SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts

[donk4u]

Is SealsWithClubs going to distribute collusion funds to be available for withdrawal as well?  This hasn't been done for nearly a year, so I am sure there is a good chunk of coin waiting.

Still would like to know the answer to this ... or is the silence the answer?

First 10 people to deposit get seals with clubs bathrobe

[wwwin]

Is SealsWithClubs going to distribute collusion funds to be available for withdrawal as well?  This hasn't been done for nearly a year, so I am sure there is a good chunk of coin waiting.

Still would like to know the answer to this ... or is the silence the answer?

First 10 people to deposit get seals with clubs bathrobe

I want the wardrobe to be delivered on the girl that did the hula hoop on the old video.

[donk4u]

@micon can you please post support email as well as the download link on here?

[SurReality89]

Download link? Is it back up?

[donk4u]

Said hours away on twitter

[donk4u]

yesssss we have liftoff site is up

[genco]

I want to move from the original site to this one, but got ominous warning when trying to download desktop client. Sure it is nothing, but I am no IT expert. Can someone tell me why IE gives a warning when downloading desktop client?

[kolloh]

Anyone tried the new client yet?

[nioc]

I want to move from the original site to this one, but got ominous warning when trying to download desktop client. Sure it is nothing, but I am no IT expert. Can someone tell me why IE gives a warning when downloading desktop client?

This is the thread for the original site.  The thread for the new site is.............

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962440.0


As far as that warning, I just ignored it.  I don't know why it comes up but it could get flagged for minor stuff such as out of date certs.  I trust it isn't anything of significance, Micon wouldn't do that.  I played last night and I think you will enjoy the new client.

[donk4u]

Anyone tried the new client yet?

Yes it has so much functionality it is looking good, streamlined. A ton of work went into it since I checked it out week before original seals went down. There were some restarts needed but players realize site will need to be debugged as they go. Hopefully if any type of disconnects during ring or mtts players will be reimbursed as with the previous site version.

[SurReality89]

still not able to get on, reset not working. and from my reply from support it seems they have no idea why its not working because they just told me to try what i've been trying. which still doesn't work today.

[CryptoDomains]

SOLD!
Again all above is projected, no gaur.

[ranlo]

If anyone is interested...

SWCPOKER.com (Highly targeted name pure genuine traffic)
Godaddy Push of ownership only at this time.
First few hours monitoring traffic looks like it may do XXX unique visits a day + as time goes on.
When one does a conversion via affiliate at 20% for life when compared to the old .com name...
100+ uv at a small X% conversion rate is approx. $15,000 USD per annum (approx 50-75 BTC) + at current BTC price, price goes up, revenue goes up! Again when using old .com name as reference.

Asking 500 Bitcoin or best offer. Big amount sure but big revenue stream potential as well!
Ciurrent high offer is 200 BTC + $25,000 USD.

Reasoning being is ownership directly of this name by swcpoker would mean approx $75,000 per annum in revenue roi in 1-2 years!

PM offers, ultimately may just use it for affiliate myself next week. Again all above is projected, no gaur.

That URL is worthless. If someone is offering 200 BTC + $25k, take it. Seriously. Before they realize they're making a horrible business deal.

That specific domain has nothing going for it. It's not special. If you just want to rank, rank for "swc poker" using the domain "urafloppydonkey.com" and you'll have the same success.

[darkmule]

Reasoning being is ownership directly of this name by swcpoker would mean approx $75,000 per annum in revenue roi in 1-2 years!

Kill yourself.

[cheekychap]

It will be stupid to buy that domain. its completely worthless.

[CryptoDomains]

You guys are right, it's worthless, things that will make you money and need no rank effort or advertisement to generate unique type in visits targeted to your product are worthless.

 

[donk4u]

Reasoning being is ownership directly of this name by swcpoker would mean approx $75,000 per annum in revenue roi in 1-2 years!

Kill yourself.

Always the voice of reason

[CryptoDomains]

SOLD!

Took your guys advice, thank you.

[donk4u]

Played some plo couple of things I noticed when all in hu on flop cards are not shown and then doesn't tell you what hand won in the description can this be changed? If can include statistics that show money won or lost at each ring game would be great also.

[LongJohnJake]

Here's some early comments after several hours of play and general hanging around the site last 24 hours.
Notwithstanding the pretty slick UI - I mean, how cool is it to be able to choose from 6 different carpets and card-back colors!? - there's some serious holes:
No browser client.
No showdown info. 
No running rake totals during hand.
No game info - Mavens was always the leader with this - you could see exactly what you were getting into regarding rake rates and caps, buyins, time banks and more. 
Speaking of Mavens: One of the strongest reasons to use their game engine is the RNG - fully documented on their site, and fully testable by doing your own sims (which my co. has done). And along with this are the millions of hands that have been played with this engine by their huge non-RM and home-poker user base.  Just check out their Forum to see the depth and quality.  Note: We absolutely have NOTHING to do with Mavens.   

Of course, these shortcomings and questions may be moot for the Grid system Micon is using,  but then why not provide them up front.  I can assure you that if they are still in the development pipeline, time and treasure are not on their side with mini-micro games.  With these shortcomings I can't see serious grinders giving him the volume needed.

Also, their communications don't provide much reassurance either. For example, the SWC FAQ:

How much do you charge in rake?
Rake at ring game tables is 1 chip per 40 (2.5% rounded down) with a cap of the lesser of 3BB or 5 chips (0.005BTC).Limit tables with a big blind of 0.5 chips (0.0005BTC) or higher have rake of 1 chip per 50 (2% rounded down) with a cap of the lesser of 2BB or 4 chips (0.004BTC).HU tables with a big blind of 0.5 chips (0.0005BTC) or higher have rake of 1 chip per 75 (~1.33% rounded down) with a cap of the lesser of 1BB or 3 chips (0.003BTC).If a game would have a rake cap of less than 0.5 chips (0.0005BTC) then the rake cap will be 0.5 chips (0.0005BTC).No rake is collected on hands that do not make it to the flop.


Reads like it was composed a stoner or someone with English as a 3rd language.  Apart from the grade-school layout, it's unclear, for example, what the HU rules are for Limit and No Limit unless, unlike 3+ games, they are now the same?)  Simple matrix layout is what's needed.