Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics

[piuk]

No, Opensuse.

[Raoul Duke]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

[HighInBC]

No, Opensuse.

Oh thank god.

[HighInBC]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

I think the way it is set up no private key or password is ever sent over the wire.

[Raoul Duke]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

I think the way it is set up no private key or password is ever sent over the wire.

I hope you're right is all I can say.

[TheButterZone]

piuk: Just PMd you about /pushtx not working properly. 1acf8d4e40951db06de6c995bc26e7dd6b03b641fea658893173ce6dfd4e7930 finally got broadcasted after 4 or so attempts, but no beep. One other transaction I did today with the /address/ page in a background tab didn't beep either.

[BurtW]

piuk: Just PMd you about /pushtx not working properly. 1acf8d4e40951db06de6c995bc26e7dd6b03b641fea658893173ce6dfd4e7930 finally got broadcasted after 4 or so attempts, but no beep. One other transaction I did today with the /address/ page in a background tab didn't beep either.

Back one page in this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40264.msg1618054#msg1618054

Could this be related?

[piuk]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

At the moment there isn't any other choice. The datacenter blockchain is currently hosted at simply doesn't have the infrastructure to handle a ddos attack that size.

Cloudflare has cached almost 3 million http requests in the past 12 hours which is pretty nice also.

piuk: Just PMd you about /pushtx not working properly. 1acf8d4e40951db06de6c995bc26e7dd6b03b641fea658893173ce6dfd4e7930 finally got broadcasted after 4 or so attempts, but no beep. One other transaction I did today with the /address/ page in a background tab didn't beep either.

/pushtx should be working fine but the websocket is still down. I need to setup a reverse proxy through a disposable vps.

[Tritonio]

Websocket & Http notifications are currently disabled. I am working on a solution for this now.

When http notifications are back, will we also get all the missed notifications? Also is there a way to tell when http notifications are off so that I can disable payments in my sites automatically? (Other than doing payments to myself I suppose)

Good luck with the new server piuk. 

[TheButterZone]

piuk: Just PMd you about /pushtx not working properly. 1acf8d4e40951db06de6c995bc26e7dd6b03b641fea658893173ce6dfd4e7930 finally got broadcasted after 4 or so attempts, but no beep. One other transaction I did today with the /address/ page in a background tab didn't beep either.

/pushtx should be working fine but the websocket is still down. I need to setup a reverse proxy through a disposable vps.

Ok, as I said in the PM, it was brainwallet's offline src (which uses bc.i/pushtx) that wasn't working - it finally worked when I copied the raw TX and pasted it in bc.i/pushtx actual. Maybe brainwallet's push is blocked by Cloudflare. Hopefully this won't be permanent, or Joric will have to recode brainwallet.

Also, is websocket what makes the page beep on a new TX? I couldn't figure it out by looking at the page source.

ETA: Beep's back (the Flash upgrade yesterday might have been the culprit, IDK)

[dooglus]

http://blockchain.info/api/api_receive says:

//Check the Request ip matches that from blockchain.info
if ($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] == '91.203.74.202') {

It seems the callback comes from 91.223.16.20 now, not 91.203.74.202.  Is there a better way of checking the IP address so the callback handler doesn't need to be edited each time you move to a different server?

Also, a couple of typos on that page:

"will be past back" -> passed back

"the server must check the the callback" -> "that the"

[ingrownpocket]

http://blockchain.info/api/api_receive says:

//Check the Request ip matches that from blockchain.info
if ($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] == '91.203.74.202') {

It seems the callback comes from 91.223.16.20 now, not 91.203.74.202.  Is there a better way of checking the IP address so the callback handler doesn't need to be edited each time you move to a different server?

Also, a couple of typos on that page:

"will be past back" -> passed back

"the server must check the the callback" -> "that the"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119600.0

[Stephen Gornick]

I'm not getting any success doing a spend.

I see the Javascript console:

 - Uncaught ReferenceError: initNewTx is not defined

[piuk]

It seems the callback comes from 91.223.16.20 now, not 91.203.74.202.  Is there a better way of checking the IP address so the callback handler doesn't need to be edited each time you move to a different server?

Yes sorry the callback now has to come through a proxy which means the IP has changed. I will be updating the documentation shortly with a new way to validate the callback.

Also, is websocket what makes the page beep on a new TX? I couldn't figure it out by looking at the page source.

Yep. Line 540 playSound('beep'); https://github.com/blockchain/My-Wallet/blob/master/wallet.js

I'm not getting any success doing a spend.

I see the Javascript console:

 - Uncaught ReferenceError: initNewTx is not defined

Please try clearing your cache an reloading the page.

[sunnankar]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

At the moment there isn't any other choice. The datacenter blockchain is currently hosted at simply doesn't have the infrastructure to handle a ddos attack that size.

But cloudflare could still not access the private keys if one is using the plugin, right? Or could they still inject malicious javascript?

[Raoul Duke]

piuk, you shure you want to have your site behind cloudflare and let them do an authorized MITM on your users?
Putting your site behind cloudflare is throwing away all the security you've built.

At the moment there isn't any other choice. The datacenter blockchain is currently hosted at simply doesn't have the infrastructure to handle a ddos attack that size.

But cloudflare could still not access the private keys if one is using the plugin, right? Or could they still inject malicious javascript?

Cloudflare can modify any page content on transit if it's being routed trough them.
That's one of the reasons I mostly use them for DNS only and not for their CDN/reverse-proxy capabilities. On-the-fly censorship comes to mind
Don't get me wrong, Cloudflare is a great service and I use them myself as stated earlier. But using all their capabilities is something that will scare even the mildest privacy concerned individual.

Read the following article till the end to understand what I'm saying: http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/06/07/cloudflare-a-website-security-product-accidentally-makes-sites-60-faster/

[dooglus]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119600.0

Ah, OK.  I didn't realise you had pointed out the problems as recently as October of last year.

We should give them time to fix the problems and stop complaining. 

[btctrada]

Same issue here Also says no outputs available?

http://i45.tinypic.com/30a5sg2.jpg

Ben can this be sorted ASAP please? I pmed all my details to you...

[GRE3N]

I am getting an error on my wallet "no free spend outputs" or something like that.
All transactions before confirmed. I emailed your help desk. (zen desk) so far no response.

Please get back to me, thanks!!

[GRE3N]

Sorry to sound bitchy, but I tried everything to fix this problem.

My wallet on blockchain says i only have .002 when I actually have .20022549

I am getting really discouraged of use of this wallet. There is obviously a bug.

When I try to send my coin thats what happens. First it said no free spends, now this.

I hope I don't loose my .200 thats what I have according to my records, and i am not sure why the wallet thinks I have less.

Please help me.....

wallet address

17Wt5vmidhegUGXFiyiuQYc21QPb8rMYnC

I emailed the zendesk email hours ago....

thanks
michael

edit : i did some testing and its the last .200 theres an issue with why?

new error

nsufficient funds. Value Needed 0.491646 BTC. Available amount 0.2915 BTC

i have .491646