Bitcoin Forum
August 19, 2018, 04:07:59 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 ... 815 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2564856 times)
HeroC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 862
Merit: 1000


GPG: FA122C1A | IRC: HeroCC


View Profile WWW
April 01, 2017, 05:08:58 PM
 #15121

I'm mining with an old BlockEruptor USB (the 300MH ones), and I keep seeing accepted shares in P2Pool, but the web UI says no shares. Any idea why?

EDIT: I see why, it's so low power that I'm putting power in, but not enough shares for an accepted share from P2Pool. Oh well, thanks!

EDIT2: Is it still beneficial to the network if I run a p2pool node without mining to it?
1534651679
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534651679

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534651679
Reply with quote  #2

1534651679
Report to moderator
1534651679
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534651679

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534651679
Reply with quote  #2

1534651679
Report to moderator
1534651679
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534651679

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534651679
Reply with quote  #2

1534651679
Report to moderator
BOUNTY PORTALS
BLOG
WHERE BOUNTY MANAGEMENT
MEETS AUTOMATION
SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
MEDIA CAMPAIGNS
AND MORE!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1233
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 01, 2017, 05:37:40 PM
 #15122

I'm mining with an old BlockEruptor USB (the 300MH ones), and I keep seeing accepted shares in P2Pool, but the web UI says no shares. Any idea why?

EDIT: I see why, it's so low power that I'm putting power in, but not enough shares for an accepted share from P2Pool. Oh well, thanks!

EDIT2: Is it still beneficial to the network if I run a p2pool node without mining to it?

Your node front end will show you "expected time to share", give your hashrate a day or so to stabilize and it will be relatively accurate.

More nodes never hurts...

Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 01, 2017, 09:39:06 PM
 #15123

Oh, yes, i like waves ...












Inside the storm :

tubexc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 01, 2017, 09:52:33 PM
 #15124

Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: Unknown block versions being mined! It's possible unknown rules are in effect

This is serious  Huh
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1233
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 01, 2017, 11:18:08 PM
 #15125

Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: Unknown block versions being mined! It's possible unknown rules are in effect

This is serious  Huh

Don't have the warning on my node, what version of Bitcoin you running?

tubexc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 01, 2017, 11:27:51 PM
 #15126

I'm using a Version: 16.0-3-g7d52c04-dirty node
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1233
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 01, 2017, 11:46:23 PM
 #15127

I'm using a Version: 16.0-3-g7d52c04-dirty node

I mean what version of bitcoind, you can run "bitcoin-cli getinfo" from the command line...

tubexc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 01, 2017, 11:53:08 PM
 #15128

Sorry don't know.
It's the http://uk.p2pool.science:9332/static/ node.
Possibly bitcoin system wallet is outdated
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1233
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 02, 2017, 12:41:31 AM
 #15129

Sorry don't know.
It's the http://uk.p2pool.science:9332/static/ node.
Possibly bitcoin system wallet is outdated

So the alert was added along with BIP9 (version bits) and is triggered when:

> If at any stage 50 of the last 100 blocks have unexpected bits set, you get Warning: Unknown block versions being mined! It’s possible unknown rules are in effect.

It's likely the node is running either BU or bitcoin Classic and that is what triggered it. In an attempt to stay apolitical, if you support that you should stay there, if you don't, find a SegWit signaling node, if you don't care find a node that signals that (thanks to veqtrus's graph we now know that's ~90% of the P2Pool network).

Right now the node is mining valid shares and will continue to until a soft/hard fork occurs, at which point Forrest will likely release a hard fork of P2Pool.... after that it gets very political and messy so I'll stop there Wink

in2tactics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 02, 2017, 02:18:37 AM
 #15130

I have been out for about a month. It is nice to see that our initial bad luck has turned for the better this past week. Smiley

Casual Miner: 3x 2PAC and 3x Moonlander 2
Retired HW: 2x AntMiner S7-LN, 5x AntMiner U1, 2x ASICMiner Block Erupter Cube, 4x AntMiner S3, 4x AntMiner S1, GAW Black Widow, and ZeusMiner Thunder X6
tubexc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 02, 2017, 08:02:51 AM
 #15131

Sorry don't know.
It's the http://uk.p2pool.science:9332/static/ node.
Possibly bitcoin system wallet is outdated

So the alert was added along with BIP9 (version bits) and is triggered when:

> If at any stage 50 of the last 100 blocks have unexpected bits set, you get Warning: Unknown block versions being mined! It’s possible unknown rules are in effect.

It's likely  :)the node is running either BU or bitcoin Classic and that is what triggered it. In an attempt to stay apolitical, if you support that you should stay there, if you don't, find a SegWit signaling node, if you don't care find a node that signals that (thanks to veqtrus's graph we now know that's ~90% of the P2Pool network).

Right now the node is mining valid shares and will continue to until a soft/hard fork occurs, at which point Forrest will likely release a hard fork of P2Pool.... after that it gets very political and messy so I'll stop there Wink
Thank you for your answer and support.
 For me is not a political issue.
 It's just a good node that can handle high dificulty shares with low doa share %. As long as they are valid.
 Smiley
 
tubexc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 03, 2017, 01:11:10 PM
 #15132

 
 Go P2Pool Go !!!!


                     

      http://imgur.com/DzMH9eg
jtoomim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818
Merit: 1001


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2017, 04:04:23 PM
 #15133

I've opened an issue on github about p2pool generating small blocks. https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool/issues/341

I think it's due primarily to shares being limited to at most 50 kB of new transactions per share, which means that it takes 20 shares (about 10 minutes) before a 1 MB block can be generated by p2pool. Exceeding this limit will cause a p2pool share to get punished in case of an orphan race, and so the p2pool code prefers to remove transactions from the block template. As an exacerbating factor, it seems that the p2pool mempool is limited to 2.5 MB; we may want to increase this as well.

Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power.
http://Toom.im
veqtrus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2017, 04:12:20 PM
 #15134

I think it's due primarily to shares being limited to at most 50 kB of new transactions per share, which means that it takes 20 shares (about 10 minutes) before a 1 MB block can be generated by p2pool.
I've already included an increase in my segwit PR.

P2Pool donation button | Bitrated user: veqtrus.
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 03, 2017, 05:10:26 PM
 #15135

Rain of Blocks.

jtoomim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818
Merit: 1001


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2017, 05:12:30 PM
 #15136

As mentioned on github, the 100 kB of that PR is better, but insufficient.

Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power.
http://Toom.im
Perseverance
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 03, 2017, 08:08:22 PM
 #15137

Whom ever is doing the rain dance for the block gods, thank you and KEEP DANCING!! This is pretty damn awesome Cheesy

Always around and down for the cause!
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1027

I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
April 03, 2017, 10:01:07 PM
 #15138

I'll keep my miner off for awhile.
jtoomim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818
Merit: 1001


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2017, 10:39:31 PM
 #15139

Whom ever is doing the rain dance for the block gods, thank you and KEEP DANCING!! This is pretty damn awesome Cheesy
I mined two of them.

I'm probably going to fork off of p2pool soon in order to increase the limit of 50 kB of new transactions per share. That limit has been severely curtailing p2pool's average block sizes and fee revenue. It looks like we're only getting about 90% of the revenue we could be getting if our block sizes didn't suck.

Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power.
http://Toom.im
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1233
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 04, 2017, 01:36:52 AM
 #15140

Whom ever is doing the rain dance for the block gods, thank you and KEEP DANCING!! This is pretty damn awesome Cheesy
I mined two of them.

I'm probably going to fork off of p2pool soon in order to increase the limit of 50 kB of new transactions per share. That limit has been severely curtailing p2pool's average block sizes and fee revenue. It looks like we're only getting about 90% of the revenue we could be getting if our block sizes didn't suck.

I know you have received some opposition on the PR on github, but I'd ask that you give it a little time before forking. I'd love to have the time to review and understand the proposed change better, and I imagine as it's been less than a day others would as well  Smiley

Either way your contributions to p2pool have been appreciated, thanks.

Pages: « 1 ... 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 ... 815 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!