Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2017, 07:27:51 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 [717] 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2228507 times)
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 10:01:00 AM
 #14321

Where can I download the source for the latest version of Bitcoind that might work? 0.11.2 is useless.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
1493537271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493537271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493537271
Reply with quote  #2

1493537271
Report to moderator
1493537271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493537271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493537271
Reply with quote  #2

1493537271
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493537271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493537271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493537271
Reply with quote  #2

1493537271
Report to moderator
1493537271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493537271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493537271
Reply with quote  #2

1493537271
Report to moderator
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 02:34:18 PM
 #14322

https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.12.0/

lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134

I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 13, 2016, 05:44:40 PM
 #14323

Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).

Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.


Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 06:40:58 PM
 #14324

use XT with mempool limiter instead ... or rise relay fees on normal Core release.

windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2016, 06:41:30 PM
 #14325

Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).

Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.




12 has proven to be much more efficient than previous versions, perhaps it's catching up?

notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 07:56:18 PM
 #14326

Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134

I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 13, 2016, 11:27:02 PM
 #14327

Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
Indeed. Totally rebuilt p2pool from scratch, It might be running, my stale rate is 50% after a few hours. Will give it a day.
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547



View Profile
February 14, 2016, 02:19:35 AM
 #14328

"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.

NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values.

I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers.

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 14, 2016, 03:04:32 AM
 #14329

"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.

NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values.

I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers.
Read what I said again.
Yes you do.

... or did you just ignore reading my post explaining it?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg13846873#msg13846873

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
February 14, 2016, 10:43:28 AM
 #14330

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!  Smiley

Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners  Sad

Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node.......
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile WWW
February 14, 2016, 02:29:20 PM
 #14331

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!



+1

A lot of rented hash power just pointed at P2Pool to support Classic

lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134

I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 14, 2016, 02:38:55 PM
 #14332

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!  Smiley

Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners  Sad

Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node.......
It's because I came back of course. Anyway it's looking like it settled down to 94% or so with a .3s latency that seems to be constant.

Nice!
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 11:40:19 AM
 #14333

0.12.0 RC5 is ready : https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.12.0/test/

wariner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 942


pool.sexy


View Profile
February 16, 2016, 10:28:05 AM
 #14334

you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core?

or need change something on this line?

 p2pool/p2pool/work.py

Code:
372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),

Pool.sexy - Pool ETH-ETC-EXP-UBQ-ZEC-DBIX-DASH..and more 0.25% fee Discussion

my BTC: 1KiMpRAWscBvhRgLs8jDnqrZEKJzt3Ypfi
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
February 16, 2016, 12:18:47 PM
 #14335

As far as I'm aware it's a straight swap - no changes needed. I tried the classic client for a few hours, but the latency was higher & a bit erratic, so I reverted back to core again.
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile WWW
February 16, 2016, 03:37:57 PM
 #14336

you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core?

or need change something on this line?

 p2pool/p2pool/work.py

Code:
372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),

You need to change the version in the line you quoted (372 in work.py) to:

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 0x30000000),

or

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 805306368),

Both work.

p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
February 16, 2016, 06:34:02 PM
 #14337

Ah, sorry. I misunderstood your question...... Tongue
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
February 17, 2016, 12:28:08 AM
 #14338

looking good ... (refreshed local blockchain + refreshed shares of P2Pool)


wariner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 942


pool.sexy


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 06:00:01 AM
 #14339

you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core?

or need change something on this line?

 p2pool/p2pool/work.py

Code:
372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),

You need to change the version in the line you quoted (372 in work.py) to:

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 0x30000000),

or

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 805306368),

Both work.

Thank you  Wink

But i'm come back to bitcoin core, to me it seems more efficient at this time compared to classic...you have noticed the same thing?

Pool.sexy - Pool ETH-ETC-EXP-UBQ-ZEC-DBIX-DASH..and more 0.25% fee Discussion

my BTC: 1KiMpRAWscBvhRgLs8jDnqrZEKJzt3Ypfi
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
February 17, 2016, 12:41:30 PM
 #14340

Classic and XT are based on 0.11.2 + somes 0.12.0 features.
0.12.0 RC5 is really a good build for all.

Pages: « 1 ... 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 [717] 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!