Bitcoin Forum
February 21, 2024, 01:49:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Nov. 18 closing price:
<$35,000 - 4 (9.1%)
$35,000-$35,500 - 1 (2.3%)
$35,500-$36,000 - 4 (9.1%)
$36,000-$36,500 - 4 (9.1%)
$36,500-$37,000 - 4 (9.1%)
$37,000-$37,500 - 3 (6.8%)
$37,500-$38,000 - 4 (9.1%)
$38,000-$38,500 - 5 (11.4%)
$38,500-$39,000 - 2 (4.5%)
$39,000-$39,500 - 1 (2.3%)
$39,500-$40,000 - 0 (0%)
>$40,000 - 12 (27.3%)
Total Voters: 44

Pages: « 1 ... 20566 20567 20568 20569 20570 20571 20572 20573 20574 20575 20576 20577 20578 20579 20580 20581 20582 20583 20584 20585 20586 20587 20588 20589 20590 20591 20592 20593 20594 20595 20596 20597 20598 20599 20600 20601 20602 20603 20604 20605 20606 20607 20608 20609 20610 20611 20612 20613 20614 20615 [20616] 20617 20618 20619 20620 20621 20622 20623 20624 20625 20626 20627 20628 20629 20630 20631 20632 20633 20634 20635 20636 20637 20638 20639 20640 20641 20642 20643 20644 20645 20646 20647 20648 20649 20650 20651 20652 20653 20654 20655 20656 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 20662 20663 20664 20665 20666 ... 33042 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26309921 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:11:42 PM

Might wanna fix your quotes there Yogi.
1708523344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1708523344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1708523344
Reply with quote  #2

1708523344
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1708523344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1708523344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1708523344
Reply with quote  #2

1708523344
Report to moderator
1708523344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1708523344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1708523344
Reply with quote  #2

1708523344
Report to moderator
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:14:47 PM

The hard fork should be left for huge emergencies like finding a bug that makes Bitcoin vulnerable to collapse (as was done in the past). Upgrades should be done via soft fork if possible.

The choice of using the so-called 'soft fork' kluge was what introduced the gaping security hole into The Segwit Omnibus Changeset. If it would have been a hard fork, they would not have overloaded anyonecanspend, but rather just made a simple segregated witness upgrade free of side effects.

IOW, you may wish to rethink your position.
fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 749
Merit: 562



View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:17:33 PM
Merited by nutildah (2)

- Non-segwit transactions require 51% of the hashpower and a private key to steal. Segwit transactions just require 51% of the hashpower.
Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

Hmm. Where have I heard that before?

 51% attacks require nothing more, and they can do anything....ANYTHING.
They can make every bitcoin address contain an mp3. The whole discussion about Segwit is bollox.

Of course if you are running a full node you wouldn’t accept the mp3 invested junk, but then, non segwit people don’t run nodes, they rely on miners.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:17:40 PM

Might wanna fix your quotes there Yogi.

Sorry. Reworked it. We good now?

Thanks, BTW.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:20:24 PM

Welp. We know how high level money and power works. When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).

Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

I feel dumb. I've been a segwit cheerleader without knowing all the facts. I see now that some of it is tribalism, as you mentioned earlier.

Anyway, it's what we've got now, and I still support Bitcoin. I won't be keeping my cold storage coins in a segwit address though.

Fair enough. I'm just glad the scales have fallen from your eyes, allowing you to make an objective evaluation based upon actual fact.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:21:23 PM

Welp. We know how high level money and power works. When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).

Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

I feel dumb. I've been a segwit cheerleader without knowing all the facts. I see now that some of it is tribalism, as you mentioned earlier.

Anyway, it's what we've got now, and I still support Bitcoin. I won't be keeping my cold storage coins in a segwit address though.
Group identity is a powerful thing. What's important now is what to do going forward.

I didn't even know why it might be bad, I just had a funny feeling due to the lack of open discussion of its pros and cons. When only one side is being talked about, it's time to be careful.


Welcome to ignore

None so blind as those who refuse to see...
fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 749
Merit: 562



View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:25:10 PM

Welp. We know how high level money and power works. When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).

Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

I feel dumb. I've been a segwit cheerleader without knowing all the facts. I see now that some of it is tribalism, as you mentioned earlier.

Anyway, it's what we've got now, and I still support Bitcoin. I won't be keeping my cold storage coins in a segwit address though.
Group identity is a powerful thing. What's important now is what to do going forward.

I didn't even know why it might be bad, I just had a funny feeling due to the lack of open discussion of its pros and cons. When only one side is being talked about, it's time to be careful.


Welcome to ignore

None so blind as those who refuse to see...

It’s not what he says, I listen to you being wrong, but don’t enjoy being trolled.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:25:40 PM

Why is bitcoin being attacked?

Willie Sutton knows.
gembitz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 639


*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:29:02 PM
Merited by Last of the V8s (1)

- Non-segwit transactions require 51% of the hashpower and a private key to steal. Segwit transactions just require 51% of the hashpower.
Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

Hmm. Where have I heard that before?

jbearer hour?>_> stap flooding da chat! :-D haha
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127


Whimsical Pants


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:31:00 PM

Welp. We know how high level money and power works. When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).

Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

I feel dumb. I've been a segwit cheerleader without knowing all the facts. I see now that some of it is tribalism, as you mentioned earlier.

Anyway, it's what we've got now, and I still support Bitcoin. I won't be keeping my cold storage coins in a segwit address though.

Fair enough. I'm just glad the scales have fallen from your eyes, allowing you to make an objective evaluation based upon actual fact.

If Segwit is the death of corn, then it's already dead.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:31:43 PM

For the current leg, and I repeat myself yet again, why was segwit better than simply doubling the blocksize? Nobody seems willing to explain that bit, for whatever reason.

Answer why doubling the block size is even needed at this point in time. With actual logic and facts to back your argument.

Because using LN requires opening channels on chain. To do this in a decentralized fashion, LN can onboard no more than several hunnert thousand peeps per day.

Several hundred thousand peeps opening/closing LN channels per day seems a bit overkill currently, don't you think?

Currently? Yes.

But I thought LN was supposed to be a scalability solution. And eliminate the benefit of bigger blocks.
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 7598



View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:32:40 PM

I want to know who's observing that walls?!

edit: wow... I've only had one beer and I can't type.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:34:09 PM

I've been reading anonymint's writings for the past week or so, which also prompted me to dive into some other rabbit holes.

I'm more convinced now of the dangers of segwit. Don't mistake that for being a promotion of bcash.

Could you provide me with a link where I can read about that? I remember anonymint's post, but I did not pay enough attention and now I can not find it.

Geeze, guys. We've been discussing these very same aspects of segwit since years. Have you had your fingers in your ears and blinders on up 'til now?

Agreed. It's unbelievable how people are coming NOW with points that were debated for years and were (even if slightly) a concern until a few months ago. And now that those are completely debunked they act as if they just discovered em....

Except they haven't been debunked. Well, other than with a handwavey 'we don't believe this to be a significant exposure'.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:37:12 PM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1)

I want to know who's observing that walls?!

edit: wow... I've only had one beer and I can't type.


It's been so dry down by the river here, the Roman mason's carved phallus has been exposed

xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 7598



View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:38:43 PM

I want to know who's observing that walls?!

edit: wow... I've only had one beer and I can't type.


It's been so dry here the Roman mason's carved phallus has been exposed



Thanks Wink
 I'm glad somebody is watching it!
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:39:07 PM

The base layer has to stay VERY comfortably within Moore's law.

If one is to use Moore's law as the metric, computing power has increased by a factor of 64 in the time of Bitcoin's existence.

Lessee.... what's 1MB times 64? Humm....
Nope. Actual use of computers over that time says nope. It's not a fucking universal principle, it was a trend until it wasn't, and now it isn't.

Well, if you were to state that 'Moore's law' is misnamed, and is really something akin to 'Moore's assertion' or 'Moore's rule-of-thumb', I'd agree.

However, the situation cAPSLOCK brings up is valid. Whatever the rate, computing power becomes ever-so-more affordable as time goes on. Typical home computers can now handle 100 tx/s even before fixing the broken Core threading model (500 tx/s has been demonstrated with a mockup). If you can't pony up for a typical home computer, I'm happy to say bye-bye to your node.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:41:03 PM

- Non-segwit transactions require 51% of the hashpower and a private key to steal. Segwit transactions just require 51% of the hashpower.
Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

Hmm. Where have I heard that before?

 51% attacks require nothing more, and they can do anything....ANYTHING.
They can make every bitcoin address contain an mp3. The whole discussion about Segwit is bollox.

Of course if you are running a full node you wouldn’t accept the mp3 invested junk, but then, non segwit people don’t run nodes, they rely on miners.


Blanket statement is ignorant falsehood.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1632


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:42:47 PM

If Segwit is the death of corn, then it's already dead.

All outputs free of segwit taint all the way back to segwit activation are completely unaffected by the scenario under discussion.
lunyrdoctor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 28, 2018, 10:43:39 PM
Merited by Toxic2040 (1)

Welp. We know how high level money and power works. When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).

Just the first line in your post sold it for me. What in the actual fuck.

I feel dumb. I've been a segwit cheerleader without knowing all the facts. I see now that some of it is tribalism, as you mentioned earlier.

Anyway, it's what we've got now, and I still support Bitcoin. I won't be keeping my cold storage coins in a segwit address though.
Group identity is a powerful thing. What's important now is what to do going forward.

I didn't even know why it might be bad, I just had a funny feeling due to the lack of open discussion of its pros and cons. When only one side is being talked about, it's time to be careful.


Welcome to ignore

None so blind as those who refuse to see...

Wow my first post after lurking around for months now.. so hello to everyone that's been around for years.. I'm one the new HODLers Cheesy

As far as I could gather, this post here pretty much discusses this topic. It is also explained why SegWit shouldn't be a problem since the 51% attack would hard fork bitcoin because the nodes wouldn't validate the transaction: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6p3wie/can_anyone_explain_why_this_attack_against_segwit/
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 2503


Spear the bees


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2018, 10:44:43 PM

That's ok. Everybody's merits are worth more now. Smiley
You'd be surprised the number of merits that have been sent to deleted posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1762404 (check the received section)

Smiley
When it's financially worthwhile to do so, someone will get together the required processing power and buy off the proper authorities and make an honest attempt to steal segwit coins. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will be a big blow to the faith people have in the system (bitcoin in all its forms, authorities, moneyed people (us, even if simply by association)).
But in what scenario would this be viable? Perhaps, if we're at a situation where Bitcoin is seconded by another coin with the same mining algorithm, it would be a way to 'surpass' it (provided the ones doing the takeover had a large enough investment in the second) but this seems like an unlikely event.
When there is enough value in segwit addresses to be worth it. What are you confused about?
1) Steal coins with hash power
2) Everybody finds out and bitcoin is dead
3) Now you have useless coins?
Pages: « 1 ... 20566 20567 20568 20569 20570 20571 20572 20573 20574 20575 20576 20577 20578 20579 20580 20581 20582 20583 20584 20585 20586 20587 20588 20589 20590 20591 20592 20593 20594 20595 20596 20597 20598 20599 20600 20601 20602 20603 20604 20605 20606 20607 20608 20609 20610 20611 20612 20613 20614 20615 [20616] 20617 20618 20619 20620 20621 20622 20623 20624 20625 20626 20627 20628 20629 20630 20631 20632 20633 20634 20635 20636 20637 20638 20639 20640 20641 20642 20643 20644 20645 20646 20647 20648 20649 20650 20651 20652 20653 20654 20655 20656 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 20662 20663 20664 20665 20666 ... 33042 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!