BillionDollarMan
Member
 Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 21, 2018, 11:33:23 AM |
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam  Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not  Said every bitconeeeeect holder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 11:45:41 AM |
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not Said every bitconeeeeect holder You going to compare Bitconnect with Credits? haha hope you are trolling... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:07:58 PM |
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months. Invest now or cry later!!! |
|
|
|
|
Btcid1995
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:08:45 PM |
|
current price $ 0.695063 I hope credits token can reach $ 2 month april.waiting patiently towards credits token moon  |
|
|
|
|
iqt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:10:33 PM |
|
hi, this is iqant exchange. if you are interested in being listed, please contact us. https://5iquant.orgEmail: iqt@5iquant.org |
|
|
|
|
plr
Member
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 24
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:18:00 PM |
|
First time I read about this exchange I hope it can help to push the volume and price further, I like to see this on other exchange like Coss, Cryptopia or even Mercatox this coin is now a must-have coin/token price is rapidly changing maybe the fuds is helping it I'm sure he is also buying it while creating FUDS  |
|
|
|
|
therat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:19:14 PM |
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months.
Invest now or cry later!!!
AHAHAHAH are you really this retarded? Nah, you are just trying to hype it. |
|
|
|
|
sebastian787
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:25:45 PM |
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months.
Invest now or cry later!!!
480 TPS its even WAY too much for credits. Imagine the 480K TPS they claim or 1mln. Come on dont copy my comments about crying mister "smart" investor. Your sh*ty shady ico have been exposed on all over the net. Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project. |
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:26:49 PM |
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months.
Invest now or cry later!!!
AHAHAHAH are you really this retarded? Nah, you are just trying to hype it. I`m retarded yes making a lot of money indeed and what are you doing? spreading FUD and not making any money because you focusing on FUDDING |
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:27:36 PM |
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months.
Invest now or cry later!!!
480 TPS its even WAY too much for credits. Imagine the 480K TPS they claim or 1mln. Come on dont copy my comments about crying mister "smart" investor. Your sh*ty shady ico have been exposed on all over the net. Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project. Nope look at the buy and sell orders, take some time to learn the market |
|
|
|
|
|
kubricktrader
|
|
March 21, 2018, 12:50:49 PM |
|
I've called out some scams in my time. But I simply can't see how this is a scam. Look at the team!!!! Look at all these quality people, does anyone think they would ruin their lives being involved in a complete scam? NOOOOO way. This is a legit project. Hey it might not be as amazing tech as 1m tis suggests. I mean there are other chains that boast something similar. Its gonna go at least 10x probably more. And I am willing to eat my penis if this is a scam, cause there is no way people with these talents would be fooled into one or stay involved in a scam. Fud has really damaged many peoples opportunities on this one. Look deeper, its the same for XBY. Stuff that looks a bit scammy or get s FUD but is 99% likely to be a solid project are THE BEST investments you can make in crypto. https://credits.com/en/Home/Team |
|
|
|
|
BillionDollarMan
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:06:13 PM |
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not Said every bitconeeeeect holder You going to compare Bitconnect with Credits? haha hope you are trolling... Comparing religious buyers who refused reality. If you want to compare project then seele is good scam to compare credits scam. |
|
|
|
|
penig
Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 13
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:11:58 PM |
|
Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project.
The market thinks otherwise. Isn't there another (few hundred) projects you can spend some time attacking? So much time focus on one make you obvious, only question is what is your agenda? |
|
|
|
|
sebastian787
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:20:24 PM |
|
Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project.
The market thinks otherwise. Isn't there another (few hundred) projects you can spend some time attacking? So much time focus on one make you obvious, only question is what is your agenda? Now that there is a ready research available im focusing on other things too dont worry. The fake accounts and bots credits use is obvious not us that we are warning newcomers. Go complain about how much of my effort i dedicate on credits scam exposure and invest on your sh*ty ico. We dont really care for stupid greedy investors or pump and dumpers. |
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:23:02 PM |
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not Said every bitconeeeeect holder You going to compare Bitconnect with Credits? haha hope you are trolling... Comparing religious buyers who refused reality. If you want to compare project then seele is good scam to compare credits scam. If Credits is scam you`re scam, your life is scam, your profile is scam, your reply`s are scam. Try to focus on projects that are not scam in your eyes, in the time that you are fudding here you could already make some money on the project... |
|
|
|
|
ddevink
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:27:40 PM |
|
Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project.
The market thinks otherwise. Isn't there another (few hundred) projects you can spend some time attacking? So much time focus on one make you obvious, only question is what is your agenda? Now that there is a ready research available im focusing on other things too dont worry. The fake accounts and bots credits use is obvious not us that we are warning newcomers. Go complain about how much of my effort i dedicate on credits scam exposure and invest on your sh*ty ico. We dont really care for stupid greedy investors or pump and dumpers. Lol there are no bots wake up! we have 28k+ members on telegram alone so we can vote without bots. Look at the buy and sell orders learn the market watch youtube to educate yourself. What fake accounts are here on every project and I think you are getting paid to fud on Credits. You take a lot of time to make your story here.. |
|
|
|
|
therat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:30:55 PM |
|
Your price is artificially increased and soon they will dump everyone as there is NO VALUE to support this scam project.
The market thinks otherwise. Isn't there another (few hundred) projects you can spend some time attacking? So much time focus on one make you obvious, only question is what is your agenda? Now that there is a ready research available im focusing on other things too dont worry. The fake accounts and bots credits use is obvious not us that we are warning newcomers. Go complain about how much of my effort i dedicate on credits scam exposure and invest on your sh*ty ico. We dont really care for stupid greedy investors or pump and dumpers. Lol there are no bots wake up! we have 28k+ members on telegram alone so we can vote without bots. Look at the buy and sell orders learn the market watch youtube to educate yourself. What fake accounts are here on every project and I think you are getting paid to fud on Credits. You take a lot of time to make your story here.. LMAO. That telegram is a special kind of a communist party. You just stay there and shill, ban anyone who warns people about this shitcoin. Others deserve to know how retarded this marketing story about Credits is. |
|
|
|
|
|
