[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!

[pallas]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

On my testrig:

1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+

x86 is generally faster.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip

thanks!
how does it compare to my fork?

[palgin]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

On my testrig:

1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+

x86 is generally faster.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip

thanks!
how does it compare to my fork?

Haven't checked this with your fork, currently have Linux only on VM's so can't measure speed, as no PCIe support on VM

[Sayman_nsk]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

On my testrig:

1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+

x86 is generally faster.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip

I think this can be more optimized, because 1070 can have 18-19mhs. 18mhs for 1080 it`s few. my 1070 could give only ~15mhs with your miner.

[palgin]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

On my testrig:

1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+

x86 is generally faster.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip

I think this can be more optimized, because 1070 can have 18-19mhs. 18mhs for 1080 it`s few. my 1070 could give only ~15mhs with your miner.

Of course it can, but it requires more time.

As for me, I do it for free (but anyway, it's GPL violation, if Djm34 asks - I will remove it immediately), it's not my primary task, but for community it's better to have +1-2 MH speed increase to compete with private miner(OpenSource-based too, GPL violation too).

Equality is what crypto needs 

[kabi123]

You can try MaxMiners site and see if you have the same problem:
https://maxminers.net/xcn/
Can also use it as a backup site (or primary)

i tested it and, at this moment is worse then suprnvova
all the time stuck in some 1000%+ blocks, for now stuck in some 2 hour block ( big miners just left it, i hope they come back)
and i at this moment cant connect... error message: stratum subscribe timed out...

XCN really need some stable mining pool.... :-(
or maybe i have some internet provider problems or i dontknow.. ( i donthave conections problems when i mine other coins)

[palgin]

OK, same tunes applied to pallas fork, built for Debian distros.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_pallas1.tar.gz - REMOVED

Haven't actually tested, if somebody measures speed for this - great, post your results. Dependencies same as for pallas version.
 
If pallas will be OK with this - I'll leave bins on GitHub, if not - I'll remove.

Anyway, waiting for feedback.

[romasalah]

OK, same tunes applied to pallas fork, built for Debian distros.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_pallas1.tar.gz

Haven't actually tested, if somebody measures speed for this - great, post your results. Dependencies same as for pallas version.
 
If pallas will be OK with this - I'll leave bins on GitHub, if not - I'll remove.

Anyway, waiting for feedback.

Thanks for your efforts. It's giving me +1mh/s. But, my GTX 780 is giving. invalid device function. is there a solution to that?

[palgin]

OK, same tunes applied to pallas fork, built for Debian distros.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_pallas1.tar.gz

Haven't actually tested, if somebody measures speed for this - great, post your results. Dependencies same as for pallas version.
 
If pallas will be OK with this - I'll leave bins on GitHub, if not - I'll remove.

Anyway, waiting for feedback.

Thanks for your efforts. It's giving me +1mh/s. But, my GTX 780 is giving. invalid device function. is there a solution to that?

Compiled for CC 5.0+ cards only, 780 is 3.5 as I remember, sorry.

[Anthbs]

OK, same tunes applied to pallas fork, built for Debian distros.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_pallas1.tar.gz

Haven't actually tested, if somebody measures speed for this - great, post your results. Dependencies same as for pallas version.
 
If pallas will be OK with this - I'll leave bins on GitHub, if not - I'll remove.

Anyway, waiting for feedback.

1080ti: 26.7MHs to 28.7MHs

[pallas]

OK, same tunes applied to pallas fork, built for Debian distros.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_pallas1.tar.gz

Haven't actually tested, if somebody measures speed for this - great, post your results. Dependencies same as for pallas version.
 
If pallas will be OK with this - I'll leave bins on GitHub, if not - I'll remove.

Anyway, waiting for feedback.

You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?

[ManuBBXX]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

On my testrig:

1060 3G ~ 12+ MH
1080 ~ 18+

x86 is generally faster.

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/download/1.1-m7/m7_tweaked_djm34.zip

I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?

[palgin]

You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?

Not now, so removed

I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?

x86 is faster, yes. Just make sure you have VC++ Runtime 2015 x86 installed (download one from Microsoft site).

[pallas]

You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?

Not now, so removed

It's ok, you can keep it, I was just curious to see what tweaks you did. :-)

[ManuBBXX]

You should have asked beforehand, now it's in the wild ;-)
Will you publish the sources?

Not now, so removed

I have the same results between the 2 versions
You are faster with the x86 version on a windows 10 x64 install ?

x86 is faster, yes. Just make sure you have VC++ Runtime 2015 x86 installed (download one from Microsoft site).

indeed ! yes I can see it now yo'r right.
Anyway, I'll love to test the 'optimised' xcn miner ^^

But it's very expensive for the gain added

[Sayman_nsk]

supernova web in down, but stratum work...it seems.

[megainarmy]

supernova web in down, but stratum work...it seems.

SNova works fine! Web and stratum 

[antantti]

A bit optimised m7 kernels, this time it's pure Djm34 work + my tweaks (not palginmod)

+7% on maxwell+windows+x86...

edit: with oc, 970 13+ MH, 980ti 21+ MH

[ntym]

I've contacted to Novaexchange about my lost XCN, they do not see any transactions to the wallet, but Suprnova shows coins were transfered.
What should I do in this case?

Use a third party source, like a block explorer, to show them the coins.

As pallas said, I provided to Nova support block info with my transaction. Coins appeared in wallet few hour later.
Now Nova refuses my sell orders - "Trades for XCN has been disabled, probably wallet issues. Check coininfo under balances."
Coininfo shows - all ok.

[Sayman_nsk]

ocminer not answer me. May be pallas can help - as I think my ip is banned by ocminer scripts. not web and stratum.

[JasonSW]

ocminer not answer me. May be pallas can help - as I think my ip is banned by ocminer scripts. not web and stratum.

Coin is towards dead, less people interested to it. There aren't updates so far since takeover pretty much telling incapable of new dev except few fixes, and don't even want to try out the sync issue fixed or not.