Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 10:54:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 59 (86.8%)
$48,000 - 9 (13.2%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 20911 20912 20913 20914 20915 20916 20917 20918 20919 20920 20921 20922 20923 20924 20925 20926 20927 20928 20929 20930 20931 20932 20933 20934 20935 20936 20937 20938 20939 20940 20941 20942 20943 20944 20945 20946 20947 20948 20949 20950 20951 20952 20953 20954 20955 20956 20957 20958 20959 20960 [20961] 20962 20963 20964 20965 20966 20967 20968 20969 20970 20971 20972 20973 20974 20975 20976 20977 20978 20979 20980 20981 20982 20983 20984 20985 20986 20987 20988 20989 20990 20991 20992 20993 20994 20995 20996 20997 20998 20999 21000 21001 21002 21003 21004 21005 21006 21007 21008 21009 21010 21011 ... 33173 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26330646 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:21:36 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations. 

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:

1710845644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710845644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710845644
Reply with quote  #2

1710845644
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710845644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710845644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710845644
Reply with quote  #2

1710845644
Report to moderator
1710845644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710845644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710845644
Reply with quote  #2

1710845644
Report to moderator
1710845644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710845644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710845644
Reply with quote  #2

1710845644
Report to moderator
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1844
Merit: 2805


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:43:19 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)


Are we at the reversal point yet? The funny thing is everybody is talking about bear patterns, but the falling wedge is generally considered as a bullish sign:
"The falling wedge pattern is characterized by a chart pattern which forms when the market makes lower lows and lower highs with a contracting range. When this pattern is found in a downward trend, it is considered a reversal pattern, as the contraction of the range indicates the downtrend is losing steam... In a falling wedge, both boundary lines slant down from left to right. The upper descends at a steeper angle than the lower line. Volume keeps on diminishing and trading activity slows down due to narrowing prices. There comes the breaking point, and trading activity after the breakout differs."
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_pattern
https://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:falling_wedge_reversal
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:43:41 AM

@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.

It's a bullshit argument.  If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered.  They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place.  So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork.  You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol.

It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized".
They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front.  This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.
Phil_S
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2087
Merit: 1456


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 07:49:59 AM

Lingering in the middle... it might take a while.


realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:34:39 AM

One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin.  As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market.  There are very few possibilities for this entity:

1)  Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)

2)  Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs

3)  The ESF

4)  The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)

In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1062
Merit: 1041



View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:37:54 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Funny. When we pointed out that soft forks -- which Coreans put forth as being inherently safe -- were capable of making any change whatsoever, we were shouted down as FUDsters. Now a Corean is putting forth this very same truism as new knowledge, and the masses are proclaiming some new revelation.

I don't think "the masses" are proclaiming any revelations  Roll Eyes

One guy says he will do a presentation demonstrating a way such soft forks can be done.  As of this writing, this claim is still unsubstantiated, and it may turn out that there are issues that make his method unworkable in practice - or he may have genuinely have found a way to soft fork any change.  In either case, there certainly has not been any blind acceptance by "the masses" of Mark's claim nor any 'proclaiming' of anything related to it.

You say "when we pointed out that soft forks ... were capable of making any change whatsoever , we were shouted down as FUDsters".  I was not aware that you and some others had already presented a method to do this kind of thing (and apparently had your method rebuked and refused by 'coreans')...  Can you provide a link to the presentation (and hopefully the 'corean' rebuking as well)?
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:39:54 AM

Changes that alter the security model or fungiblity are NOT soft forks, NOOBS.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:12:04 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2018, 09:28:12 AM by JayJuanGee

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.

It's a bullshit argument.  If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered.  They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place.  So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork.  You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol.

It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized".
They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front.  This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.

Oh my gawd!!!!!  

Two posts in a row making sense from roach the poach.



One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin.  As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market.  There are very few possibilities for this entity:

1)  Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)

2)  Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs

3)  The ESF

4)  The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)

In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.

Whew!!!!!!  What a relief!!!!!  Back to normal with some bitcoin is gonna die from one cause nonsense.  I feel better now.

ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1844
Merit: 2805


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:12:33 AM
Merited by Last of the V8s (1)

I know that feeling. Today it happened again for n-th time Grin  Wink
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:14:21 AM

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:22:15 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations. 

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner  Roll Eyes
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:25:59 AM



*Australians can now pay everyday bills with Bitcoin NICE but i will just HODL them
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:34:19 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner  Roll Eyes

He seems to know so much about bitcoin, so you gotta wonder why Roach dee poach would be so dumb and not already own at least a bit of coin (like a secret hedge on the side?) (by the way, we know that he already did own some coin in the 2015 time frame, and that is where the term "getting roached" or "getting BJA'd" comes into play)... Perhaps, like Stolfi, Roachie poachie wants to maintain some semblance of journalistic "impartiality", if that is even possible?
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422



View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:37:25 AM

Code:
that mayor
Last of the V8s
Elwar
Anon136
becoin
jbreher
jojo69
Gyrsur
samson
yefi
bitserve
DaRude
Searing
kromer
kurious
mymenace
jonoiv
fragout
xhomerx10
strawbs
Asrael999
gentlemand
Torque
holzer
HairyMaclairy
Hueristic
slowlyslowly
RayX12
JayJuanGee
criptix
LFC_Bitcoin
BTCMILLIONAIRE
bones261
RoomBot
BobLawblaw
gembitz
Raja_MBZ
Millionero
ivomm
33bitcoin
Aveatrex
Phil_S
Ludwig Von
Icygreen
josephpogi
micgoossens
goldkingcoiner
realr0ach
diesmaster
kirreev070
serveria.com
leetlezee
RivAngE
BTCHadzija
asiwajuadejumo

After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:37:33 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1), Torque (1), LFC_Bitcoin (1), Gyrsur (1)

‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Is Having a Hard Time Winning Over True Believers

Quote
...Bitcoin Cash payments slumped to $3.7 million in May from a high of $10.5 million in March.


BITCOIN JESUS turned into to the BITCOIN CLOWN as proven by this spreadsheet





El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:39:15 AM

Code:
that mayor
Last of the V8s
Elwar
Anon136
becoin
jbreher
jojo69
Gyrsur
samson
yefi
bitserve
DaRude
Searing
kromer
kurious
mymenace
jonoiv
fragout
xhomerx10
strawbs
Asrael999
gentlemand
Torque
holzer
HairyMaclairy
Hueristic
slowlyslowly
RayX12
JayJuanGee
criptix
LFC_Bitcoin
BTCMILLIONAIRE
bones261
RoomBot
BobLawblaw
gembitz
Raja_MBZ
Millionero
ivomm
33bitcoin
Aveatrex
Phil_S
Ludwig Von
Icygreen
josephpogi
micgoossens
goldkingcoiner
realr0ach
diesmaster
kirreev070
serveria.com
leetlezee
RivAngE
BTCHadzija
asiwajuadejumo

After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate.

who's list is that one  Roll Eyes  Shocked
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:08:54 AM

it was just a joke list
seems a long time ago now
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:21:04 AM

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149
Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency
By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor

-front page of BBC today
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers
Totscha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1276
Merit: 622



View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:30:35 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), RoomBot (1)

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149
Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency
By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor

-front page of BBC today
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers

TLDR:
- Bitcoin sucks donkey balls
- Stablecoins are a short term distraction
- EOS and Stellar are the future

I puked in my mouth a bit to improve the taste I got from reading the article...
Samarkand
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 282


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:36:44 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), El duderino_ (1), Totscha (1)

...
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers

Quote
Circle's USD Coin will run on the Ethereum blockchain - the distributed ledger technology underlying cryptos...



The author really has no clue whatsoever if he claims that Ethereum is "the distributed ledger
technology underlying cryptos".
He should have at least rephrased it to "the distributed centralized ledger technology underlying 99.8 % of all ICO scams".

Circle´s plan looks like a terrible idea, too. What could possibly go wrong by running
a stablecoin on the buggy Ethereum blockchain, which already has a size of more than
a terabyte and no plan for scaling.

Quote
It will allow money to move at the speed of light around the world for free, but also offer binding,
verifiable contracts, enabling anyone to do business together.

Yes, because Ethereum is known for its binding contracts  Roll Eyes

Quote
Fruit sellers on the streets in Zimbabwe could accept your digital payment via an app," he says.
"Their fiat money is almost worthless, but they could receive tokens in seconds and sell them very easily for a small commission."

Yeah, this seems like a viable use case. Zimbabwean fruit sellers were the killer app that crypto needed all along!

Quote
Say I have a house in downtown Saigon worth $1m," says Mr Hoang. "I could tokenise it and sell those tokens on the global crypto market.
You could issue a billion pieces of your house if you wanted. Then people would start trading them, just like shares in a real estate investment trust.

A stable-coin scam on top of a real estate scam  Grin

The whole article is a disgrace for the BBC. I could have easily picked various other
quotes that make absolutely laughable claims that are at odds with reality.

Discard BBC, buy BTC.


Pages: « 1 ... 20911 20912 20913 20914 20915 20916 20917 20918 20919 20920 20921 20922 20923 20924 20925 20926 20927 20928 20929 20930 20931 20932 20933 20934 20935 20936 20937 20938 20939 20940 20941 20942 20943 20944 20945 20946 20947 20948 20949 20950 20951 20952 20953 20954 20955 20956 20957 20958 20959 20960 [20961] 20962 20963 20964 20965 20966 20967 20968 20969 20970 20971 20972 20973 20974 20975 20976 20977 20978 20979 20980 20981 20982 20983 20984 20985 20986 20987 20988 20989 20990 20991 20992 20993 20994 20995 20996 20997 20998 20999 21000 21001 21002 21003 21004 21005 21006 21007 21008 21009 21010 21011 ... 33173 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!