Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ImThour]

Voyager temporarily suspends trading, deposits, withdrawals, and loyalty rewards.


https://www.investvoyager.com/blog/voyager-update-july-1-2022/

[Biodom]

another one, another one...bites the dust.
dropping like flies...hopefully, we are close the end than to a beginning with those entities.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Hamza2424]

In sceen
B
T
C
Holders VS Economy Manipulators

Source: Twitter Related to Finance & Politics

[death_wish]

LTC just got dumped from some exchanges due to the privacy issue.  BTC doesn't have this issue.

If anyone wonders why I quoted Tyler Winklevoss’ vocal support for Zcash when it was hit with a stupid FUD-delisting from Bittrex, or why I point here and in other threads to what Adam Back has said about fungibility:  This is why.

The above-quoted statement is mere FUD, without details.  No time to add details.

We need to get strong privacy in BTC, ASAP.  Those who are thoughtless and shortsighted don’t see how this has been a war of precedents from the start; and they lack any perspective on the big picture, long-term view.

Bitcoin set a bad precedent, just because the needed technology had not yet been developed.  Satoshi himself was interested in ways to make transactions unlinkable and untraceable, but he didn’t know how.  Now, the burden of fixing this problem has fallen on altcoins.

Some excellent precedents have been set for privacy.  Besides privacy coins, I don’t think that any exchange will dare to target Ethereum with a FUD-delisting over Tornado.Cash and Aztec Protocol, which provide much stronger privacy than LTC.  But someday, strong privacy needs to come home to Bitcoin—preferably before BTC fungibility gets so wrecked that it causes irreparable economic damage in Bitcoin.  Lack of fungibility destroys confidence in a currency; that is an old and timeless monetary principle, which BTC defies at its peril.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[death_wish]

“The people will rise”, “the proles will rise”—this is one of the most damaging myths in history.

The people do not rise.  The proles do not rise.  But empty talk about it appeals to the conceits of the masses; it is a mirage of Hopium.  And this type of propaganda helps to paralyze serious-minded activists, if they are so naïve as to buy it.

No revolution in all of history ever resulted from the people rising of their own accord.

If you don’t get it, I don’t have time to explain it to you.

Source: Twitter Related to Finance & Politics

Um, where?  “Source” usually means a link and/or a name, unless it is something private in the manner of “(private correspondence)” or “journalistic anonymous sources”.

[cAPSLOCK]

“The people will rise”, “the proles will rise”—this is one of the most damaging myths in history.

I think you are right about this, but to play devil's advocate the "it's different this time" angle is the one world communication system.

But back to the other side... the rulers have not only access to that, but seemingly control over it.

[348Judah]

No revolution in all of history ever resulted from the people rising of their own accord.

I think i understand this as a personal fight for a freedom amd not collective one could give a rising, the so called manipulators will never gibe room for rising on every individual, but he that finds that opportunity for an escape through bitcoin is free indeed, this is what the government and the so called economy manipulators feast on, our wealth, profits interests, rights, and strength, that's why freedom isn't given but taken, soon bitcoin will rise to end their feast on us but only those that take courage in rising together with it will have the benefits thereof.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Arriemoller]

Went for the more Upscale Biltema food today.

There's still a 2.5 Mb limit 



 Looks delicious!

Thanks for fixing it, I don't know how to do these things, especially on a phone.

[Arriemoller]

Went for the more Upscale Biltema food today.

That DOES look fairly tasty!  Did you need some spark plugs?  Or just going for the grub?

I needed a new tap and a USB stick, they where out of the tap but I got the stick, and a burger.

The burger did look delicious, but it was pretty tasteless, it had all the right ingredients, good size meat, bacon, cheese, onion, that green stuff, tomatoes, dressing, but it all lacked in taste except for the tomato slices, I don't know how you manage to make bacon taste bland but they did it.

[xhomerx10]

LTC just got dumped from some exchanges due to the privacy issue.  BTC doesn't have this issue.

If anyone wonders why I quoted Tyler Winklevoss’ vocal support for Zcash when it was hit with a stupid FUD-delisting from Bittrex, or why I point here and in other threads to what Adam Back has said about fungibility:  This is why.

The above-quoted statement is mere FUD, without details.  No time to add details.

We need to get strong privacy in BTC, ASAP.  Those who are thoughtless and shortsighted don’t see how this has been a war of precedents from the start; and they lack any perspective on the big picture, long-term view.

Bitcoin set a bad precedent, just because the needed technology had not yet been developed.  Satoshi himself was interested in ways to make transactions unlinkable and untraceable, but he didn’t know how.  Now, the burden of fixing this problem has fallen on altcoins.

Some excellent precedents have been set for privacy.  Besides privacy coins, I don’t think that any exchange will dare to target Ethereum with a FUD-delisting over Tornado.Cash and Aztec Protocol, which provide much stronger privacy than LTC.  But someday, strong privacy needs to come home to Bitcoin—preferably before BTC fungibility gets so wrecked that it causes irreparable economic damage in Bitcoin.  Lack of fungibility destroys confidence in a currency; that is an old and timeless monetary principle, which BTC defies at its peril.

 That's a bat slap.

  I put as much effort into my reply to ImThour as he put into his analysis of a situation he thought required investigation.  I brought the matter relating the the drop in value of LTC to his attention and I assumed he could take it from there.  The perils of sending your LTC to exchanges are best left to another thread.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Biodom]

OT
hmmm...
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/mystery-rocket-NASA-moon-crash-country-origin-17273903.php
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3543757-nasa-calls-mystery-rocket-crash-on-moon-highly-unusual/

Not making any connections, but if something like the ref. below occurred now, we would have a full blown panic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1566_celestial_phenomenon_over_Basel

Apparently, somewhere between 1561 and 1648 many such phenomena were observed and recorded.
Do I think that all of them were just 'sun dogs'? Unlikely, but to think that someone would come to Earth's vicinity for a space fight is also quite strange.

[Torque]

another one, another one...bites the dust.
dropping like flies...hopefully, we are close the end than to a beginning with those entities.

Michael Saylor keeps stressing the importance of backtesting the collateral against the loans like Microstrategy did.

Did all these fly-by-night VC-funded crypto shitcoin derivative companies not backtest anything?

Are they all fucking stupid, or what?

Like, "Hey let's go over-leverage loans against all of our bitcoin collateral we bought at $40K-50K/btc. What could possibly go wrong?"  

It's no wonder no one should trust them with anything.

Personally, I think all these shitty crypto companies were set up to cause a crash. Because they always magically show up during bull runs, only to get margin called, liquidate and go bankrupt literally every single bear market. They are designed to distract Average Joe away from bitcoin and steal noobs money. Just like the ICOs did.

[xhomerx10]

OT
hmmm...
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/mystery-rocket-NASA-moon-crash-country-origin-17273903.php
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3543757-nasa-calls-mystery-rocket-crash-on-moon-highly-unusual/

Not making any connections, but if something like the ref. below occurred now, we would have a full blown panic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1566_celestial_phenomenon_over_Basel

Apparently, somewhere between 1561 and 1648 many such phenomena were observed and recorded.
Do I think that all of them were just 'sun dogs'? Unlikely, but to think that someone would come to Earth's vicinity for a space fight is also quite strange.

Maybe the accidental discovery of psychoactive mushrooms in the Holy Roman Empire?

[bitcoinPsycho]

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-10968909/New-EU-vehicles-fitted-speed-limiting-tech-6-July-Britain-follow-suit.html


"The speed-limiting systems use GPS, sat-nav and cameras to identify the legal limit and will warn drivers to slow down - and if they don't the car can restrict engine power"


Fuck this

[Biodom]

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-10968909/New-EU-vehicles-fitted-speed-limiting-tech-6-July-Britain-follow-suit.html


"The speed-limiting systems use GPS, sat-nav and cameras to identify the legal limit and will warn drivers to slow down - and if they don't the car can restrict engine power"


Fuck this

old (used) cars would dramatically increase in price, perhaps.

[Torque]

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-10968909/New-EU-vehicles-fitted-speed-limiting-tech-6-July-Britain-follow-suit.html


"The speed-limiting systems use GPS, sat-nav and cameras to identify the legal limit and will warn drivers to slow down - and if they don't the car can restrict engine power"


Fuck this

More nanny-state government overreach.