jlbaseball11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 08:43:02 AM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc?
|
|
|
|
funnel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 09:31:24 AM |
|
A good energy-efficient and profitable algorithm for the card, this is phi1612. Temperature and consumption are low compared to zec and other algorithms(keccak, blake2s, timetravel, c11).
There are more energy-efficient algos like M7 (XCN coin) and Lyra2z (XZC) What's the M7 algo 1080ti hashrate? 28MH?
|
|
|
|
stevascha
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 10:05:09 AM |
|
A good energy-efficient and profitable algorithm for the card, this is phi1612. Temperature and consumption are low compared to zec and other algorithms(keccak, blake2s, timetravel, c11).
lets go, go green and buy masternode ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
crocozino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 10:16:09 AM |
|
A good energy-efficient and profitable algorithm for the card, this is phi1612. Temperature and consumption are low compared to zec and other algorithms(keccak, blake2s, timetravel, c11).
lets go, go green and buy masternode ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) how much is it? just as little as 25k usd? or something like that right? can I say - no?! better will mine and earn - then green and poor ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) sorry, man, but that how I think!
|
|
|
|
Mike011
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 11:58:32 AM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back.
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 12:35:00 PM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? I used KlausT
|
|
|
|
GulhanG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 06:10:30 PM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back. Im getting 2920 kh/s max per card on all my cards. that is using ccminer 2.2.2 tpruvot Using SMOS ; fun thing i noticed in the miner it says 130watts; while i put m at 250
|
|
|
|
Moondoggie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 07:29:39 PM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back. Im getting 2920 kh/s max per card on all my cards. that is using ccminer 2.2.2 tpruvot Using SMOS ; fun thing i noticed in the miner it says 130watts; while i put m at 250 Algo doesn’t use much power at all
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 02, 2017, 09:00:06 PM |
|
Guys
Sorry if it's not the right place to ask this... if not, please tell me where should I.
When you mine through Windows, does your anti virus detect the miner as a infectious file and kills it? Should I turn off my anti virus and mining without it?
rather then turn off your AV, i would recommend just whitelisting the miner file This is a well known issue with these miner files, as they were flagged back in the day when people maliciously packaged them ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) One day, and some miners dont trigger it ;p read the forums man, especially EVERYTHING relevant from this board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=160.0 (current board) We set up a folder called "Mining" on each rig that we have running and then have separate folders within that for ever single mining program etc... We then whitelist that entire "Mining" folder in the AV software and it's been fine ever since. Even with just Windows Defender you will have all sorts of issues if you don't exclude/whitelist a folder with everything else installed within that folder.
|
|
|
|
mak013
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:52:34 AM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back. Im getting 2920 kh/s max per card on all my cards. that is using ccminer 2.2.2 tpruvot Using SMOS ; fun thing i noticed in the miner it says 130watts; while i put m at 250 cuda 9 djm is the best now really. yet, if u like tpruvot miner - u ought to try version 2.2.1, it may be better.
|
|
|
|
Moondoggie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 07:49:17 PM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back. Im getting 2920 kh/s max per card on all my cards. that is using ccminer 2.2.2 tpruvot Using SMOS ; fun thing i noticed in the miner it says 130watts; while i put m at 250 cuda 9 djm is the best now really. yet, if u like tpruvot miner - u ought to try version 2.2.1, it may be better. Djm is pretty fast and stable
|
|
|
|
milicic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 11:18:13 PM |
|
My efficiency is 93 %. Is that ok ?
2 GTX 1080 ti with 3150 kh/s per card. Intensity 20. XZC
You should get atleast 3300 kH/s. Core : +75 Mem : -400 and intensity 21 Which version of ccminer is best now for xzc? djm34 version i think. someone posted download link few pages back. Im getting 2920 kh/s max per card on all my cards. that is using ccminer 2.2.2 tpruvot Using SMOS ; fun thing i noticed in the miner it says 130watts; while i put m at 250 cuda 9 djm is the best now really. yet, if u like tpruvot miner - u ought to try version 2.2.1, it may be better. Djm is pretty fast and stable Could someon please help me, I am mining XCZ with 6x1080ti ccmmier 2.2.2 cuda 9 and in miner it reports 18.6 mhs (3.100khs per card), but in miningpoolhub dashboard it reports 10-12mhs for the whole rig. What is the problem?
|
|
|
|
Jaerin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 11:23:55 PM |
|
Could someon please help me, I am mining XCZ with 6x1080ti ccmmier 2.2.2 cuda 9 and in miner it reports 18.6 mhs (3.100khs per card), but in miningpoolhub dashboard it reports 10-12mhs for the whole rig. What is the problem?
Your local hashrate is how many hashes your card is producing. Not all hashes are accepted and not all hashes are given equal weight on the pool. Of the accepted hashes the more difficult the hash the more it is worth so if you get lucky and find a number of difficult hashes that are accepted in short succession you can get higher than normal hashrate. Equally if you get unlucky and only find low difficulty hashes your hashrate will show lower than your local rate. On average though over time it should be close to what you have locally. There is a large luck factor when it comes to mining that can significantly affect your reported hashrate at times both high and low.
|
|
|
|
milicic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 01:26:50 AM |
|
Could someon please help me, I am mining XCZ with 6x1080ti ccmmier 2.2.2 cuda 9 and in miner it reports 18.6 mhs (3.100khs per card), but in miningpoolhub dashboard it reports 10-12mhs for the whole rig. What is the problem?
Your local hashrate is how many hashes your card is producing. Not all hashes are accepted and not all hashes are given equal weight on the pool. Of the accepted hashes the more difficult the hash the more it is worth so if you get lucky and find a number of difficult hashes that are accepted in short succession you can get higher than normal hashrate. Equally if you get unlucky and only find low difficulty hashes your hashrate will show lower than your local rate. On average though over time it should be close to what you have locally. There is a large luck factor when it comes to mining that can significantly affect your reported hashrate at times both high and low. I know all this and everything about luck factor, but I ran ccminer 2.2.2 cuda 9 for 2 days and never got to more than 12mhs on miningpoolhub chart and my rig was producing 18.6mhs all the time. Someone wrote that there is some problem with the miner and some custom miner fix this... What are your clock settings for getting 3.3mhs mining XCZ with 1080ti?
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 04:02:52 AM |
|
Could someon please help me, I am mining XCZ with 6x1080ti ccmmier 2.2.2 cuda 9 and in miner it reports 18.6 mhs (3.100khs per card), but in miningpoolhub dashboard it reports 10-12mhs for the whole rig. What is the problem?
Your local hashrate is how many hashes your card is producing. Not all hashes are accepted and not all hashes are given equal weight on the pool. Of the accepted hashes the more difficult the hash the more it is worth so if you get lucky and find a number of difficult hashes that are accepted in short succession you can get higher than normal hashrate. Equally if you get unlucky and only find low difficulty hashes your hashrate will show lower than your local rate. On average though over time it should be close to what you have locally. There is a large luck factor when it comes to mining that can significantly affect your reported hashrate at times both high and low. I know all this and everything about luck factor, but I ran ccminer 2.2.2 cuda 9 for 2 days and never got to more than 12mhs on miningpoolhub chart and my rig was producing 18.6mhs all the time. Someone wrote that there is some problem with the miner and some custom miner fix this... What are your clock settings for getting 3.3mhs mining XCZ with 1080ti? You need to use the djm version of ccminer or you will not get accurate hashrate accepted by the pool when mining Zcoin. +150 Core Stock Memory 80% tdp (doesn't matter much for this algo since it won't even use that much) and -I 22 should get around 3300 hashrate for a GTX 1080 Ti on Zcoin.
|
|
|
|
ivakar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 05:04:11 AM |
|
I know all this and everything about luck factor, but I ran ccminer 2.2.2 cuda 9 for 2 days and never got to more than 12mhs on miningpoolhub chart and my rig was producing 18.6mhs all the time. Someone wrote that there is some problem with the miner and some custom miner fix this... What are your clock settings for getting 3.3mhs mining XCZ with 1080ti?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs018.radikal.ru%2Fi520%2F1712%2F61%2F580c10039153.png&t=665&c=EglU7qU7PnWP3A) So as you can see by screen, my settings are Pl 80%, core clock + 78, memory -502 and this is Zotac GTX 1080ti amp extreme pushes 3338 kh/s which is rather nice I think
|
|
|
|
suilow1991
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 05:34:41 AM |
|
Could someon please help me, I am mining XCZ with 6x1080ti ccmmier 2.2.2 cuda 9 and in miner it reports 18.6 mhs (3.100khs per card), but in miningpoolhub dashboard it reports 10-12mhs for the whole rig. What is the problem?
include --submit-stale if you use ccminer 2.2.2 for XZC then the problem will be fixed.
|
|
|
|
Rashkae
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 06:16:58 AM |
|
For XZC mining, any advantage of MPH vs Suprnova?
Also, slight side topic...
Anyone tried a regular 1080? Sure, they're not good for Eth, but XZC and regular skein etc should be fine, no?
|
Did I help you? If yes, hit me up with some Eth! 0xD6422bcFD87989cf04D7dB489B9c18b3cA95886e
|
|
|
Rashkae
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 06:22:03 AM |
|
I know all this and everything about luck factor, but I ran ccminer 2.2.2 cuda 9 for 2 days and never got to more than 12mhs on miningpoolhub chart and my rig was producing 18.6mhs all the time. Someone wrote that there is some problem with the miner and some custom miner fix this... What are your clock settings for getting 3.3mhs mining XCZ with 1080ti?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs018.radikal.ru%2Fi520%2F1712%2F61%2F580c10039153.png&t=665&c=EglU7qU7PnWP3A) So as you can see by screen, my settings are Pl 80%, core clock + 78, memory -502 and this is Zotac GTX 1080ti amp extreme pushes 3338 kh/s which is rather nice I think Hmmmm Mine is the MSI Gaming X 11G and I'm at 80% TDP, +115 core, mem -502 and only getting about 3100 MH
|
Did I help you? If yes, hit me up with some Eth! 0xD6422bcFD87989cf04D7dB489B9c18b3cA95886e
|
|
|
funnel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2017, 07:52:57 AM |
|
For XZC mining, any advantage of MPH vs Suprnova?
Also, slight side topic...
Anyone tried a regular 1080? Sure, they're not good for Eth, but XZC and regular skein etc should be fine, no?
It does ~2400H/s, but it's a little less efficient with 24 H/W, the Ti gives 25 H/W.
|
|
|
|
|