Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2024, 02:04:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 [2030] 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761621 times)
morigu777
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:16:42 PM
 #40581

BTC38 is asking about which coin to add next on their exchange. Please take a few minutes to let them know about Nxt:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501963.msg5525645#msg5525645



Don't forget to vote on what should btc38 add Smiley
igmaca
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:17:09 PM
Last edit: March 05, 2014, 04:28:28 PM by igmaca
 #40582

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.


Instead of leasing forge power or Pooled Forging , you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful (with special conditions like committing to run the node for some time, ...).

TEXT



Why do you always overwhelm the community with so much text?

And why do you post my text Grin

I don't get your idea, or I get it. I don't know.

Instead of leasing forge power, you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful (with special conditions like committing to run the node for some time, ...). Could this be done with AT and would that make sense?

sorry  Wink, because in my humble opinion all the explanation resolves this

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/10829/impossible-trinity-security-environment-protection-decentralization/

.....

Here I propose a ternary paradox, that the natures of decentralization, security and environment protection constitute an impossible trinity. (Graph 2) A crypto-currency which is both environmentally-friendly and secured would definitely need to be centralized, like PPcoin, Nextcoin and Ripple. These coins either contain aspects of centralized structure, or their decentralized structure is not sustainable, with a Paypal-like centralized verification mechanism. A crypto-currency which is both environmentally-friendly and decentralized would be unsecured, like P2P currencies of ‘one-IP-address-one-vote,’ which are already excluded by Satoshi. He believed that if the majority were based on ‘one-IP-address-one-vote,’ it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs.5 If one designs a secured decentralized currency, it must come with the cost of consuming energy and calculation power. PoW is the first solution to construct a verification system in the form of decentralization, and will probably be the only one.


with share fee pools this not occurs.

Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes but in reality will be many more) and therefore very secure network
Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day not every 10 year)
rich and poor have the same chance to forge because everybody forge everyday!!!!
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250

AKA jefdiesel


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:19:13 PM
 #40583

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.

As long as the big account holders dont pool their forging, it seems LIKE A SERIOUS RISK

However, if we had nodecoin, that would let the small accounts gain daily rewards that they can see. I think that is what most people want to see. We can then just put in bids in AE for nodecoin so that it is actually worth NXT

Instead of pooled forging, can you port over multisig? That is much more important than pooled forging, since there are alternate solutions for that. Multisig is pretty fundamental.

James

FIFY

SN
S   U   P   E   R    N   E   T
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   
Uniting cryptocurrencies, Rewarding talent, Sharing benefits..

Blockchain Technology.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:21:31 PM
 #40584

What for?

Not everyone can process 1000 tps.
abuelau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500


www.coinschedule.com


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:22:43 PM
 #40585

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.

As long as the big account holders dont pool their forging, it seems LIKE A SERIOUS RISK

However, if we had nodecoin, that would let the small accounts gain daily rewards that they can see. I think that is what most people want to see. We can then just put in bids in AE for nodecoin so that it is actually worth NXT

Instead of pooled forging, can you port over multisig? That is much more important than pooled forging, since there are alternate solutions for that. Multisig is pretty fundamental.

James

FIFY


For the stakeholders pooliing their NXT: The API for forging rights should have this hardcoded. No account can have more than, say 10% of total forging power associated to it.

Know what's happening in cryptoworld: www.coinschedule.com
abuelau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500


www.coinschedule.com


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:23:58 PM
 #40586

What for?

Not everyone can process 1000 tps.

So the node that has the account that received forging power process more TX? Hmm... I hadn't though about this! This means that whoever is receiving forging power will spend more money with hardware that can handle all the TX. How do we know if this will ROI?

Know what's happening in cryptoworld: www.coinschedule.com
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:24:39 PM
 #40587

What for?

Not everyone can process 1000 tps.

Before people shout "Nxt will never come to 1000 transactions per second in the next months/years", don't forget that Nxt is more than a currency. What people will do with it... we don't know yet.
pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:26:48 PM
 #40588

I personally consider wesleys client as standard client, when it is implemented in the code from J-L, and with the installer from mistafreeze this is the best we can get.

easy to use one click installation. AFAIK wesleyh and J-L are in the proces of integrating the client as we speak.

so lets put our effort to promote that.

Yes, that is what I am telling here for hours Smiley

+1 for Wesleys as standard. But this one click installation - is this open source and necessary?

It is open source and yes it is necessary for average Joe.

It is the only thing of holding us to go out and promote NXT properly

brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250

AKA jefdiesel


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:27:43 PM
 #40589

Hey guys! I'm allwelder's friend.
If you want the price of NXT pumping up,
please go to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501963.0 to vote NXT!!!
Www.btc38.com is the biggest Altcoins exchange in China.
It will be a great news to NXT if the site launch NXT!!!

Please!!!


Vote!

Expect the question; How are we going to implement NXT at BTC38?

Or have we learned from the past and made an instruction?

Whoever is our Chinese rep for NXT(I believe we have one right?) should work with opticalc or someone along those lines to help btc38 implement it if it comes to that.

Alright. We shouldn't let this be the second Mintpal disaster.

I think we will win this vote, so we have to prepare ourselves.

BTC38 is very important.

Mintpal wasn't a disaster. They proved they are jokes. They want to make money off the busiest coins, without doing any work to understand or support the community.
BTC38 seems a more serious site, but it's not like the bad old days of DGex and no one else. We have 5 markets trading NXT now, and we're doing fine.

Markets need products to buy. These exchanges NEED NXT.  

SN
S   U   P   E   R    N   E   T
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   
Uniting cryptocurrencies, Rewarding talent, Sharing benefits..

Blockchain Technology.

ShroomsKit_Disgrace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:28:26 PM
 #40590

+1 for Wesleys as standard. But this one click installation - is this open source and necessary?

Yes, it is open source. Yes it is necessary for the ordinary user. Why don´t you like it?

Didn't test it.

It looks very sexy and is very easy. It installt everythinbg for you and opens up the webui. Very cool stuff. And it is only 0.5Mbyte.

Is this only Win?

Yes. Please check it out:

https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,1902.0.html


When the download is complete the installation wizard says "SHA-256 Checksums don't match!. Exiting the setup"

Is everybody having this problem? Thanks!
Fatih87SK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:31:04 PM
 #40591

Hey guys! I'm allwelder's friend.
If you want the price of NXT pumping up,
please go to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501963.0 to vote NXT!!!
Www.btc38.com is the biggest Altcoins exchange in China.
It will be a great news to NXT if the site launch NXT!!!

Please!!!


Vote!

Expect the question; How are we going to implement NXT at BTC38?

Or have we learned from the past and made an instruction?

Whoever is our Chinese rep for NXT(I believe we have one right?) should work with opticalc or someone along those lines to help btc38 implement it if it comes to that.

Alright. We shouldn't let this be the second Mintpal disaster.

I think we will win this vote, so we have to prepare ourselves.

BTC38 is very important.

Mintpal wasn't a disaster. They proved they are jokes. They want to make money off the busiest coins, without doing any work to understand or support the community.
BTC38 seems a more serious site, but it's not like the bad old days of DGex and no one else. We have 5 markets trading NXT now, and we're doing fine.

Markets need products to buy. These exchanges NEED NXT.  

I know mate. We don't need Mintpal.

BTC38 on the other hand can give NXT a new boost.

pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:33:12 PM
 #40592

What for?

Not everyone can process 1000 tps.

please stop talking about 1000 tps, it is wishfull thinking from BCNext.

Mistafreeze
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 897
Merit: 284



View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:33:38 PM
 #40593

+1 for Wesleys as standard. But this one click installation - is this open source and necessary?

Yes, it is open source. Yes it is necessary for the ordinary user. Why don´t you like it?

Didn't test it.

It looks very sexy and is very easy. It installt everythinbg for you and opens up the webui. Very cool stuff. And it is only 0.5Mbyte.

Is this only Win?

Yes. Please check it out:

https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,1902.0.html


When the download is complete the installation wizard says "SHA-256 Checksums don't match!. Exiting the setup"

Is everybody having this problem? Thanks!

I just downloaded it from the link and tried it with no issue...maybe the zip got corrupted during the download?

Have you tried it again?
pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:35:14 PM
 #40594

Call for more java developers:

We need more developers to help work on the core! CFB is leaving in 1 month and we can't just have Jean-Luc do everything.

Is anyone here qualified to help?

First possible feature that could be done, (talked about it with CFB), is adding a category field to Arbitrary Messages. This will allow us a lot of extra functionality, like decentralized stores, reputation system and so on. It should not be too hard to add this extra field. Is anyone up to the job? Unfortunately I do not know java myself.

If others have suggestions for Nxt, please make Nxt improvement proposals. See here for more info: http://www.thenxtwiki.org/wiki/NIP:Nxt_Improvement_Proposals

It appears the NIP process is not yet complete, we need a contact person or a simple method of allowing anyone to add NIP's.



About NIP(Nxt_Improvement_Proposals) procedure, I think NXTtechdevfund Committee should decide.

Correct me if I'm wrong!

+1 this is pure DEV dicisions so they can make the procedure.

bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:35:42 PM
 #40595

What for?

Not everyone can process 1000 tps.

please stop talking about 1000 tps, it is wishfull thinking from BCNext.

Pinarello, Nxt as a decentralized platform could become huge, not (only) as a currency. Imagine, we have zero fees.

Ah, right...

We should activate the incentive and fee discussion again Grin
martismartis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1005


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:38:13 PM
 #40596

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.


Current NXT circulation:
1. Buy NXT from initial stakeholder.
2. Register alias / send message / issue asset and pay fee to stakeholder.
3. Goto :1

As I always said, forging was created for stakeholders. You (community) always said that "when we'll have more transactions, fees would be better distributed". False! Forging is not dependent on fee in expected block. The only thing that will change is that stakeholders would get back their sold NXT faster.

Nxt is good platform. It is another P2P software like Bittorent. We need to find another way to prevent spam and get rid of NXT.

I would like to offer an experiment:

Please 1M NXT and above holders stop forging for 3 days. Lets make countdown of 72 hours and lets forgers with less than 1M NXT post their results of forging during these 72 hours.

 Grin Grin Grin

Isildur23
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:41:55 PM
 #40597

yeah right, nxt and his awesome initial distribution.

That make sense

I remember u!

Thanks a lot.

Nxt is doing great.

U should maybe delete the adress in the op. Noobs can be tempted to not read that it's disabled and send more coins.

Cheers

I am sorry, I guess it hurts to sell at 0.000001 and then price rises to 0.00008. Sorry!

Ties are a prison for the soul...
chanc3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 253



View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:44:37 PM
 #40598

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.


Instead of leasing forge power or Pooled Forging , you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful (with special conditions like committing to run the node for some time, ...).

share fee group (share fee pool or share fee Hubs) and limiting forging power of an account to 1.000.000 Nxt coin maximum . this means 10.000 nodes to ensure minimum network

Now imagine if I am correct with 1,000,000 Nxt coins pools (share fee group)

1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin
1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool (share fee group)

10 accounts  90.000 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging
10 accounts  9.900 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging
10 accounts  100 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging

Total pool (share fee group) 1.000.000 Nxt
Total 30 Nodes participate in forging in this exemple

Chance to forge 0,001
rate forging 1440 blocs per day
526 Blocs per year
aprox 1,44 Blocs per day. 100 Nxt account is forging every day. receives fees in proportion to their funds every day!!!

1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin
1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool (share fee group)
30.000 Nodes participate in forging. if there are only 30 accounts linked per pool (share fee group)

this means;

Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes) and therefore very secure network
Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day not every 10 year)
rich and poor have the same chance to forge because everybody forge everyday!!!!

You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive.

An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power
Other interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased memory storage capacity

Perhaps creating nodes coins proposed by jl777 implementing shared  fees pool  would be technically easier.

Could distribute node coins to the participants in the pool (share fee group) at all times proportion to the funds of each participant if any member had success in forging


I really like this idea because your node still has to be online to be part of the shared group.
It retains the decentralisation and number of nodes.
Forging is a bit like bingo/lottery anyway rather than mining and it smooths out the impact of penalty and people pool hopping if the pool was based on a single node...
So generally in stead of buying a single big ticket you are offering to share your ticket and any winnings with lots of others and vice versa
Penalties would only affect the nodes in the shared pool an would not take huge chunks of NXT out of the forging balance in one go by taking a whole pool out.

brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250

AKA jefdiesel


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:47:53 PM
 #40599

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.


Current NXT circulation:
1. Buy NXT from initial stakeholder.
2. Register alias / send message / issue asset and pay fee to stakeholder.
3. Goto :1

As I always said, forging was created for stakeholders. You (community) always said that "when we'll have more transactions, fees would be better distributed". False! Forging is not dependent on fee in expected block. The only thing that will change is that stakeholders would get back their sold NXT faster.

Nxt is good platform. It is another P2P software like Bittorent. We need to find another way to prevent spam and get rid of NXT.

I would like to offer an experiment:

Please 1M NXT and above holders stop forging for 3 days. Lets make countdown of 72 hours and lets forgers with less than 1M NXT post their results of forging during these 72 hours.

 Grin Grin Grin


I have an experiment, Hey Russia (or USA) why dont you turn off your Radar and Drones and ICBM for 72 hours and we can see how many people can do stupid ass shit while your security is down. Oh wait? its your MONEY we're messing with? NM

SN
S   U   P   E   R    N   E   T
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   
Uniting cryptocurrencies, Rewarding talent, Sharing benefits..

Blockchain Technology.

igmaca
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 05, 2014, 04:49:05 PM
Last edit: March 05, 2014, 05:04:36 PM by igmaca
 #40600

More I think about Pooled Forging, more I don't like it. Does anyone have any ideas where this could lead to? Won't we face the same problem as Bitcoin (GHash)?

I put refactoring on hold until the community decides that it's safe for Nxt.


Instead of leasing forge power or Pooled Forging , you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful (with special conditions like committing to run the node for some time, ...).

share fee group (share fee pool or share fee Hubs) and limiting forging power of an account to 1.000.000 Nxt coin maximum . this means 10.000 nodes to ensure minimum network

Now imagine if I am correct with 1,000,000 Nxt coins pools (share fee group)

1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin
1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool (share fee group)

10 accounts  90.000 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging
10 accounts  9.900 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging
10 accounts  100 Nxt 10 Node participate in forging

Total pool (share fee group) 1.000.000 Nxt
Total 30 Nodes participate in forging in this exemple

Chance to forge 0,001
rate forging 1440 blocs per day
526 Blocs per year
aprox 1,44 Blocs per day. 100 Nxt account is forging every day. receives fees in proportion to their funds every day!!!

1.000.000.000 Nxt Coin
1.000.000 Nxt Coin per pool (share fee group)
30.000 Nodes participate in forging. if there are only 30 accounts linked per pool (share fee group)

this means;

Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes) and therefore very secure network
Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day not every 10 year)
rich and poor have the same chance to forge because everybody forge everyday!!!!

You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive.

An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power
Other interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased memory storage capacity

Perhaps creating nodes coins proposed by jl777 implementing shared  fees pool  would be technically easier.

Could distribute node coins to the participants in the pool (share fee group) at all times proportion to the funds of each participant if any member had success in forging


I really like this idea because your node still has to be online to be part of the shared group.
It retains the decentralisation and number of nodes.
Forging is a bit like bingo/lottery anyway rather than mining and it smooths out the impact of penalty and people pool hopping if the pool was based on a single node...
So generally in stead of buying a single big ticket you are offering to share your ticket and any winnings with lots of others
Penalties would only affect the nodes in the shared pool an would not take huge chunks of NXT out of the forging balance in one go by taking a whole pool out.

exact  Smiley

You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive.

An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power
Other interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased memory storage capacity

Imagine now that someone decides to attack the " shared fee pools " and has success. (Or government or central power closes some "shared fee pools")

The only thing that happens is that it temporarily stop for shared allocation of fees.
As shared liquidation fees can be made instantly for each block forged. economic losses are negligible.
As power forging is fully decentralized network security is not compromised at all
Fees again fall entirely to the account that has already forged a successful block.

when the attack are Overcomes on the "shared fee pools" it is reactivated shared allocation of fees without major problems.

What use could also have share fee pools?

Could be gateways for Fiat currencies until the new economy adopts  massively crypto currencies
Therefore we could add value to 10,000 VPS nodes (hubs) scattered around the world
Pages: « 1 ... 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 [2030] 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!