NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[gs02xzz]

*** Need Community Response ***

Now that Songs of Love has our landing page posted (with their wallet), I want to know how you guys want to handle it moving forward.  One valid concern is since Nxt has a wallet address for donations and Songs of Love has their wallet address posted, people might get confused.  Should we:

Continue to only advertise our wallet?
Transfer the funds to their wallet and use that one in PR?


It's not a big deal either way, just want to address the concern posted and have the community tell us how they want to handle it.


http://www.songsoflove.org/nxt/

+1. BTW they need to make an out transaction to make their account more secure.

[Anon136]

[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.

I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

[martismartis]

[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.

I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Anon, I think I'm sure I am not on forked chain. Check http://217.17.88.5:7874/

[rickyjames]

CfB,

Is there a definition of the bytes in a transaction? I am trying to figure out which ones are AM and which ones are not.
I thought maybe doing a getTransaction call would return what type of transaction it is, but it doesnt seem to.

Where can we get a reference on decoding the bytes of a getTransactionBytes API call?  And is there anyway to get the bytes for an entire block?  Id really like to learn more about the bits/bytes of NXT, can someone point me in the right direction as far as decoding the blockchain?

Today is my first day stumbling around with the API, so not sure of any block format

+1 on this, I am very interested in starting to learn about the block structure too.

[Anon136]

[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.

I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Anon, I think I'm sure I am not on forked chain. Check http://217.17.88.5:7874/

with base targets like those i would tend to agree. i do not think you are on a fork.

[opticalcarrier]

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

dude, the longer you dont author our white paper, the more we will suspect you are BCNext.

[martismartis]

[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.

I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Anon, I think I'm sure I am not on forked chain. Check http://217.17.88.5:7874/

with base targets like those i would tend to agree. i do not think you are on a fork.

OK. So what is the problem? In public node i see errors for not accepting 90% of good blocks, which are good in blockchain, private node and public node.

[Come-from-Beyond]

Nxt is mentioned here - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2393940 (It Will Cost You Nothing to 'Kill' a Proof-of-Stake Crypto-Currency)

Resume of this paper: All PoS coins will die except Nxt coz it's 90% attack-proof.

[rickyjames]

A system has already been created to reward running a public node.  https://www.peerexplorer.com/ (seems to be down right now for maintenance).

Sponsors create caches in the form of small amounts of NXT which are rewarded to registered public nodes.

Hmmm....must have been asleep at my desk when this happened. or it could have got lost in the information tsunami that is this thread.....

...or another thread:
https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,2266.120.html

Obviously I need to get out more......pity the cache system seems to have got gamed/broken.

LOL, probably lost in the tsunami

Looking at the nextcoin.org post, seems he's shutting it down after some recent changes let someone walk away with 4100 NXT...  A real pity.  The peerexplorer.com cache system encouraged me to set up a few extra public VPS nodes.  Hope he reconsiders...

Thinking generally here: we've put a lot of effort into clients, AM, AE, marketing, etc over the last few weeks, but network infrastructure has been put a little to one side, since the massive efforts we made in December/January to get the current infrastructure up and running smoothly.

Looking at the peer explorer :
https://www.peerexplorer.com/
I'm only seeing 399 active nodes right now. One of them is mine, so I am currently responsible for 0.25% of NXTs network.
 Hmmmm......I would feel happier if we had more nodes. 1000 seems like a nice number.

So, what do u guys think? Do we need more nodes ?
How can we encourage more people to run nodes, given that forging revenues are not exactly brilliant right now?

So, I'm really interested in this as I hope to get on the infrastructure committee.  Is Blockexplorer your site?  does it show ALL active nodes at a given time, or just SOME active nodes, or just systems that people have registered that may or may not be on at all right now?  These are basic questions, sorry, but gotta start somewhere learning to get ready to ask the harder questions...

[bitmadaboutcoin]

holy crap this is nuts.. utilities actually breaking into houses to install smart meters? wtf?

http://www.movshare.net/video/ba7120ed1ddf1

[BitcoinForumator]

I think it's wise to listen to this and consider some of the problems of proof of stake they're discussing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt3C8i51mmg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCqyGuDv57Q

Just listen to the whole interview because it's a plethora of good info.

[jl777]

CfB,

I am trying to come up with something that a forging node can do that a non-forging node cannot do. The only thing I have found so far is the numberOfUnlockedAccounts > 0 test, but this can easily be spoofed for someone that wants to pretend to be forging. I am hoping there is something that already exists in the NXT core that would enable a third party to verify that a reporting node was in fact forging. Maybe some sort of encryption calculation that is not done when not forging? It doesn't have to be 100% perfect for now.

I am just trying to make nodecoin that rewards people for forging. I dont want to use NXT transaction to do it, because it is too expensive, so I was just going to use direct connection to coin server. I was hoping that getState's cumulative difficulty wasnt available for non-forging nodes. Then I could just send that in and the coin server could verify it.

James

[bitmadaboutcoin]

do you need nrs open in order to use solaris??

[Come-from-Beyond]

CfB,

I am trying to come up with something that a forging node can do that a non-forging node cannot do. The only thing I have found so far is the numberOfUnlockedAccounts > 0 test, but this can easily be spoofed for someone that wants to pretend to be forging. I am hoping there is something that already exists in the NXT core that would enable a third party to verify that a reporting node was in fact forging. Maybe some sort of encryption calculation that is not done when not forging? It doesn't have to be 100% perfect for now.

I am just trying to make nodecoin that rewards people for forging. I dont want to use NXT transaction to do it, because it is too expensive, so I was just going to use direct connection to coin server. I was hoping that getState's cumulative difficulty wasnt available for non-forging nodes. Then I could just send that in and the coin server could verify it.

James

There is no way to determine if a node forging or not.

[SongsofLove]

On behalf of the Songs of Love Foundation, I would like to than the Nxt community for helping top raise much needed funding for our mission of music. For the last 18 years we have enhanced the lives of sick children and teens by giving them their very own personalized "songs of love". Over 24,000 children have been helped all across the world. You can see us in action on the 60 Minutes News Program at:
www.songsoflove.org/60minutes. Songs of Love and Nxt....making beautiful music together for the children who need a reason to smile.


John Beltzer
President and Founder
Songs of Love Foundation

[Mario123]

Which brings me to some important questions about where are we heading with charity marketing:
Is SoL going to be the "official" NXT charity?
Are we going to make an ongoing commitment to them, or move on to another good cause after we hit the target?
Are multiple charity projects a good idea?
Does any one have any suggestions for another charity to support?

We have two inquiries:

- Ra'ad Charity: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=468258.msg5179240#msg5179240
- SPICES: http://spices.org.my (they emailed me)

Please discuss!

[Sh1n]

Forgive me for having a little too much joy hearing this politically correct answer/reply from BitonicNL on twitter when asked whether they are going to start selling NXT for Euros! I have been buying bitcoins regularly from this site and is a happy customer.

Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/Bitonicnl/statuses/435398282617966592

[ChuckOne]

[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

a
I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.

I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Okay, let me ask you some questions. I put these ones on the table some time ago in my analysis of 'Transparent Forging' and CfB haven't answered it, yet. So, maybe you can.

You said: "The higher the stake involved in forging a block the 'better' the block."

So, how should a node (not the network as every node decides on their own) decide when two blocks are forged: one from account A and one from account B.

Now, there are several cases:
1) A comes first, TF says A is before B => A is on top of chain, B gets rejected when arriving (and vice versa)
2) B comes first, TF says A is before B => A didn't forge => B is on top of chain (and vice versa)

3) 2) happend; A arrived late; what happens? Will B get popped off?

[hlksis]

It would be awesome to get some Nxt Coins for testing. My ID would be 2221954241417961541.

Thank you very much!

[Damelon]

Forgive me for having a little too much joy hearing this politically correct answer/reply from BitonicNL on twitter when asked whether they are going to start selling NXT for Euros! I have been buying bitcoins regularly from this site and is a happy customer.

Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/Bitonicnl/statuses/435398282617966592

Wow!
This would be great!
Bitonic is very good and dependable :-)