[TEK] TEKcoin Hi-PoS hybrid pos/pow no premine/ipo/ico

[thundertoe]

TEKCoin: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4hvzl47knv2a0lf/Tekcoin-Qt.zip?dl=0

Thank you! i posted over on Tek thread, should make some users very happy.

No problem, but let them know that s3v3nh4cks commissioned it.

Mac Wallet for Tek
thanks s3v3nh4cks

[1714967432]

1714967432

[1714967432]

1714967432

[jk9694]

OK, so this error and the error 22 block decode failed are due to the blocktemplate. I am almost sure of that now.  

Thundertoe, can you or any of the other devs please tell me what blocktemplate version TEK uses?

Am I correct in thinking this is still on version 2 as that is what the wallet is giving back?

If so, that is why only stratum-python works with TEK.

EDIT*****

I guess the real question here is what version should be passed when submitting a block.  The getblocktemplate returns version 4.  All of these stratum servers I am looking at are sending 2.

EDIT*****

Sending a 4 didn't help either...  back to the drawing board.

[vancefox]

Biomech:

http://xguild.net/tek/


Here's the pool's address.

I sent them an email through their contact us page but it might be better coming from a Dev or significant player.

Xguild

oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.

ispace.co.uk - TEK pool



i send mesage them

cool. I've contacted miner's point, dsync, and tompool. Central Cavern is down, and Raskul is out of the country for a bit, but I'll let him know in case he's bringing it back.

Any others?

Don't know that one. Can you contact them or post a link?


Also, on buying my stake, I'm not sure I'm selling, but PM me. I'd rather do it off exchange myself.

[David Latapie]

Code:

cd ~/cryptos/TEK && git pull && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make STATIC=1 -f Makefile 

Thanks!

[jk9694]

OK, I give up on a multipool for TEK.  Unless someone is willing to write their own pool software, this just does not seem possible now.  Only MPOS works for a TEK pool and you cant do switching very effectively at all with stratum-python.

If the block submission error is ever solved I will gladly finish my setup of a multipool that pays out in nothing but TEK.  So someone let me know if it ever gets fixed, im headed back to old reliable BTC.

[xhabit]

so, we have also updated today our platform, and is running fine ...

happy mining.

http://poolparty.port-x.de

[jk9694]

Thanks xhabit

Just joined looks good.

[jk9694]

xhabit, you need to check your config for TEK.  The blockreward is 1 coin.

[xhabit]

i,know, but it's don't give more ... in one block stake etc. is activate ... and will pay also

here is the:
BALANCE SUMMARY
Wallet Balance   202.28104400
Locked for users   186.81859110
Unconfirmed   5.00020000
Liquid Assets   15.46245290
PoS New Mint   5.00020000

i'think this is correct ... later the update ...

i'have edit, the reward calc to 1 coin on block ... now it's calc correct the reward TEK/DAY.

[ButtCrack]

Min stake size

Just wondering what do you guys recommend as minimum stack size of coins ?

Since TEK has no max_subsidy unlike CAP or HYP, there is no economical reason to have a particular stack size. I suggest you to keep them al together, you'll stake faster.
If one day TEK implements max_subsidy, then a maximum stack size would make sense (but a minimum size would still not).

presstab, tranz, correct me if I'm wrong.

LOL, I could have saved myself all the trouble.
Anyway, I guess I better change those small stakes into bigger ones.
I guess 4 stacks of 250 would be a lot better, 1 stack per week which means I only have to catch up 1 week of chain sync and hopefully large enough to get reward without too much delay.

[m33]

Min stake size

Just wondering what do you guys recommend as minimum stack size of coins ?

Since TEK has no max_subsidy unlike CAP or HYP, there is no economical reason to have a particular stack size. I suggest you to keep them al together, you'll stake faster.
If one day TEK implements max_subsidy, then a maximum stack size would make sense (but a minimum size would still not).

presstab, tranz, correct me if I'm wrong.

LOL, I could have saved myself all the trouble.
Anyway, I guess I better change those small stakes into bigger ones.
I guess 4 stacks of 250 would be a lot better, 1 stack per week which means I only have to catch up 1 week of chain sync and hopefully large enough to get reward without too much delay.

do you mean 250 will stake better than 50 , and tekcoin now no max supply of coins means we can pos till , it is change , sry new noob .

[B3dr0ck]

by stacks, are you guys having separate wallets for each "stack"?   I don't know of any other way to separate the coins into "stacks".

[m33]

by stacks, are you guys having separate wallets for each "stack"?   I don't know of any other way to separate the coins into "stacks".

I think they mean address 1 stack 1 address

[Whoisthelorax]

well i've done what i think i was supposed to do.

I made sure i had backups of my wallet.dat file in two locations.

I deleted the wallet.dat in my app roaming folder. I downloaded presstab's qt. I ran the qt. I closed the qt. I opened the app roaming folder and removed the new dat file and planted my old wallet.dat file in there. I ran the new Tekcoin client. My coins showed up.


How can we tell if we did it right?

I know over time, of course, we will be able to tell if we aren't staking.

[Biomech]

by stacks, are you guys having separate wallets for each "stack"?   I don't know of any other way to separate the coins into "stacks".

you can combine multiple blocks into one by sending your chosen amount to yourself. any number of blocks can be in the same wallet, even the same address.

Using coin control (which is under the send coins tab) you can choose what blocks to combine, which to exclude. It's fairly simple in it's mechanics. We in the high staking coin community have quite a widespread debate over the best strategies, but the short form is that bigger blocks have a higher chance of staking first than smaller blocks. It all comes down to how you choose to stage them. TEK is a pretty forgiving coin, so do what thou wilt. Some of 'em are picky in what stategies work.

[jdhatch]

I simply backed up the wallet (well the whole directory).
Deleted the old exe and dlls.
Copied in the qt with the static libraries and it runs and syncs.

Did me, not allowing it to run and create a new wallet.dat and then closing and replacing wallet.dat, compromise my configuration?

Thanks, Jason

PS: a build with a new version number would sure make it easier to be more sure that we noobies have properly updated the wallet.

[Biomech]

well i've done what i think i was supposed to do.

I made sure i had backups of my wallet.dat file in two locations.

I deleted the wallet.dat in my app roaming folder. I downloaded presstab's qt. I ran the qt. I closed the qt. I opened the app roaming folder and removed the new dat file and planted my old wallet.dat file in there. I ran the new Tekcoin client. My coins showed up.


How can we tell if we did it right?

I know over time, of course, we will be able to tell if we aren't staking.

You're good. You didn't actually have to delete the wallet file, but that causes no harm. Now you wait for block 506500 like the rest of us

For the tests, we had the fork at an earlier block (which of course would have screwed up the coin if issued live), but other than that, it's the same wallet. Thundertoe and I both staked within a few blocks of the test fork. I think it will be pretty dramatic come the fork I suspect there will be a LOT of orphans the first few days after the fork. Just because there will be so many people competing for stake.

Also, I haven't spoken to the developers yet today, but hopefully the version number thing will be fixed in git. But there's gonna be a majorly upgraded wallet soon, so maybe they'll just let it go. If you got it from Presstab or Argakiig's link, or compiled from the master github link after the announcement, you're good.

[defaced]

block 506550 GET! ^_^

I got so much stake weight its crazy hehe.

[jaggard]

Tompool uses primarily NOMP, stratum-python for a few specific coins that don't cooperate, but I'm almost sure TEK is on the nomp side of things.

And btw, about pools being current -

12:32 jaggard: you did catch the tek wallet update right tommo?
12:44 Tommo: yep did that last Friday or so

OK, I give up on a multipool for TEK.  Unless someone is willing to write their own pool software, this just does not seem possible now.  Only MPOS works for a TEK pool and you cant do switching very effectively at all with stratum-python.

If the block submission error is ever solved I will gladly finish my setup of a multipool that pays out in nothing but TEK.  So someone let me know if it ever gets fixed, im headed back to old reliable BTC.

[Biomech]

Tompool uses primarily NOMP, stratum-python for a few specific coins that don't cooperate, but I'm almost sure TEK is on the nomp side of things.

And btw, about pools being current -

12:32 jaggard: you did catch the tek wallet update right tommo?
12:44 Tommo: yep did that last Friday or so

OK, I give up on a multipool for TEK.  Unless someone is willing to write their own pool software, this just does not seem possible now.  Only MPOS works for a TEK pool and you cant do switching very effectively at all with stratum-python.

If the block submission error is ever solved I will gladly finish my setup of a multipool that pays out in nothing but TEK.  So someone let me know if it ever gets fixed, im headed back to old reliable BTC.

If Tom got it working with NOMP, I'll pay him some tek to post up how. I couldn't do it, Defaced couldn't do it and he's good, and several others who had tried. Most coins Nomp works with without issue, but TEK APPEARS to work but doesn't ever break a block. Has the error that jk9694 found in the error logs.