Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[yellogold]

Only slightly. I make my own analysis.

[raimslii]

I think the rating of the reference only. Each ICO we join it is enough enough of my research, no view all of any ICO, also also see the review of your project and your company. If a project is a community is also a positive point to start.

[elpsycongro]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Im not always believe in ICO ratings, but definetly checking them. I do invest only after my own researchs. Recently found Usechain ICO projects, good team,good advisors, some big funds joined too.

[john_nautica]

ico rating can not be trusted completely because now that determines the success of ico is not a rating but the performance of the team to promote the ongoing ico. so i think ico rating is just to attract the investors.

[Beet1e]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I remember the case that the project on one of the above sites was rated by the author 4+ ( I can not say the exact figure) in the end, the project turned out to be fraudulent, but he collected millions. He was just removed from the rating list as if he wasn't there. 

[krhnrhn]

This is only one agument for ICO but No, I don't believe the ratings. I myself conduct research and choose a good ICO.
Additionally expreinced friends advices is important.

[cryptocyprus]

Personally, I do not really believe in the rating that is put up by the ICO, since they are all exposed to certain indicators, and they can sometimes be even good for bad projects.

[GmBoom]

Yes I believe in ico ratings. It is the best factor to consider whether the ico you are going to invest is a legit one, or not, a hyped one or not. They give a rating in the ico to really filter the best of the best ico. And also, they give prior investigation to the ico to determine if the ico was a scam or not.

[Fritz93]

In general, in choosing ICO, I rely on these ratings, and almost always this choice justifies itself. There were certainly a few cases when these ratings were wrong, but I think it's more randomness than the trend.

[cikey]

Yes, I believe it, I usually rely on it to avoid some scams. But according to what you said, maybe I should not be so dependent on it.

[BlasterS]

Yes Of Course I Do Believe To The Ratings Of A ICO Because It Is A Good Basing To Know If They Are Still Regulate Well In This Business And Also To Secured Your Investments,
In Short Ratings Means The Key To Know How The Business Is, Is It In The Bad Or Good Condition.

[GameRaider85]

Almost all of the ICO ratings and reviews nowadays are being fabricated, wouldn't trust much everything it says. One thing though, menlo.one is something that differs these kinds of fabricated ICO ratings/reviews. They have introduced this thing "guild system" where investors can really benefit.

[Ignacia]

No, I don't believe in all ICO Ratings, only some of them. But sometimes I use ICO ratings to assist me when doing ICO research.  I take a look for different ratings, but I always make a decision based only on my own review.

[waaat?]

Any rating is created by people. And all people want to get own profit. I see so few ratings in the net that think about own reputation. The most want money and much clients. Nothing more. I advise to think how to trust in this case?

[crypt0junkie28]

I do. Aside from reading the whitepaper thoroughly, checking out the webpage and everything. ICO ratings are also one of the factors why I invest in ICO's today. It's why I invested in Chozun 途赞, actually.

[Maricurijohn]

No, I don't believe in all ICO Ratings, only some of them. But sometimes I use ICO ratings to assist me when doing ICO research.  I take a look for different ratings, but I always make a decision based only on my own review.

I do not believe it, but they are also a factor to help us identify potential ico, those numbers they can deceive the site easily.

[pujumba]

Like I have said before, the sites like ICObench and others are clearly paid by some ICOs so that they can have higher ratings. I don't trust any site that gives out many 4-5 star ratings. Most projects in crypto deserve a 1-2 star rating.

[Nikitavoz]

Not all, of course. Many of them are just corrupt and there's no point in trusting them. It is worth paying attention when ICO is marked as "paid", and when this project is really well worked and studied all the details, and only then gave their assessment. I only trust ICO Drops now.

[dreadfullICO]

when I am interested in rates and scores I am going to www.icobench.com and www.icoguide.com, these two for me have realistic rates, when I am making research my opinion is always matched with their scores.

[adolf512]

I think icobench and icodrops can be trusted. These time-tested resources and ratings there correspond to reality.

I agree with you. Icodrops has a very strong team that provides people with very important and relevant information, but even they can sometimes make mistakes, for this there is no 100% certainty about the success of the project.