Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 12:17:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 ... 400 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Catcoin - Scrypt meow!  (Read 470749 times)
userpacman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 03:17:26 AM
 #6141

Just a quick message before I pop off;



Quick chat with Coinedup. They've been made aware of tonight's drama.

Coinedup - DONE
Cryptsy - WAITING
Coinwarz - WAITING


If someone could let Cryptsy/Bitjohn know, though, that would be good. I get the feeling Coinwarz is the kind of site you need to nag, so by all means, nag away. Catcoin is quite profitable right now. Now is the time to be listed on Coinwarz. It still shows the old difficulty, though.

If we want Catcoin to go to Mars, we must make sure everyone's on the same page since the fork.

Happy Catcoining.

Cryptsy is fine, deposit/withdrawal working correctly.

Join our DOPE pool - 1% fee - register now!
http://dope.internetarena.it
foodies123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:19:30 AM
 #6142

So I slept through the fork everythin good ?

nope
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:24:31 AM
 #6143

I think coinwarz is showing correct value

Don't think so;

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/catcoin

Still showing old difficulty. It should be higher up on the profitability list based on the difficulty. It's been there since before the fork.

Anyway, I'll be back online tomorrow. We got a working faucet and a raffle-style faucet made today. That's cool.

Coinedup - DONE
Cryptsy - DONE
Coinwarz - WAITING

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
userpacman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 03:25:10 AM
 #6144

So I slept through the fork everythin good ?

Except 1 hour of panic LOL

poolerino pool forked (unvolontary) the fork.. they had to close the pool and restart on correct blockchain.

People crying, girls gone wild, panic selling..

but everything is fixed now, hashrate and prices going up again!

Join our DOPE pool - 1% fee - register now!
http://dope.internetarena.it
OBrien
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:27:11 AM
 #6145

I think coinwarz is showing correct value

Don't think so;

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/catcoin

Still showing old difficulty. It should be higher up on the profitability list based on the difficulty. It's been there since before the fork.

Anyway, I'll be back online tomorrow. We got a working faucet and a raffle-style faucet made today. That's cool.

Coinedup - DONE
Cryptsy - DONE
Coinwarz - WAITING


So "Current Difficulty  60.1987" isn't the correct one?
overseerio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 03:28:17 AM
 #6146

I think coinwarz is showing correct value

Don't think so;

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/catcoin

Still showing old difficulty. It should be higher up on the profitability list based on the difficulty. It's been there since before the fork.

Anyway, I'll be back online tomorrow. We got a working faucet and a raffle-style faucet made today. That's cool.

Coinedup - DONE
Cryptsy - DONE
Coinwarz - WAITING


So "Current Difficulty  60.1987" isn't the correct one?
It's correct. Coinwarz is correct too.

foodies123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:29:53 AM
 #6147

So I slept through the fork everythin good ?

Except 1 hour of panic LOL


poolerino pool forked (unvolontary) the fork.. they had to close the pool and restart on correct blockchain.

People crying, girls gone wild, panic selling..

but everything is fixed now, hashrate and prices going up again!

Good thing I pointed my 6m to coinium before going to bed Smiley)

nope
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:41:54 AM
 #6148

I think coinwarz is showing correct value

Don't think so;

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/catcoin

Still showing old difficulty. It should be higher up on the profitability list based on the difficulty. It's been there since before the fork.

Anyway, I'll be back online tomorrow. We got a working faucet and a raffle-style faucet made today. That's cool.

Coinedup - DONE
Cryptsy - DONE
Coinwarz - WAITING


So "Current Difficulty  60.1987" isn't the correct one?
It's correct. Coinwarz is correct too.

Ah, my bad. It's still showing the old Diff Adjustment. If it's showing the correct difficulty then that's fine.

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
overseerio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 03:52:55 AM
 #6149

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.
Today's fail might have happened because Catcoinforum sent that email -- it definitely played its role in causing Poolerino to have >=51% network hash. Why is the forum choosing only one pool anyway? Did they pay him?

Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 03:56:37 AM
 #6150

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.
Today's fail might have happened because Catcoinforum sent that email -- it definitely played its role in causing Poolerino to have >=51% network hash. Why is the forum choosing only one pool anyway? Did they pay him?

I don't know, but I'm not happy with the way the owner seems to "speak" for the community on more than one occasion in this thread. It's fantastic he's got a forum for Catcoin, and much respect to him for maintaining it and running it, but this is more or less an ad-hoc democracy. There's no hierarchy.

He announced in this thread when we were debating the fork a thread on his forum on whether or not the coin should fork. As far as I'm concerned this thread is the official thread, and any decisions about Catcoin's development should be made here. It's bad enough as it is in here sometimes when there's a panic on. We need coordination. Not discord. If he can help coordinate efforts, that would be great, but there can't be several people making rogue decisions that could cause even more confusion. It gets messy and it harms Catcoin.

Anyway, I really must go now. See ya.  Smiley

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
overseerio
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 04:01:17 AM
 #6151

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.
Today's fail might have happened because Catcoinforum sent that email -- it definitely played its role in causing Poolerino to have >=51% network hash. Why is the forum choosing only one pool anyway? Did they pay him?

I don't know, but I'm not happy with the way the owner seems to "speak" for the community on more than one occasion in this thread. It's fantastic he's got a forum for Catcoin, and much respect to him for maintaining it and running it, but this is more or less an ad-hoc democracy. There's no hierarchy.

He announced in this thread when we were debating the fork a thread on his forum on whether or not the coin should fork. As far as I'm concerned this thread is the official thread, and any decisions about Catcoin's development should be made here. It's bad enough as it is in here sometimes when there's a panic on. We need coordination. Not discord. If he can help coordinate efforts, that would be great, but there can't be several people making rogue decisions that could cause even more confusion. It gets messy and it harms Catcoin.

Anyway, I really must go now. See ya.  Smiley
He also asks for donations in almost every post. I'm getting more and more uncertain whether he should have the responsibility for managing (what should be) a great Catcoin community.

Go sleep, good night! Smiley

ubermoose
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:10:23 AM
 #6152

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.
Today's fail might have happened because Catcoinforum sent that email -- it definitely played its role in causing Poolerino to have >=51% network hash. Why is the forum choosing only one pool anyway? Did they pay him?

I don't know, but I'm not happy with the way the owner seems to "speak" for the community on more than one occasion in this thread. It's fantastic he's got a forum for Catcoin, and much respect to him for maintaining it and running it, but this is more or less an ad-hoc democracy. There's no hierarchy.

He announced in this thread when we were debating the fork a thread on his forum on whether or not the coin should fork. As far as I'm concerned this thread is the official thread, and any decisions about Catcoin's development should be made here. It's bad enough as it is in here sometimes when there's a panic on. We need coordination. Not discord. If he can help coordinate efforts, that would be great, but there can't be several people making rogue decisions that could cause even more confusion. It gets messy and it harms Catcoin.

Anyway, I really must go now. See ya.  Smiley
He also asks for donations in almost every post. I'm getting more and more uncertain whether he should have the responsibility for managing (what should be) a great Catcoin community.

Go sleep, good night! Smiley

I asked him about the poolerino plug and he said he is advertising them because they were the first to lower the confirmations.
vaelrock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 251


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:12:09 AM
 #6153

Next diff retarget soon, this will put catcoin as interesting as lottocoin/dogecoin, which is good.
If it's too much profitable, diff will skyrocket again, but at this level, we should have a much more moderate increase, letting this coin be correctly profitable for some time. This can inspire confidence to investor and make its value increase slowly.
Evilish
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 563


Bitcoin to the moon!


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:12:34 AM
 #6154

Did something happen with Poolerino? I started mining at 1200 kh/s and went to sleep as soon as the fork happened. Now I woke up only to see that I've made only 5 coins in the previous 8 hours.
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?  Sad Here's what one of their announcements say:
"WE ARE BACK! Sorry, but after the fork last night, we hade to remove the blocks, that we're mined in the forkchain, but we are back on the right chain rightnow, and hoping, that there will be no more forks after this! Happy Mining!"
etblvu1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:17:59 AM
 #6155

Did something happen with Poolerino? I started mining at 1200 kh/s and went to sleep as soon as the fork happened. Now I woke up only to see that I've made only 5 coins in the previous 8 hours.
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?  Sad Here's what one of their announcements say:
"WE ARE BACK! Sorry, but after the fork last night, we hade to remove the blocks, that we're mined in the forkchain, but we are back on the right chain rightnow, and hoping, that there will be no more forks after this! Happy Mining!"

When you are mining, whether solo or through a pool, you are always at risk of mining on a wrong fork. When you mine a block solution on a wrong fork, there is no coin generated because the blocks become orphaned, i.e., subsequent blocks on the right fork will not recognize them, i.e., will not recognize that any coins got created. So, it's not so much that you wasted mining power and electricity, as that you are always risking a certain percentage of the times blocks are found, they turn out not to be valid, and that's what appears to have happened in your case. But statistically, over the long-term, you should not suffer this anymore than anyone else, so you should consider it just an inherent risk of mining, not that you got singled out to take losses.
johnny_non
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:18:38 AM
 #6156

Did something happen with Poolerino? I started mining at 1200 kh/s and went to sleep as soon as the fork happened. Now I woke up only to see that I've made only 5 coins in the previous 8 hours.
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?  Sad Here's what one of their announcements say:
"WE ARE BACK! Sorry, but after the fork last night, we hade to remove the blocks, that we're mined in the forkchain, but we are back on the right chain rightnow, and hoping, that there will be no more forks after this! Happy Mining!"
you missed a show and a wild ride

send your strays CAT: 9W4aXggw9bgraD88j77fZg7aT8Lnb4mkTw  Everyone has a Dream: DKDB1yj2ohbakpQQvUZsCEWow6K2CDDggD
Evilish
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 563


Bitcoin to the moon!


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:25:14 AM
 #6157

Did something happen with Poolerino? I started mining at 1200 kh/s and went to sleep as soon as the fork happened. Now I woke up only to see that I've made only 5 coins in the previous 8 hours.
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?  Sad Here's what one of their announcements say:
"WE ARE BACK! Sorry, but after the fork last night, we hade to remove the blocks, that we're mined in the forkchain, but we are back on the right chain rightnow, and hoping, that there will be no more forks after this! Happy Mining!"

When you are mining, whether solo or through a pool, you are always at risk of mining on a wrong fork. When you mine a block solution on a wrong fork, there is no coin generated because the blocks become orphaned, i.e., subsequent blocks on the right fork will not recognize them, i.e., will not recognize that any coins got created. So, it's not so much that you wasted mining power and electricity, as that you are always risking a certain percentage of the times blocks are found, they turn out not to be valid, and that's what appears to have happened in your case. But statistically, over the long-term, you should not suffer this anymore than anyone else, so you should consider it just an inherent risk of mining, not that you got singled out to take losses.

I mean, haven't they got the most hashrate among the network? It's their duty to make sure things work well, especially after all the trust we put into them.
janos666
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:25:31 AM
 #6158

Did something happen with Poolerino? [...]
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?

Yes, and yes.
I lost some coins there too before I switched to coinium. The pool went rogue and those blocks got orphaned later. When they detected this problem, the pool switched to "maintenance" mode for a while.


By the way. Does the current state on exchanges looks like there was an inflation? Grin
Evilish
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 563


Bitcoin to the moon!


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 04:30:01 AM
 #6159

Did something happen with Poolerino? [...]
Does that mean I just wasted my mining power and electricity?

Yes, and yes.
I lost some coins there too before I switched to coinium. The pool went rogue and those blocks got orphaned later. When they detected this problem, the pool switched to "maintenance" mode for a while.


By the way. Does the current state on exchanges looks like there was an inflation? Grin

Ah and no, I believe Catcoin is currently at its all time low price, $0.42. Hopefully we can rise it soon.
raistlinthewiz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2014, 04:33:10 AM
 #6160

One thing I wasn't too happy about tonight was getting an email from http://www.catcoinforum.com/ to my registered email account urging me to switch to poolerino. I'm not sure what affiliation the forum owner has with that pool, but considering they were on the wrong fork, it probably didn't help matters.

Anyway. Bed time. Ciao.
Today's fail might have happened because Catcoinforum sent that email -- it definitely played its role in causing Poolerino to have >=51% network hash. Why is the forum choosing only one pool anyway? Did they pay him?

I don't know, but I'm not happy with the way the owner seems to "speak" for the community on more than one occasion in this thread. It's fantastic he's got a forum for Catcoin, and much respect to him for maintaining it and running it, but this is more or less an ad-hoc democracy. There's no hierarchy.

He announced in this thread when we were debating the fork a thread on his forum on whether or not the coin should fork. As far as I'm concerned this thread is the official thread, and any decisions about Catcoin's development should be made here. It's bad enough as it is in here sometimes when there's a panic on. We need coordination. Not discord. If he can help coordinate efforts, that would be great, but there can't be several people making rogue decisions that could cause even more confusion. It gets messy and it harms Catcoin.

Anyway, I really must go now. See ya.  Smiley
He also asks for donations in almost every post. I'm getting more and more uncertain whether he should have the responsibility for managing (what should be) a great Catcoin community.

Go sleep, good night! Smiley

I asked him about the poolerino plug and he said he is advertising them because they were the first to lower the confirmations.

if he really minded the community a bit and checked all the available pools, he would have seen that we were running cat.coinium.org with 30 confirmations during dark-times Smiley Advertising a single pool through emails & forum and making it sticky as the official pool was really a bad idea for a coin that was already going to re-fork as a fix. A bad idea in every terms...

Pages: « 1 ... 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 ... 400 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!