[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!

[yaoye0o]

suprnova in down.

frequently down ,you should change another pool ,or solo mining

[Sayman_nsk]

suprnova in down.

frequently down ,you should change another pool ,or solo mining

Solo mining? Cryptonite in solo, really?

[krnlx]

suprnova in down.

frequently down ,you should change another pool ,or solo mining

Solo mining? Cryptonite in solo, really?

It is easy. Just point miner to your wallet's rpc port

[Sayman_nsk]

suprnova in down.

frequently down ,you should change another pool ,or solo mining

Solo mining? Cryptonite in solo, really?

It is easy. Just point miner to your wallet's rpc port

xcn have high difficulty. this coin is not for solo (with powers like I have). I tried before. no one blocks found with my 13*1060 and 1*1070.

[ocminer]

suprnova in down.

frequently down ,you should change another pool ,or solo mining

Ah sorry my bad, I thought the attacker finally stopped and I disabled the monitoring script.

Back up now.

[HamiltonWDS]

Ah sorry my bad, I thought the attacker finally stopped and I disabled the monitoring script.

Back up now.

Not directed at Ocminer by the way, I do accept it is an actual attack.

I do not see the validity of using resources to DDoS'ing a pool. It's not a smart idea for a long term plan.
Unless someone wants the coin to die, makes no sense to try to horde for the hopes of solo mining, with a large farm.
Popularity of a coin is what helps to drive the price...

As with BTC38 and the wallet issue. I am wondering if there is something more to it.
I still see trading being conducted, with supposedly a faulty wallet.
Hummm....

I did give a try with a corrupted wallet, and the trick to just list suprnova's site in the config file, made it work.
So again, this makes me ponder and wonder.

[pallas]

Ah sorry my bad, I thought the attacker finally stopped and I disabled the monitoring script.

Back up now.

Not directed at Ocminer by the way, I do accept it is an actual attack.

I do not see the validity of using resources to DDoS'ing a pool. It's not a smart idea for a long term plan.
Unless someone wants the coin to die, makes no sense to try to horde for the hopes of solo mining, with a large farm.
Popularity of a coin is what helps to drive the price...

As with BTC38 and the wallet issue. I am wondering if there is something more to it.
I still see trading being conducted, with supposedly a faulty wallet.
Hummm....

I did give a try with a corrupted wallet, and the trick to just list suprnova's site in the config file, made it work.
So again, this makes me ponder and wonder.

ddosing the pool brings diff down, so they can mine more, then they stop attacking and wait for the price to go up.
the fault in this plan is that the price doesn't seem to have any correlation to pool or wallet problems.

[HamiltonWDS]

Received a reply from BTC38 support, "Hello, sorry, XCN wallet repair, has been suspended"

[krnlx]

Received a reply from BTC38 support, "Hello, sorry, XCN wallet repair, has been suspended"

I think, they have more priority tasks like implementing BCC trading, or there wallet may be under same ddos attack.

[Sayman_nsk]

if coin can`t exchange to btc, this coin is dead coin. bter exchange bad exchange. very low price.
ATM I hunt for other coin for mine...

[nu1mlock]

Received a reply from BTC38 support, "Hello, sorry, XCN wallet repair, has been suspended"

It's really hard to figure out what they actually mean. Because from your reply it sounds like they have stopped trying to fix the wallet.

However, when I asked if they had stopped trying (after I read your reply) they said:
"No, it needs official administrator to fix it after opening, please wait "

I'm guessing "official administrator" means Pallas (I don't think they mean their internal administrator), but it could mean anything really.

[pallas]

Received a reply from BTC38 support, "Hello, sorry, XCN wallet repair, has been suspended"

It's really hard to figure out what they actually mean. Because from your reply it sounds like they have stopped trying to fix the wallet.

However, when I asked if they had stopped trying (after I read your reply) they said:
"No, it needs official administrator to fix it after opening, please wait "

I'm guessing "official administrator" means Pallas (I don't think they mean their internal administrator), but it could mean anything really.

I think they mean their technical staff.

[HamiltonWDS]

Yeah I guess that is what it all means.
Along with the BTC wallet is out of commission currently.
So perhaps it has to due with the BCC fork.

[nu1mlock]

I think they mean their technical staff.

I'm not so sure. When I asked if they meant their technical staff or coin developer, this is what they replied. I'm not sure if "XCN administrator" means their own staff. However, as usual it's a bit cryptic:

We want to know why the bugs that come up require the blockchain packets provided by the XCN administrator. To recover. We can prove it to be no problem.

[romasalah]

Ah sorry my bad, I thought the attacker finally stopped and I disabled the monitoring script.

Back up now.

Not directed at Ocminer by the way, I do accept it is an actual attack.

I do not see the validity of using resources to DDoS'ing a pool. It's not a smart idea for a long term plan.
Unless someone wants the coin to die, makes no sense to try to horde for the hopes of solo mining, with a large farm.
Popularity of a coin is what helps to drive the price...

As with BTC38 and the wallet issue. I am wondering if there is something more to it.
I still see trading being conducted, with supposedly a faulty wallet.
Hummm....

I did give a try with a corrupted wallet, and the trick to just list suprnova's site in the config file, made it work.
So again, this makes me ponder and wonder.

I second that, I did tried fixing the wallet with connect=xc.suprnova.cc Solution suggested by Krnlx and it worked perfectly. my wallet was stuck at "4 days left" maybe it was on a bad fork.

[antantti]

Is this "x days behind" bug windows only? I have never seen it on linux but on windows it happens every now and then. Anyone with linux & days behind?

[krnlx]

Is this "x days behind" bug windows only? I have never seen it on linux but on windows it happens every now and then. Anyone with linux & days behind?

Did you edit cryptonite.conf file in windows or used stock version?

[Sayman_nsk]

on bter.com: 258 sat for 1 xcn hahahahaaaaA 

[antantti]

Is this "x days behind" bug windows only? I have never seen it on linux but on windows it happens every now and then. Anyone with linux & days behind?

Did you edit cryptonite.conf file in windows or used stock version?

I have tried pretty much everything, stock/ custom .conf, ports, router settings, locked/ unlocked...

Also, anyone with encrypted wallet.dat that at some point crashes to "Error: System error: CDB : Error -30974, can't open database wallet.dat"?

[pallas]

Is this "x days behind" bug windows only? I have never seen it on linux but on windows it happens every now and then. Anyone with linux & days behind?

Maybe it's because of QT, did you try windows version without gui?