Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers.

[flagpara]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

[notbatman]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

[Hippie Tech]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

[Spendulus]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Meanwhile, this assertion of yours...

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

Is ridiculous, the aggregate heat output of man does not and will not increase the temperature of the planet.  Although in certain areaas we see effects, and it is talked about - the so called "urban heat island" effect.  That's been well studied.

[notbatman]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Now that you point that out I'd say the grammar and sentence structure does indicate an AI spam bot. I was thinking it was just an ESL user but a sig spamming AI bot makes more sense. Make money and disrupt the thread; very clever, too clever. Perhaps it's the works of a team of overpaid psychopathic bureaucrats with unlimited resources pushing a massive scam on an unsuspecting and gullible public they see as nothing more than farm animals and doing it in such a way that it provides plausible deniability.

[flagpara]

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

This user has a pseudo thank you and I'm not taking your quote out of context... Or at least I don't think I did. Maybe I didn't understand perfectly as a non native English speaker (better stay humble).

And sig spamming has nothing to do with that thank you. I came on this thread much before I entered Yobit campaign. And I don't think posts in off topic or Politics & Society count. And I don't really care, I just wanted to put again the right translation of Newton's law that's all.

So thanks for the beautiful translation from latin to english notbatman  

Now that you point that out I'd say the grammar and sentence structure does indicate an AI spam bot. I was thinking it was just an ESL user but a sig spamming AI bot makes more sense. Make money and disrupt the thread; very clever, too clever. Perhaps it's the works of a team of overpaid psychopathic bureaucrats with unlimited resources pushing a massive scam on an unsuspecting and gullible public they see as nothing more than farm animals and doing it in such a way that it provides plausible deniability.

But but but but... I'm a human  
Perhaps not a very smart one but I still have soul! (╯°□°)╯

[Hippie Tech]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Meanwhile, this assertion of yours...

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

Is ridiculous, the aggregate heat output of man does not and will not increase the temperature of the planet.  Although in certain areaas we see effects, and it is talked about - the so called "urban heat island" effect.  That's been well studied.

Those controlled opposition folks are almost as creative as I am.. haha

I guess you have never had the pleasure of experiencing what it is like to feel the 400-600F heat exhaust of a car/truck/bus as it washes over you while stuck at a red light EDIT - ON YOUR BIKE.

[Wilikon]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Meanwhile, this assertion of yours...

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

Is ridiculous, the aggregate heat output of man does not and will not increase the temperature of the planet.  Although in certain areaas we see effects, and it is talked about - the so called "urban heat island" effect.  That's been well studied.

Those controlled opposition folks are almost as creative as I am.. haha

I guess you have never had the pleasure of experiencing what it is like to feel the 400-600F heat exhaust of a car/truck/bus as it washes over you while stuck at a red light.

Use a bike. Fossil fuel is evil.

[Hippie Tech]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Now that you point that out I'd say the grammar and sentence structure does indicate an AI spam bot. I was thinking it was just an ESL user but a sig spamming AI bot makes more sense. Make money and disrupt the thread; very clever, too clever. Perhaps it's the works of a team of overpaid psychopathic bureaucrats with unlimited resources pushing a massive scam on an unsuspecting and gullible public they see as nothing more than farm animals and doing it in such a way that it provides plausible deniability.

The same can be/should be said about EVERY movement and cause ... including this false hope of a cryptofiat movement..

[Hippie Tech]

Obomba needs to include grade "A" morons and his own peace prize buying ass because they must have failed science class. xD

"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction CONTROLLED OPPOSTION."

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

The whole debate is really American so I won't take position, but I wanted to tell you that the correct enunciation of Newton's law is "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

With love.

The exact translation of Newton's 3^rd Law is actually: "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Original text: "Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi."

This can be simplified to: "All forces come in pairs". The "equal and directed to contrary parts" bit is more of a general rule than a law as there are cases where force pairs are concurrent.

So that must explain why my ignore list is filled with sig spammers.

That user is purposely taking my quote out of context because he/she needed the easy post and/or is a climate denier and/or a controlled opposition shill.

Meanwhile, this assertion of yours...

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

Is ridiculous, the aggregate heat output of man does not and will not increase the temperature of the planet.  Although in certain areaas we see effects, and it is talked about - the so called "urban heat island" effect.  That's been well studied.

Those controlled opposition folks are almost as creative as I am.. haha

I guess you have never had the pleasure of experiencing what it is like to feel the 400-600F heat exhaust of a car/truck/bus as it washes over you while stuck at a red light EDIT - ON YOUR BIKE.

Use a bike. Fossil fuel is evil.

I forgot to include that in there.. lol

And besides, the smogheads almost never feel it because they almost always have their windows rolled up..

[tvbcof]

Meanwhile, this assertion of yours...

What do you think happens to all of that heat being generated by the billions of motors, engines, exhaust manifolds ect. ?

Why isn't this so called environmental movement talking about it ?

Is ridiculous, the aggregate heat output of man does not and will not increase the temperature of the planet.  Although in certain areaas we see effects, and it is talked about - the so called "urban heat island" effect.  That's been well studied.

Rio, which popped out 'Agenda 21', was a 20 year follow-on to a conference in Stockholm.  This shindig produced a delightful propaganda film called 'The Survival of Spaceship Earth' (and written by our current 'science czar' Holdren interestingly.)

One of the more interesting things about this film was that the concept of anthropogenic global warming was there but in a crude form which, as you point out, makes no sense from a basic thermodynamics point of view.  That deficiency was polished up to involve carbon dioxide by the time 1992 rolled around.  Now, 20 years on, it is pretty clear that this new and improved story-line also is bunk.

Aaron's condensation of the original 'spaceship earth' film happens to include a clip of the dude promising to study 'heat pollution'...with Rockefeller money no doubt...

http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/05/30/survival-of-spaceship-earth-the-ultimate-rockefeller-depopulation-propaganda-film/

Those controlled opposition folks are almost as creative as I am.. haha

I guess you have never had the pleasure of experiencing what it is like to feel the 400-600F heat exhaust of a car/truck/bus as it washes over you while stuck at a red light.

The only time I've been impressed by the phenomenon was when I was waiting at a red light directly behind an M1A1 Abrams.  And more precisely, when the light turned green.

[Spendulus]

....

I forgot to include that in there.. lol

And besides, the smogheads almost never feel it because they almost always have their windows rolled up..

If you doubt what I said, let's just take total energy from the sun, total energy used by man in a recent year, and compare them.

These sorts of numbers are available.

 

[Hippie Tech]

Those controlled opposition folks are almost as creative as I am.. haha

I guess you have never had the pleasure of experiencing what it is like to feel the 400-600F heat exhaust of a car/truck/bus as it washes over you while stuck at a red light.

The only time I've been impressed by the phenomenon was when I was waiting at a red light directly behind an M1A1 Abrams.  And more precisely, when the light turned green.

I'm sweating just thinking about it. xD

....

I forgot to include that in there.. lol

And besides, the smogheads almost never feel it because they almost always have their windows rolled up..

If you doubt what I said, let's just take total energy from the sun, total energy used by man in a recent year, and compare them.

These sorts of numbers are available.

Do I really need to spell out the meaning of the term, "disinfo campaign" ?

Whatever the (amount of energy the earth absorbs from the sun) number is.. it should be considered a historical constant. Nothing that is natural will cause a billion sources of 400F heat to just trek the globe like that.

Btw... what do your sources/disinfo agents have to say about the EMF fields generated by every one of your fatmobiles ?

[hdbuck]

meanwhile, unlimited cow farts methane leak much in cali?

[Spendulus]

Do I really need to spell out the meaning of the term, "disinfo campaign" ?

Whatever the (amount of energy the earth absorbs from the sun) number is.. it should be considered a historical constant. Nothing that is natural will cause a billion sources of 400F heat to just trek the globe like that.

Btw... what do your sources/disinfo agents have to say about the EMF fields generated by every one of your fatmobiles ?

So is this all you do, when you are challenged on an assertion, is change the subject?

[Hippie Tech]

Do I really need to spell out the meaning of the term, "disinfo campaign" ?

Whatever the (amount of energy the earth absorbs from the sun) number is.. it should be considered a historical constant. Nothing that is natural will cause a billion sources of 400F heat to just trek the globe like that.

Btw... what do your sources/disinfo agents have to say about the EMF fields generated by every one of your fatmobiles ?

So is this all you do, when you are challenged on an assertion, is change the subject?

I'm not the one who brought the sun (and it's electromagnetic relationship with the planet and it's inhabitants) into this.

You did.

[galdur]

I read somewhere that experts have decided that people that are afraid of being unhealthy and therefore detest fast food and such and only eat health foods are mentally ill. it´s --exia something. Couldn´t copy paste it so forgot where it was.

[galdur]

Ah, Orthorexia nervosa. 

OFFICIALS Declare ‘Eating Healthy’ A Mental Disorder

It´s so ####### dumb that I can´t even bring myself to posting the text. You´ll have to search for it if interested.

[strayanbit]

Ah, Orthorexia nervosa. 

OFFICIALS Declare ‘Eating Healthy’ A Mental Disorder

It´s so ####### dumb that I can´t even bring myself to posting the text. You´ll have to search for it if interested.

I can see how it could be seen as a mental disorder if all the person is eating is a multi-vitamin and 20 carrot smoothies a day.. But I can also see how people with legitimate, healthy diets like vegans or vegetarians could be tarred with the same brush.

[galdur]

Ah, Orthorexia nervosa. 

OFFICIALS Declare ‘Eating Healthy’ A Mental Disorder

It´s so ####### dumb that I can´t even bring myself to posting the text. You´ll have to search for it if interested.

I can see how it could be seen as a mental disorder if all the person is eating is a multi-vitamin and 20 carrot smoothies a day.. But I can also see how people with legitimate, healthy diets like vegans or vegetarians could be tarred with the same brush.

“a pathological obsession for biologically pure and healthy nutrition.”

“Orthorexia nervosa is a label designated to those who are concerned about eating healthy. Characterized by disordered eating fueled by a desire for “clean” or “healthy” foods, those diagnosed with the condition are overly pre-occupied with the nutritional makeup of what they eat”.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/officials-declare-eating-healthy-mental-disorder/#ixzz3wqJeDeo9
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook