Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 08:51:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 [1958] 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761529 times)
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:43:29 AM
 #39141

New version of my Nxt client online at http://nxtra.org/nxt-client/

Not sure if it's a client bug or AE bug.  I placed an Asset sell order, cancelled the order, Asset returned to my account, then went to place another sell order for same Asset and it says "Not enough funds or incorrect password"

I assume that is an AE bug, I have had those insufficient funds messages in all clients.
1714855902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714855902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714855902
Reply with quote  #2

1714855902
Report to moderator
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2014, 10:44:33 AM
 #39142

This colossal thread is unwieldy, I agree. But before closing it, you should create threads for every large topic (voting/AE gateway/forging) discussed here, so people know where to go to.

All the topics we are discussing here are interweaved. To split them in separate topics is counter productive.
I agree. It will make it a lot more work for generalists who like to follow all the different things. Speciality subthreads get 1% the activity.


http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Isildur23
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:50:30 AM
 #39143

That will be dumbest thing. People will not magically move to other forums just because this thread is locked. They will just spend times in other coins threads

How about creating topic-specific threads in this forum? Wouldn't it be better?

We have:
[ANN] Anon136's Silver Bullion NXT Gateway

Nxt :: NXTcash - progress and discussion  

Nxt full feature clients - progress tracking thread  

Nxt marketing & promotion :: Infographics and Articles Bounties

Nxt web service providers - progress tracking thread

Nxt source code flaw reports

Ties are a prison for the soul...
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:51:23 AM
 #39144

I agree. It will make it a lot more work for generalists who like to follow all the different things. Speciality subthreads get 1% the activity.

It is not only more work. We maybe miss great ideas or interdependence problems if we don't have this big central thread.

If we split into different topics we adapt idea-creating methods of Microsoft and General Motors. But we should be Apple.
salsacz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 504


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:53:45 AM
 #39145

Visit also: Nxt full feature clients, Nxt web service providers, Nxt security and user interface, Nxt open source code flaw report
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:57:00 AM
 #39146

DOGE Gateway --

Guys, please test this. It's like magic (except that it's science + hard work).

I set up a DOGE account for testing purposes at dogevault.com, as I didn't want to spend hours syncing my main QT wallet. I sent 10 DOGE from my online wallet to the gateway address; after a few confirms, it appeared (magic!) in my assets (I'm using wesleyh's test client).

Then I transferred 5 back. After a few confirmations, there is was in the wallet. Like magic. And I still had my remaining 5 still safely ensconced in My Assets.

Very slick.

Send James a PM with your testNXT acct number and your DOGE acct number if you can't compile the multigateway dogeaddr app.
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:01:36 AM
 #39147

DOGE Gateway --

Guys, please test this. It's like magic (except that it's science + hard work).

I set up a DOGE account for testing purposes at dogevault.com, as I didn't want to spend hours syncing my main QT wallet. I sent 10 DOGE from my online wallet to the gateway address; after a few confirms, it appeared (magic!) in my assets (I'm using wesleyh's test client).

Then I transferred 5 back. After a few confirmations, there is was in the wallet. Like magic. And I still had my remaining 5 still safely ensconced in My Assets.

Very slick.

Send James a PM with your testNXT acct number and your DOGE acct number if you can't compile the multigateway dogeaddr app.



Thank's .
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2014, 11:06:26 AM
 #39148

DOGE Gateway --

Guys, please test this. It's like magic (except that it's science + hard work).

I set up a DOGE account for testing purposes at dogevault.com, as I didn't want to spend hours syncing my main QT wallet. I sent 10 DOGE from my online wallet to the gateway address; after a few confirms, it appeared (magic!) in my assets (I'm using wesleyh's test client).

Then I transferred 5 back. After a few confirmations, there is was in the wallet. Like magic. And I still had my remaining 5 still safely ensconced in My Assets.

Very slick.

Send James a PM with your testNXT acct number and your DOGE acct number if you can't compile the multigateway dogeaddr app.
We need to try to crash the gateway, or get it to deadlock. Simultaneous deposits,withdraws. Try fractions, I think you will be surprised. Ive designed the dataflow so that even if the gateway crashes, it restores its state by processing the blockchain, so its pretty fault tolerant. I am not using any database, just tracking pending deposit/withdrawal.

I see all three servers syncing up and processing the withdrawals. Thats the part that is really slick, it is doing all this using multisig. Do you know how painful it is to create valid rawtransactions?

James

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Jerical13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:07:48 AM
 #39149

I would help out with marketing too if I could help. Would love to.

And regarding the actual functioning of the gateway, if there is a holding account for these external assets, I was thinking: if it were possible to create a wallet client or modify the current wallet client to allow for holding and sending and receiving AE internal assets (both user created and the ones created by your gateway) it would be possible to kind of hijack the external assets and keep them in our network. I don't know if it would be possible, but if you would have time to download and check out the alt coin "bitgem" client to see an example of what I mean. basically this client allows for holding and sending and receiving multiple versions of coins with multiple values. I know that there is a lot you have going on, and that there is a lot going on with working out the basic functionality of NXT, but this might be something that could be implemented in the future, that would really strengthen our network. If people could spend there own self generated assets and spend NXTDoge on our network....
More people helping is always good!

Not sure exactly what you mean, but the NXT AE "My Assets" is basically a wallet for all types of NXT assets including the ones that represent other crypto. If you mean directly sending DOGE to a different address, that would be possible, but I think opens up a security issue as there is no protection when using transfer asset.

Changing the withdraw address is currently only allowed by an AM with the NXT acct in the "sender" field, which I am pretty sure cannot be changed without invalidating the block.

James

Maybe what I am talking about is already possible with the AE and I am not seeing it. but what I mean is instead of someone sending their newly acquired NXTDoge back through the gateway to their Doge wallet, If there were a NXTDoge wallet or an internal asset wallet that any asset could sent to they could send and receive Doge or any other asset within the NXT network and not have to send it back through the gateway. Don't trouble yourself over it is probably just a pipe dream, and the AE is already capable of doing it. I will just play around with it some more and try to figure it out. I will try to post a screen shot of the "Bitgem" coin client for you to see what I mean though.
antanst
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 260


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:09:23 AM
 #39150

I agree. It will make it a lot more work for generalists who like to follow all the different things. Speciality subthreads get 1% the activity.

It is not only more work. We maybe miss great ideas or interdependence problems if we don't have this big central thread.

Why miss them? It's easier to follow separate threads. Following a huge thread like this creates ample missing opportunities, at least for those who don't have hours to spare every day scanning for posts that interest them. I bet I'm not the only one that has missed interesting posts in this thread, some of which I felt lucky to have noticed them quoted later.

If we split into different topics we adapt idea-creating methods of Microsoft and General Motors. But we should be Apple.

I'm not an Apple employee, but I can guess that they don't coordinate in a huge forum thread :-)

bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:17:58 AM
 #39151

If we split into different topics we adapt idea-creating methods of Microsoft and General Motors. But we should be Apple.

I'm not an Apple employee, but I can guess that they don't coordinate in a huge forum thread :-)


put A-players in a room and let them talk. Much better than committees and subcommittees and memos and shit.

Well, there are pros and cons for both.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2014, 11:26:56 AM
 #39152

speak of the devil. I just lost internet and all my ssh sessions got terminated along with all three of the gateways. I think there were a few pending transactions, so this is a good test to see if recreating the state from blockchain is working.

I am having some server issues, they keep saying "bind() failed: Address already in use", but all prior instances have been gone for a while...

Edit: OK, all three gateways are rescanning blockchain, just from the first possible timestamp

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:30:23 AM
 #39153

speak of the devil. I just lost internet and all my ssh sessions got terminated along with all three of the gateways. I think there were a few pending transactions, so this is a good test to see if recreating the state from blockchain is working.

I am having some server issues, they keep saying "bind() failed: Address already in use", but all prior instances have been gone for a while...

Edit: OK, all three gateways are rescanning blockchain, just from the first possible timestamp

Could that have been why I was just seeing 'not enough funds' when trying to send DOGE back to my wallet?

I'll try sending back/forth again after my confirmations complete.
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:33:56 AM
 #39154

speak of the devil. I just lost internet and all my ssh sessions got terminated along with all three of the gateways. I think there were a few pending transactions, so this is a good test to see if recreating the state from blockchain is working.

I am having some server issues, they keep saying "bind() failed: Address already in use", but all prior instances have been gone for a while...

Edit: OK, all three gateways are rescanning blockchain, just from the first possible timestamp

Could that have been why I was just seeing 'not enough funds' when trying to send DOGE back to my wallet?

I'll try sending back/forth again after my confirmations complete.

It' a bug  in the Nxt server :

Example :

Quote
{"balance":684600,"effectiveBalance":684600,"unconfirmedBalance":684300}
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:39:57 AM
 #39155

speak of the devil. I just lost internet and all my ssh sessions got terminated along with all three of the gateways. I think there were a few pending transactions, so this is a good test to see if recreating the state from blockchain is working.

I am having some server issues, they keep saying "bind() failed: Address already in use", but all prior instances have been gone for a while...

Edit: OK, all three gateways are rescanning blockchain, just from the first possible timestamp

Could that have been why I was just seeing 'not enough funds' when trying to send DOGE back to my wallet?

I'll try sending back/forth again after my confirmations complete.

It' a bug  in the Nxt server :

Example :

Quote
{"balance":684600,"effectiveBalance":684600,"unconfirmedBalance":684300}

I had 905 DOGE, and it wouldn't let me send 905, or 904, but it let me send 900.

The 900 I transferred back still haven't appeared in my wallet (tx id 6241877687289801711), but the AE appears to be down... no assets are listed, but My Assets appears to be correct.

edit: never mind, spoke too soon. All is good.

wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:41:48 AM
 #39156

The 900 I transferred back still haven't appeared in my wallet (tx id 6241877687289801711), but the AE appears to be down... no assets are listed, but My Assets appears to be correct.

Works here, which client are you using ? mine? If so, any javascript errors in the console?
Emule
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:42:40 AM
 #39157


I would like to have an audit on the DGEX exchange to prevent mtgox scenario!

swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:45:00 AM
 #39158

The 900 I transferred back still haven't appeared in my wallet (tx id 6241877687289801711), but the AE appears to be down... no assets are listed, but My Assets appears to be correct.

Works here, which client are you using ? mine? If so, any javascript errors in the console?

Your client. Next to Asset Exchange there are three animated periods/ellipsis that looks like it's 'loading' the asset list but nothing appears.

Should I open Safari's Develop>Show error console?

edit: whatever it was, logging off and back on cured it. Assets appear properly now.
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 11:57:44 AM
 #39159

The 900 I transferred back still haven't appeared in my wallet (tx id 6241877687289801711), but the AE appears to be down... no assets are listed, but My Assets appears to be correct.

Works here, which client are you using ? mine? If so, any javascript errors in the console?

Your client. Next to Asset Exchange there are three animated periods/ellipsis that looks like it's 'loading' the asset list but nothing appears.

Should I open Safari's Develop>Show error console?

edit: whatever it was, logging off and back on cured it. Assets appear properly now.

Hmm ok, if it happens again, do check the error console. Indeed develop > show error console or just right click on the page and choose inspect element and then click on the console button. thx!
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2014, 11:58:35 AM
 #39160

The 900 I transferred back still haven't appeared in my wallet (tx id 6241877687289801711), but the AE appears to be down... no assets are listed, but My Assets appears to be correct.

Works here, which client are you using ? mine? If so, any javascript errors in the console?

Your client. Next to Asset Exchange there are three animated periods/ellipsis that looks like it's 'loading' the asset list but nothing appears.

Should I open Safari's Develop>Show error console?

edit: whatever it was, logging off and back on cured it. Assets appear properly now.
I always reload to verify the latest Asset Exchange balances.

The servers finished rescanning blockchain, noticed a pending deposit, completed it and are now caught up. I tried to make the worst case be a delay in finalizing the transaction, which most of the time would happen automatically. Not sure when it wouldn't, but I am counting on manual intervention to deal with the super rare cases that I cant think of. I think there are some cases where things could get stuck.

I did see one case where I submitted a transaction to the dogecoin network but it just never appeared. I am not sure what to do in this case as when I tried to resubmit it, I kept getting error -22, eg. you already sent that transaction. due to the requirement that all servers generate identical rawtransactions, once one server gets in a confused state, it will take some fiddling to sync all three servers again. This is why I am thinking it will take a while before this is production ready. Just need to make all the gateway management tools.

does anybody know how often bitcoin blockchains are rolled back? How much time to be sure it wont be? For larger deposits, I am thinking of issuing assets that cant be redeemed right away to limit exposure to blockchain rollbacks

James

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Pages: « 1 ... 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 [1958] 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!