SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts

[sed]

I guess eventually even us with little to no krill will get to try

Can't wait!

[katerniko1]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

[sed]

Sounds like you should try another table?  (that table you described sounds tough)

[Tdowns]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those, as poker is not provvably fair, and its 50-50 chance, so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

[hopenotlate]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1) 

2) 

3) 

[Tdowns]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1) 

2) 

3) 

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

[tspacepilot]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1) 

2) 

3) 

I think you're wrong at least about (2) and (3).

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

[sed]

tspacepilot, I think you messed up that quote ^^^

Yah, @dude who dislikes poker, it's definitely not (usually) 50-50 chance, figuring out what the chances are for a particular hand is part of the fun!

[cheekychap]

tspacepilot, I think you messed up that quote ^^^

Yah, @dude who dislikes poker, it's definitely not (usually) 50-50 chance, figuring out what the chances are for a particular hand is part of the fun!

Actually the 1 BB games are 50-50 if played between 2 and mathematically less with multiple opponents. And you have to dodge colluders too so maybe less.
However the 5 BB games are the fun games. They definitely involve some form of skill , as you can always fold.

[sed]

I think I see what you mean.

But if you and I are heads up and I get dealt AA, then it's more likely that you don't have AA than that you do, so I think I have a better than 50-50 to beat whatever you have.  Then, as you say, there's reacting to other player's moves, and that should affect the odds somehow (but in a less calculable way).

[adaseb]

Yes I don't have luck with it either

Honestly I think poker is played best in Real life. On the computer its hard to tell emotion and everything.

Its just not the same.

But its a great site, probably best for poker.

[hopenotlate]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1)  

2)  

3)  

I think you're wrong at least about (2) and (3).

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

I think he is wrong mainly about (1) and (2).
And is right with (3)  only for people who don't have preflop poker skills.

[Tdowns]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1)  

2)  

3)  

I think you're wrong at least about (2) and (3).

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

I think he is wrong mainly about (1) and (2).
And is right with (3)  only for people who don't have preflop poker skills.

How am I wrong about any of those ?
1. Is poker provably fair ?
2. You are all in on the 1BB table, no skill required, no matter what so ever. In heads up odds are always 50%.
3. Isn't that right ?

[hopenotlate]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1)  

2)  

3)  

I think you're wrong at least about (2) and (3).

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

I think he is wrong mainly about (1) and (2).
And is right with (3)  only for people who don't have preflop poker skills.

How am I wrong about any of those ?
1. Is poker provably fair ?
2. You are all in on the 1BB table, no skill required, no matter what so ever. In heads up odds are always 50%.
3. Isn't that right ?

1) RNGs used to generate cards are fair but will not argue with you, or anyone else, if you belong to those people I use to define "rigtards" ( rigged poker theorists) because that discussion will still leave anyone of us on the same side. So I think you are wrong on this.

2) You are not forced to go allin: you have the options either to fold preflop or just call BB (and BB is 20% of maximum buyin at those tables). So there is a bit of skill involved (you should know what range of hole cards have >50% equity against another random couple of cards). So I can definitely state you are wrong on this particular opinion.

3) It is related to the previous point: if you have a clue of what to do, and depending on your oppononents skills, playing poker is definitely more convenient than playing any other casino games in which there is a predefined house edge (whose percentage depends on the game). So in some way you may be wrong on this one.

Be aware it is nothing personal at you or anyone else but it's just to share opinions and I'm ready to change mine once I'm proved to be wrong.  

[donk4u]

.

[sed]

.

Is that really all you meant to put?  ^^^

Some people really feel like they're left hanging without that final full stop, eh?

[nioc]

.d.o.n.k.4.u.

[masterzino]

nice site im playing it but i dont like (all-in poker) tables with 2min buy-in 2max-buy in and blinds 1.99 small and 2 big one

Those are for degens. Best to stay out of those,
1) as poker is not provvably fair,

2) and its 50-50 chance,

3) so better play something provably fair, instead of playing those tables

1) 

2) 

3) 

I think you're wrong at least about (2) and (3).

Am I wrong  in saying that ? Or you are clueless about it ?

I think he is wrong mainly about (1) and (2).
And is right with (3)  only for people who don't have preflop poker skills.

How am I wrong about any of those ?
1. Is poker provably fair ?
2. You are all in on the 1BB table, no skill required, no matter what so ever. In heads up odds are always 50%.
3. Isn't that right ?

1) RNGs used to generate cards are fair but will not argue with you, or anyone else, if you belong to those people I use to define "rigtards" ( rigged poker theorists) because that discussion will still leave anyone of us on the same side. So I think you are wrong on this.

2) You are not forced to go allin: you have the options either to fold preflop or just call BB (and BB is 20% of maximum buyin at those tables). So there is a bit of skill involved (you should know what range of hole cards have >50% equity against another random couple of cards). So I can definitely state you are wrong on this particular opinion.

3) It is related to the previous point: if you have a clue of what to do, and depending on your oppononents skills, playing poker is definitely more convenient than playing any other casino games in which there is a predefined house edge (whose percentage depends on the game). So in some way you may be wrong on this one.

Be aware it is nothing personal at you or anyone else but it's just to share opinions and I'm ready to change mine once I'm proved to be wrong. 

Go to wikipedia and type Texas Holdem Poker read everything on that page

[Micon]

Just want to thank everyone participating in our closed beta.

We will likely welcome 25k+ krillers very soon. 

Thanks very much for your continued support of SwC, this new platform is truly bitcoin poker 2.0

[Tdowns]

1) RNGs used to generate cards are fair but will not argue with you, or anyone else, if you belong to those people I use to define "rigtards" ( rigged poker theorists) because that discussion will still leave anyone of us on the same side. So I think you are wrong on this.

2) You are not forced to go allin: you have the options either to fold preflop or just call BB (and BB is 20% of maximum buyin at those tables). So there is a bit of skill involved (you should know what range of hole cards have >50% equity against another random couple of cards). So I can definitely state you are wrong on this particular opinion.

3) It is related to the previous point: if you have a clue of what to do, and depending on your oppononents skills, playing poker is definitely more convenient than playing any other casino games in which there is a predefined house edge (whose percentage depends on the game). So in some way you may be wrong on this one.

Be aware it is nothing personal at you or anyone else but it's just to share opinions and I'm ready to change mine once I'm proved to be wrong.  

1. Yes , no point arguing over that as everyone has there own opinions.
2. I meant in a HU game. 90% of the time these games are HU and you don't have 3-4 players sitting on the table. If its 3 people, then you can only fold one turn, next you have to be all in no matter what.
3.Previous point