ikilled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
August 20, 2013, 08:48:51 PM |
|
Sorry, the one in the background is mining slower than the one in the foreground.
So, for example if i run jhprimeminer in foreground in the terminal: ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass it will mine faster than if I run it in the background (with the & at the end): ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass >> jhprimeminer.log &
Maybe I am wrong... I'm basing my findings by looking at the jhprimeminer's output when running in the foreground (in the ssh client window while logged in) and running in the background (I redirect the output to a file >> jhprimeminer.log) and logging out of shell.
One weird thing I notices is that this log file "jhprimeminer.log" is updating very slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
jh00
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2013, 12:06:39 AM |
|
I updated my build with the latest share values: 11ch 100 10ch 80 9ch 16 8ch 1 7ch 0.03125 6ch 0.000976
I am using the opportunity to ask everyone working on an unofficial build of jhPrimeminer to avoid having hardcoded share values. The server does send the share value (when a share is accepted) to the miner for a few weeks now. Take a look at this commit: https://github.com/jh000/jhPrimeminer/commit/3c93c1e68d05ebf41893306d179e0ccb869f8741The share value can be retrieved in this function: xptClient_processPacket_shareAck(xptClient_t* xptClient);I might need to do a few more changes to the share values, maybe even make them dynamic. Having them hardcoded only adds confusion on the user side whenever the values are changed.
|
|
|
|
x3maniac (OP)
|
|
August 21, 2013, 03:50:44 AM |
|
updated thanks for the info!
|
|
|
|
mhps
|
|
August 21, 2013, 04:02:57 AM |
|
Cabin It is quite similar to the Mumus build but does not do the large divisor test anymore since others have said this part is buggy and wastes a bit of time. It also has the -h parameter which specifies what length of chain to search for (default 9 which is the case for all current miners) and it removes some unused fermat test branches and other calculations. 64 bit - https://www.dropbox.com/s/szayx15skhevv7x/jhPrimeminer.ziprdebourbon This is an optimized version of Mumus 7.1 build with my sieve updates and a few other performance increases. Block rate should be as good as / better than Mumus. Use same as you would Mumus V7.1 64 bit - https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zij7j205ucsmj3n/s3NKCVo8mL/jhPrimeMiner_RdBBeta3.zipThanks. I am trying your jhPrimeMiner_RdBBeta3.zip above. It still uses the old values for the chains found (i.e. 0.1 for 6chain, 1 for 7chain etc.).
|
|
|
|
samos123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2013, 04:45:47 AM |
|
@Cabin: Your build doesn't work under wine for me.
|
|
|
|
clintar
|
|
August 21, 2013, 05:43:53 AM |
|
Sorry, the one in the background is mining slower than the one in the foreground.
So, for example if i run jhprimeminer in foreground in the terminal: ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass it will mine faster than if I run it in the background (with the & at the end): ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass >> jhprimeminer.log &
Maybe I am wrong... I'm basing my findings by looking at the jhprimeminer's output when running in the foreground (in the ssh client window while logged in) and running in the background (I redirect the output to a file >> jhprimeminer.log) and logging out of shell.
One weird thing I notices is that this log file "jhprimeminer.log" is updating very slowly.
It probably has something to do with the way it's outputting. I get weird characters on screen in my client, so it's probably having a hard time interacting with the terminal. You can try using screen instead of the &
|
|
|
|
clintar
|
|
August 21, 2013, 05:52:34 AM |
|
@Cabin: Your build doesn't work under wine for me.
yeah, not working for me, either. Sounds like the one I'd want to try. Wish you guys were compiling on linux. I might have to break down and try my hand at trying to get some of your changes into the repo that's compiling on linux now. (that will take a long time I'm sure)
|
|
|
|
TheXev
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 06:20:51 AM |
|
I started using rdebourbon's beta 3 yesterday under Windows, and the performance on my A10-4600m is threw the roof now: Val/h:21.572 - PPS:10778 - SPS:22.929 - ACC:473 Chain/Hr: 4: 2228.14 5: 191.39 6: 18.50 7: 1.64 8: 0.00 9: 0.18 10: 0.00 11: 0.00 12: 0.00 Total/Valid shares: [ 207 / 201 ] - Max diff: 9.84485 6ch/h: 18.55 - 203 [ 48 / 39 / 116 ] - Val: 20.300 7ch/h: 1.64 - 18 [ 3 / 2 / 13 ] - Val: 18.000 8ch/h: 0.00 - 0 [ 0 / 0 / 0 ] - Val: 0.000 9ch/h: 0.18 - 2 [ 1 / 1 / 0 ] - Val: 200.000 Share Value submitted - Last Block/Total: 0.000000 / 32.708984 Number of mining threads: 4 Sieve Size: 1000000 Sieve Percentage: 20 Round Sieve Percentage: 70 Prime Limit: 400000 Primorial Multiplier: 53 L1CacheElements: 128000 Total Runtime: 0 Days, 10 Hours, 57 minutes, 19 seconds Total Share Value submitted to the Pool: 32.70898 Taking to rdebourbon and AeroCloud was a huge help. rde's build is great because once you know how to tune, you know what to look for, and those new values of SPS and ACC is a huge help.
|
|
|
|
clintar
|
|
August 21, 2013, 07:42:44 AM |
|
I started using rdebourbon's beta 3 yesterday under Windows, and the performance on my A10-4600m is threw the roof now: Val/h:21.572 - PPS:10778 - SPS:22.929 - ACC:473 Chain/Hr: 4: 2228.14 5: 191.39 6: 18.50 7: 1.64 8: 0.00 9: 0.18 10: 0.00 11: 0.00 12: 0.00 Total/Valid shares: [ 207 / 201 ] - Max diff: 9.84485 6ch/h: 18.55 - 203 [ 48 / 39 / 116 ] - Val: 20.300 7ch/h: 1.64 - 18 [ 3 / 2 / 13 ] - Val: 18.000 8ch/h: 0.00 - 0 [ 0 / 0 / 0 ] - Val: 0.000 9ch/h: 0.18 - 2 [ 1 / 1 / 0 ] - Val: 200.000 Share Value submitted - Last Block/Total: 0.000000 / 32.708984 Number of mining threads: 4 Sieve Size: 1000000 Sieve Percentage: 20 Round Sieve Percentage: 70 Prime Limit: 400000 Primorial Multiplier: 53 L1CacheElements: 128000 Total Runtime: 0 Days, 10 Hours, 57 minutes, 19 seconds Total Share Value submitted to the Pool: 32.70898 Taking to rdebourbon and AeroCloud was a huge help. rde's build is great because once you know how to tune, you know what to look for, and those new values of SPS and ACC is a huge help. I saw you got a block earlier. Wonder if there is a guide anywhere, yet for targetting higher chain shares.
|
|
|
|
CoinBuzz
|
|
August 21, 2013, 07:43:08 AM |
|
how could i run it under linux with wine?
please make 32bit version too.
|
|
|
|
rdebourbon
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 07:54:03 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update.
|
XPM:AUwKMCYCacE6Jq1rsLcSEHSNiohHVVSiWv LTC:LV7VHT3oGWQzG9EKjvSXd3eokgNXj6ciFE BTC:1Fph7y622HJ5Cwq4bkzfeZXWep2Jyi5kp7
|
|
|
tadakaluri
|
|
August 21, 2013, 08:07:39 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update. Thank you very much for your work.
|
|
|
|
tadakaluri
|
|
August 21, 2013, 08:22:34 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update. Thank you very much for your work. WARNING - Avast Says this file have VIRUS
|
|
|
|
rdebourbon
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 08:35:17 AM |
|
WARNING - Avast Says this file have VIRUS
Not sure why - but both Chrome & Avast keep flagging my builds.. Can you send the virus report so I can analyse.
|
XPM:AUwKMCYCacE6Jq1rsLcSEHSNiohHVVSiWv LTC:LV7VHT3oGWQzG9EKjvSXd3eokgNXj6ciFE BTC:1Fph7y622HJ5Cwq4bkzfeZXWep2Jyi5kp7
|
|
|
TheXev
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 08:58:48 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update. Thank you very much for your work. WARNING - Avast Says this file have VIRUSAvast flags everything as a virus. I really have no clue why anyone uses it. flags cgminer, now rde's build... prob cause some goofball ran it on a corporate network and another admin picked it out.
|
|
|
|
CoinBuzz
|
|
August 21, 2013, 09:04:05 AM |
|
please someone tell me how can i run these miners on 32bit linux?
|
|
|
|
ikilled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2013, 09:46:13 AM |
|
Sorry, the one in the background is mining slower than the one in the foreground.
So, for example if i run jhprimeminer in foreground in the terminal: ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass it will mine faster than if I run it in the background (with the & at the end): ./jhprimeminer -o http://... -u user.1 -p pass >> jhprimeminer.log &
Maybe I am wrong... I'm basing my findings by looking at the jhprimeminer's output when running in the foreground (in the ssh client window while logged in) and running in the background (I redirect the output to a file >> jhprimeminer.log) and logging out of shell.
One weird thing I notices is that this log file "jhprimeminer.log" is updating very slowly.
It probably has something to do with the way it's outputting. I get weird characters on screen in my client, so it's probably having a hard time interacting with the terminal. You can try using screen instead of the & Thanks, yep probably is because of the way how I am redirecting the output. Now i forcibly disconnected the ssh sessinon (without quitting jhprimeminer and exit-ing) , leaving the jhprimeminer running. I found out how to read output from any process running (from another ssh session) - with this command: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/58550/how-to-view-the-output-of-a-running-process-in-another-bash-sessionNow I can see that the pps is normal - as it I would run it in the foreground. Thanks everybody for the help :-)
|
|
|
|
FoldingTime
|
|
August 21, 2013, 10:14:11 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update. I would really like to get this running under native linux. Can you provide the source so we can try to compile it under linux? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
rdebourbon
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 10:52:46 AM |
|
I've posted a new beta v3.1 that removes the hard coded share values. Share value now only reported on block summary. I've also created a single dropbox folder for all my releases now - so only a single link to check: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sq24hzo993afy9c/l7icP0KiuMNo performance difference to beta v3 only the display update. I would really like to get this running under native linux. Can you provide the source so we can try to compile it under linux? Thanks. Source is forked on github: https://github.com/rdebourbon/jhPrimeminer
|
XPM:AUwKMCYCacE6Jq1rsLcSEHSNiohHVVSiWv LTC:LV7VHT3oGWQzG9EKjvSXd3eokgNXj6ciFE BTC:1Fph7y622HJ5Cwq4bkzfeZXWep2Jyi5kp7
|
|
|
|