Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2019, 02:40:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What year will we achieve a new ATH?
2019 - 43 (28.7%)
2020 - 59 (39.3%)
2021 - 34 (22.7%)
2022 - 8 (5.3%)
2023 - 1 (0.7%)
Never - 5 (3.3%)
Total Voters: 150

Pages: « 1 ... 21027 21028 21029 21030 21031 21032 21033 21034 21035 21036 21037 21038 21039 21040 21041 21042 21043 21044 21045 21046 21047 21048 21049 21050 21051 21052 21053 21054 21055 21056 21057 21058 21059 21060 21061 21062 21063 21064 21065 21066 21067 21068 21069 21070 21071 21072 21073 21074 21075 21076 [21077] 21078 21079 21080 21081 21082 21083 21084 21085 21086 21087 21088 21089 21090 21091 21092 21093 21094 21095 21096 21097 21098 21099 21100 21101 21102 21103 21104 21105 21106 21107 21108 21109 21110 21111 21112 21113 21114 21115 21116 21117 21118 21119 21120 21121 21122 21123 21124 21125 21126 21127 ... 23965 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21180789 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (24 posts by 13 users deleted.)
bluebits
Copper Member
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:09:51 AM

Does anyone have a link to the post about the original Winklevos ETF rejection and how some traders opened big positions on Mex while simultaneously pushing the Finex market? They only had to trade a relatively small amount to lock in a lot of profit from the expected volatility event.
1558881619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558881619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558881619
Reply with quote  #2

1558881619
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1558881619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558881619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558881619
Reply with quote  #2

1558881619
Report to moderator
1558881619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558881619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558881619
Reply with quote  #2

1558881619
Report to moderator
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 292


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:21:36 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations. 

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:

ivomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 680
Merit: 289


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:43:19 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)


Are we at the reversal point yet? The funny thing is everybody is talking about bear patterns, but the falling wedge is generally considered as a bullish sign:
"The falling wedge pattern is characterized by a chart pattern which forms when the market makes lower lows and lower highs with a contracting range. When this pattern is found in a downward trend, it is considered a reversal pattern, as the contraction of the range indicates the downtrend is losing steam... In a falling wedge, both boundary lines slant down from left to right. The upper descends at a steeper angle than the lower line. Volume keeps on diminishing and trading activity slows down due to narrowing prices. There comes the breaking point, and trading activity after the breakout differs."
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_pattern
https://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:falling_wedge_reversal
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 292


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 06:43:41 AM

@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.

It's a bullshit argument.  If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered.  They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place.  So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork.  You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol.

It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized".
They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front.  This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.
Phil_S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 255


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 07:49:59 AM

Lingering in the middle... it might take a while.


realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 292


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:34:39 AM

One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin.  As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market.  There are very few possibilities for this entity:

1)  Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)

2)  Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs

3)  The ESF

4)  The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)

In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1039
Merit: 1010



View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:37:54 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Funny. When we pointed out that soft forks -- which Coreans put forth as being inherently safe -- were capable of making any change whatsoever, we were shouted down as FUDsters. Now a Corean is putting forth this very same truism as new knowledge, and the masses are proclaiming some new revelation.

I don't think "the masses" are proclaiming any revelations  Roll Eyes

One guy says he will do a presentation demonstrating a way such soft forks can be done.  As of this writing, this claim is still unsubstantiated, and it may turn out that there are issues that make his method unworkable in practice - or he may have genuinely have found a way to soft fork any change.  In either case, there certainly has not been any blind acceptance by "the masses" of Mark's claim nor any 'proclaiming' of anything related to it.

You say "when we pointed out that soft forks ... were capable of making any change whatsoever , we were shouted down as FUDsters".  I was not aware that you and some others had already presented a method to do this kind of thing (and apparently had your method rebuked and refused by 'coreans')...  Can you provide a link to the presentation (and hopefully the 'corean' rebuking as well)?
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 292


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 08:39:54 AM

Changes that alter the security model or fungiblity are NOT soft forks, NOOBS.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1761


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:12:04 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2018, 09:28:12 AM by JayJuanGee

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.

It's a bullshit argument.  If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered.  They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place.  So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork.  You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol.

It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized".
They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front.  This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.

Oh my gawd!!!!!  

Two posts in a row making sense from roach the poach.



One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin.  As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market.  There are very few possibilities for this entity:

1)  Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)

2)  Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs

3)  The ESF

4)  The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)

In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.

Whew!!!!!!  What a relief!!!!!  Back to normal with some bitcoin is gonna die from one cause nonsense.  I feel better now.

ivomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 680
Merit: 289


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:12:33 AM
Merited by Last of the V8s (1)

I know that feeling. Today it happened again for n-th time Grin  Wink
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2021


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:14:21 AM

micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2021


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:22:15 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations. 

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner  Roll Eyes
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2021


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:25:59 AM



*Australians can now pay everyday bills with Bitcoin NICE but i will just HODL them
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1761


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:34:19 AM

(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.

JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:



The realrOach is making some sense.  Is something wrong in the world?

one day even the realr0ach will become a coiner  Roll Eyes

He seems to know so much about bitcoin, so you gotta wonder why Roach dee poach would be so dumb and not already own at least a bit of coin (like a secret hedge on the side?) (by the way, we know that he already did own some coin in the 2015 time frame, and that is where the term "getting roached" or "getting BJA'd" comes into play)... Perhaps, like Stolfi, Roachie poachie wants to maintain some semblance of journalistic "impartiality", if that is even possible?
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1070


Be Revolutionary Or Die Trying


View Profile WWW
August 21, 2018, 09:37:25 AM

Code:
that mayor
Last of the V8s
Elwar
Anon136
becoin
jbreher
jojo69
Gyrsur
samson
yefi
bitserve
DaRude
Searing
kromer
kurious
mymenace
jonoiv
fragout
xhomerx10
strawbs
Asrael999
gentlemand
Torque
holzer
HairyMaclairy
Hueristic
slowlyslowly
RayX12
JayJuanGee
criptix
LFC_Bitcoin
BTCMILLIONAIRE
bones261
RoomBot
BobLawblaw
gembitz
Raja_MBZ
Millionero
ivomm
33bitcoin
Aveatrex
Phil_S
Ludwig Von
Icygreen
josephpogi
micgoossens
goldkingcoiner
realr0ach
diesmaster
kirreev070
serveria.com
leetlezee
RivAngE
BTCHadzija
asiwajuadejumo

After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate.
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2021


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:37:33 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1), Gyrsur (1), JayJuanGee (1), Torque (1), LFC_Bitcoin (1)

‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Is Having a Hard Time Winning Over True Believers

Quote
...Bitcoin Cash payments slumped to $3.7 million in May from a high of $10.5 million in March.


BITCOIN JESUS turned into to the BITCOIN CLOWN as proven by this spreadsheet





micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2021


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 09:39:15 AM

Code:
that mayor
Last of the V8s
Elwar
Anon136
becoin
jbreher
jojo69
Gyrsur
samson
yefi
bitserve
DaRude
Searing
kromer
kurious
mymenace
jonoiv
fragout
xhomerx10
strawbs
Asrael999
gentlemand
Torque
holzer
HairyMaclairy
Hueristic
slowlyslowly
RayX12
JayJuanGee
criptix
LFC_Bitcoin
BTCMILLIONAIRE
bones261
RoomBot
BobLawblaw
gembitz
Raja_MBZ
Millionero
ivomm
33bitcoin
Aveatrex
Phil_S
Ludwig Von
Icygreen
josephpogi
micgoossens
goldkingcoiner
realr0ach
diesmaster
kirreev070
serveria.com
leetlezee
RivAngE
BTCHadzija
asiwajuadejumo

After reading that list I feel lonely and desperate.

who's list is that one  Roll Eyes  Shocked
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 2134


Be a bank.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:08:54 AM

it was just a joke list
seems a long time ago now
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 2134


Be a bank.


View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:21:04 AM

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149
Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency
By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor

-front page of BBC today
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers
Totscha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1088
Merit: 585



View Profile
August 21, 2018, 10:30:35 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), RoomBot (1)

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45245149
Bitcoin buster? The search for a more stable cryptocurrency
By Matthew Wall Technology of Business editor

-front page of BBC today
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers

TLDR:
- Bitcoin sucks donkey balls
- Stablecoins are a short term distraction
- EOS and Stellar are the future

I puked in my mouth a bit to improve the taste I got from reading the article...
Pages: « 1 ... 21027 21028 21029 21030 21031 21032 21033 21034 21035 21036 21037 21038 21039 21040 21041 21042 21043 21044 21045 21046 21047 21048 21049 21050 21051 21052 21053 21054 21055 21056 21057 21058 21059 21060 21061 21062 21063 21064 21065 21066 21067 21068 21069 21070 21071 21072 21073 21074 21075 21076 [21077] 21078 21079 21080 21081 21082 21083 21084 21085 21086 21087 21088 21089 21090 21091 21092 21093 21094 21095 21096 21097 21098 21099 21100 21101 21102 21103 21104 21105 21106 21107 21108 21109 21110 21111 21112 21113 21114 21115 21116 21117 21118 21119 21120 21121 21122 21123 21124 21125 21126 21127 ... 23965 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!