★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[ghostycc]

DGB is moving up. We can see 120 sats today.

Based on technicals?

not sure about 120's. But for sure we've got a new uptrend wave for daily traders.

[maxsinner]

If we all could just buy one coin and hold it, we would be all rich. DGB for the win!

[DigiByte]

Is anyone still having issues with DigiHash? if so please let us know.

[perrie454]

Sold all my Dgb-bought another altcoin with great community without mean people like HR.                                      Very happy,wishing all at Dgb community great success even the mean one Scrooge HR  

[cryptmebro]

Sold all my Dgb-bought another altcoin with great community without mean people like HR.                                      Very happy,wishing all at Dgb community great success even the mean one Scrooge HR  

He's just trying to make people dump so the price will go down and he can buy more.

[IloveDigibyte]

Every page has a person with issues. This is not good when people get introduced to digibyte. The code is archaic , a coin like Doge already on code base 0.11, false advertising and bad apps. This coin is no where near being ready for mainstream.

talking about the IOS wallet issue ?

Like you were to bored to read the pages , and DL the new wallet to be able to send your funds to Polo ?

You sent 6 messages on this forum / and specially in DGB thread, all negatives, comon.

  TROLL (troll)
  trōl/Submit
  noun
  a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.
  synonyms:   goblin, hobgoblin, gnome, halfling, demon, monster, bugaboo, ogre
  "the storybook trolls who live under the bridge"

Don't get too upset with them, it sucks to live under a bridge. Very sad, ugly creatures. Best not to feed them or they might reproduce...

He is telling the truth about digibyte being on a old code base. About 4 or 5 behind bitcoin. One person did PM to say Gulden is also on 0.11 when I mentioned this last time, Doge devs have said they won't do another one as it's time consuming. Dash is only on 0.1 which is about 2 ahead of digibyte and found another coin GRS that is also on 0.11

GRS is proof that marketing is > development as I have stated the same about myriadcoin when compared to digibyte.

About 90% of the marketcap is thanks to Jared and Jared alone. The power of marketing must not be underestimated.

EDIT: I left out litecoin that is also on 0.11 .

You can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.
Gulden has no marketing and those developers will be snapped up by currencies in the top 10, it would be great if they joined digibyte.
Had a quick look at GRS but the developers are anonymous? Anonymous developers won't get anywhere.

[Bluestreet]

Every page has a person with issues. This is not good when people get introduced to digibyte. The code is archaic , a coin like Doge already on code base 0.11, false advertising and bad apps. This coin is no where near being ready for mainstream.

talking about the IOS wallet issue ?

Like you were to bored to read the pages , and DL the new wallet to be able to send your funds to Polo ?

You sent 6 messages on this forum / and specially in DGB thread, all negatives, comon.

  TROLL (troll)
  trōl/Submit
  noun
  a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.
  synonyms:   goblin, hobgoblin, gnome, halfling, demon, monster, bugaboo, ogre
  "the storybook trolls who live under the bridge"

Don't get too upset with them, it sucks to live under a bridge. Very sad, ugly creatures. Best not to feed them or they might reproduce...

He is telling the truth about digibyte being on a old code base. About 4 or 5 behind bitcoin. One person did PM to say Gulden is also on 0.11 when I mentioned this last time, Doge devs have said they won't do another one as it's time consuming. Dash is only on 0.1 which is about 2 ahead of digibyte and found another coin GRS that is also on 0.11

GRS is proof that marketing is > development as I have stated the same about myriadcoin when compared to digibyte.

About 90% of the marketcap is thanks to Jared and Jared alone. The power of marketing must not be underestimated.

EDIT: I left out litecoin that is also on 0.11 .

You can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.
Gulden has no marketing and those developers will be snapped up by currencies in the top 10, it would be great if they joined digibyte.
Had a quick look at GRS but the developers are anonymous? Anonymous developers won't get anywhere.

Gulden team are committed to Gulden as per the post Waterloodown made here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1343317.msg14464989#msg14464989

They are as committed to their project as the digibyte development team is to dgb.

[DropDead.Be]

Who can help me clarify these 2 questions?

1) Is the Digibyte easy miner still downloadable? I Can't seem to find it on google.

2) How many full nodes does the DGB ecosystem entail?

Thanks in advance

[24hralttrade]

Every page has a person with issues. This is not good when people get introduced to digibyte. The code is archaic , a coin like Doge already on code base 0.11, false advertising and bad apps. This coin is no where near being ready for mainstream.

talking about the IOS wallet issue ?

Like you were to bored to read the pages , and DL the new wallet to be able to send your funds to Polo ?

You sent 6 messages on this forum / and specially in DGB thread, all negatives, comon.

  TROLL (troll)
  trōl/Submit
  noun
  a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.
  synonyms:   goblin, hobgoblin, gnome, halfling, demon, monster, bugaboo, ogre
  "the storybook trolls who live under the bridge"

Don't get too upset with them, it sucks to live under a bridge. Very sad, ugly creatures. Best not to feed them or they might reproduce...

He is telling the truth about digibyte being on a old code base. About 4 or 5 behind bitcoin. One person did PM to say Gulden is also on 0.11 when I mentioned this last time, Doge devs have said they won't do another one as it's time consuming. Dash is only on 0.1 which is about 2 ahead of digibyte and found another coin GRS that is also on 0.11

GRS is proof that marketing is > development as I have stated the same about myriadcoin when compared to digibyte.

About 90% of the marketcap is thanks to Jared and Jared alone. The power of marketing must not be underestimated.

EDIT: I left out litecoin that is also on 0.11 .

You can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.
Gulden has no marketing and those developers will be snapped up by currencies in the top 10, it would be great if they joined digibyte.
Had a quick look at GRS but the developers are anonymous? Anonymous developers won't get anywhere.

Gulden team are committed to Gulden as per the post Waterloodown made here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1343317.msg14464989#msg14464989

They are as committed to their project as the digibyte development team is to dgb.

Gulden team is committed until the Dev funds /  premine is gone and with the speed they are spending the funds and the price is not really rising ( Yet ) Do you think mani will work for free? The "bigger" inverstors of Gulden projects are gone already and now stepped over to develop AUR.

No attack to NLG, I know they work hard and do their thing but its all money involved and if the money is gone and nobody is willing to give thousands of euro's /  Guldens for development......

Changing to the  new codebase, Is that really needed for now? The chain works, Digibyte needs to focus on more important things atm. Things will be fixxed if needed but i dont see any urgent reason to change to the newest codebase at this moment.

So please guys, Stop comparing coins to eachother, Do your research and decide for yourself if you want to support or hold or just not even want to buy

[TamiLee]

Every page has a person with issues. This is not good when people get introduced to digibyte. The code is archaic , a coin like Doge already on code base 0.11, false advertising and bad apps. This coin is no where near being ready for mainstream.

talking about the IOS wallet issue ?

Like you were to bored to read the pages , and DL the new wallet to be able to send your funds to Polo ?

You sent 6 messages on this forum / and specially in DGB thread, all negatives, comon.

  TROLL (troll)
  trōl/Submit
  noun
  a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.
  synonyms:   goblin, hobgoblin, gnome, halfling, demon, monster, bugaboo, ogre
  "the storybook trolls who live under the bridge"

Don't get too upset with them, it sucks to live under a bridge. Very sad, ugly creatures. Best not to feed them or they might reproduce...

He is telling the truth about digibyte being on a old code base. About 4 or 5 behind bitcoin. One person did PM to say Gulden is also on 0.11 when I mentioned this last time, Doge devs have said they won't do another one as it's time consuming. Dash is only on 0.1 which is about 2 ahead of digibyte and found another coin GRS that is also on 0.11

GRS is proof that marketing is > development as I have stated the same about myriadcoin when compared to digibyte.

About 90% of the marketcap is thanks to Jared and Jared alone. The power of marketing must not be underestimated.

EDIT: I left out litecoin that is also on 0.11 .

You can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.
Gulden has no marketing and those developers will be snapped up by currencies in the top 10, it would be great if they joined digibyte.
Had a quick look at GRS but the developers are anonymous? Anonymous developers won't get anywhere.

Gulden team are committed to Gulden as per the post Waterloodown made here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1343317.msg14464989#msg14464989

They are as committed to their project as the digibyte development team is to dgb.

Gulden team is committed until the Dev funds /  premine is gone and with the speed they are spending the funds and the price is not really rising ( Yet ) Do you think mani will work for free? The "bigger" inverstors of Gulden projects are gone already and now stepped over to develop AUR.

No attack to NLG, I know they work hard and do their thing but its all money involved and if the money is gone and nobody is willing to give thousands of euro's /  Guldens for development......

Changing to the  new codebase, Is that really needed for now? The chain works, Digibyte needs to focus on more important things atm. Things will be fixxed if needed but i dont see any urgent reason to change to the newest codebase at this moment.

So please guys, Stop comparing coins to eachother, Do your research and decide for yourself if you want to support or hold or just not even want to buy

I have an idea to get Waterloodown and MaNi to quit Gulden, if everyone who holds Gulden puts all their Gulden between 500 - 600 sat. Have huge sell walls and force the price down to 200 or 300.
AUR marketcap is over $2 000 000 because all those investors have dumped Gulden and moved on. LTEX, Biomike and all of them don't care if Gulden fails at this point.

We destroy Gulden their development team becomes available but it doesn't mean they will come to digibyte first.

This can work because they have no marketing and people won't be buying those sell walls.

You obviously an AUR supporter and good for you but this is the digibyte ANN and your suggestion smells like a cheap shot of getting low priced coins. You Sir are mad.

[Jumbley]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI4HagtgTPQ

this technology is a tool.

[motherfucker123]

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

[motherfucker123]

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

people here slowly realising what a sham digibyte is with all the broken wallets and no coding going on

So what you do on this thread then? Go support your favorite coin on its ANN thread. I am sure it's much better.

[Telenong]

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

people here slowly realising what a sham digibyte is with all the broken wallets and no coding going on

So what you do on this thread then? Go support your favorite coin on its ANN thread. I am sure it's much better.

you can make conclusion, digibyte ann thread so famous, people talk other coin to make attention to their coin are talking about. because their coin ann thread is less visitor and small community 

[Telenong]

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

people here slowly realising what a sham digibyte is with all the broken wallets and no coding going on

So what you do on this thread then? Go support your favorite coin on its ANN thread. I am sure it's much better.

here to expose scams, scams hurt all proper coins the longer they exist so should be exposed, this coin is my first target due to the crazy levels of BS claims going on here microsoft technology what a joke. I will move on to expose other coins as scams soon enough but one scam at a time. so now that everyone has admitted that I was actually right and that the digibyte code is outdated junk lets go back to the topic of the BS claim of a $250000 investment why is there still no proof of it? if it really existed shouldnt there be actual development going on instead of broken wallets? admit it the investment was BS there is no $250000 all you have is a marketing guy who looks like a used car dealer

your troll so boring, be creative dude

[Jumbley]

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

people here slowly realising what a sham digibyte is with all the broken wallets and no coding going on

So what you do on this thread then? Go support your favorite coin on its ANN thread. I am sure it's much better.

here to expose scams, scams hurt all proper coins the longer they exist so should be exposed, this coin is my first target due to the crazy levels of BS claims going on here microsoft technology what a joke. I will move on to expose other coins as scams soon enough but one scam at a time. so now that everyone has admitted that I was actually right and that the digibyte code is outdated junk lets go back to the topic of the BS claim of a $250000 investment why is there still no proof of it? if it really existed shouldnt there be actual development going on instead of broken wallets? admit it the investment was BS there is no $250000 all you have is a marketing guy who looks like a used car dealer

So far you have only exposed yourself as ignorant but I have no doubt you can top that. The answers to all your questions are already in this thread but you obviously couldn’t be bothered to read any of it before you came in here throwing your accusations around like you know what you are talking about, you obviously don’t. Whatever, fill your boots!

[IloveDigibyte]

Where is the proof the code is 3 years old?

this is technical, get someone who actually understand programming to verify it for you if you dont believe me.

it is well known that dgb forked from myriad, if you go to the myriad github repo https://github.com/myriadcoin/myriadcoin you will see some info at top left, 1) myriad itself has only done 151 commits 2) myriad forked from zetacoin
we then go to zetacoins github https://github.com/zetacoin/zetacoin you will see some info at top left 1) zetacoin forked from bitcoin 2) it is an amazing 6103 commits behind bitcoin

from this we can infer that myriad was also 6103 commits behind bitcoin, and that when digibyte was forked from myriad it would also then be 6103 commits behind.

of course at this point you are going to claim digibyte updated the code after forking, but here is a simple script that will prove you wrong

Code:

rm -rf dgb
rm -rf myr
#clone the 2 for comparison
git clone https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte.git
git clone https://github.com/myriadcoin/myriadcoin.git
cp -rf myriadcoin myr
cp -rf digibyte dgb
#normalise name changes for comparison
find myr -type f -exec sed -i 's/bitcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find myr -type f -exec sed -i 's/digibyte/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find myr -type f -exec sed -i 's/myriadcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find myr -type f -exec sed -i 's/myriad/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/bitcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/digibyte/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/myriadcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/myriad/shitcoin/gI' {} +
#delete images and localisation files as these are not code and create a lot of noise
rm -rf dgb/src/qt/res
rm -rf myr/src/qt/res
rm -rf dgb/src/qt/locale
rm -rf myr/src/qt/locale
#compare the src directories to get an idea of how much code has been added
diff -rubd myr/src/ dgb/src/ | grep -E "^[+][^+]" | wc -l

if you run this script you will find that there are only (and this is an upper bound) 1118 differences (most of these are from myriad side, as I showed in my earlier posts the entire code written by th e digibyte team is as little as 500 lines with most of that being generic stuff a child could change) between the current myriad and digibyte codebases if digibyte  had updates to the latest bitcoin these differences would be much greater.

from this it is safe to infer that digibyte is on the same bitcoin codebase as zetacoin and myriad - the exact bitcoin commit zetacoin forked from is here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/6d89611c3aaa85798c4d70d20e35e6bcb7bdd5c0 and dates back to 2013 meaning digibyte is terribly out of date and missing lots of features and bug fixes from bitcoin


of course I expect you still wont believe me so here is another script

Code:

rm -rf dgb
rm -rf btc
rm -rf btcforkpoint
#clone the 2 for comparison
git clone https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte.git
git clone https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
cp -rf digibyte dgb
cp -rf bitcoin btc
cp -rd bitcoin btcforkpoint
#revert the repo to the point where digibyte was forked from
cd btcforkpoint
git reset --hard 6d89611c3aaa85798c4d70d20e35e6bcb7bdd5c0
cd ..
#normalise name changes for comparison
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/bitcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find dgb -type f -exec sed -i 's/digibyte/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find btc -type f -exec sed -i 's/bitcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find btc -type f -exec sed -i 's/digibyte/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find btcforkpoint -type f -exec sed -i 's/bitcoin/shitcoin/gI' {} +
find btcforkpoint -type f -exec sed -i 's/digibyte/shitcoin/gI' {} +
#delete images and localisation files as these are not code and create a lot of noise
rm -rf dgb/src/qt/res
rm -rf btc/src/qt/res
rm -rf btcforkpoint/src/qt/res
rm -rf dgb/src/qt/locale
rm -rf btc/src/qt/locale
rm -rf btcforkpoint/src/qt/locale
#compare the src directories to get a basic idea of how much is different
diff -rubd dgb/src/ btc/src/ | grep -E "^[+][^+]" | wc -l
diff -rubd dgb/src btcforkpoint/src/ | grep -E "^[+][^+]" | wc -l

this script compares the latest digibyte codebase to the current bitcoin codebase and to the 2013 bitcoin codebase, it finds the 2013 codebase much more similar, this proves that digibyte has not kept updates with bitcoin

Crypto_Beast you know your way around code, I know hackers get poached by government to work for them. Would you consider being a developer for digibyte to update the code? A good friend of mine has confirmed you are telling the truth in this regard.

I came in to read about DigiByte and all I read was about Gulden. What the fuck?

people here slowly realising what a sham digibyte is with all the broken wallets and no coding going on

So what you do on this thread then? Go support your favorite coin on its ANN thread. I am sure it's much better.

here to expose scams, scams hurt all proper coins the longer they exist so should be exposed, this coin is my first target due to the crazy levels of BS claims going on here microsoft technology what a joke. I will move on to expose other coins as scams soon enough but one scam at a time. so now that everyone has admitted that I was actually right and that the digibyte code is outdated junk lets go back to the topic of the BS claim of a $250000 investment why is there still no proof of it? if it really existed shouldnt there be actual development going on instead of broken wallets? admit it the investment was BS there is no $250000 all you have is a marketing guy who looks like a used car dealer

So far you have only exposed yourself as ignorant but I have no doubt you can top that. The answers to all your questions are already in this thread but you obviously couldn’t be bothered to read any of it before you came in here throwing your accusations around like you know what you are talking about, you obviously don’t. Whatever, fill your boots!

actually I do know what I am talking about unlike you who probably has not even researched the coin you support, a true example of an ignorant fanboy, at the pace the digibyte developers copy and paste code it would take them two months to write the above scripts. go ahead prove me wrong, prove that digibyte has actual competent developers that the $250k is not a lie or that jared does not look like a used car salesman, I bet you cannot prove any of these things

I posted this before, you can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.

The code works good enough, I only had trouble with syncing when i installed, it took a few days but since then the wallet has been able sync fine and I can send coins fast to the exchanges and back.

[Jumbley]

I do want a coin that has all the bitcoin bug fixes, it is called bitcoin!
I also want DigiByte with its own bug fixes, please.
 

[ghostycc]

actually I do know what I am talking about unlike you who probably has not even researched the coin you support, a true example of an ignorant fanboy, at the pace the digibyte developers copy and paste code it would take them two months to write the above scripts. go ahead prove me wrong, prove that digibyte has actual competent developers that the $250k is not a lie or that jared does not look like a used car salesman, I bet you cannot prove any of these things

Let me guess, you jumped in at 180 ?

[Jero]

Every page has a person with issues. This is not good when people get introduced to digibyte. The code is archaic , a coin like Doge already on code base 0.11, false advertising and bad apps. This coin is no where near being ready for mainstream.

talking about the IOS wallet issue ?

Like you were to bored to read the pages , and DL the new wallet to be able to send your funds to Polo ?

You sent 6 messages on this forum / and specially in DGB thread, all negatives, comon.

  TROLL (troll)
  trōl/Submit
  noun
  a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.
  synonyms:   goblin, hobgoblin, gnome, halfling, demon, monster, bugaboo, ogre
  "the storybook trolls who live under the bridge"

Don't get too upset with them, it sucks to live under a bridge. Very sad, ugly creatures. Best not to feed them or they might reproduce...

He is telling the truth about digibyte being on a old code base. About 4 or 5 behind bitcoin. One person did PM to say Gulden is also on 0.11 when I mentioned this last time, Doge devs have said they won't do another one as it's time consuming. Dash is only on 0.1 which is about 2 ahead of digibyte and found another coin GRS that is also on 0.11

GRS is proof that marketing is > development as I have stated the same about myriadcoin when compared to digibyte.

About 90% of the marketcap is thanks to Jared and Jared alone. The power of marketing must not be underestimated.

EDIT: I left out litecoin that is also on 0.11 .

You can't compare a over $6 billion (BTC) , over $140 million (LTC) and Dash over $40 million marketcap coins with digibyte that is only $2.7 million.
Gulden has no marketing and those developers will be snapped up by currencies in the top 10, it would be great if they joined digibyte.
Had a quick look at GRS but the developers are anonymous? Anonymous developers won't get anywhere.

Gulden team are committed to Gulden as per the post Waterloodown made here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1343317.msg14464989#msg14464989

They are as committed to their project as the digibyte development team is to dgb.

Gulden team is committed until the Dev funds /  premine is gone and with the speed they are spending the funds and the price is not really rising ( Yet ) Do you think mani will work for free? The "bigger" inverstors of Gulden projects are gone already and now stepped over to develop AUR.

No attack to NLG, I know they work hard and do their thing but its all money involved and if the money is gone and nobody is willing to give thousands of euro's /  Guldens for development......

Changing to the  new codebase, Is that really needed for now? The chain works, Digibyte needs to focus on more important things atm. Things will be fixxed if needed but i dont see any urgent reason to change to the newest codebase at this moment.

So please guys, Stop comparing coins to eachother, Do your research and decide for yourself if you want to support or hold or just not even want to buy

Are you really telling people here Gulden has no future because it depends on her premine?
Are you telling Mani only works for money and dont care about Gulden?
Are you calling the ones with big wallets left Gulden "bigger investors"?

Please clarify these pronunciations, they dont my sense imo. It actually really sucks big time!