Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bones261]

Right. But you strongly support having the largest military budget is the world by an order of magnitude yeah?

I'm against any standing army.  
I'm not even american, but its 2nd amendment is the last hope to not end all in a planetary gulag.

The US Government has already regulated arms to such an extent that the citizens have only a glimmer of hope. How are some semi-automatic weapons going to fare against the full weaponry of the US Military? The only hope is that the citizens become well organized and are able to train a large militia. I'm not confident that is realistic. How would we train mass amounts of people without the federal government taking notice and crushing it?

[1638056769]

1638056769

[1638056769]

1638056769

[User705]

Even a small topic like why there is an NRA backed ban on research into gun violence would take a long time to do properly, even though on its face it’s a ridiculous law.  What is more anti-science than banning research ?

All over human history being forcefully disarmed was a synonym of being a slave or a prisoner. Maybe "research" that.

Australia had all their guns confiscated 25 years ago.  They haven’t had a mass shooting since.  And they don’t look like slaves.

As we recently went over, jobs are slavery. Comrade.

Now I’m confused.  Is going on food stamps to avoid slavery a good thing or a bad thing?

If you have to rely on others to survive, you are a slave. So, n/a. People on food stamps are already slaves.

GL with bing your own island. Freedom as total, absolute autonomy. Never understood how a human being could really believe that. It's going out of fad that idea btw, it's more of an 80's-90's thing.

I literally have enough money to never have to work again. As do quite a number of other people here. What do you even think you are trying to say?

That’s only because others want to pay for your bitcoins.  Without those others you don’t have anything.

[mymenace]

Even a small topic like why there is an NRA backed ban on research into gun violence would take a long time to do properly, even though on its face it’s a ridiculous law.  What is more anti-science than banning research ?

All over human history being forcefully disarmed was a synonym of being a slave or a prisoner. Maybe "research" that.

Australia had all their guns confiscated 25 years ago.  They haven’t had a mass shooting since.  And they don’t look like slaves.

As we recently went over, jobs are slavery. Comrade.

Now I’m confused.  Is going on food stamps to avoid slavery a good thing or a bad thing?

If you have to rely on others to survive, you are a slave. So, n/a. People on food stamps are already slaves.

GL with bing your own island. Freedom as total, absolute autonomy. Never understood how a human being could really believe that. It's going out of fad that idea btw, it's more of an 80's-90's thing.

I literally have enough money to never have to work again. As do quite a number of other people here. What do you even think you are trying to say?

That’s only because others want to pay for your bitcoins.  Without those others you don’t have anything.

Australian Law

Mandatory Voting
Mandatory Education - until 17
Mandatory Vaccines
Mandatory Cash reporting
Mandatory reporting of all transactions over $10000


I think I will leave the slaves alone now

one more - one of the most over regulated countries in the world

[suchmoon]

Right. But you strongly support having the largest military budget is the world by an order of magnitude yeah?

I'm against any standing army.  
I'm not even american, but its 2nd amendment is the last hope to not end all in a planetary gulag.

The US Government has already regulated arms to such an extent that the citizens have only a glimmer of hope. How are some semi-automatic weapons going to fare against the full weaponry of the US Military? The only hope is that the citizens become well organized and are able to train a large militia. I'm not confident that is realistic. How would we train mass amounts of people without the federal government taking notice and crushing it?

This isn't gonna work unless we allow recreational use of tanks and nukes.

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Right. But you strongly support having the largest military budget is the world by an order of magnitude yeah?

I'm against any standing army.  
I'm not even american, but its 2nd amendment is the last hope to not end all in a planetary gulag.

The US Government has already regulated arms to such an extent that the citizens have only a glimmer of hope. How are some semi-automatic weapons going to fare against the full weaponry of the US Military? The only hope is that the citizens become well organized and are able to train a large militia. I'm not confident that is realistic. How would we train mass amounts of people without the federal government taking notice and crushing it?

This isn't gonna work unless we allow recreational use of tanks and nukes.

Nothing over blasting some recreational nukes on NYE.

[realr0ach]

This isn't gonna work unless we allow recreational use of tanks and nukes.

Uh, you do know the Jewish occupied govt who passes down orders to the military relies entirely on the petrodollar for funding which is currently imploding, right?

[Toxic2040]

This isn't gonna work unless we allow recreational use of tanks and nukes.

[jojo69]

I'll just leave this here

[Spaceman_Spiff_Original]

I'll just leave this here

Holy shit that is few wild animals compared to people and cattle.

[JayJuanGee]

JayJuanGee post

Can you be more specific you hate-filled nutjob?   Probably not, because you don't really have anything to contribute beyond your various non-topical talking points.

[explorer]

Even a small topic like why there is an NRA backed ban on research into gun violence would take a long time to do properly, even though on its face it’s a ridiculous law.  What is more anti-science than banning research ?

All over human history being forcefully disarmed was a synonym of being a slave or a prisoner. Maybe "research" that.

Australia had all their guns confiscated 25 years ago.  They haven’t had a mass shooting since.  And they don’t look like slaves.

Maybe not from your perspective...

[El duderino_]

Breaking 24777$ prediction game      FINAL LIST       

27/12/2017 bikerleszno
29/12/2018 cAPSLOCK 
30/12/2017 digithusiast
31/12/2017 Raja_MBZ
01/01/2018 elg
02/01/2018 wachtwoord
03/01/2018 JimboToronto
04/01/2018 d_eddie 
05/01/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE
06/01/2018 HanvanBitcoin
07/01/2018 ghandi
08/01/2018 savetherainforrest
09/01/2018 explorer
10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho
11/01/2018 Bitcoinaire
12/01/2018 speedwheel
13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner
14/01/2018 northypoale
15/01/2018 ivomm
16/01/2018 maca068
17/01/2018 bitcoinvest
18/01/2018 last of the v8s
19/01/2018 mfort312
20/01/2018 1982dre
21/01/2018 flamast2
22/01/2018 RealMachasm
23/01/2018 willope
24/01/2018 kartala
25/01/2018 orpington
26/01/2018 rolling
27/01/2018 LFC_bitcoin
28/01/2018 jojo69
29/01/2018 CristiTCM
30/01/2018 rayX12
31/01/2018 realsteelboy
01/02/2018 twocorn
02/02/2018 mancroofer
03/02/2018 True Myth
04/02/2018 poolminor
05/02/2018 itod
06/02/2018 scheptan
07/02/2018 vapourminer
08/02/2018 alexeft
09/02/2018 siera
10/02/2018 AlcoHoDL
11/02/2018 Dunkelheit667
12/02/2018 yonton
13/02/2018 Wekkel
14/02/2018 Thekool1s
15/02/2018 starmman
16/02/2018 Globb0
17/02/2018 leveldkrypto
18/02/2018 olesh
19/02/2018 BitCoinBurger
20/02/2018 Paashaas
21/02/2018 flynn
22/02/2018 icygreen
23/02/2018 erisdiscordia
24/02/2018 phil_s
25/02/2018 sirazimuth
26/02/2018 Arriemoller
27/02/2018 yonton
28/02/2018 Muttley
01/03/2018 bones261
02/03/2018 heater
03/03/2018 soullyG
04/03/2018 InvoKing
05/03/2018 Notme
06/03/2018 sa_94
07/03/2018 NUFCrichard
08/03/2018 Imbatman
09/03/2018 Roombot
10/03/2018 STT
11/03/2018 badream
13/03/2018 erre
14/03/2018 julian071
15/03/2018 podyx
17/03/2018 fragout
18/03/2018 fabiorem
21/03/2018 dakustaking76
23/03/2018 nikauforest
31/03/2018 vroom
01/04/2018 somac.
02/04/2018 kurious
04/04/2018 fluidjax
05/04/2018 bitcoinbunny
08/04/2018 tyler1890
10/04/2018 ludwigvon
11/04/2018 hairymaclairy
16/04/2018 practicaldreamer
18/04/2018 free-bit.co.in
27/04/2018 drbrockoin
01/05/2018 sprinkles
02/06/2018 oblox
07/07/2018 IntroVert
03/08/2018 toxic2040
28/08/2018 bitserve
15/10/2018 Yefi
05/11/2018 mikenz
31/12/2018 melman2002
01/01/2019 Spaceman_Spiff_Original
12/02/2019 FractalUniverse
21/04/2019 gentlemand
20/02/2020 romneymoney
18/12/2021 luckygenough56

UPDATE     AND GOOD LUCK

[JayJuanGee]

Also, if Roger were to go on a little rant that he does not want bcash to be called bcash, then perhaps the discussion should end at that point because roger can call his bcash anything that he wants, but if he will not engage with you because you continue to call bcash, bcash, then may as well not discuss the matter with the loonie...

I really like this. So much drama and energy...and most important...TIME..could have been saved with just this. Just to have called it VerCoin...WuCoin...whatevercoin. Just own your own branding instead of trying to befuddle bitcoin with half truths. They were so afraid back then that without the name brand it would not succeed. Now that crypto is going mainstream they have realized they could have called it anything and still have enough success to be economically viable. Hindsight smh.

I'm not sure whether I am understanding you here, ToxicPoxic. 

They have only achieved the level of "success" that they had been able to achieve through a kind of parasite-ism on bitcoin both in terms of name and transferring over of intellectual work (software.. blah blah blah).. Bitserve had done a pretty decent outlined of this, recently... .

Of course, bitcoin's software is open source, so their does remain a certain level of "fair game" within the bcash's team's chosen tactics, but surely a lot of folks are beginning to seem more clearly regarding their smoke and mirrors gamesmanship - yet at the same time, they continue to play off the ongoing and seeming increasing entrants of newbies into the space who can be deceived through their tactics - and it remains somewhat difficult to fight some of their deceitful tactics in the free market, which does allow for a certain level of "all is fair in love and war" environment.

[explorer]

Right. But you strongly support having the largest military budget is the world by an order of magnitude yeah?

I'm against any standing army.  
I'm not even american, but its 2nd amendment is the last hope to not end all in a planetary gulag.

The US Government has already regulated arms to such an extent that the citizens have only a glimmer of hope. How are some semi-automatic weapons going to fare against the full weaponry of the US Military? The only hope is that the citizens become well organized and are able to train a large militia. I'm not confident that is realistic. How would we train mass amounts of people without the federal government taking notice and crushing it?

You have to run with the idea that there are enough inside the military with ideology similar to your own that there will be sufficient disruptions.  Big machines are vulnerable to small disruptions.

[explorer]

I'll just leave this here

Which squares represent fat banksters? 

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

I'll just leave this here

Which squares represent fat banksters? 

Half of the human ones are the BIS dude.

[Tzupy]

Exchange incompetence reaches a new level in Japan...
https://www.coindesk.com/customer-tries-to-withdraw-20-trillion-in-crypto-exchange-glitch/

[realr0ach]

JayJuanGee post

Can you be more specific you hate-filled nutjob?   Probably not, because you don't really have anything to contribute beyond your various non-topical talking points.

JayJuanGee, can I interest you in a few trillion dollars of Jewish treasuries?

[jojo69]

I'll just leave this here



0% Billet AR-15 Lower Receiver

[JayJuanGee]

The American right wing conspiratard radio commentator. I don’t know his name but he talks about gay frogs. So he is gay frogs guy.

I believe that would be Alex Jones.

Sounds familiar so probably right.  

Gerald Celente was on Alex Jones yesterday (depending on your time zone) telling people to buy Bitcoin.

Do you have a link for that?  I feel like I wasted some of my life listening to Alex Jones trying to find it, and then the Gerald Celente crypto currencies part was at 2 hours 23 minutes and 30 seconds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwe_iMi8-fw

I did not even believe him to be recommending anything, and he does not really seem to know how to differentiate bitcoin from other cryptos because he said that the "valuable ones" are the ones that offer a kind of product, and I have recently been seeing that kind of bullshit discussion that in order to be valuable cryptocurrencies have to offer a product.

Accordingly, cryptocurrency pundits miss the whole fucking idea (or product of bitcoin), and they fail to realize that bitcoin is the actual product because of what it actually offers in terms of liberating folks from traditional money's control over you.

Furthermore, Alex Jones is no where to be seen, and what Alex needs is to have someone on his show specifically informing him about the Roger dat bullshit, and maybe even have an ability for both Roger and a regular bitcoin supporter to debate... someone who can hold their own to Roger.. which should be anyone who is fairly knowledgeable about bitcoin, and understands the bullshiterie of Bcash.

Also, if Roger were to go on a little rant that he does not want bcash to be called bcash, then perhaps the discussion should end at that point because roger can call his bcash anything that he wants, but if he will not engage with you because you continue to call bcash, bcash, then may as well not discuss the matter with the loonie...

 That was the show I was listening to (but I was falling asleep during it because it was after a night shift).  It starts around the 2hr40min mark.  He says follow the money and that's a segue into Switzerland and it becoming the crypto capital of the world.  He mentions they don't make specific recommendations, but he says crypto-currencies are "going North".  Then he talks about gold and right near the end of it, he says when gold hits 1400 or 1450 "it's gonna be a Bitcoin bounce baby!" - you kind of have to read between the lines but he's saying "Buy Bitcoin".

I find no reason to argue with you about whether Gerald Cerente is overall bullish about bitcoin and crypto, yet my point remains that it does not matter too much regarding how bullish he happens to be, because he seem to be caught up with fucked up premises that will likely interfere with his ability to differentiate bitcoin from other cryptos in meaningful ways.

Most bitcoin maximalists, including a large number of the ones participating in this thread (to the extent that they are not caught up in distracting and irrelevant social engineering hate nonsense discussions) recognize that bitcoin retains fundamental characteristics around proof of work that is not fundamentally characteristics of other cryptos, which includes bitcoin networking effects that are fairly established around bitcoin under largely free-market conditions that have really decent chances that bitcoin is going to come out top no matter what and no matter if some other snake oil alt becomes BIGGER than bitcoin in terms of market cap. 

TLDR:  I am just saying that Cerente does not seem to understand BTC fundamentals and what actually causes bitcoin to be valuable in an ongoing paradigm shifting kind of way and differentiated from other cryptos and other traditional asset classes.