runeks
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
|
 |
January 13, 2014, 09:52:15 PM |
|
Feature request:
When changing the page language, by clicking the flag in the upper right corner and choosing a different flag than the current one, the currently viewed page should be shown in the new language instead of one being redirected to the front page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
advanced
|
|
January 14, 2014, 08:58:27 AM |
|
Feature request :
import BIP0038 private keys
|
Bitmessage : BM-NAx31aEiqeq5zKUtxhKscXQ7Dwn1jJfR
|
|
|
Its About Sharing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
|
|
January 14, 2014, 09:02:44 AM
Last edit: January 14, 2014, 09:12:55 AM by Its About Sharing |
|
With Blockchain.info it allows you to see the current balance based on your import addresses. (Under "receive money")
But BTC's sent out are not included in the figure.
Is there a way to see a summary of total deposits made to each address?
(Basically, I'd like to compare different addresses (which are from different mining ventures).
Thanks in advance,
Its about sharing
Does the drop down transaction filter do what you need? (show just the transactions you want to see) Thx for the reply but
that is the first thing I checked (and where the functionality should be added, quite easily I would think.)
The choices under "My Transactions"/"filter" include: All, Sent, Received, Escrow. Nothing else.
Under "Receive Money", it lists only BTC's in your account, not historically. Putting a "Total Coins received to this address" choice here, makes sense as well.
Unless I'm missing something...
So, "Feature Request" please - This would really help tracking things for us.My apologies, it is there, not as a summary but on a per address basis. All you have to do is click on the Address Name under Receive Money. It will give a total as well as current received. Hope that helped someone! Its about sharing |
BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
|
|
|
vongesell
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 14, 2014, 01:38:23 PM |
|
Would be nice to see a simple graph of BTC volume in an address over time. Bonus points for showing a clever way to see size of transactions in over time as well. The latter, aggregated actually shows the total volume as well. Simple shading inversion of a few decimals (such as for time slice N transaction 1 rgb=grey, transaction 2 rgb=white, 3=grey, etc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
RGBKey
|
|
January 15, 2014, 03:56:30 PM |
|
Please support multisig addresses and transactions! It would be a huge improvement and would make this wallet so much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trader Steve
|
|
January 16, 2014, 01:53:36 AM |
|
Feature Request for Mobile App:
SharedCoin
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
btharper
|
|
January 16, 2014, 02:57:03 PM |
|
The site sharedcoin sender is rejecting my transaction with the error that I'm lacking funds, however it's only considering my largest key. It would also be nice if sendmany were possible with shared coin, but that's a feature request instead of bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linkeex
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 10:18:55 AM |
|
Hi, I was banned yesterday at 13:00 EST because of exceeding request limits. Since then I am still banned. When I request blockchain.info i get: Can you please unban me now, I am developing an app which uses your JSON RPC API and I would like to make progress. I sent you a PM with my IP. |
|
|
|
|
DennisD7
|
|
January 20, 2014, 02:48:08 PM |
|
Feature Request: NOT MtGox prices as reference price.
I made a wallet for my parents so they can watch what their current holding is worth, but there's no way they'd ever get that price if they wanted to sell it. Can we change to something more realistic, like Bitstamp prices or so?
|
Proud ASIC miner and long term Bitcoin investor
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
January 20, 2014, 07:14:15 PM |
|
Feature Request: NOT MtGox prices as reference price.
I made a wallet for my parents so they can watch what their current holding is worth, but there's no way they'd ever get that price if they wanted to sell it. Can we change to something more realistic, like Bitstamp prices or so?
https://blockchain.info/address/[address] uses Stamp. Where is it using Gox? |
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1114
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
January 20, 2014, 07:38:07 PM |
|
Feature Request: NOT MtGox prices as reference price.
I made a wallet for my parents so they can watch what their current holding is worth, but there's no way they'd ever get that price if they wanted to sell it. Can we change to something more realistic, like Bitstamp prices or so?
https://blockchain.info/address/[address] uses Stamp. Where is it using Gox? looks stampy everywhere to me but I don't see any reference to which exchange actually is used. that should be visible in every page that makes any claims about $$ values. |
| ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
|
rme
|
|
January 21, 2014, 06:24:10 AM |
|
Feature Request: NOT MtGox prices as reference price.
I made a wallet for my parents so they can watch what their current holding is worth, but there's no way they'd ever get that price if they wanted to sell it. Can we change to something more realistic, like Bitstamp prices or so?
https://blockchain.info/address/[address] uses Stamp. Where is it using Gox? looks stampy everywhere to me but I don't see any reference to which exchange actually is used. that should be visible in every page that makes any claims about $$ values. I believe it mades a average. |
|
|
|
|
|
DennisD7
|
|
January 21, 2014, 10:49:07 AM |
|
Feature Request: NOT MtGox prices as reference price.
I made a wallet for my parents so they can watch what their current holding is worth, but there's no way they'd ever get that price if they wanted to sell it. Can we change to something more realistic, like Bitstamp prices or so?
https://blockchain.info/address/[address] uses Stamp. Where is it using Gox? looks stampy everywhere to me but I don't see any reference to which exchange actually is used. that should be visible in every page that makes any claims about $$ values. Oh yeah the USD seems to be bitstamp, but I'm in UK and my parents are in Sweden. GBP and SEK both seem to still be using MtGox prices. It's a detail, but pretty annoying. |
Proud ASIC miner and long term Bitcoin investor
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
January 21, 2014, 06:19:04 PM |
|
Oh yeah the USD seems to be bitstamp, but I'm in UK and my parents are in Sweden. GBP and SEK both seem to still be using MtGox prices. It's a detail, but pretty annoying.
Even EUR looks way up to me, it currently is 687€, while on TheRock is 620€. |
|
|
|
Heads-Tails
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2014, 06:30:02 AM
Last edit: January 23, 2014, 07:07:45 AM by Heads-Tails |
|
Why doesn't Blockchain.info identify the 'Discus Fish' pool in the pool pie chart? http://blockchain.info/poolsIt's the 3rd largest public pool, http://www.f2pool.com/ ... why hide it under 'unknown'? This site knows about it.... http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/top.phpBitcoin Block Origin - Ranking Pools
As explained on the overview page, this data is from the last 2016 blocks
N., Pool. Found blocks
1 GHash.IO 675 (33.48%)
2 BTC Guild 466 (23.12%)
3 Discus Fish 258 (12.80%)
4 Eligius 222 (11.01%)
5 slush - mining.bitcoin.cz 89 (4.41%)
6 Bitminter 50 (2.48%)
7 Eclipse Mining pool 37 (1.84%)
8 p2pool 21 (1.04%)
9 ASICMiner 6 (0.30%)
10 Bitparking Merged Mining Pool 4 (0.20%)
11 Give-Me-Coins 2 (0.10%)
12 Polmine 1 (0.05%)
We have no data about 185 (9.18%) blocks. And this site knows all about Discus Fish, too: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/Shouldn't it at least be grouped into the 'Other Known' category if only Chinese residents can join? |
|
|
|
|
|
lunarboy
|
|
January 23, 2014, 08:20:12 PM |
|
Slight glitch with the 3.1.8 firefox addon, run with Firefox 26.0 and Mavericks OSX 10.9.1
The little blue cube Icon will only show on one active window at a time. Unless the addon is disabled then re-enabled with window active. (the one where it was missing)
|
|
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
January 23, 2014, 08:54:19 PM |
|
Slight glitch with the 3.1.8 firefox addon, run with Firefox 26.0 and Mavericks OSX 10.9.1
The little blue cube Icon will only show on one active window at a time. Unless the addon is disabled then re-enabled with window active. (the one where it was missing)
Same here, except in Text mode for the toolbar. |
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
|
Gws24
|
|
January 25, 2014, 01:16:34 AM |
|
Why are the transaction amounts shown defaulting back to my local currency (EUR) instead of BTC? Since a week or so this is happening most of the time and it's getting really annoying that the site doesn't remember my preference for BTC and I have to click on the amount to change it back to BTC. By the way, why is it defaulting to local currency? imho the standard should be BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RGBKey
|
|
January 25, 2014, 01:38:36 AM |
|
Why are the transaction amounts shown defaulting back to my local currency (EUR) instead of BTC? Since a week or so this is happening most of the time and it's getting really annoying that the site doesn't remember my preference for BTC and I have to click on the amount to change it back to BTC. By the way, why is it defaulting to local currency? imho the standard should be BTC.
Seriously blockchain, for a bitcoin website this is stupidly absurd. I have to change this every time I change pages on your website. wtf. |
|
|
|
|
|
