Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH

[ciang huang]

but if I think it's good and there are also less good effects for ico with the development of erc20-based tokens, because ico is now to introduce the tokens they are developing and selling. but if I myself have seen a bounty that hangs with eth, that is from the bounty portal, the meta hash

[jebul2]

but if I think it's good and there are also less good effects for ico with the development of erc20-based tokens, because ico is now to introduce the tokens they are developing and selling. but if I myself have seen a bounty that hangs with eth, that is from the bounty portal, the meta hash

in your opinion it is very true, bro, if the bounty program is paid with their eth tokens, no one wants to buy because the bounty program specifically introduces their tokens and coins.

[nightfury]

It will be a whole lot prettier if bounty hunters are paid with ETH because we already know how legit and much potential ETH is. But basically, campaigns are offering their tokens as bounty rewards for bounty hunters rather than paying in ethereum. Still, that's fine because you can always trade your bounty tokens to ethereum once it hits cryptoexchange.

[Tamilson]

The idea of giving away their tokens is like giving nothing since they just created it out of nothing

Even they pay nothing but their campaigns will be fully occupied that's why they are not worried to pay with other coins.

It's true and of course paying in their tokens let's them have a token circulation in the market and to be able to be listed in CMC, more likely hitting two birds with one stone.
Paying with eth is a far dream so wake up, nobody on right mind will do this considering a lot of spammers and farm accounts.

If you guys want to paid with btc, go here
Just make sure you're a good poster.

[dzhan]

Of course, Ethereum is better for bounty hunters because it is already listed in exchanges and have a good potential and price, but when you are doing a bounty campaign, you are supposed to support the ICO project, by receiving the rewards in its tokens, and if it is successful it will be profitable too.

[ololajulo]

Of course, Ethereum is better for bounty hunters because it is already listed in exchanges and have a good potential and price, but when you are doing a bounty campaign, you are supposed to support the ICO project, by receiving the rewards in its tokens, and if it is successful it will be profitable too.

The idea is more for the support of the project when you are paid the ICO token as you said, I also think for token with lower than $1, there are higher chances of getting a better reward than with ethereum.

[finaleshot2016]

I also recommend to be paid in BTC rather than in ETH or the project tokens. Why? If we're receiving the tokens, they will just list it on a DEX and probably it has no volume, if there's no volume then it's not profitable.

All of the efforts you've put in the campaign will pop up like a bubble. Unlike in BTC, you can hold your income received from the campaign and also it's a great assurance and will do your best next time.

DEX is the stepping stone of those mofo's scammers and I really hate when they announce about the listing and it'll be on DEX. As of now, I'm still waiting for some tokens  to be listed in CMC and a good P2P exchange like kucoin and binance. Soon enough, BQT will be launch and I think it'll be the one to dominate the DEX.

[changxia]

I always hope that all bounty events will be rewarded with ETH, but this is never possible, because all merchants who issue coins on the market want to make money from the coins they create, not ETH!

[hidrocop]

I really think that projects that don't pay with their own coin are valuable, but very rare projects tend to pay with ethereum. Because many coins are trash, they will give their own coins.

[Armstand]

I really think that projects that don't pay with their own coin are valuable, but very rare projects tend to pay with ethereum. Because many coins are trash, they will give their own coins.

They created their own coin to be used and to replace some top coins, so why would not use it as payment for the bounties, that's the only way to let their created coins known.

[daladno12]

Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.

ANY HUNTER can already get payment in ETH (ETHER), right now. Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5039136.msg46642862#msg46642862

NO NEED to wait 4-6 month, exchange you bounty stakes for ETH immediately when they earned.

[panpine]

If you pay for the ETH bonuses for bonus campaigns, it will certainly be good for the bounty hunter because it does not affect the holder of the ICO. But this is not good for ico builders

[sergiorus]

now way they will pay bounties in ETH.
ether/bitcoin etc are pure money while their tokens are nothing as long as they aren't trading on solid exchanges with good volumes
also there will always be people who are willing to make bounty for tokens, hence no point for teams to change anything

[mazdafunsun]

This is only rational and logical IF the team care about the price of tokens, in 99% team does not actually care thats why they pay in tokens and comes up with hundread of excuses why they ar not doing it. The reality is that they dont care, they just have gathered tons of money and are sitting on it, investors are left to watch how their " asset" is getting mercilessly paunted bby hunters who do not care.

[Arkham Knight]

Only the brave ICO teams would do that. Majority of those projects does not have much money and it's only enough to pay for the team and marketing. I also like to be paid in Eth for assurance but we don't decide on this matter and we should be thankful that we are given this kind of opportunity.

[nadyn]

It is unlikely that this idea will be supported by developers, it makes no sense for them to spend Ethereum, it is easier to pay with their tokens, which may not be worth anything.

[00DKM@]

I think this is a good idea for the project as well as the bounty participants and project support for them. But it should be done when the project has achieved certain success. This will protect the interests and values ​​of investors. However, it is not easy if the project does not actually achieve secure funding. We have no right to judge that decision. They are full of space and they will do everything best because of their project.

[atayating]

This is a very good suggestion for bounty hunters, but ICO projects don't think so, because they are making money from their own tokens. If ETH is used instead of rewards, their tokens will lose value!

[Blamsud]

It is unlikely that this idea will be supported by developers, it makes no sense for them to spend Ethereum, it is easier to pay with their tokens, which may not be worth anything.

They only have their tokens by this time, spending ETH might be a hassle for them, before their companies that paid in BTC and ETH, there are only few who did it with strict rules in able to claim a reward.

[honghe99]

If the bounty can use ETH as a payment method, then I believe that the bounty activity can attract more professional hunters, but sadly most merchants will not accept such an idea!