Bitcoin Forum
November 28, 2021, 12:04:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will we close Nov. at or above Plan B's posited minimum of $98K?
Yes - 42 (38.5%)
No - 67 (61.5%)
Total Voters: 109

Pages: « 1 ... 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 19594 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 [19629] 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 19659 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 19673 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 ... 29908 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25490354 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (158 posts by 14 users with 9 merit deleted.)
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 3138


Volcano Corn!


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:39:11 PM
Merited by BobLawblaw (1)

Dudes. DUDES. 'Hol up there. I promise you I'm HODLing for at least $12k...
Stop saying that!  Every time you say that it tanks! Wink

Fine. Fuck you man. Shit's gonna drop below $10k in the next 24 hours.

Are you happy now ?!

Umm... Well...
1638057840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638057840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638057840
Reply with quote  #2

1638057840
Report to moderator
1638057840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638057840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638057840
Reply with quote  #2

1638057840
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638057840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638057840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638057840
Reply with quote  #2

1638057840
Report to moderator
1638057840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638057840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638057840
Reply with quote  #2

1638057840
Report to moderator
flynn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 540



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:41:47 PM


Plus more than 95% of c02 comes from natural sources not human influence. "Climate change" is bullshit. It's just cyclical and perfectly normal variance.

I also see the argument regarding CO2 level as too simplistic.
Maybe there is no climate change.
However, one thing is difficult to argue with: human population affects on environment.
This is discussed less, because the remedies are unknowable.

Specifically, humans may be causing the sixths extinction event in planet's history.
For those who would argue that it is "natural"-no it isn't because it is happening too fast-within 100-150 years, not millions of years.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/19/humans-creating-sixth-great-extinction-of-animal-species-say-scientists

Quote
Under a “natural” rate of extinction, the study said that two species go extinct per 10,000 species per 100 years, rather than the one species that previous work has assumed.

Modern rates of extinction were eight to 100 times higher , the authors found. For example, 477 vertebrates have gone extinct since 1900, rather than the nine that would be expected at natural rates.

Unfortunately, the way it may develop would be either for us to go non-biological and, hence, have little imprint on life OR natural habitats would become so stressed that extremely effective life forms would arise and finish us off one way or another.

(snip)


I'll just drop this here (it's one among 1000's) =>

https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2016/02/is_there_really_a_sixth_great_extinction_maybe_not.html
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:42:04 PM

too simplistic.
The truth is always simple.

And the truth is that lefties are liars.

If you don't have anything factual, that can be communicated in three sentences or less, that can be checked by anyone with access to google within 30 seconds, it doesn't matter.

you get no argument from me re CO2 level. It might be irrelevant, and most likely is.
However, the rest of my post shows that we DID change this planet already.
This is not a political statement-it is a fact.

This is pretty much my position on the matter. It sucks that politics literally ruins any objective discourse on such issues. Science shouldn't be a matter of politics or government, but unfortunately increasingly is, and getting anything funded that doesn't further some moneygrabbing agenda is virtually impossible these days. Nonetheless, there is no denying that we're fucking over wildlife.
flynn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 540



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:45:35 PM
Merited by Ibian (1)

too simplistic.
The truth is always simple.

And the truth is that lefties are liars.

If you don't have anything factual, that can be communicated in three sentences or less, that can be checked by anyone with access to google within 30 seconds, it doesn't matter.

you get no argument from me re CO2 level. It might be irrelevant, and most likely is.
However, the rest of my post shows that we DID change this planet already.
This is not a political statement-it is a fact.


And this is another way of seeing it :

It's the purpose of mankind to dig the earth to recover all the carbon that the plants hid down there. Without us, CO2 would go below 150ppm and all life would disappear from the surface of the EArth.
 
bitcoinPsycho
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 944


THE NEXT 2.4 YEARS ARE CRITICAL🍄💊


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:50:10 PM

Fine. Fuck you man. Shit's gonna drop below $10k in the next 24 hours.
Are you happy now ?!
It's just gonna tank faster now.
I think it's bad karma to talk about Bitcoin in this thread.

You're not the boss of me, honey.

Just for that, I placed a limit sell order for $12,500.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, HUH ?! HUH ?! COME AT ME... BRING IT !
go bob Smiley   looks like the green eye monster is rattling some people. I'm happy for you mate . respect to you and your foresight. Happy retirement  Wink
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 2079



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:51:53 PM


1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior events lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 3138


Volcano Corn!


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:55:42 PM


go bob Smiley   looks like the green eye monster is rattling some people. I'm happy for you mate . respect to you and your foresight. Happy retirement  Wink

Oh good gracious.  Has no one humor anymore!?  I will cheer when it hits 12500 and BBL can add to his diversifications.

I got no reason to be jealous.  I'm doing just fine...

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:56:35 PM
Last edit: February 21, 2018, 08:12:03 PM by realr0ach

you get no argument from me re CO2 level. It might be irrelevant, and most likely is.

It is irrelevant.  Giant insects used to roam the earth and since insects don't have lungs (they have a bunch of tracts called trachea), the size the insects can grow is determined by atmospheric content of o2.  When c02 levels were vastly higher than now, it caused the plants to be more efficient and create more o2, thus making insects much larger than now.  The earth was not an uninhabitable fireball when giant insects roamed the earth.

Report from Iron Mountain was a real leak, which foretold the coming of the Club of Rome.  The Club of Rome might be the biggest failure in world history if their goal was population control and reduction, since the govt roundtable groups allowed themselves to be completely taken over by Zionist Jews whose goal is to unsustainably flood the planet with as many brown people as possible to destroy 1st world white civilizations that aren't reproducing out of control in the first place.  It's the R-selection brown people that reproduce out of control in places like the horn of Africa, not K-selection whites.  

Homogeneous populations always rally together and dispose of parasites trying to practice usury against them, so the Jews decided trying to safeguard their banking monopolies were more important than sustainable populations.  The Club of Rome's other goal was after figuring out the only purpose of govt is warfare and that govt collapses without an external threat, was to fabricate some type of reason for govt to exist like rallying around global warming, alien invasion, anything to justify the existence of central govt and a vertically integrated civilization for parasites to leach off.

There is no need for any of this garbage.  K-selection whites and asians (places like Japan for example) simply stop reproducing the second resources and space become scarce.  The R-selection types like in the horn of Africa on the other hand probably will reproduce out of control, so you cannot subsidize them in any way.

moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 07:57:06 PM

Price bounced off support/resistance 11755, with a reasonably normal looking correction in progress




explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1257



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:02:36 PM


1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior event lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?


I think you need to balance that with discoveries.  It's like saying x people die every year, so the population will be zero in xy years.

vanobe
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 37


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:03:24 PM


1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior event lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?


Because in a few years we will be eating meat grown in a laboratory. We won't need huge numbers of cows, and the farm land they needed can return to the wild.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/science/a-lab-grown-burger-gets-a-taste-test.html

Quote
A hamburger made from cow muscle grown in a laboratory was fried, served and eaten in London on Monday in an odd demonstration of one view of the future of food.

Quote
Recent studies have shown that producing cultured meat in factories could greatly reduce water, land and energy use, and emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases, compared with conventional meat production using livestock.
moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:05:42 PM


1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior event lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?


Because in a few years we will be eating meat grown in a laboratory. We won't need huge numbers of cows, and the farm land they needed can return to the wild.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/science/a-lab-grown-burger-gets-a-taste-test.html

Quote
A hamburger made from cow muscle grown in a laboratory was fried, served and eaten in London on Monday in an odd demonstration of one view of the future of food.

Quote
Recent studies have shown that producing cultured meat in factories could greatly reduce water, land and energy use, and emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases, compared with conventional meat production using livestock.

ill let you eat meat grown in a laboratory, and drink water make in a factory. Personally Ill be eating crushed bull/bear soul Wink
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 2079



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:07:19 PM


And this is another way of seeing it :

It's the purpose of mankind to dig the earth to recover all the carbon that the plants hid down there. Without us, CO2 would go below 150ppm and all life would disappear from the surface of the EArth.
 

It's funny that I had similar thoughts when I was in my early twenties and was a bit more 'philosophical'.
My thinking was about the initial "purpose" of humans as a part of the biosphere.

I also thought about that, perhaps, at least initially we were there to warm it up, so to speak, because if we didn't and ice covered the whole earth, there would be almost no large scale vertebrates left (at least on the surface).
It goes without saying that low Co2 could have been at least one of the factors behind ice ages.

For those who thinks that earth land could not be fully covered by ice-apparently, it was before, in pre-Cambrian (snowball hypothesis).
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:11:46 PM
Merited by kurious (1)

I wonder what proportion of the alt-right thinks the earth is flat.  10%?  30%? 75%?
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1107



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:14:51 PM

Fine. Fuck you man. Shit's gonna drop below $10k in the next 24 hours.
Are you happy now ?!
It's just gonna tank faster now.
I think it's bad karma to talk about Bitcoin in this thread.

You're not the boss of me, honey.

Just for that, I placed a limit sell order for $12,500.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, HUH ?! HUH ?! COME AT ME... BRING IT !

Just tell us the truth, B'awb. You a long con? You know things you ain't tellin' us?
mymenace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061


Smile


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:15:59 PM

I wonder what proportion of the alt-right thinks the earth is flat.  10%?  30%? 75%?

alt-right

a media induced fantasy linking conservative thinkers to white supremacy, Nazism, conspiracy theories and russians

I think I will take the flat earthers, I would even believe the earth is flat just to oppose the media
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3570
Merit: 2376


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2018, 08:16:27 PM

I wonder what proportion of the alt-right thinks the earth is flat.  10%?  30%? 75%?

I wonder what proportion of the flat earthers are actually trolls, getting Youtube hits from people going there to view their insanity or prove them wrong. Or just for the lolz.



As for me, I've circled the globe and every time I look down from the airplane window, what do I see? A flat earth.

</QED>
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1257



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:16:50 PM


And this is another way of seeing it :

It's the purpose of mankind to dig the earth to recover all the carbon that the plants hid down there. Without us, CO2 would go below 150ppm and all life would disappear from the surface of the EArth.
 

It's funny that I had similar thoughts when I was in my early twenties and was a bit more 'philosophical'.
My thinking was about the initial "purpose" of humans as a part of the biosphere.

I also thought about that, perhaps, at least initially we were there to warm it up, so to speak, because if we didn't and ice covered the whole earth, there would be almost no large scale vertebrates left (at least on the surface).
It goes without saying that low Co2 could have been at least one of the factors behind ice ages.

For those who thinks that earth land could not be fully covered by ice-apparently, it was before, in pre-Cambrian (snowball hypothesis).

Well I wouldn't say it.

Quote
The Global Warming crowd ignores the fact that CO2 levels used to be measured in thousands of ppm instead of hundreds historically. In fact, the temperature does not even correlate very well with CO2 levels. During ice ages in the Ordovician period, some 450 million years ago, when the CO2 levels were several thousand of ppm, this did not result in temperatures 10 times greater than today.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/climate-change-conspiracy-against-us-all/
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:16:58 PM
Merited by conspirosphere.tk (1)

I wonder what proportion of the alt-right thinks the earth is flat.  10%?  30%? 75%?

It's called a "poison the well" Jewish media disinfo tactic you idiot.  They pose as the opposition alt-right type groups who are a threat to them then claim "yes, Jews control the media and banks, and the earth is also flat!".  You mix some real and fake information together to try and poison all of it.  This is what Qanon is.  Some of the posts were real at some point, but most of them now are just Jewish media disinfo shills.
hazukison
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10

Donate --> 15B6eKDUmjbV21Ujwj32HCX7qctCeSuzyi


View Profile
February 21, 2018, 08:18:07 PM

What's with the current 10% blood bath happening?
Pages: « 1 ... 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 19594 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 [19629] 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 19645 19646 19647 19648 19649 19650 19651 19652 19653 19654 19655 19656 19657 19658 19659 19660 19661 19662 19663 19664 19665 19666 19667 19668 19669 19670 19671 19672 19673 19674 19675 19676 19677 19678 19679 ... 29908 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!