realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 21, 2018, 06:21:36 AM |
|
(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.
JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1844
Merit: 2805
All good things to those who wait
|
|
August 21, 2018, 06:43:19 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Are we at the reversal point yet? The funny thing is everybody is talking about bear patterns, but the falling wedge is generally considered as a bullish sign: "The falling wedge pattern is characterized by a chart pattern which forms when the market makes lower lows and lower highs with a contracting range. When this pattern is found in a downward trend, it is considered a reversal pattern, as the contraction of the range indicates the downtrend is losing steam... In a falling wedge, both boundary lines slant down from left to right. The upper descends at a steeper angle than the lower line. Volume keeps on diminishing and trading activity slows down due to narrowing prices. There comes the breaking point, and trading activity after the breakout differs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_patternhttps://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:falling_wedge_reversal
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 21, 2018, 06:43:41 AM |
|
@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers. It's a bullshit argument. If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered. They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place. So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork. You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol. It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized". They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front. This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1456
We choose to go to the moon
|
|
August 21, 2018, 07:49:59 AM |
|
Lingering in the middle... it might take a while.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 21, 2018, 08:34:39 AM |
|
One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin. As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market. There are very few possibilities for this entity:
1) Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)
2) Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs
3) The ESF
4) The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)
In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
|
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1041
|
|
August 21, 2018, 08:37:54 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Funny. When we pointed out that soft forks -- which Coreans put forth as being inherently safe -- were capable of making any change whatsoever, we were shouted down as FUDsters. Now a Corean is putting forth this very same truism as new knowledge, and the masses are proclaiming some new revelation.
I don't think "the masses" are proclaiming any revelations One guy says he will do a presentation demonstrating a way such soft forks can be done. As of this writing, this claim is still unsubstantiated, and it may turn out that there are issues that make his method unworkable in practice - or he may have genuinely have found a way to soft fork any change. In either case, there certainly has not been any blind acceptance by "the masses" of Mark's claim nor any 'proclaiming' of anything related to it. You say "when we pointed out that soft forks ... were capable of making any change whatsoever , we were shouted down as FUDsters". I was not aware that you and some others had already presented a method to do this kind of thing (and apparently had your method rebuked and refused by 'coreans')... Can you provide a link to the presentation (and hopefully the 'corean' rebuking as well)?
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 21, 2018, 08:39:54 AM |
|
Changes that alter the security model or fungiblity are NOT soft forks, NOOBS.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:12:04 AM Last edit: August 21, 2018, 09:28:12 AM by JayJuanGee |
|
(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.
JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not: The realrOach is making some sense. Is something wrong in the world? @MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers. It's a bullshit argument. If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered. They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place. So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork. You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol. It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized". They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front. This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals. Oh my gawd!!!!! Two posts in a row making sense from roach the poach. One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin. As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market. There are very few possibilities for this entity:
1) Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)
2) Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs
3) The ESF
4) The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)
In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
Whew!!!!!! What a relief!!!!! Back to normal with some bitcoin is gonna die from one cause nonsense. I feel better now.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1844
Merit: 2805
All good things to those who wait
|
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:14:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:22:15 AM |
|
(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.
JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not: The realrOach is making some sense. Is something wrong in the world? one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:25:59 AM |
|
*Australians can now pay everyday bills with Bitcoin NICE but i will just HODL them
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:34:19 AM |
|
(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.
JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not: The realrOach is making some sense. Is something wrong in the world? one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner He seems to know so much about bitcoin, so you gotta wonder why Roach dee poach would be so dumb and not already own at least a bit of coin (like a secret hedge on the side?) (by the way, we know that he already did own some coin in the 2015 time frame, and that is where the term "getting roached" or "getting BJA'd" comes into play)... Perhaps, like Stolfi, Roachie poachie wants to maintain some semblance of journalistic "impartiality", if that is even possible?
|
|
|
|
Karartma1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:37:25 AM |
|
that mayor Last of the V8s Elwar Anon136 becoin jbreher jojo69 Gyrsur samson yefi bitserve DaRude Searing kromer kurious mymenace jonoiv fragout xhomerx10 strawbs Asrael999 gentlemand Torque holzer HairyMaclairy Hueristic slowlyslowly RayX12 JayJuanGee criptix LFC_Bitcoin BTCMILLIONAIRE bones261 RoomBot BobLawblaw gembitz Raja_MBZ Millionero ivomm 33bitcoin Aveatrex Phil_S Ludwig Von Icygreen josephpogi micgoossens goldkingcoiner realr0ach diesmaster kirreev070 serveria.com leetlezee RivAngE BTCHadzija asiwajuadejumo After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:37:33 AM |
|
BITCOIN JESUS turned into to the BITCOIN CLOWN as proven by this spreadsheet
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2450
Merit: 11717
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
August 21, 2018, 09:39:15 AM |
|
that mayor Last of the V8s Elwar Anon136 becoin jbreher jojo69 Gyrsur samson yefi bitserve DaRude Searing kromer kurious mymenace jonoiv fragout xhomerx10 strawbs Asrael999 gentlemand Torque holzer HairyMaclairy Hueristic slowlyslowly RayX12 JayJuanGee criptix LFC_Bitcoin BTCMILLIONAIRE bones261 RoomBot BobLawblaw gembitz Raja_MBZ Millionero ivomm 33bitcoin Aveatrex Phil_S Ludwig Von Icygreen josephpogi micgoossens goldkingcoiner realr0ach diesmaster kirreev070 serveria.com leetlezee RivAngE BTCHadzija asiwajuadejumo After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate. who's list is that one
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
August 21, 2018, 10:08:54 AM |
|
it was just a joke list seems a long time ago now
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
August 21, 2018, 10:21:04 AM |
|
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor -front page of BBC today -shilling for Goldman and other scammers
|
|
|
|
Totscha
|
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor -front page of BBC today -shilling for Goldman and other scammers TLDR: - Bitcoin sucks donkey balls - Stablecoins are a short term distraction - EOS and Stellar are the future I puked in my mouth a bit to improve the taste I got from reading the article...
|
|
|
|
Samarkand
|
|
August 21, 2018, 10:36:44 AM |
|
... -shilling for Goldman and other scammers
Circle's USD Coin will run on the Ethereum blockchain - the distributed ledger technology underlying cryptos... The author really has no clue whatsoever if he claims that Ethereum is "the distributed ledger technology underlying cryptos". He should have at least rephrased it to "the distributed centralized ledger technology underlying 99.8 % of all ICO scams". Circle´s plan looks like a terrible idea, too. What could possibly go wrong by running a stablecoin on the buggy Ethereum blockchain, which already has a size of more than a terabyte and no plan for scaling. It will allow money to move at the speed of light around the world for free, but also offer binding, verifiable contracts, enabling anyone to do business together. Yes, because Ethereum is known for its binding contracts Fruit sellers on the streets in Zimbabwe could accept your digital payment via an app," he says. "Their fiat money is almost worthless, but they could receive tokens in seconds and sell them very easily for a small commission." Yeah, this seems like a viable use case. Zimbabwean fruit sellers were the killer app that crypto needed all along! Say I have a house in downtown Saigon worth $1m," says Mr Hoang. "I could tokenise it and sell those tokens on the global crypto market. You could issue a billion pieces of your house if you wanted. Then people would start trading them, just like shares in a real estate investment trust. A stable-coin scam on top of a real estate scam The whole article is a disgrace for the BBC. I could have easily picked various other quotes that make absolutely laughable claims that are at odds with reality. Discard BBC, buy BTC.
|
|
|
|
|