Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[HairyMaclairy]

Peter Rizun has about as much credibility as Dorian Nakamoto

[El duderino_]

Dr. Peter Rizun - Bitcoin Unlimited (www.bitcoinunlimited.info)

bCASH fan says segwit isn't secure. How surprising.

AGAIN !!, nothing more nothing less

[vroom]

Anunymint raises some good points. I am guessing similar to Peter Rizun. It points out a potential attack vector on segwit coins.

Dr. Peter Rizun - SegWit Coins are not Bitcoins

The video is worth watching even if you believe Segwit posses no risk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoFb3mcxluY

All I read is Trilemma.

yes.

if segwit is doomed like anunymint is praising, people would lose trust in bitcoin and blockchain as a whole. that's why there is no advantage in storing coins on legacy addresses.

[babanana]

Anunymint raises some good points. I am guessing similar to Peter Rizun. It points out a potential attack vector on segwit coins.

Dr. Peter Rizun - SegWit Coins are not Bitcoins

The video is worth watching even if you believe Segwit posses no risk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoFb3mcxluY

All I read is Trilemma.

yes.

if segwit is doomed like anunymint is praising, people would lose trust in bitcoin and blockchain as a whole. that's why there is no advantage in storing coins on legacy addresses.

Ultimately these poor shills just want to see their BTrash appreciate in value and resorted to shilling. Well, good luck to them, they chose the wrong altcoin. They should have chosen Key coin, it

appreciated 300% today, instead of the trash BCash.

[TERA2]

These two charts are on completely different scales, they dont look anything alike, and the volume hits are totally out of whack. The 100 youre pointing to also was not real and only happened on a couple exchanges due to an error.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

27% of England’s Male Millennials Say Bitcoin Better Investment Than Property

Millennials Turning from Traditional Investments and Toward Crypto

let them  

I have two properties (nothing amazing, one house & 1 apartment) but I HODL more in bitcoin than their combined value ($ worth) so I guess I fall under that category.

[bones261]

Well, it appears that Peter Todd made a tweet that basically states Satoshi was fallible too, and now Craig Wright seems to be making some kind of veiled threat.
My wager is that Craig Wright doesn't really have the cajones.   HODL

[El duderino_]

[mindrust]

These two charts are on completely different scales, they dont look anything alike, and the volume hits are totally out of whack. The 100 youre pointing to also was not real and only happened on a couple exchanges due to an error.

I like to think positive.

[Ibian]

Anunymint raises some good points. I am guessing similar to Peter Rizun. It points out a potential attack vector on segwit coins.

Dr. Peter Rizun - SegWit Coins are not Bitcoins

The video is worth watching even if you believe Segwit posses no risk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoFb3mcxluY

All I read is Trilemma.

yes.

if segwit is doomed like anunymint is praising, people would lose trust in bitcoin and blockchain as a whole. that's why there is no advantage in storing coins on legacy addresses.

Praising? Who says he is happy about it?

Something that might be interesting to consider is why some of you seem to be so invested in the idea of segwit being the ultimate good that you call anyone who question it, even on a technical security front, names. What's up with that?

[fluidjax]

Almost identical 

[bones261]

yes.

if segwit is doomed like anunymint is praising, people would lose trust in bitcoin and blockchain as a whole. that's why there is no advantage in storing coins on legacy addresses.

Praising? Who says he is happy about it?

Something that might be interesting to consider is why some of you seem to be so invested in the idea of segwit being the ultimate good that you call anyone who question it, even on a technical security front, names. What's up with that?

Because many BTC HODLers want to believe that the Bitcoin core team is headed in the right direction. They want to believe that BTC, in it's current state, is antifragile.

[Ibian]

yes.

if segwit is doomed like anunymint is praising, people would lose trust in bitcoin and blockchain as a whole. that's why there is no advantage in storing coins on legacy addresses.

Praising? Who says he is happy about it?

Something that might be interesting to consider is why some of you seem to be so invested in the idea of segwit being the ultimate good that you call anyone who question it, even on a technical security front, names. What's up with that?

Because many BTC HODLers want to believe that the Bitcoin core team is headed in the right direction. They want to believe that BTC, in it's current state, is antifragile.

Yes, but are they right? Want is a childish way to think. Which would be fine if it didn't matter, you do you etc. But emotions do not dictate physical reality. It is counterproductive.

[Torque]

A 51% attack will never happen. The miners would never do it because they know that would be the end of the crypto world, and all their investments would turn to dust overnight.

So.... checkmate FUD'ing concern trolls?

[Ibian]

A 51% attack will never happen. The miners would never do it because they know that would be the end of the crypto world, and all their investments would turn to dust.

So.... checkmate concern trolls?

Again with the name calling. It is not useful. Not even to you.

There are many powerful people who want to see bitcoin die. I know you know this.

[Torque]

A 51% attack will never happen. The miners would never do it because they know that would be the end of the crypto world, and all their investments would turn to dust.

So.... checkmate concern trolls?

Again with the name calling. It is not useful. Not even to you.

There are many powerful people who want to see bitcoin die. I know you know this.

Want is a childish way to think. Which would be fine if it didn't matter, you do you etc. But emotions do not dictate physical reality. It is counterproductive.

It's so easy to destroy you with your own inane blather, Ibian.

[bones261]

A 51% attack will never happen. The miners would never do it because they know that would be the end of the crypto world, and all their investments would turn to dust overnight.

So.... checkmate FUD'ing concern trolls?

Unfortunately, there are margin short options which would allow the attacker to make a boatload of cash if the price falls. However, at the present time, there probably is really not enough liquidity in any of those markets to offset the huge cost. However, with the CME and CBOE on board, that could change in the future...

[Vlada69]

Another dump...how surprising...

[vroom]

what are the latest prognoses from masterluc? does someone know?

[MrRobot]

what are the latest prognoses from masterluc? does someone know?

https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga

He has been silent for a long time.