Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Jacata98]

I always take into account the ICO ratings because they allow to reduce the number of projects necessary for consideration and analysis. So I find them useful and recommend to use them to my friends.

[kudryas]

I have an assumption that some rating agencies take money for a high rating, so I check everything myself. Team, product, road map and only then I invest!

That's a solid statement. I also think that money plays a crucial role in this rankings so you shouldn't believe everything they say.

[fitty]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion.

That's gonna be the best way to invest not depending on others review or to review it for you. Researching on your own would be help you to decide and develop your skills in critical areas of thinking and how you grade a project based on your own personal standard and visions.

[harrycalik]

I think you can trust them only partially, as many people want to pump and promote their ICOs with the usage of such ratings. But also I don't believe that a complete scam project can be at the top of a rating.

[batishta]

I usually trust such ratings. You only need to look at them on proven resources where there is no data manipulation

[BenjaminFranklingwould]

All these sites are dangerous, because they can pursue one's goals. It is better to make your own qualitative analysis by yourself and look for some evaluation from famous bloggers on twitter and youtube for example. But always don't trust anyone but your eyes, check everything.

[PG13]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO rating is just one of many factors of successful ICO and not a guarantee that they will collect enough money with their ratings. Ratings are just made by people and their basis is also in a speculative then it's still prone to mistakes.
For me, a good project with a solid team, a realistic road maps and with active advertising and promotions are the biggest contributors for the success of the ICO.

[Schwifty27]

well i trust some of websites like that but i dont really think about the ratings of the ico.

[Susu xanh]

Many people got fooled by that ICO rating.
been encounter with some ICO that is SOLD Out and Good rating .
i think the ICO for me is great when they are so many Ads around in Internet .
it may help their ICO to be notice and have a good trust and more rating .

[Stormspirit]

I think that you should not rely on the opinions of such sites. The rating there is built on the opinion of the majority of users. But I'm sure only a small part of these users conduct a detailed analysis of ICO.I once chatted with a person, who worked as an expert on Icobench, but he was rather critical of this website. Then I sometimes noticed that their ratings were incorrect, so I don’t trust the ICO ratings except the cases when they coincide between several sites.

[repetecrypto]

Take it with a pinch of salt, you have to pay to get on the website meaning that if the ICO doesn't have a large marketing budget can't afford to be on the website.

[Yana_M1]

I don't really trust the rating of ICO. Although many have the good rating but not in terms of their sales. so it's just as an additional course if for me. the product and the team will determine whether the ICO could not succeed and, if what is done and the results are good then, by all means, ICO will be successful and have a lot of funds.

[homhay]

ICO rating to minimize the failure rate of the current number of ICOs, and for any high rating will surely get investors to invest into the ICO it
So my thinking rating of ICO is very useful for bitcoiner who have joined into cryptocurrency world

[ntrader]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

It depends on person that rate an ICO. for example I belive Ilan and some other persons that rate ICOs but some sites is not trust able and i advise you be aware from the site that you do not know them.

[WhoAmAi]

I still believe in ICO ratings, because that's the only way to see a good coin or not. But my friend said, do not judge coins from ICO ratings

[cryptoicicle]

I do not really trust the rating of sites, but I believe the live rating of the participants more. Good reviews, high attendance and positive reviews about the company.

[Utyg]

To trust or not to trust, I believe this is the business of everyone personally. But first of all, I consider it necessary to personally approach each ISO and disassemble its significance, for the social community or the individuality of the product against the background of the market.

[eolitic]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

 to tell the truth, I have never heard about these websites. But I always use Icodrops.com, i like it a lot, it has all the necessary information + the rating of projects. they also have telegram channel, which is even more convenient to read.

[milada]

It is good criteria red ICO  ratings but then the most important thing is to do own research about the company,product and team and of course try to read in all shadows the white paper.It is a  really important mix this combination.

[tangbori]

Yes I believe in the rating by some ICO rating websites like Icodrop and ICObench. Those two websites have reputable experts in the crypto world that will do research on all the ICO before they give it rating. Most of the time their rating is not 100% sure but their rating do achieve 80-90% sometimes.