R-
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Pasta
|
|
June 17, 2012, 06:52:28 PM |
|
Hi Ben, Is the wallet feature offline again? I cannot send transactions unfortunately. The page says 'client disconnected' despite me being logged in.
Does not work on: Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari. The iOS App is experiencing the same problem. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
June 17, 2012, 07:31:22 PM |
|
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
R-
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Pasta
|
|
June 17, 2012, 07:34:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
June 17, 2012, 07:55:48 PM |
|
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
piuk (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2012, 08:39:03 PM |
|
Actually, I tried to send to Facebook, to a labeled address, and to a raw Bitcoin address, and all three attempts failed. Some of the failures actually wrote "success", but no money was sent. This repeats consistently for me.
The RMI bridge between bitcoind and the website frontend died for a bit so the UI would not have updated with any new transactions. The transaction may have been pushed out successfully though so check you haven't double sent. If you have double sent the coins can be reclaimed by sweeping the address labelled 'Sent via Facebook' in your archived addresses. Is the wallet feature offline again? I cannot send transactions unfortunately. The page says 'client disconnected' despite me being logged in.
Everything should be fully functional again now. Apologies for the issues.
|
|
|
|
ripper234
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
|
June 18, 2012, 07:48:16 AM |
|
One question - I changed my wallet pass yesterday via the web interface, and yet my Android app seems to work. How does it work? I expect a password change to disable the Android client's ability to view and certainly spend funds.
Technically, unless I move all my BTC to new addresses, then of course a change of password doesn't offer a lot of security, but at least it should not so easy...
|
|
|
|
ripper234
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
|
June 18, 2012, 08:01:18 AM |
|
BTW, I just sent Bitcoins to some Facebook friends. This is one reply I got: claimed them had to try twice first time password didn't worked for some reason "error while decrypting password"
|
|
|
|
|
piuk (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2012, 02:49:52 PM |
|
One question - I changed my wallet pass yesterday via the web interface, and yet my Android app seems to work.
A new password dialog should popup when the wallet next syncs e.g. when you open and close the app. Sometimes syncing can be a bit patchy when the web socket server is down. first time password didn't worked for some reason "error while decrypting password"
Do you know if they were creating a new wallet or logging into an existing one? I just testing creating a few new wallets and couldn't replicate the issue. Doesn't that mean that not only the block displays are wrong, but that many of the charts are wrong too?
Thanks for the bug report, this was a display issue only and should be fixed now. The largest block by value is http://blockchain.info/block-index/127584 (4m BTC)
|
|
|
|
beckspace
|
|
June 18, 2012, 04:03:59 PM |
|
Hey piuk
Does the first version of the Blockchain Wallet for iOS downloaded from the U.S. Apple Store is suposed to still work?
My app shows the balance, the transactions, but the little icon on upper-left is red.
Another question:
The encrypted backup don't ask for my yubikey, only relying on the passphrase? I just want to be sure of that.
|
|
|
|
piuk (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2012, 06:28:48 PM |
|
My app shows the balance, the transactions, but the little icon on upper-left is red.
Yes I also get the red X. It means the WebDocket isn't connected (so you will need to press the refresh icon in the top right), i'm not sure why this is I need to have a closer look. The encrypted backup don't ask for my yubikey, only relying on the passphrase? I just want to be sure of that.
Correct, two-factor authentication does not effect how the wallet is encrypted. --- New Smarter Transaction Push Algorithm ----Although Eligius should process low fee transactions for My Wallet users there has been some issues getting low fee transaction to propagate properly through the network. Now transactions will be directly relayed to every known mining node. If network propagation is still poor they will be relayed again every 10 minutes. If your transaction doesn't confirm within 24 hours you will now receive a notification: A transaction made through My Wallet has been removed from our database because it was taking a long time to be included in a block. The transaction can be temporarily viewed at {link} however it will be removed shortly. In addition the WebSocket server now runs on all 3 servers providing better fault tolerance and a flash fallback has been added for older browsers without native WebSocket support. Anyone who has been having problems with slow transactions or any errors pushing transactions things should be much improved now. void NodeManager::pushTransaction(CTransaction& tx, int maxNodes) { if (fDebug) printf("pushTransaction() %s\n", tx.GetHash().ToString().c_str()); std::set<unsigned int> already_pushed; ReadLock read(nodeManagerMutex); //100ms lock timeout boost::system_time const timeout = boost::get_system_time()+ boost::posix_time::milliseconds(100);
int nPushed = 0; int retryTimes = 5; bool done = false; uint256 hash = tx.GetHash(); for (int retry = 0; retry < retryTimes; ++ retry) { bool allZero = true;
//Node mangers handle groups of nodes 100 at a time for (int ii = 0; ii < nodeManagers.size(); ++ii) { NodeManager * manager = nodeManagers[ii]; if (manager->connectedNodes.size() == 0) { if (fDebug) printf("Size %lu\n", manager->connectedNodes.size()); continue; } //If the recent inventory contains the transaction hash then we can finish because the network // has already relayed us back the transaction if (CNode::recentInventoryContains(hash)) { if (fDebug) printf("Breaking because recent inventory contains transaction hash\n"); return; } allZero = false; if (fShutdown) return; if (manager->connectedNodesMutex.timed_lock_shared(timeout)) { if (fShutdown) return; //Push to mining pools first BOOST_FOREACH(CNode* pnode, manager->connectedNodes) { if (already_pushed.count(pnode->addr.ip) > 0) { continue; } if (ConnectionManager::isMiningPool(pnode->addr.ip)) { already_pushed.insert(pnode->addr.ip);
if (pnode->hSocket == INVALID_SOCKET || pnode->fDisconnect) continue; pnode->PushMessage("tx", tx); ++nPushed; } if (nPushed > maxNodes) { if (fDebug) printf("Relayed to sufficient number of nodes (known) %d\n", nPushed); done = true; break; } } manager->connectedNodesMutex.unlock_shared(); } } if (allZero) { return; } if (done) { return; } } if (nPushed < maxNodes) { printf("Didn't relay to enough nodes %d < %d\n", nPushed, maxNodes); return; } }
|
|
|
|
Topazan
|
|
June 19, 2012, 01:25:39 AM Last edit: June 19, 2012, 01:44:45 AM by Topazan |
|
I'm currently experiencing a weird bug. Whenever I try to send money, whether within the wallet or not, I get an error that says "Unknown Error Pushing Transaction".
In addition, whenever I try to do a "custom" transaction, the confirm screen shows an amount much higher than I specified on the form. For example, if I try to send 20 BTC it will say "Please confirm you would like to move 109.00 BTC between your own bitcoin addresses".
|
Save the last bitcoin for me!
|
|
|
nimda
|
|
June 19, 2012, 01:39:40 AM |
|
I'm currently experiencing a weird bug. Whenever I try to send money, whether within the wallet or not, I get an error that says "Unknown Error Pushing Transaction". Me too
|
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1005
this space intentionally left blank
|
|
June 19, 2012, 12:29:08 PM |
|
First time I go to the site today: "Your wallet is locked for the next 239 minutes." Three hours later: "Your wallet is locked for the next 239 minutes." An hour later: "Your wallet is locked for the next 239 minutes."
WTF?
Please unlock.
|
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1005
this space intentionally left blank
|
|
June 19, 2012, 06:23:30 PM |
|
thanks for the quick help :-D now someone riddle me this: https://blockchain.info/address/1goLdrbvhTSbpSaSzKVUTz7fhTuAQe6JZthis adress I use for a savings plan. however, i guess the adress was randomly chosen as a "change back" adress for received or sent money. can someone help me figure out how many BTC this adress has received that were genuinely from another sender?
|
|
|
|
nimda
|
|
June 20, 2012, 01:50:24 AM |
|
Depends on how many of those input addresses you own...
|
|
|
|
minimalB
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 674
Merit: 522
|
|
June 20, 2012, 10:26:01 AM |
|
Found a bug: 1. Login to web wallet and go to "Send money / Address Book" 2. Add new entry 3. After clicking "Add address", "Quick send" window is changed to this: 4. And "Custom send" is changed to this: And request: could you make AddressBook popup items also selectable with keyboard cursors (now user can select them only with mouse)? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
LightRider
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1021
I advocate the Zeitgeist Movement & Venus Project.
|
|
June 21, 2012, 12:09:48 PM |
|
Google Chrome is telling me that the wallet verifier app needs new permissions. What's the story?
|
|
|
|
Peter Todd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1149
|
|
June 21, 2012, 01:43:34 PM |
|
Google Chrome is telling me that the wallet verifier app needs new permissions. What's the story?
I'm seeing this too. Oddly I saw the message first on a totally unrelated site.
|
|
|
|
|