Bitcoin Forum
November 29, 2021, 03:45:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will we close Nov. at or above Plan B's posited minimum of $98K?
Yes - 43 (37.4%)
No - 72 (62.6%)
Total Voters: 115

Pages: « 1 ... 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 19659 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 [19673] 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 19680 19681 19682 19683 19684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 19708 19709 19710 19711 19712 19713 19714 19715 19716 19717 19718 19719 19720 19721 19722 19723 ... 29915 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25491369 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (158 posts by 14 users with 9 merit deleted.)
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:14:47 PM

Also fuck quantum clowns. We would be using them to mine if they were ever to become more than a nerdish fantasy.

You can not do it mate, if Quantum breaks SHA256 it will be useless. It's not an option. I don't believe it's realistic, but big boys are pouring a lot of money into it and you never know what the results will be.
1638200750
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638200750

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638200750
Reply with quote  #2

1638200750
Report to moderator
1638200750
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638200750

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638200750
Reply with quote  #2

1638200750
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638200750
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638200750

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638200750
Reply with quote  #2

1638200750
Report to moderator
1638200750
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638200750

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638200750
Reply with quote  #2

1638200750
Report to moderator
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:16:55 PM

People who can't compete always want to change the rules of the game.
Especially if the game is about keeping open competition.

Quote
I don't care if there is only one shovel maker. Good for them for being successful at what they do.
I do care, if they can charge whatever they want for their shovels, to the point of suppressing shoveling when they don't want it to happen.

Monopoly is never good, except for the monopolist. Don't jbreher yourself into a corner.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:17:21 PM

Also fuck quantum clowns. We would be using them to mine if they were ever to become more than a nerdish fantasy.

You can not do it mate, if Quantum breaks SHA256 it will be useless. It's not an option. I don't believe it's realistic, but big boys are pouring a lot of money into it and you never know what the results will be.
Like I said NERDISH FANTASY. Show a functional product. I read plenty of sci-fi as it is, don't need more of it here.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:18:43 PM

People who can't compete always want to change the rules of the game.
Especially if the game is about keeping open competition.

Quote
I don't care if there is only one shovel maker. Good for them for being successful at what they do.
I do care, if they can charge whatever they want for their shovels, to the point of suppressing shoveling when they don't want it to happen.

Monopoly is never good, except for the monopolist. Don't jbreher yourself into a corner.
If they raised prices a hundredfold from here, and it was still profitable to buy their stuff, then that's fair game.

The market can bear whatever it can bear. Let's not turn into pretend-communists.

And why would you compare me to yogi? That makes no sense.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:20:35 PM

I'd posted my reply about PoW change before reading the posts by Icygreen, flipperish, flynn and others.

I, too, would like the full nodes to have a say in the relative distribution of hash functions, but full nodes are too easy to sybyl attack. PoS vote is also dangerous, because established miners have huge availability they could employ to crush GPU- or CPU- friendly functions. That's why we will eventually need to figure out more game theory to have a stable solution.
Could you elaborate on the bold part?

PoS - Those who can prove ownership of coin get more votes.

Short: An established miner has (or can quickly have) lots of coin lying around, so he can steer the voting result more easily than a few hodlers with the same total stake (read: stash).

Longer: Giving each satoshi the same voting weight is a hard problem, possibly unsolvable. What is needed is a hypothetical system of incentives that makes GPU- and CPU- miner owned satoshis as heavy as ASIC-miner owned ones. Is such a system practical to implement? Does it ever exist? I doubt it. That's why PoS is dangerous.

Proof of Stake has coin age to consider, any participant has to first be fully upto date and part of a network for some time in order to then be part of the staking process which even then is randomised not on demand.    Theres only some average rate at which a large holder will stake not that they can force participation.   POS is dangerous if the majority of a crypto currency is liquid on an exchange perhaps, its unlikely to be especially cheap to undermine in this way
That's a good point that I haven't considered fully. Guess I need to read up a bit more.

Quote
I do imagine Proof of stake is going to be part of Ethereum this year as they move to make their transactions cheaper, faster and more efficient.   Vitalik Buterin seems quite focused on avoiding the problems bitcoin transactions had with mining fees and POS is the most viable route ?
Buterin would do better to first make sure transactions are irreversible.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:27:15 PM

(snip)

(EDIT - about "softness". The initial conditions could be 100% ASIC-based, 0% others, as it is now. Then in times of mempool storms, or fork FUD, or whatever, the "others" might be gently pushed up until the situation gets back to normal.)

There can not be soft fork PoW change, it's the hardest of all hard forks.
But but... initial 0%? It's as soft as can be. As long as it doesn't budge from 0%, it's still good ol'bitcoin.

Quote
Keep in mind that no one would more encourage such a change than Jihan Wu. If such thing happen, he will have a ground to a claim BCash is the real Bitcoin, and he knows that claim is false in current situation. I'm afraid he may even really attack Bitcoin just to make some more incentive for PoW change.
I haven't considered this. It seems a bit far fetched, but not totally out of this world.

Quote
IMHO the only thing that can justify PoW change is Quantum computing attack on SHA2, and Cuckoo Cycle is Quantum resistant btw. Doing it now is jumping in the abyss just for the sake of change.
Yes, a quantum computing breakout (unlikely for several years to come) would destroy Bitcoin as we know it. Having the necessary machinery for PoW in place could be a safety exit. Just insert Cuckoo Cycle into an "other hashing algos" slot.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:33:24 PM
Last edit: February 25, 2018, 03:50:00 PM by d_eddie

People who can't compete always want to change the rules of the game.
Especially if the game is about keeping open competition.

Quote
I don't care if there is only one shovel maker. Good for them for being successful at what they do.
I do care, if they can charge whatever they want for their shovels, to the point of suppressing shoveling when they don't want it to happen.

Monopoly is never good, except for the monopolist. Don't jbreher yourself into a corner.
If they raised prices a hundredfold from here, and it was still profitable to buy their stuff, then that's fair game.

The market can bear whatever it can bear. Let's not turn into pretend-communists.
You don't need to be a communist to expect markets to be as efficient as they can be. In fact, market efficiency is not a primary concern in communist utopy. For capitalists, however, monopolies and oligopolies are the primary source of market inefficiency.

Quote
And why would you compare me to yogi? That makes no sense.
Nothing personal, and probably not too accurate. All right, I apologise. The point is, although you come from very different places, you can end up arriving at the same point. Big blocks, miner power and progressive irrelevance of the network of users (as in "full nodes").
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:35:58 PM


IMHO the only thing that can justify PoW change is Quantum computing attack on SHA2, and Cuckoo Cycle is Quantum resistant btw. Doing it now is jumping in the abyss just for the sake of change.

Core devs can come out and say "We upgrading the btc protocol to keep it safe against Quantum computers so a PoW change is necessary".

Bitmain will have no ground against this.  Grin
Just merited you - even with that fuckface avatar  Wink
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:38:00 PM
Merited by mindrust (1)

People who can't compete always want to change the rules of the game.
Especially if the game is about keeping open competition.

Quote
I don't care if there is only one shovel maker. Good for them for being successful at what they do.
I do care, if they can charge whatever they want for their shovels, to the point of suppressing shoveling when they don't want it to happen.

Monopoly is never good, except for the monopolist. Don't jbreher yourself into a corner.
If they raised prices a hundredfold from here, and it was still profitable to buy their stuff, then that's fair game.

The market can bear whatever it can bear. Let's not turn into pretend-communists.
You don't need to be a communist to expect markets to be as efficient as they can be. In fact, market efficiency is not a primary concern in communist utopy. For capitlaists, however, Monopolies and oligopolies are the primary source of market inefficiency.

Quote
And why would you compare me to yogi? That makes no sense.
Nothing personal, and probably not too accurate. All right, I apologise. The point is, although you come from very different places, you can end up arriving at the same point. Big blocks, miner power and progressive irrelevance of the network of users (as in "full nodes").

Adam Smith was right. Stop trying to control things and everything works out. So there is only one shovel maker? That means their products are functional and their prices are reasonable. The moment either of those stop being the case, someone else will overtake them.

Green is an ugly color.

As for yogi. If bcash was objectively better than bitcoin then I would be supporting it. I go with what works, not what I would like to work. It's not, so that's the end of that.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:42:17 PM

Adam Smith was right. Stop trying to control things and everything works out. So there is only one shovel maker? That means their products are functional and their prices are reasonable. The moment either of those stop being the case, someone else will overtake them.

The invisible hand only works if there are no hidden hand-choppers, like unnaturally high entry barriers to the business or vast discrepancies in the price of energy.
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 4337


Go! BTC Go!


View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:42:57 PM

I think it's an English mistake. I read it as "less and less people own homes". Which is true.

 I wondered about that but the post seemed well-written otherwise.
Thanks.
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 2175



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:44:57 PM

Andreas has an opinion on this %51 attack debate also.
https://twitter.com/Xentagz/status/967432856745193473

I am convinced.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:52:29 PM

Adam Smith was right. Stop trying to control things and everything works out. So there is only one shovel maker? That means their products are functional and their prices are reasonable. The moment either of those stop being the case, someone else will overtake them.

The invisible hand only works if there are no hidden hand-choppers, like unnaturally high entry barriers to the business or vast discrepancies in the price of energy.
Alright, point them out.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 02:58:08 PM

Andreas has an opinion on this %51 attack debate also.
https://twitter.com/Xentagz/status/967432856745193473

I am convinced.
Governments that can do IT. Heehee.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:04:34 PM
Merited by jojo69 (1)

Adam Smith was right. Stop trying to control things and everything works out. So there is only one shovel maker? That means their products are functional and their prices are reasonable. The moment either of those stop being the case, someone else will overtake them.

The invisible hand only works if there are no hidden hand-choppers, like unnaturally high entry barriers to the business or vast discrepancies in the price of energy.
Alright, point them out.
I'll point out just one: delayed access to leading edge mining hardware. A jus primae noctis of sorts, imposed by the lord to the commoners.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:10:05 PM

Adam Smith was right. Stop trying to control things and everything works out. So there is only one shovel maker? That means their products are functional and their prices are reasonable. The moment either of those stop being the case, someone else will overtake them.

The invisible hand only works if there are no hidden hand-choppers, like unnaturally high entry barriers to the business or vast discrepancies in the price of energy.
Alright, point them out.
I'll point out just one: delayed access to leading edge mining hardware. A jus primae noctis of sorts, imposed by the lord to the commoners.
You're saying nobody else can make something on par? Why not?
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:10:36 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (1), BobLawblaw (1), flynn (1)

I can see 8000 where I will purchase another $100k Of BTC. What is your plans?
My plan is to ignore you.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 7239


Observing No-Coiners.


View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:12:06 PM

3 days to go over 13K seems like a tuff nut to crack right now   Shocked

but as we say it seems to be a nice buying uppertunity under 10K i hope in short time it will be 1 of the last chances ....
abercrombie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1159
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:22:25 PM

is crypto done??  Huh

sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 2095


born once atheist


View Profile
February 25, 2018, 03:42:04 PM

I can see 8000 where I will purchase another $100k Of BTC. What is your plans?
My plan is to ignore you.

That is your mistake Ibian. You think you are somebody here with your
“Legendary” status. In reality you are a foolish person. Also can tell from how u speak that you most likely are not
worth very much money.




you must be new here....
Pages: « 1 ... 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 19659 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 [19673] 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 19680 19681 19682 19683 19684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 19708 19709 19710 19711 19712 19713 19714 19715 19716 19717 19718 19719 19720 19721 19722 19723 ... 29915 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!