|
ZeroTheGreat
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 07:35:39 AM |
|
Sorry, BTT's actually more comfortable for reading. At least for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
wakasaki808
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 07:41:12 AM |
|
Sorry, BTT's actually more comfortable for reading. At least for me. did you try all the different board themes with nxtcrypto?
|
|
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1040
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 07:43:02 AM |
|
Hey I have a question with transaction malleability. From the NXT Wiki: Transaction malleability is an issue with Nxt, as it is with all cryptocurrencies. Do not rely on a transaction ID alone to verify transactions! ... So if an exchange should not rely on just looking for a transactionID, what is the proper method? Do they have to attempt to track sendingAccountID, receivingAccountId, and amount? - there was the CfB's answer: It's a problem only for exchanges that rely solely on transaction id. It doesn't need to be fixed. An exchange is supposed to pay attention to timestamp and other parameters of a transaction.
what parameters ,except timestamp? Amount or ReferencedTransaction.
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | , the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1131
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 07:50:12 AM |
|
I would think ReferencedTransaction would be the most convenient (perhaps being always a previous one that has already confirmed although better not to be hard-coded otherwise it might fail after blockchain pruning).
|
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:16:30 AM |
|
I'm trying to simulate TF using Ian's program if we limit all accounts to a 1% forge balance. Using 100 accounts holding 1% of the currency over a ten year period, I'm getting a combined best streak of ~23. This is combining the first 50 accounts. (These are the accounts assumed to be under the same control.) // Copyright (c) 2014 CIYAM Developers // // Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, please refer to the file license.txt // in the root project directory or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#include <ctime> #include <cmath> #include <cstdlib>
#include <string> #include <vector> #include <sstream> #include <iostream>
//#define NUM_DAYS 1 #define NUM_YEARS 10
#define PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE //#define PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT
//#define SHOW_WINNERS //#define SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT
using namespace std;
const int c_combined_proportion = 2;
#ifndef NUM_YEARS const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * NUM_DAYS; #else const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * 365 * NUM_YEARS; #endif
int main( ) { #ifdef SHOW_WINNERS string winners; #endif vector< int > wins; vector< int > streaks; vector< int > balances; vector< int > penalised; vector< int > penalising; vector< int > best_streak;
vector< int > combined; vector< long > weights;
long total_balance = 0;
int combined_streak = 0; int best_combined_streak = 0;
balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 ); balances.push_back( 1 );
srand( ( unsigned int )time( 0 ) );
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { total_balance += balances[ i ];
wins.push_back( 0 ); weights.push_back( 0 ); streaks.push_back( 0 ); combined.push_back( 0 ); penalised.push_back( 0 ); penalising.push_back( 0 ); best_streak.push_back( 0 ); }
size_t last_winner = 0; for( size_t blocks = 0; blocks < c_num_blocks; blocks++ ) { long total_weight = 0; for( size_t i = 0; i < weights.size( ); i++ ) { if( penalising[ i ] ) { --penalising[ i ]; weights[ i ] = 0; } else { int divisor = rand( ) % 10;
if( divisor == 0 ) ++divisor;
weights[ i ] = ( rand( ) % 10000 ) * ( balances[ i ] / divisor );
if( weights[ i ] == 0 ) ++weights[ i ];
total_weight += weights[ i ]; } }
if( total_weight == 0 ) ++total_weight;
size_t winner = 0; size_t runner_up = 0; long best_target = 0; long second_best_target = 0;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { long adjusted_weight = weights[ i ] * 1000 / total_weight;
if( adjusted_weight > best_target ) { winner = i; best_target = adjusted_weight; } else if( adjusted_weight > second_best_target ) { runner_up = i; second_best_target = adjusted_weight; } }
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE if( best_target == 350 ) // an above median value { ++penalised[ winner ]; penalising[ winner ] = 1440; } #endif
#ifdef PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT if( winner == last_winner ) winner = runner_up; #endif
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS winners += ( char )( 'a' + winner ); # ifdef SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT ostringstream osstr; osstr << best_target; winners += "(" + osstr.str( ) + ")"; # endif #endif ++wins[ winner ];
if( winner < balances.size( ) / c_combined_proportion ) { ++combined_streak; if( combined_streak > best_combined_streak ) best_combined_streak = combined_streak; } else combined_streak = 0;
if( winner == last_winner ) { ++streaks[ winner ]; if( streaks[ winner ] > best_streak[ winner ] ) best_streak[ winner ] = streaks[ winner ]; } else streaks[ winner ] = 0;
last_winner = winner; }
cout << "blocks = " << c_num_blocks << endl;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) cout << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " = " << balances[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS cout << winners << endl; #endif for( size_t i = 0; i < wins.size( ); i++ ) cout << "wins( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << wins[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE for( size_t i = 0; i < penalised.size( ); i++ ) cout << "penalised( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << penalised[ i ] << endl; #endif
for( size_t i = 0; i < best_streak.size( ); i++ ) cout << "best_streak( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << ( best_streak[ i ] + 1 ) << endl;
cout << "best_combined_streak = " << best_combined_streak << endl; cout << "(combined the first " << ( balances.size( ) / c_combined_proportion ) << " accounts)" << endl; cout << balances.size() << endl; }
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:18:33 AM |
|
Just a reminder: BCNext don't want NXT to be a currency. Coins on top of Nxt should be. Does this change anything?
Does this change anything regarding instant confirmation discussion? No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:19:45 AM |
|
did you try all the different board themes with nxtcrypto?
Maybe I'll look for it and'll try it someday. I like use things "as is" very often.
|
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:21:25 AM |
|
did you try all the different board themes with nxtcrypto?
Maybe I'll look for it and'll try it someday. I like use things "as is" very often. Please try out the " prosilver" theme at least, before making a judgement. It is SO much better and will probably be a mind-changer 
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1131
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:26:11 AM |
|
I'm trying to simulate TF using Ian's program if we limit all accounts to a 1% forge balance. Using 100 accounts holding 1% of the currency over a ten year period, I'm getting a combined best streak of ~23. This is combining the first 50 accounts. (These are the accounts assumed to be under the same control.)
That's not too bad at all really - it basically gives us a rough idea that for huge transfer amounts (where you might be concerned with such a possible attack) you would want to require 30+ confirmations (around half the time of the average 6 confirmations for Bitcoin). You might also want to experiment with different amounts of collusion (there should be a constant in the code that is used to determine the proportion of that).
|
|
|
|
leetrump
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
hehe
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:26:24 AM |
|
When the test is completed AE? 
|
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:28:01 AM |
|
Any luck with the decentralized exchange? Seems like a hot buzz word across the crypto community, but not much content.
We are testing it.
|
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:32:24 AM |
|
When the test is completed AE?  When we are confident that it is secure?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wakasaki808
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:34:46 AM |
|
did you try all the different board themes with nxtcrypto?
Maybe I'll look for it and'll try it someday. I like use things "as is" very often. well if you ever decide to and have an account there. Its https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/ucp.php -> "Board Preferences" -> "My board style:" -> Then just look through the 5 different styles available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:47:37 AM |
|
I'm trying to simulate TF using Ian's program if we limit all accounts to a 1% forge balance. Using 100 accounts holding 1% of the currency over a ten year period, I'm getting a combined best streak of ~23. This is combining the first 50 accounts. (These are the accounts assumed to be under the same control.)
That's not too bad at all really - it basically gives us a rough idea that for huge transfer amounts (where you might be concerned with such a possible attack) you would want to require 30+ confirmations (around half the time of the average 6 confirmations for Bitcoin). You might also want to experiment with different amounts of collusion (there should be a constant in the code that is used to determine the proportion of that). I edited the code and added a constant, c_combined_percent, to determine the proportion of accounts in collusion. Assuming all nodes are limited to 1% forge power over a ten year period and a ninety percent collusion rate, I'm getting a combined best streak of 151, 137 and 136 from three runs. // Copyright (c) 2014 CIYAM Developers // // Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, please refer to the file license.txt // in the root project directory or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#include <ctime> #include <cmath> #include <cstdlib>
#include <string> #include <vector> #include <sstream> #include <iostream>
//#define NUM_DAYS 1 #define NUM_YEARS 10
#define PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE //#define PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT
//#define SHOW_WINNERS //#define SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT
using namespace std;
const int c_combined_proportion = 10; const double c_combined_percent = 90;
#ifndef NUM_YEARS const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * NUM_DAYS; #else const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * 365 * NUM_YEARS; #endif
int main( ) { #ifdef SHOW_WINNERS string winners; #endif vector< int > wins; vector< int > streaks; vector< int > balances; vector< int > penalised; vector< int > penalising; vector< int > best_streak;
vector< int > combined; vector< long > weights;
long total_balance = 0;
int combined_streak = 0; int best_combined_streak = 0;
for(int a=0;a<100;a++){ balances.push_back( 1 ); }
srand( ( unsigned int )time( 0 ) );
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { total_balance += balances[ i ];
wins.push_back( 0 ); weights.push_back( 0 ); streaks.push_back( 0 ); combined.push_back( 0 ); penalised.push_back( 0 ); penalising.push_back( 0 ); best_streak.push_back( 0 ); }
size_t last_winner = 0; for( size_t blocks = 0; blocks < c_num_blocks; blocks++ ) { long total_weight = 0; for( size_t i = 0; i < weights.size( ); i++ ) { if( penalising[ i ] ) { --penalising[ i ]; weights[ i ] = 0; } else { int divisor = rand( ) % 10;
if( divisor == 0 ) ++divisor;
weights[ i ] = ( rand( ) % 10000 ) * ( balances[ i ] / divisor );
if( weights[ i ] == 0 ) ++weights[ i ];
total_weight += weights[ i ]; } }
if( total_weight == 0 ) ++total_weight;
size_t winner = 0; size_t runner_up = 0; long best_target = 0; long second_best_target = 0;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { long adjusted_weight = weights[ i ] * 1000 / total_weight;
if( adjusted_weight > best_target ) { winner = i; best_target = adjusted_weight; } else if( adjusted_weight > second_best_target ) { runner_up = i; second_best_target = adjusted_weight; } }
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE if( best_target == 350 ) // an above median value { ++penalised[ winner ]; penalising[ winner ] = 1440; } #endif
#ifdef PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT if( winner == last_winner ) winner = runner_up; #endif
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS winners += ( char )( 'a' + winner ); # ifdef SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT ostringstream osstr; osstr << best_target; winners += "(" + osstr.str( ) + ")"; # endif #endif ++wins[ winner ];
if( winner < (int)((double)balances.size( ) * c_combined_percent / 100.0) ) { ++combined_streak; if( combined_streak > best_combined_streak ) best_combined_streak = combined_streak; } else combined_streak = 0;
if( winner == last_winner ) { ++streaks[ winner ]; if( streaks[ winner ] > best_streak[ winner ] ) best_streak[ winner ] = streaks[ winner ]; } else streaks[ winner ] = 0;
last_winner = winner; }
cout << "blocks = " << c_num_blocks << endl;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) cout << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " = " << balances[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS cout << winners << endl; #endif for( size_t i = 0; i < wins.size( ); i++ ) cout << "wins( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << wins[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE for( size_t i = 0; i < penalised.size( ); i++ ) cout << "penalised( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << penalised[ i ] << endl; #endif
for( size_t i = 0; i < best_streak.size( ); i++ ) cout << "best_streak( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << ( best_streak[ i ] + 1 ) << endl;
cout << "best_combined_streak = " << best_combined_streak << endl; cout << "(combined the first " << ( (double)balances.size( ) * c_combined_percent / 100.0 ) << " accounts)" << endl; cout << balances.size() << endl; }
|
|
|
|
|
Labteck
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:57:37 AM |
|
This 2000 post thrad is madness...please consider to CLOSE IT, with a last message like "go to forum nxccrypto" or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 08:59:21 AM |
|
I'm trying to simulate TF using Ian's program if we limit all accounts to a 1% forge balance. Using 100 accounts holding 1% of the currency over a ten year period, I'm getting a combined best streak of ~23. This is combining the first 50 accounts. (These are the accounts assumed to be under the same control.)
That's not too bad at all really - it basically gives us a rough idea that for huge transfer amounts (where you might be concerned with such a possible attack) you would want to require 30+ confirmations (around half the time of the average 6 confirmations for Bitcoin). You might also want to experiment with different amounts of collusion (there should be a constant in the code that is used to determine the proportion of that). I edited the code and added a constant, c_combined_percent, to determine the proportion of accounts in collusion. Assuming all nodes are limited to 1% forge power over a ten year period and a ninety percent collusion rate, I'm getting a combined best streak of 151, 137 and 136 from three runs. Compare this to allowing an unlimited amount of forging power per account. If you assign ninety-one percent of the currency to one account and run the test over a ten year period, the account with 91% of the currency gets best streak of 468, 419, 415. These streaks are three times longer than if you limit accounts to 1% forging power. // Copyright (c) 2014 CIYAM Developers // // Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, please refer to the file license.txt // in the root project directory or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
#include <ctime> #include <cmath> #include <cstdlib>
#include <string> #include <vector> #include <sstream> #include <iostream>
//#define NUM_DAYS 1 #define NUM_YEARS 10
#define PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE //#define PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT
//#define SHOW_WINNERS //#define SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT
using namespace std;
const int c_combined_proportion = 10;
#ifndef NUM_YEARS const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * NUM_DAYS; #else const size_t c_num_blocks = 1440 * 365 * NUM_YEARS; #endif
int main( ) { #ifdef SHOW_WINNERS string winners; #endif vector< int > wins; vector< int > streaks; vector< int > balances; vector< int > penalised; vector< int > penalising; vector< int > best_streak;
vector< int > combined; vector< long > weights;
long total_balance = 0;
int combined_streak = 0; int best_combined_streak = 0;
for(int a=0;a<9;a++){ balances.push_back( 1 ); } balances.push_back(91);
srand( ( unsigned int )time( 0 ) );
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { total_balance += balances[ i ];
wins.push_back( 0 ); weights.push_back( 0 ); streaks.push_back( 0 ); combined.push_back( 0 ); penalised.push_back( 0 ); penalising.push_back( 0 ); best_streak.push_back( 0 ); }
size_t last_winner = 0; for( size_t blocks = 0; blocks < c_num_blocks; blocks++ ) { long total_weight = 0; for( size_t i = 0; i < weights.size( ); i++ ) { if( penalising[ i ] ) { --penalising[ i ]; weights[ i ] = 0; } else { int divisor = rand( ) % 10;
if( divisor == 0 ) ++divisor;
weights[ i ] = ( rand( ) % 10000 ) * ( balances[ i ] / divisor );
if( weights[ i ] == 0 ) ++weights[ i ];
total_weight += weights[ i ]; } }
if( total_weight == 0 ) ++total_weight;
size_t winner = 0; size_t runner_up = 0; long best_target = 0; long second_best_target = 0;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) { long adjusted_weight = weights[ i ] * 1000 / total_weight;
if( adjusted_weight > best_target ) { winner = i; best_target = adjusted_weight; } else if( adjusted_weight > second_best_target ) { runner_up = i; second_best_target = adjusted_weight; } }
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE if( best_target == 350 ) // an above median value { ++penalised[ winner ]; penalising[ winner ] = 1440; } #endif
#ifdef PREVENT_IMMEDIATE_REPEAT if( winner == last_winner ) winner = runner_up; #endif
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS winners += ( char )( 'a' + winner ); # ifdef SHOW_WINNERS_WEIGHT ostringstream osstr; osstr << best_target; winners += "(" + osstr.str( ) + ")"; # endif #endif ++wins[ winner ];
if( winner < balances.size( ) / c_combined_proportion ) { ++combined_streak; if( combined_streak > best_combined_streak ) best_combined_streak = combined_streak; } else combined_streak = 0;
if( winner == last_winner ) { ++streaks[ winner ]; if( streaks[ winner ] > best_streak[ winner ] ) best_streak[ winner ] = streaks[ winner ]; } else streaks[ winner ] = 0;
last_winner = winner; }
cout << "blocks = " << c_num_blocks << endl;
for( size_t i = 0; i < balances.size( ); i++ ) cout << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " = " << balances[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef SHOW_WINNERS cout << winners << endl; #endif for( size_t i = 0; i < wins.size( ); i++ ) cout << "wins( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << wins[ i ] << endl;
#ifdef PENALISE_HIGHER_STAKE for( size_t i = 0; i < penalised.size( ); i++ ) cout << "penalised( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << penalised[ i ] << endl; #endif
for( size_t i = 0; i < best_streak.size( ); i++ ) cout << "best_streak( " << ( char )( 'a' + i ) << " ) = " << ( best_streak[ i ] + 1 ) << endl;
cout << "best_combined_streak = " << best_combined_streak << endl; cout << "(combined the first " << ( balances.size( ) / c_combined_proportion ) << " accounts)" << endl; cout << balances.size() << endl; }
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1131
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:02:08 AM Last edit: February 28, 2014, 09:13:22 AM by CIYAM Open |
|
I edited the code and added a constant, c_combined_percent, to determine the proportion of accounts in collusion. Assuming all nodes are limited to 1% forge power over a ten year period and a ninety percent collusion rate, I'm getting a combined best streak of 151, 137 and 136 from three runs.
That's really not too bad either - less than the time it takes to watch a LOTR film to be able to safely buy a house or other big investment even if 90% of the forging power is trying to secretly forge a replacement blockchain!
|
|
|
|
|
zorke
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:16:56 AM |
|
The two top 50M accounts!! What is their deal? Why are they not sharing their wealth or participating in the progress of their investment. I mean if we consider that the account No. 3 and No. 4 are DGEX and BTER that means they have almost double amount of coins compared to account No. 5 which has about 29M. That is a huge difference. Honestly I would be really ashamed if I was them and I am sure these two 50M amounts are poke in the eye to any new investor that looks our distribution just like they are poking my eye.
Heck, to start at least get your accounts under 50M so they are in the 40s or divide this 50M into two accounts of 25M, it will definitely look better for newcomers. I really don't understand this!!
|
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit_Disgrace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:23:47 AM |
|
The two top 50M accounts!! What is their deal? Why are they not sharing their wealth or participating in the progress of their investment. I mean if we consider that the account No. 3 and No. 4 are DGEX and BTER that means they have almost double amount of coins compared to account No. 5 which has about 29M. That is a huge difference. Honestly I would be really ashamed if I was them and I am sure these two 50M amounts are poke in the eye to any new investor that looks our distribution just like they are poking my eye.
Heck, to start at least get your accounts under 50M so they are in the 40s or divide this 50M into two accounts of 25M, it will definitely look better for newcomers. I really don't understand this!!
+ 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
swartzfeger
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:28:30 AM |
|
This 2000 post thrad is madness...please consider to CLOSE IT, with a last message like "go to forum nxccrypto" or something like that.
No. Nostalgie de la boue. It's messy and fine just like it is. You organized neat freaks can admire your manicured threads over at nxtcrypto 
|
|
|
|
|
|