Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[Jody.Drummer]

As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.

[1714206481]

1714206481

[1714206481]

1714206481

[1714206481]

1714206481

[Fivestar4everMVP]

As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.

This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?
I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Strategy can be same as "Knowledge".

If you are playing with a player without "Strategy/Knowledge", and he messed up the game while the type game is against the house (Example like Blackjack). We as the player who has strategy/knowledge are gonna be mad/pissed off.

Why? because that player can ruin the game while the dealer can be bust but because him who are playing like "Idiot" then the dealer win. No matter you have a luck, bad section and other think people should have strategy.

The strategy is not being used for chasing the luck, but make sure you're playing with correct no matter win/lose.

[serjent05]

As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.

This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?

I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?

There are strategies that are implemented in the luck-type game, but they are only effective in the short term and often losses in the long run.   but bankroll management strategies do work to minimize your losses.

If you played dice, martingale is a very effective strategy to recover losses but due to house edge, it is only effective for a short period of time.  If we prolong our gameplay, the strategy to recover our losses will become strategy to drain our balance faster since series of losses increases the longer we roll the dice.

[o48o]

If you played dice, martingale is a very effective strategy to recover losses but due to house edge, it is only effective for a short period of time.  If we prolong our gameplay, the strategy to recover our losses will become strategy to drain our balance faster since series of losses increases the longer we roll the dice.

Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.

[Symphonized]

The champ keeps his belt! 🥇

#UFC286

https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1637244348013383680

[Bitinity]

I wonder how long until they lose customers because of this, weekly/monthly rewards is the only attractive thing about stake.

Even if the cut down the reward or make a new requirement to be eligible for the base bonus of the weekly/monthly bonus, they wont lose their customer as long as the requirement is just to wager because it is something normal. They will lose customers if they remove the weekly/monthly bonus completely. However saying that weekly/monthly rewards is the only attractive offer is obviously a subjective opinion. There are still many other offers in Stake that can make players stay and play at Stake especially for active players.

[Jody.Drummer]

As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.

This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?
I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?

As I said before, things like this are not real evidence when a strategy can conquer the ratio of luck and this kind of thing is still a fifty-fifty but this comes back again to comfort and confidence.
One can play gambling in any way they want. I like to gamble by doing what I'm doing now and that just adds to my confidence in gambling, so that's enough. It doesn't mean that by implementing a strategy we will always be profitable because of course things like this we also have to look at an important aspect, namely luck.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.

I agree, everyone has his own style of gambling. That is why we keep trying different gambling platforms to find the best suitable option in the long run. Whatever makes money for me and I keep enjoying this activity I will not regret to keep repeating the same process.

This is the point, but on the other hand we also have to be aware that conditions like this are not only focused on money, I think because there are a number of other things that are of course felt especially by being in gambling when talking about making money actually it doesn't make sense because we know how strong it is we are in gambling that will still win is the casino.

[tusandii]

Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.

Actually, martingale is a fairly effective strategy for making a profit. If you rely on martingale for a short period of time, it's tantamount to hoping for luck, because martingale is a strategy that cannot be done quickly.
Unfortunately, what needs to be considered when using the martingale strategy is that gamblers need more money because if you rely on limited money, this strategy will never work.
There have been many gamblers out there who have proven this strategy, but they are a little overwhelmed because they have to spend more money than usual.
Maybe rich gamblers can easily spend big money to aim to get more profits, but for small gamblers this strategy is very difficult for them to implement.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.

Actually, martingale is a fairly effective strategy for making a profit. If you rely on martingale for a short period of time, it's tantamount to hoping for luck, because martingale is a strategy that cannot be done quickly.
Unfortunately, what needs to be considered when using the martingale strategy is that gamblers need more money because if you rely on limited money, this strategy will never work.
There have been many gamblers out there who have proven this strategy, but they are a little overwhelmed because they have to spend more money than usual.
Maybe rich gamblers can easily spend big money to aim to get more profits, but for small gamblers this strategy is very difficult for them to implement.

Martingale is the death of every serious gambler as it only work if you have unlimited money. Sooner or later you will los it all.

The math of course says it improbable that a 50/50 bet will land on the same side like 15-20 times but experience says otherwise.

Only starting with 0.01$ and lose lets say 15 times on a row you would already be down 328$. But who starts with 1 cent? If you start with 1$ and "only lose 10x in a row you are down 1k already.

The most important aspect is that you always just win you base amount. All the stress and finally win on the 11th try and get your money back, plus 1$ . Totally not worth it.

[Emitdama]

3000 spins? damn , obviously that's not normal in a pragmatic game may I know what game are you playing? I'm really curious to try
My worst experience was at The Dog House game by pragmatic 900+ spins without bonuses then I blacklisted this game
now almost 3 years I have never played this game and maybe not forever.

3000 spins is a lot to do, and I don't know how long we have to wait for it to finish. I only used 100 spins, and even then, I had to use auto spin, so I didn't have to hold down my mouse to play. Pragmatic is a game that can provide big profits, but maybe that doesn't apply to some slot games, so even if we use lots of rounds, it's still difficult for us to get big wins.

I wonder how much betting he used and how long it took him to complete all those rounds. But what is clear, it may require a large balance to be able to complete 3000 rounds. Keep the enthusiasm to try until you get big profits.

We can double click the spin button so that the reels won't roll for too long. Maybe there is also an instant play feature for some of them. It's a great help if we are rushing and wants to see the results immediately. 100 spins is already a great number if one is playing the normal way and then betting with a good base bet.

I don't usually use the auto play function because the experience is much better if I am the one who clicks the spin button. It wasn't tiring though but if I am going to play with 3k spins then that's a different story anymore . I think my fingers will be erased right after the game is finished. The minimum bet for pragmatic slot is $0.03 so if times 3000, that was still a whopping 90 dollars.

[babygun]

Martingale is the death of every serious gambler as it only work if you have unlimited money. Sooner or later you will los it all.

The math of course says it improbable that a 50/50 bet will land on the same side like 15-20 times but experience says otherwise.

Only starting with 0.01$ and lose lets say 15 times on a row you would already be down 328$. But who starts with 1 cent? If you start with 1$ and "only lose 10x in a row you are down 1k already.

The most important aspect is that you always just win you base amount. All the stress and finally win on the 11th try and get your money back, plus 1$ . Totally not worth it.

Exactly, 100% agree. Martingale is still the "to-go" strategy for a lot of gamblers but in the end, you will always end up in loss. Tried it myself multiple times and went always good in the beginning. I kept doing it and offcourse had a bad streak and lost a big amount of money. Happened already 2 times so nowadays I try to avoid doing it lol.

[Dewi Aries]

We can double click the spin button so that the reels won't roll for too long. Maybe there is also an instant play feature for some of them. It's a great help if we are rushing and wants to see the results immediately. 100 spins is already a great number if one is playing the normal way and then betting with a good base bet.

I don't usually use the auto play function because the experience is much better if I am the one who clicks the spin button. It wasn't tiring though but if I am going to play with 3k spins then that's a different story anymore . I think my fingers will be erased right after the game is finished. The minimum bet for pragmatic slot is $0.03 so if times 3000, that was still a whopping 90 dollars.

I know they don't use local currency when playing they use USD which means the minimum bet is $0.2 especially if he's hunting for a challenge
imagine $0.2 per spin in 3000 spins obviously it will drain our balance faster    but somehow this week pragmatic wasn't very friendly with me at Stake.com.

[n0ne]

Martingale is the death of every serious gambler as it only work if you have unlimited money. Sooner or later you will los it all.

The math of course says it improbable that a 50/50 bet will land on the same side like 15-20 times but experience says otherwise.

Only starting with 0.01$ and lose lets say 15 times on a row you would already be down 328$. But who starts with 1 cent? If you start with 1$ and "only lose 10x in a row you are down 1k already.

The most important aspect is that you always just win you base amount. All the stress and finally win on the 11th try and get your money back, plus 1$ . Totally not worth it.

Exactly, 100% agree. Martingale is still the "to-go" strategy for a lot of gamblers but in the end, you will always end up in loss. Tried it myself multiple times and went always good in the beginning. I kept doing it and offcourse had a bad streak and lost a big amount of money. Happened already 2 times so nowadays I try to avoid doing it lol.

Martingale strategy can be used when we play with small bet amounts. If not, we should have the number of rolls, beyond that we should not roll whether it is a win/loss. Every gambler could've atleast once lost big out of Martingale strategy. Higher the bank balance higher the risk, same is with the chance of recovering what we've lost in the previous rolls. I personally experienced 12 continued losing streak while trying for Martingale Strategy.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

We can double click the spin button so that the reels won't roll for too long. Maybe there is also an instant play feature for some of them. It's a great help if we are rushing and wants to see the results immediately. 100 spins is already a great number if one is playing the normal way and then betting with a good base bet.

I don't usually use the auto play function because the experience is much better if I am the one who clicks the spin button. It wasn't tiring though but if I am going to play with 3k spins then that's a different story anymore . I think my fingers will be erased right after the game is finished. The minimum bet for pragmatic slot is $0.03 so if times 3000, that was still a whopping 90 dollars.

I know they don't use local currency when playing they use USD which means the minimum bet is $0.2 especially if he's hunting for a challenge
imagine $0.2 per spin in 3000 spins obviously it will drain our balance faster    but somehow this week pragmatic wasn't very friendly with me at Stake.com.

Every week has its own share of luck, and if you are somebody that plays every day, i would also say that everyday has its own share of luck as well.
This is just how it is with gambling, there are times when one would hit big winnings that would surprise everyone around, but then also, there are other times when we just end up wasting money without winning a dime.

I have a friend who played pragmatic game and won $5000 three times in a row in one week, thats a total of $15,000 earned in just one week, he probably allowed the winning get into his head, the next week, he felt the winning would continue, he continued on the same game but this time, he wagered a higher amount on each round, before one could say jack, he already lost almost every penny of the money he won the last week.
So this is just how gambling is, everyone have their lucky time and how we use it determines our success in gambling.

[o48o]

Martingale is the death of every serious gambler as it only work if you have unlimited money. Sooner or later you will los it all.
The math of course says it improbable that a 50/50 bet will land on the same side like 15-20 times but experience says otherwise.
Only starting with 0.01$ and lose lets say 15 times on a row you would already be down 328$. But who starts with 1 cent? If you start with 1$ and "only lose 10x in a row you are down 1k already.
The most important aspect is that you always just win you base amount. All the stress and finally win on the 11th try and get your money back, plus 1$ . Totally not worth it.

Yeah, I wish people would stop kidding themself with this tactic, as they could actually have fun time not pursuing something that doesn't apply to real world.
Proof that it doesn't work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optional_stopping_theorem

And if people would stop to think about it just a minute they would realize that IF it would work EVERYONE would be doing it, because it would totally hack gambling and probability as we know it.

[seleme]

We can double click the spin button so that the reels won't roll for too long. Maybe there is also an instant play feature for some of them. It's a great help if we are rushing and wants to see the results immediately. 100 spins is already a great number if one is playing the normal way and then betting with a good base bet.

I don't usually use the auto play function because the experience is much better if I am the one who clicks the spin button. It wasn't tiring though but if I am going to play with 3k spins then that's a different story anymore . I think my fingers will be erased right after the game is finished. The minimum bet for pragmatic slot is $0.03 so if times 3000, that was still a whopping 90 dollars.

I know they don't use local currency when playing they use USD which means the minimum bet is $0.2 especially if he's hunting for a challenge
imagine $0.2 per spin in 3000 spins obviously it will drain our balance faster    but somehow this week pragmatic wasn't very friendly with me at Stake.com.

Every week has its own share of luck, and if you are somebody that plays every day, i would also say that everyday has its own share of luck as well.
This is just how it is with gambling, there are times when one would hit big winnings that would surprise everyone around, but then also, there are other times when we just end up wasting money without winning a dime.

I have a friend who played pragmatic game and won $5000 three times in a row in one week, thats a total of $15,000 earned in just one week, he probably allowed the winning get into his head, the next week, he felt the winning would continue, he continued on the same game but this time, he wagered a higher amount on each round, before one could say jack, he already lost almost every penny of the money he won the last week.
So this is just how gambling is, everyone have their lucky time and how we use it determines our success in gambling.

Damn, losing all profit back is depressive, and not every gambler is ready to handle such stress. It is just a matter of luck at that moment, if you think wisely and withdraw profit it is all yours, otherwise, gamblers mostly lose all back sooner or later due to being greedy. The winners think in the wrong way, maybe they have thought it should be easy to beat the casino with the strategy they keep doing but the reality is completely different like in this case.

[abel1337]

-snip

-snip

Every week has its own share of luck, and if you are somebody that plays every day, i would also say that everyday has its own share of luck as well.
This is just how it is with gambling, there are times when one would hit big winnings that would surprise everyone around, but then also, there are other times when we just end up wasting money without winning a dime.

I have a friend who played pragmatic game and won $5000 three times in a row in one week, thats a total of $15,000 earned in just one week, he probably allowed the winning get into his head, the next week, he felt the winning would continue, he continued on the same game but this time, he wagered a higher amount on each round, before one could say jack, he already lost almost every penny of the money he won the last week.
So this is just how gambling is, everyone have their lucky time and how we use it determines our success in gambling.

Damn, losing all profit back is depressive, and not every gambler is ready to handle such stress. It is just a matter of luck at that moment, if you think wisely and withdraw profit it is all yours, otherwise, gamblers mostly lose all back sooner or later due to being greedy. The winners think in the wrong way, maybe they have thought it should be easy to beat the casino with the strategy they keep doing but the reality is completely different like in this case.

It's a hard earned lesson. Imagine all of the hard work you did last week turn into dust because of how greedy and confident you are that you can repeat everything you just did to earn that kind of profit. Casino wins majority of the time and this one is the example of that. Remember that casino has house edge and no matter how lucky you are, You will be hit by it as long as you stay longer than you should handle. I believe that we all have regrets like this though the profits loss might differ. $15000 is a big money for me and losing that kind of money personally even if it's a profit from a casino will make me regret hard.

[rahmad2nd]

Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.

Actually, martingale is a fairly effective strategy for making a profit. If you rely on martingale for a short period of time, it's tantamount to hoping for luck, because martingale is a strategy that cannot be done quickly.
Unfortunately, what needs to be considered when using the martingale strategy is that gamblers need more money because if you rely on limited money, this strategy will never work.
There have been many gamblers out there who have proven this strategy, but they are a little overwhelmed because they have to spend more money than usual.
Maybe rich gamblers can easily spend big money to aim to get more profits, but for small gamblers this strategy is very difficult for them to implement.

Is that true, even I highly doubt it. if you assume that using more money, the martinggale strategy will be effective, then that's wrong. Did you know that in every game there is a maximum limit. if each multiple has reached its limit, it means you cannot double the bet for a higher one. So, basically this technique has not been adopted by gamblers for a long time. Except, you can use this technique only occasionally.

To be honest, I'm not too sure there are effective techniques or strategies for us to use in gambling. in particular, casino games which are almost purely luck-based. the martingale technique can be very effective, but with one condition, luck is on your side. IMO, the only thing that is most effective in gambling is, luck. so, play wisely there and make gambling just part of the fun, nothing more.

[Symphonized]

🥇 [Over $9,000] Target Multiplier 🔥 - 10 Hours left



On the Stake Limbo game, win at least two unique multipliers, from the following list:

| 10x | 20x | 30x | 40x | 50x | 60x | 70x | 80x | 90x | 100x | 110x| 120x | 130x| 140x| 150x | 200x| 210x| 220x |230X | 240x| 250x | 300x | 350x | 400x | 500x | 600x | 700x | 800x | 900x | 1000x | 1500x | 2000x | 2500x | 3000x | 3500x | 4000x | 4500x | 5000x | 10000x |

To be eligible, you need to hit at least 2 different multipliers.

Extra reward: If 2000x is one of those unique multipliers you need to hit to be eligible, you will get an extra reward. More info bellow

1 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/70456-%F0%9F%A5%87-over-9000-target-multiplier-%F0%9F%94%A5/