Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 04:31:09 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ... 168 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics  (Read 414141 times)
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 30, 2013, 10:52:21 AM
 #2161

I can't seem to pair my Yubikey with My Wallet.

I press the button, get a standard Yubikey code, and then get "Authentication code is incorrect"

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
March 30, 2013, 08:49:45 PM
 #2162

I can't seem to pair my Yubikey with My Wallet.

I press the button, get a standard Yubikey code, and then get "Authentication code is incorrect"

I see now that Mt. Gox Yubikeys are not supported. Perhaps you can specify this somewhere on the Yubikey auth form (perhaps only in case of error)

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128



View Profile
April 01, 2013, 09:42:44 PM
 #2163

Those transaction costs seem high:


PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
SgtSpike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344



View Profile
April 01, 2013, 11:17:39 PM
 #2164

Those transaction costs seem high:


That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct?  I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624



View Profile
April 02, 2013, 01:12:14 AM
 #2165

That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct?  I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.



Based on that statement, "miners revenue divided by the number of transactions", it would seem that the chart makes the assumption that market forces drive up mining costs until they approach break-even with revenue.

So the chart takes the total block reward expressed in U.S. dollars (subsidy + fees) and divides it by the total number of transactions in the block.

If the reward is high, and mining costs have not grown fast enough to keep up, then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially high.  If the mining reward does not keep up with costs, but miners continue to mine at a loss (perhaps with visions of future value?) then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially low.

The quality of posts has dropped to such a low level that all users who are participating in a paid signature campaign are added to my ignore list. If you'd like a copy of the list to improve your browsing experience, you can find it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973843.0 (Updated 2016-1-4)
techwtf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 09:47:43 AM
 #2166

http://blockchain.info/tx/590a504f5cd2494bc0c0e49bd71069fe11aaf7016980e3d911a97e464951fa2e
WTF this tx...
malevolent
can into space
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 09:53:00 AM
 #2167


Basically what your nickname says.

Technical WTF
giantdragon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 04:26:53 PM
 #2168

Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?

picobit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547


Decor in numeris


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 04:48:34 PM
 #2169

Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?
In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!).  Then they will never propagate nor confirm.
JonSnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 05:05:29 PM
 #2170

What happens if someone send bitcoins to one of the Shared Send addresses that is no longer valid?
giantdragon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 07:37:22 PM
 #2171

In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!).  Then they will never propagate nor confirm.
I am telling about standard payments and tried myself - small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days.

2weiX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 08:13:37 PM
 #2172

also unconfirmed for ages now:

https://blockchain.info/tx/a64ab804eeb0f20752714a04fdc0b965dda106a9eb6125a84bf50c015b6596de


any help?
deadweasel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 08:16:19 PM
 #2173


same boat as you.

https://blockchain.info/tx/30deffd409515b085375abcb1dc04c00d55b9040130fecf2661ab8083122f621

deadweasel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 08:17:31 PM
 #2174

In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!).  Then they will never propagate nor confirm.
small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days.

why is it happening now?

TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


Nemo me impune lacessit


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2013, 09:10:39 PM
 #2175

Boycott:
blockchain.info for everything but informational purposes
mtgox.com for getting intermittently DDOSd in order to tank the price, most recently ~$34 in about 12 hours

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! I sell stuff for BTC here here and here | Skirt & Kilts & Violin For Sale | Voiceover for BTC | Copy editing for BTC | THE Bitcoin Sound is here.
gpg_identity=http://pgp.thebutterzone.com | WoT feedback here & eBay feedback here | Buy BTC in San Diego, CA, or worldwide! | Get paid for taking surveys!
Change my name! "I am __ Satoshi __." | PayPal: Bitcoinese for "FU, I'm getting a chargeback up to 365 days later!" | Bitcoin voice chat
JonSnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 09:10:54 PM
 #2176

Apparently in spite of having our wallet set to include the highest fee possible, the two "unconfirmed" transactions were broadcast without any fee whatsoever.
JonSnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 09:58:05 PM
 #2177

Will we ever receive a response?  Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through?  Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours?  Who knows.  Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems. 
mcris444
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 10:00:48 PM
 #2178

Will we ever receive a response?  Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through?  Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours?  Who knows.  Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems. 

The questions you are asking is not blockchain.info specific, but bitcoin protocol specific. So he is not the only one who can answer your questions.
JonSnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 10:03:08 PM
 #2179

It is blockchain specific - it involves my blockchain wallet and a transaction someone mistakenly sent to one of the "one time use only" Shared Send addresses associated with our account.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
April 03, 2013, 10:14:01 PM
 #2180

Will we ever receive a response?  Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through?  Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours?  Who knows.  Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems. 

The transaction will eventually go through. If you would like to speed it up, Luke-jr, the owner of the eligius.st mining pool has a way to prioritize a specific transaction.

You can PM him on the forums and ask for his help.

As for blockchain.info not including a fee, I'm sure Ben will look into it and get it resolved.
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ... 168 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!