[ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!]

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Those guys approaching you in the CREDITS channel on telegram have probably nothing to do with CREDITS itself. They are scammers and they also wait for victims in other TG channels.

Very true and a very good point. It's possible, but the motivation for what I've seen appears to be designed to create buzz, similar to how the U.S. election was hacked.  Here again, my point is also that anything Russian or related to Russia is tainted due to recent world events in the U.S. in the UK and in Syria.  It puts a bad taste in people's mouths and minds for anything Russian.

If Credits wants to redeem itself, they can start by using more polished English speaking people when using the English language to communicate ANYTHING TO THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD.  Otherwise they look like total idiots in the PR sense.  No one in the West, wants to hear from a Russia ANYTHING right now.  Russia is openly despised right now on the world's stage, so it's stupid to underline that ethnicity in any way, under the present circumstances.

On the positive side, this is actually a good time to buy Credit$, because of the negative news cycle. This is when you want to buy. Also, my suspicion is that Binance doesn't care about anything but profits, generally, and Credits is one of the best sellers on KuCoin, so they must be chomping at the bit to list it. Binance doesn't want to list a true scam, but with their decentralized platform coming out this year anyway, it won't make much difference what they list on their centralized exchange, as it will be the wild West on their decentralized platform, regardless. So why be too picky now?

Everytime Credits$ dips below 0.50 cents, people rush in to buy it, which is not typical of most of the ICO's that we've seen launched during the bear market.

[skybot13x]

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

Great idea! If i were in their shoes I would lock it and create new self-moderated one to communicate with normal on CREDITS progress and where I couldn't  listen to the babble of two blackmailers spreading FUD all around here (though both of them were send to ignore list   so that I can't see their nonsense). cheus, please. respond to this.

It has been mentioned before that the best response the team could give is technology that backs up their claims. It is as simple as that. A moderated thread is never the right response. Imagine Elon Musk would moderate the media because they say he is crazy. He either delivers, or he doesn't. If he doesn't he gets crushed and if he does the critics turn silent.

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

Great idea! If i were in their shoes I would lock it and create new self-moderated one to communicate with normal on CREDITS progress and where I couldn't  listen to the babble of two blackmailers spreading FUD all around here (though both of them were send to ignore list   so that I can't see their nonsense). cheus, please. respond to this.

It has been mentioned before that the best response the team could give is technology that backs up their claims. It is as simple as that. A moderated thread is never the right response. Imagine Elon Musk would moderate the media because they say he is crazy. He either delivers, or he doesn't. If he doesn't he gets crushed and if he does the critics turn silent.

Big Applause for this post.  How do I give you Credit$ for your wisdom? 

[robelneo]

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

Great idea! If i were in their shoes I would lock it and create new self-moderated one to communicate with normal on CREDITS progress and where I couldn't  listen to the babble of two blackmailers spreading FUD all around here (though both of them were send to ignore list   so that I can't see their nonsense). cheus, please. respond to this.

It has been mentioned before that the best response the team could give is technology that backs up their claims. It is as simple as that. A moderated thread is never the right response. Imagine Elon Musk would moderate the media because they say he is crazy. He either delivers, or he doesn't. If he doesn't he gets crushed and if he does the critics turn silent.

I am against thread moderation and have second thought investing and campaigning on moderated projects, but criticism is good as long as it is constructive criticism, but not here to the point that everyone who supports this project or invested is considered part of the scam if it is a scam, let's not take this personal, people are investing at their own risk, just saying.

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

Right now Credit$ is the #1 traded coin on KuCoin, which is the most available exchange to most people in the West.  I expect that Binance is looking at this with some measure of GREED.  It's astonishing, really, given how many popular projects and coins are traded on KuCoin.

It will be a total shock I expect, when Credits hits Binance, and will dearly cost those who are not on board when it happens.  We can expect a move of possibly 200-300% if previous coins are an example, before it settles back down.

[surasak]

Right now Credit$ is the #1 traded coin on KuCoin, which is the most available exchange to most people in the West.  I expect that Binance is looking at this with some measure of GREED.  It's astonishing, really, given how many popular projects and coins are traded on KuCoin.

It will be a total shock I expect, when Credits hits Binance, and will dearly cost those who are not on board when it happens.  We can expect a move of possibly 200-300% if previous coins are an example, before it settles back down.

   
                     I think it will hit Binance soon otherwise they wouldn't let them use the Application in progress sign on their website

[CryptoGorilla]

CREDITS is expanding on telegram in all languages...

You have the main telegramgroup (https://t.me/creditscom) but also:

CREDITS in China https://t.me/creditschina
CREDITS в Poccии https://t.me/creditsrussia
CREDITS in Japan https://t.me/creditsjapan
CREDITS in Korea https://t.me/creditskorea
CREDITS India https://t.me/creditsindia
CREDITS in Spanish https://t.me/creditsspanish
CREDITS in Turkey https://t.me/creditsturkey
CREDITS em Portugues https://t.me/creditsPortuguese
CREDITS in Vietnam https://t.me/CreditsVietnam
CREDITS Arabic https://t.me/creditsarab
CREDITS Nederlands https://t.me/creditsholland
CREDITS Germany https://t.me/creditsgermany
CREDITS Thailand https://t.me/CreditsThailand
CREDITS Indonesian https://t.me/creditsindonesian

[therat]

That half-wit   hidden under mask of two accounts has posted 97% of his messages in one single thread of BTT and all of his posts are FUD,  duplicate posting of that FUD , accusations and untrue information. I don't believe that a person with  the passion for crypto  could act like this   but worst of all, he messed with normals. It is our own  right to invest our money into  any project  and disscuss the development.

P.S. Put him/them into ignore as I did.

P.P.S.  Credits doing well. I've increased my bag to 50K during the last dip.

What a bunch of crap, every single sentence of it.

'It's all FUD'

'untrue accusations and info'

'how can someone spread such stuff'

'it's not normal, we have the right to praise our shitcoin'

'ignore him'

'omg I just filled my bags with more of this shitcoin, get it quickly while it's cheap'

All the classic stuff shitcoin promoters say. You can't make this any better, people have seen the truth behind it. You can try and cover or sugarcoat it and wrap in some shiny paper. But it still remains a log of shit. So until this gets a proper dev team, abandons cheap marketing and shills, actually makes a working product that is not meant to be a marketing trick to fool people by some manipulated scaling tps videos, it remains a shitcoin. Yeah, you've guessed it, won't happen. Any of that. You all can ignore the truth, but you will not delude new people by your sweet words and lambos. Go and have your shill party with all the already deluded and brainwashed folks in there.

[bobq]

Right now Credit$ is the #1 traded coin on KuCoin, which is the most available exchange to most people in the West.  I expect that Binance is looking at this with some measure of GREED.  It's astonishing, really, given how many popular projects and coins are traded on KuCoin.

It will be a total shock I expect, when Credits hits Binance, and will dearly cost those who are not on board when it happens.  We can expect a move of possibly 200-300% if previous coins are an example, before it settles back down.

Well, the possible scenarios are basically two: either Credits IS what it claims to be, in which case of course the sky is the limit for its price to grow, or it is just a narrative debased from true facts, in which case a bloodbath will be inevitable at some point. Time will tell

[ScamcoinBagholder]

After all what I've read in this thread I am now wondering: should I become a bagholder of Credits or not?

[sagatel]

I am waiting for news about the launch of the platform and hope that the price will rise. Recently, the price of tokens upsets me.

[DutchFinity]

Everytime Credits$ dips below 0.50 cents, people rush in to buy it, which is not typical of most of the ICO's that we've seen launched during the bear market.

Those people are probably Sebastian, the Rat and you, or the one that pays you, plucking the cheap fruits of fud. 

[DutchFinity]

After all what I've read in this thread I am now wondering: should I become a bagholder of Credits or not?

Do let us know when you have formulated a well weighed answer.

[miyami]

I am waiting for news about the launch of the platform and hope that the price will rise. Recently, the price of tokens upsets me.

I want to give you some important advice - don't sell your tokens until next year. I think that the maximum price of the token will be when people begin to use the platform.

[misterbigg]

If beta goes well, credits will surpass $1. By end of year possibility it can reach $2.

[armlock]

Credits fellow - showed excellent speed, provided the alpha version at the fundraising stage, reached a high level of hype ... But soon there will be several new interesting interlocutors and interest in CREDITS will begin to fade ... For example, Seele, NKN, YUGGDRASH and others .. .

[urban.solinc]

Credits fellow - showed excellent speed, provided the alpha version at the fundraising stage, reached a high level of hype ... But soon there will be several new interesting interlocutors and interest in CREDITS will begin to fade ... For example, Seele, NKN, YUGGDRASH and others .. .

All mentioned still have a long time until their Betas, testnets and mainnets. Time is very important in crypto space, half a year of a difference can mean that the project stalls or fails.

[fortunecrypto]

If beta goes well, credits will surpass $1. By end of year possibility it can reach $2.

People are expecting this, a project can only be distinguished on their platform they are handling, in the case of Credits they should guaranty that everything is working perfectly, even now it is behind the scene, they are everywhere that's make them trustworthy only the platform is missing.

[theleaf]

If beta goes well, credits will surpass $1. By end of year possibility it can reach $2.

People are expecting this, a project can only be distinguished on their platform they are handling, in the case of Credits they should guaranty that everything is working perfectly, even now it is behind the scene, they are everywhere that's make them trustworthy only the platform is missing.

the team behind Credits are legit and hard at work, when the beta and functional platform launches, the token value should be worth much more with its high tps

[theleaf]

If beta goes well, credits will surpass $1. By end of year possibility it can reach $2.

People are expecting this, a project can only be distinguished on their platform they are handling, in the case of Credits they should guaranty that everything is working perfectly, even now it is behind the scene, they are everywhere that's make them trustworthy only the platform is missing.

I think people are expecting way too much in crypto, no company ever success overnight or in short amount of time, they need actual working products with mass adoption, generating real revenue, not just token volatility price