08-21 09:23:57] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739
[2017-08-21 09:23:57] 8 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 09:23:58] stratum_recv_line failed
[2017-08-21 09:23:58] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 09:23:58] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 09:24:13] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033
[2017-08-21 09:24:13] 8 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 09:24:14] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zpool.ca port 6033: Connection refused
[2017-08-21 09:24:14] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 09:24:14] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 09:24:24] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233
[2017-08-21 09:24:24] 8 miner threads started, using 'yescrypt' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 09:24:26] stratum_recv_line failed
[2017-08-21 09:24:26] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 09:24:26] workio thread dead, exiting.


Shouldn't it fail m7m, then start mining the next profitable coin (in this case, xevan)?

[amitim]

Why is it that whenever you remove or disable an algo, the miners do not fail over to another algo?  I have a script written out like how you suggest in the site, but when it fails the m7m, it would try xevan next, but then gets disconnected, then yescrypt, but then gets disconnected, then goes back to m7m (which fails), and repeats itself.

Shouldn't it fail m7m, then start mining the next profitable coin (in this case, xevan)?

show your script file. for me fine restarted to the next algo:

Code:

./cpuminer.sh 

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.7  *********** 
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zpool.ca port 6033: Connection refused
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] 4 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] stratum_recv_line failed
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233
[2017-08-21 18:53:18] 4 miner threads started, using 'yescrypt' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:20] Stratum difficulty set to 1
[2017-08-21 18:53:37] yescrypt block 147294, diff 0.232
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #0: 512 H, 291.55 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #1: 512 H, 287.34 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #2: 512 H, 280.48 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #3: 512 H, 262.39 H/s

my script

Code:

#!/bin/bash
cd ~/cpuminer

for ((;;))
do

./cpuminer -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan,yescrypt,stats
./cpuminer -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan,yescrypt,stats
./cpuminer -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan,yescrypt,stats

sleep 5000
done

[guytechie]

Why is it that whenever you remove or disable an algo, the miners do not fail over to another algo?  I have a script written out like how you suggest in the site, but when it fails the m7m, it would try xevan next, but then gets disconnected, then yescrypt, but then gets disconnected, then goes back to m7m (which fails), and repeats itself.

Shouldn't it fail m7m, then start mining the next profitable coin (in this case, xevan)?

show your script file. for me fine restarted to the next algo:

Code:

./cpuminer.sh 

         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.6.7  *********** 
     A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
     with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
     BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
     Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
     to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
     Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7m' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to mine.zpool.ca port 6033: Connection refused
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] 4 miner threads started, using 'xevan' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] stratum_recv_line failed
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] workio thread dead, exiting.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233
[2017-08-21 18:53:18] 4 miner threads started, using 'yescrypt' algorithm.
[2017-08-21 18:53:20] Stratum difficulty set to 1
[2017-08-21 18:53:37] yescrypt block 147294, diff 0.232
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #0: 512 H, 291.55 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #1: 512 H, 287.34 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #2: 512 H, 280.48 H/s
[2017-08-21 18:53:39] CPU #3: 512 H, 262.39 H/s

my script

Code:

#!/bin/bash
cd ~/cpuminer

for ((;;))
do

./cpuminer -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan=0.035,yescrypt,stats
./cpuminer -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan=0.035,yescrypt,stats
./cpuminer -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=mylinux_101,c=BTC,xmg=0.035,xevan=0.035,yescrypt,stats

sleep 5000
done

Mine is Windows.

Code:

:start
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=0.02,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu  -p d=2,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=1,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
goto start

[amitim]

Mine is Windows.

Code:

:start
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=0.02,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu  -p d=2,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=1,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
goto start

http://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo example. I'm not shure, but first need try as on example?

[guytechie]

Mine is Windows.

Code:

:start
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=0.02,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu  -p d=2,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
cpuminer.exe -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p d=1,worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
goto start

http://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo example. I'm not shure, but first need try as on example?

The example is exactly how I wrote my script out.

[amitim]

The example is exactly how I wrote my script out.

try w/o "d=..."
for example "...-u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
or
"...-u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p worker,xevan,yescrypt,xmg"
Hmmm... What is it "...worker..."? algo? I don't show this in list on the zpool.ca
Try strictly by example:

ccminer -r 0 -a x11   -o stratum+tcp://x11.mine.zpool.ca:3533 -u joe -p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2
ccminer -r 0 -a x13   -o stratum+tcp://x13.mine.zpool.ca:3633 -u joe -p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2

[guytechie]

The example is exactly how I wrote my script out.

try w/o "d=..."
for example "...-u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p worker,xevan,yescrypt,m7m
or
"...-u 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu -p worker,xevan,yescrypt,xmg"
Hmmm... What is it "...worker..."? algo? I don't show this in list on the zpool.ca
Try strictly by example:

ccminer -r 0 -a x11   -o stratum+tcp://x11.mine.zpool.ca:3533 -u joe -p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2
ccminer -r 0 -a x13   -o stratum+tcp://x13.mine.zpool.ca:3633 -u joe -p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2

That's the worker's ID or name.  It is a valid way of adding a identifier.

So what is ",xmg"?  I thought it had to be the algo, which is ",m7m", not the coin.

BTW, removing the worker's name, as well as removing the difficulty setting (d=x) still does not work.

I'm using cpuminer-opt 3.6.8 if that matters.

BTW, the fact that the stratum_recv_line failed should indicate it's a server-side issue.

[2017-08-21 18:53:17] stratum_recv_line failed
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] ...terminating workio thread
[2017-08-21 18:53:17] workio thread dead, exiting.

[cryptolelefla]

Is the "24 Actual Payout" for X11 in MH or GH?  The footnote claims the that only blake and sha256 are listed in GH, but it doesn't seem like that is accurate.

fixed. missed a couple spots for that. it is in GH

getting 22 miners instead of 2. is this normal??
https://i.imgur.com/a/G58xz

[amitim]

That's the worker's ID or name.  It is a valid way of adding a identifier.

So what is ",xmg"?  I thought it had to be the algo, which is ",m7m", not the coin.

BTW, removing the worker's name, as well as removing the difficulty setting (d=x) still does not work.

I'm using cpuminer-opt 3.6.8 if that matters.

XMG is Coin of Magi
Ok, my batch for win with cpuminer-opt 3.6.7:

Code:

e:
cd e:\cpuminer367\

:start
cpuminer-sse2.exe -r 0 -a m7m -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6033 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=my_rig,c=BTC,xmg,xevan,yescrypt,stats
cpuminer-sse2.exe -r 0 -a xevan -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3739 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=my_rig,c=BTC,xmg,xevan,yescrypt,stats
cpuminer-sse2.exe -r 0 -a yescrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:6233 -u 153jhJMkgCMt5X8hoyQg8MawegeCibaBnZ -p ID=my_rig,c=BTC,xmg,xevan,yescrypt,stats

pause 10
goto start  

[crackfoo]

nova exchange has been disabled until further notice. Coins listed only on there will show 0 value until their issue is resolved

[bctcrypt]

Hi,
Been trying ZPool and Hash Refinery Mining Pool but yet to get a payout to my actual wallet.

Still a little way off hitting the payout threshold with Zpool but a bit concerned that I have had over 0.0013 BTC Confirmed on Hash Refinery Mining Pool since mid last week but it didn't payout automatically on Sunday.

On the main page it says:

"Payouts are made automatically every 8 hours for all balances above 0.0025, or 0.00025 on Sunday."

As my balance was well over the 0.00025 well before Sunday, wondering why it hasn't payed out?

Just to confirm it does show my correct Bitcoin wallet address under the wallet section on ZPool and Hash Refinery Mining Pool. Still a little way off hitting the threshold of 0.0015 for Zpool but wondering it looks like it might end up with the same issue.

Mining Pool Hub has already payed out to the same wallet address successfully.