Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 03:26:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 13157 13158 13159 13160 13161 13162 13163 13164 13165 13166 13167 13168 13169 13170 13171 13172 13173 13174 13175 13176 13177 13178 13179 13180 13181 13182 13183 13184 13185 13186 13187 13188 13189 13190 13191 13192 13193 13194 13195 13196 13197 13198 13199 13200 13201 13202 13203 13204 13205 13206 [13207] 13208 13209 13210 13211 13212 13213 13214 13215 13216 13217 13218 13219 13220 13221 13222 13223 13224 13225 13226 13227 13228 13229 13230 13231 13232 13233 13234 13235 13236 13237 13238 13239 13240 13241 13242 13243 13244 13245 13246 13247 13248 13249 13250 13251 13252 13253 13254 13255 13256 13257 ... 33305 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368887 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Xiaoxiao
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000

The Golden Rule Rules


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 03:06:36 AM

Who is the owner of Chart Buddy?
1714317966
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714317966

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714317966
Reply with quote  #2

1714317966
Report to moderator
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 03:08:56 AM

The recent shorts were wiped out on Bitfinex yesterday.



I wouldn't call stopping out 20+% of shorts with a 5% price increase all that encouraging. If they were adding... that would be very bullish.

Who is the owner of Chart Buddy?

Richy_T
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 03:24:00 AM

XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4214
Merit: 1203


I support freedom of choice


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2015, 03:34:40 AM

Thoughts from Russia on the block size situation and Blockstream
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1164828.0
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 03:51:19 AM

Thoughts from Russia on the block size situation and Blockstream
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1164828.0

It simply delegates control to the admin of the pool node, where it has always been. XT (and diverting hashes towards your interest), has shown that a chance to exit does exist. I assume that miners and yes, even "gasp", blockstream, does want increased usage in general. You either think that our interests will eventually align, or you don't, and you sell nao. Time to rally behind a solution that actually does increase the maxblocksize. (And yes it is in the miners' best interests (now) to grow the number of transactions while a subsidy exists to facilitate it.)
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 03:52:43 AM

XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.


bitcoin is going to fail.. miners should not control the block size.. bitcoin becomes pointless.. may as well keep the debit card system we already have if mining companies are controlling and making a profit on fees.... now i understand why i planning on eating pasta with a fork.... XT loses because of the "blockchain blacklists" .. this blockchain fork is all about losing atm.

billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2015, 03:56:42 AM

XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.

It's not over and the choice doesn't lay with the miners. It lays with the market, with the people who decide to invest in this project or not. Nobody is going to dump a billion dollars into bitcoin currency and infrastructure knowing they can be held hostage by miners at any time.  BIP100 does not do enough to allay those fears.

Miners need to be fucking broken to get it into their fat heads that we don't want to buy cripplecoins. I'm selling any pump and not buying back until they grok the situation.

You don't like mining without fees? Try mining $100 coins.  Who run Bartertown? I run Bartertown.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:02:26 AM

Coin
Explanation
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:07:24 AM
Last edit: August 29, 2015, 04:24:28 AM by Cconvert2G36

XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.

It's not over and the choice doesn't lay with the miners. It lays with the market, with the people who decide to invest in this project or not. Nobody is going to dump a billion dollars into bitcoin currency and infrastructure knowing they can be held hostage by miners at any time.  BIP100 does not do enough to allay those fears.

Miners need to be fucking broken to get it into their fat heads that we don't want to buy cripplecoins. I'm selling any pump and not buying back until they grok the situation.

You don't like mining without fees? Try mining $100 coins.  Who run Bartertown? I run Bartertown.

You and the 13% of nodes that XT topped out at? Time to make a compromise, or sell, I'm pretty sure the market can stand your frustration dumpage. The argument and subsequent arrival of XT showed the core devs they don't live in a vacuum, and you should be happy about it.

Edit: Very poor decision by Hearn to include anything else in XT, gasoline to a(n) (imaginary) fire that already existed about his real motives.
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:08:14 AM

XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.

It's not over and the choice doesn't lay with the miners. It lays with the market, with the people who decide to invest in this project or not. Nobody is going to dump a billion dollars into bitcoin currency and infrastructure knowing they can be held hostage by miners at any time.  BIP100 does not do enough to allay those fears.

Miners need to be fucking broken to get it into their fat heads that we don't want to buy cripplecoins. I'm selling any pump and not buying back until they grok the situation.

You don't like mining without fees? Try mining $100 coins.  Who run Bartertown? I run Bartertown.


+1 bear troll fud all the waaaay! cripplecoin is here! .. it might go double digits once everyone figures out what is happening .
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2015, 04:25:17 AM



You and the 13% of nodes that XT topped out at? Time to make a compromise, or sell, I'm pretty sure the market can stand your frustration dumpage. The argument and subsequent arrival of XT showed the core devs they don't live in a vacuum, and you should be happy about it.

You think XT has topped out already? What happens when the group hug in Canada produces no results as they explicitly said there won't be proposals even discussed much less decided on. How many XT nodes then? Then What if Honk Kong produces no results? You still think XT will have topped out at 13%? 

8MB IS the compromise. I already explained why we don't need a software limit at all because miners are already incentivized to keep blocks small enough to propagate.  I also do not accept that a one time increase helps in the long term.  Markets do not like uncertainty. 

How many nodes will be running XT when we hit the 7tx/sec limit? What about a day after that? As I've said all along, if you don't like XT, fine. Give us something that scales or I will find a better cryptocoin to invest in.
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:30:08 AM

billyjoe ... XT is dead.. as soon as the gun industry finds out about the "blockchain blacklists" bitcoin problems will just be getting started. what they are programing in is the ability to sanction anyone.. individuals, companies, states .. and it will be used as a tool to intimidate gun owners.. that code is the death of bitcoin.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:33:40 AM



You and the 13% of nodes that XT topped out at? Time to make a compromise, or sell, I'm pretty sure the market can stand your frustration dumpage. The argument and subsequent arrival of XT showed the core devs they don't live in a vacuum, and you should be happy about it.

You think XT has topped out already? What happens when the group hug in Canada produces no results as they explicitly said there won't be proposals even discussed much less decided on. How many XT nodes then? Then What if Honk Kong produces no results? You still think XT will have topped out at 13%? 

8MB IS the compromise. I already explained why we don't need a software limit at all because miners are already incentivized to keep blocks small enough to propagate.  I also do not accept that a one time increase helps in the long term.  Markets do not like uncertainty. 

How many nodes will be running XT when we hit the 7tx/sec limit? What about a day after that? As I've said all along, if you don't like XT, fine. Give us something that scales or I will find a better cryptocoin to invest in.

The cripplecoiners are ceding ground as we speak... Don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. I'm not willing to trust the future of bitcoin to Mike Hearn, same as I don't trust it to Blockstream, the market (in all its facets) can and will make the decision.
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2015, 04:39:00 AM

billyjoe ... XT is dead.. as soon as the gun industry finds out about the "blockchain blacklists" bitcoin problems will just be getting started. what they are programing in is the ability to sanction anyone.. individuals, companies, states .. and it will be used as a tool to intimidate gun owners.. that code is the death of bitcoin.

As I understand it, there is a switch you can use to turn off the I.P. restrictions. Regardless, as I've said before, I'm not married to XT or G & H. I'm committed to scaling the network. 

No scale? No sale.

Scale or die.
bitcoin1992
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:53:26 AM

What's the general sentiment around here today? Are we going to try another attempt at 240 or are we dropping down below 220?
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 04:56:37 AM

billyjoe ... XT is dead.. as soon as the gun industry finds out about the "blockchain blacklists" bitcoin problems will just be getting started. what they are programing in is the ability to sanction anyone.. individuals, companies, states .. and it will be used as a tool to intimidate gun owners.. that code is the death of bitcoin.

As I understand it, there is a switch you can use to turn off the I.P. restrictions. Regardless, as I've said before, I'm not married to XT or G & H. I'm committed to scaling the network.  

No scale? No sale.

Scale or die.

+1 i agree with you.. scale or die.... however.. right now both sides are big fail .. they should never put in that "blockchain blacklist" code.. that was a total stupid move.. maybe they should stop brushing their teeth with flouride maybe they would be able to see more clearly how that is going to totally fail. the ip thing is just the beginning of something they will finish building later on down the road.. they are slipping in the foundation of what they are attempting to build... we can always get around an ip ban... it will be wallet addresses they will blacklist later on ... cats out the bag now.
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2015, 05:01:53 AM

What's the general sentiment around here today? Are we going to try another attempt at 240 or are we dropping down below 220?

My guess is we're going nowhere unless some miracle happens and criplecoiners see the light or some macroeconomic disaster strikes.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 05:02:22 AM

Coin
Explanation
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 05:03:53 AM

What's the general sentiment around here today? Are we going to try another attempt at 240 or are we dropping down below 220?


bitcoin will be going to double digits soon because bitcoin is caught in the crunch and we're about to eat pasta with a fork .. and bitfinix will collapse when we do .
KFR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Per ardua ad luna


View Profile
August 29, 2015, 05:45:38 AM

What's the general sentiment around here today? Are we going to try another attempt at 240 or are we dropping down below 220?

My guess is we're going nowhere unless some miracle happens and criplecoiners see the light or some macroeconomic disaster strikes.

You know I think we get your position by now. Tongue

You personally (aka "the market") aren't happy and until everyone does it your way the whole world is full of idiots that just don't grok the universe like you do. Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 13157 13158 13159 13160 13161 13162 13163 13164 13165 13166 13167 13168 13169 13170 13171 13172 13173 13174 13175 13176 13177 13178 13179 13180 13181 13182 13183 13184 13185 13186 13187 13188 13189 13190 13191 13192 13193 13194 13195 13196 13197 13198 13199 13200 13201 13202 13203 13204 13205 13206 [13207] 13208 13209 13210 13211 13212 13213 13214 13215 13216 13217 13218 13219 13220 13221 13222 13223 13224 13225 13226 13227 13228 13229 13230 13231 13232 13233 13234 13235 13236 13237 13238 13239 13240 13241 13242 13243 13244 13245 13246 13247 13248 13249 13250 13251 13252 13253 13254 13255 13256 13257 ... 33305 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!