Ytterbium
|
|
September 23, 2013, 03:56:16 PM |
|
Well even if they decide to move to bitfunder they still need to go to direct shares first, not everyone want to be on bitfunder or have account there and some are just not going to be responsive quick enough for this to happened. So the direct shares will be the first step
Direct shares are a management headache. You really want labcoin to deal with however many shareholders, potentially some with just a handful of shares? They're not exactly the most responsive.
|
|
|
|
JohnyBigs
|
|
September 23, 2013, 03:57:06 PM |
|
Anyone notice the last 2 payouts for the Labcoin address have been a bit larger than the usual .1BTC Possible more devices have been deployed and btcguild hasnt been updated with correct hashing speed?
They are working with batches so yes, theh could be hashing right now just have not merged it to the labcoin team, whicb is exactly what they said
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 23, 2013, 03:58:14 PM |
|
Anyone notice the last 2 payouts for the Labcoin address have been a bit larger than the usual .1BTC Possible more devices have been deployed and btcguild hasnt been updated with correct hashing speed?
Probably extra accumulated btc. I had a spreadsheet and if you run the numbers it looks like 500Gh/s for some hours followed by 1.2Th/s worth. But it could be they're using multiple accounts to test with and haven't added the other accounts to the labcoin team yet. I'll update my spreadsheet and look at the more recent numbers.
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 23, 2013, 03:59:33 PM |
|
Direct shares are a management headache. You really want labcoin to deal with however many shareholders, potentially some with just a handful of shares? They're not exactly the most responsive.
it's the only way, really. They need to go BTCT >> Direct >> Bitfunder/Havelock. Otherwise, you don't know who owns what. I'm sure a lot of poeple don't have bitfunder accounts, and if they do, the BTC addresses may not line up. I agree, though, it's not something I would want to trust this team with. I guess that's why the share price is currently what it is.
|
|
|
|
wickedgoodtrader
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:04:38 PM |
|
hahaha.. your all gonna get raped
|
|
|
|
Sou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
(Bitcoin related text here)
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:07:51 PM |
|
hahaha.. your all gonna get raped
Jerry Sandusky quote?
|
|
|
|
JohnyBigs
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:10:10 PM |
|
hahaha.. your all gonna get raped
Moar fud please need to buy cheaper shares .00025 would be good.
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:11:46 PM |
|
last 2 transaction have 0.15 BTC instead of normal 0.1 BTC
one even 0.29072199 BTC
|
|
|
|
lzr1900
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:13:34 PM |
|
merge to BF will be the best solution.
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:19:55 PM |
|
They just got a transaction.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 BTC 9/23/2013 15:47 UTC they got 0.15 BTC a manual payout that would include extra, but bring their ballance to zero
Then 9/23/2013 16:17 they got another manual payout 0.29072199 BTC, over a half hour period.
At 112628549 difficulty, that comes out to 3.2Th/s.
|
|
|
|
JohnyBigs
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:20:19 PM |
|
This is the first time I think price might take a massive dump again, when the last few days of trading on btct occur again, people will panic about labcoin keeping track of share ownership.
|
|
|
|
damiano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:20:44 PM |
|
They just got a transaction.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 BTC 9/23/2013 15:47 UTC they got 0.15 BTC a manual payout that would include extra, but bring their ballance to zero
Then 9/23/2013 16:17 they got another manual payout 0.29072199 BTC, over a half hour period.
At 112628549 difficulty, that comes out to 3.2Th/s.
Thanks for crunching the numbers!
|
|
|
|
boyohi
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:22:07 PM |
|
On a lighter news. Hey guys congratz! We surpass AM post count.
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:22:57 PM |
|
They just got a transaction.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 BTC 9/23/2013 15:47 UTC they got 0.15 BTC a manual payout that would include extra, but bring their ballance to zero
Then 9/23/2013 16:17 they got another manual payout 0.29072199 BTC, over a half hour period.
At 112628549 difficulty, that comes out to 3.2Th/s.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 5 BTC
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:24:20 PM |
|
If they really have 3.2 TH/s online, good luck to those of you waiting for IPO price.
|
|
|
|
abuelau
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:25:09 PM |
|
They just got a transaction.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 BTC 9/23/2013 15:47 UTC they got 0.15 BTC a manual payout that would include extra, but bring their ballance to zero
Then 9/23/2013 16:17 they got another manual payout 0.29072199 BTC, over a half hour period.
At 112628549 difficulty, that comes out to 3.2Th/s.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 5 BTC Ha? I don't understand this math. How can you differentiate between a manual payout or automatic?
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:25:45 PM |
|
If they really have 3.2 TH/s online, good luck to those of you waiting for IPO price.
someone sold for .00025 this morning...
|
|
|
|
JohnyBigs
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:25:53 PM |
|
If they really have 3.2 TH/s online, good luck to those of you waiting for IPO price.
Im waiting for .0003 again im sure there will be panic sellers ftw again lol
|
|
|
|
Sou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
(Bitcoin related text here)
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:27:11 PM |
|
They just got a transaction.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 BTC 9/23/2013 15:47 UTC they got 0.15 BTC a manual payout that would include extra, but bring their ballance to zero
Then 9/23/2013 16:17 they got another manual payout 0.29072199 BTC, over a half hour period.
At 112628549 difficulty, that comes out to 3.2Th/s.
9/23/2013 15:07 UTC they got 0.1 5 BTC Ha? I don't understand this math. How can you differentiate between a manual payout or automatic? Speculation. Clean numbers vs. ones with lots of decimal places, and assuming the latter is manual.
|
|
|
|
JohnyBigs
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:28:26 PM |
|
In other news if you guys want to get in on a speculative play icedrill is removing their 3rd tranche sell wall at .0016
|
|
|
|
|