Alexey45
Jr. Member
Activity: 204
Merit: 1
|
 |
October 15, 2019, 06:28:36 AM |
|
Charts on the stock exchange show savings for 11 weeks. DASH price is in a narrow range.
I think the richest manipulators will let the red candle down to knock out weak hands.
But in the long run, the holders will receive their dividends.
Denouement soon, DASH will fall heavily down but then up rocket into space)
Obviously, DASH is now the most profitable product on the market!
|
|
|
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1250
|
 |
October 15, 2019, 08:40:30 AM |
|
|
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
A. k. solo
Newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
October 15, 2019, 09:40:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1250
|
|
October 15, 2019, 10:50:25 AM
Last edit: October 15, 2019, 11:56:00 AM by qwizzie |
|
Strange that Dash only gets DASH/USD pair, i kinda exspected a DASH/BTC pair on Binance US as well (mostly because Binance also has a DASH/BTC pair, and BTC pairs seem more easy to add as a listing in general). From Binance US itself : https://support.binance.us/hc/en-us/articles/360035174431-Binance-US-Will-List-Dash-DASH-After the above additions, Binance.US will offer the following trading pairs:
BTC Pairs: ETH/BTC, XRP/BTC, BNB/BTC, LTC/BTC, BCH/BTC
USD Pairs: BTC/USD, ETH/USD, XRP/USD, BCH/USD, LTC/USD, BNB/USD, USDT/USD, ADA/USD, BAT/USD, ETC/USD, XLM/USD, ZRX/USD, LINK/USD, RVN/USD, DASH/USD
USDT Pairs: BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT, XRP/USDT, BCH/USDT, LTC/USDT, BNB/USDT, ADA/USDT, BAT/USDT, ETC/USDT, XLM/USDT, ZRX/USDT |
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
|
NibiruHybrid
|
|
October 15, 2019, 02:43:58 PM |
|
Binance US Adds Dash Including US Dollar Trading Pairs Binance US cryptocurrency exchange has announced the inclusion of Dash on the platform, including US dollar fiat trading pairs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ePesoInitiative
|
|
October 15, 2019, 05:20:35 PM |
|
Binance US Adds Dash Including US Dollar Trading Pairs Binance US cryptocurrency exchange has announced the inclusion of Dash on the platform, including US dollar fiat trading pairs.
Oh wow! Do you know what this means? Venezuelan businesses can pay US suppliers with DASH and they can exchange it for dollars in Binance US. I know this is not simple but it is one of many small steps. |
|
|
|
|
NibiruHybrid
|
|
October 15, 2019, 06:43:06 PM |
|
UNICEF Pledges to Hold Cryptocurrency Donations in Cryptocurrency UNICEF expands on a previous cryptocurrency acceptance program by UNICEF France by pledging to hold and disburse donated charity in cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
|
|
versprichnix
|
|
October 15, 2019, 07:56:03 PM |
|
UNICEF Pledges to Hold Cryptocurrency Donations in Cryptocurrency ... UNICEF expands on a previous cryptocurrency acceptance program by UNICEF France by pledging to hold and disburse donated charity in cryptocurrency.I'm indeed surprised. The common way for business is to sell the cryptos against fiat money as soon as possible. The reason is the egocentric oeconomic program, marketprice fluctuation is risk. This greedy oeconomic progam leads to insane behaviour. Donation recipients hold the crypto donations on absurdly rising markets, and sell at once on absurdly dropping markets. This behavior increases price fluctuation. If you want a better world, change your mind. Rebalancing is the way for human live. Distribute budgets on different assets, depending on confidence. No confidence, no budget. If you are doing otherwise, take your loss! UNICEF this way should define budgets on every accepted crypto coin, depending on democratic decision. As long as the budget is not reached, especially on falling markets, the donations are collected and hold. On rising markets the budget could overflow, and on excaggeration they have to sell some of their coins to converge to the budget again. NEVER sell all coins, you never know how extremely the market price can rise. Rebalancing is market price damping, buying low and selling high. The goal is the preservation of wealth, NOT the gain. In an human world, there are nearly now price fluctuation. In a greedy world, in which we are living, the rebalancer can gain a lot of wealth, the higher the fluctuation, the more. THIS IS A PASSIVE STRATEGY, YOU DO NOT NEED FEEL LIKE A HERO, YOU ARE A BOOBY! |
|
|
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
October 16, 2019, 01:15:55 AM |
|
Evan Duffield: A leader in the Blockchain industryIn this episode, Christopher (Tao) examines the blockchain innovations put forth by Evan Duffield and questions why he doesn't receive much recognition for them in the broader digital currency space.  #Dash #DashNation |
|
|
|
Tungi17
Member
Activity: 319
Merit: 29
|
|
October 16, 2019, 01:55:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JanpriX
|
|
October 16, 2019, 03:23:20 AM |
|
The data provided in that article is quite astonishing. The portfolio's algorithm choose between 13 different coins (BTC, ETH, XRP, IOTA, BCH, NEO, ETC, DASH, EOS, XLM, LTC, ZEC and ADA) and the results are the following: the AI put 47.24% stake in DASH; 23.92% EOS; 21.86% XRP; 5.01% MIOTA; and 1.97% ETC. It is also important to take note that it rebalances every month depending on the outcome of its algorithm. This just means that the sentiment of Crypto Twitter heavily favors DASH as of the moment. This can change any moment moving forward but this just proves that the community of DASH is really thriving hard even if we are in this kind of market right now. |
|
|
|
|
Tungi17
Member
Activity: 319
Merit: 29
|
|
October 16, 2019, 07:59:23 AM |
|
The data provided in that article is quite astonishing. The portfolio's algorithm choose between 13 different coins (BTC, ETH, XRP, IOTA, BCH, NEO, ETC, DASH, EOS, XLM, LTC, ZEC and ADA) and the results are the following: the AI put 47.24% stake in DASH; 23.92% EOS; 21.86% XRP; 5.01% MIOTA; and 1.97% ETC. It is also important to take note that it rebalances every month depending on the outcome of its algorithm. This just means that the sentiment of Crypto Twitter heavily favors DASH as of the moment. This can change any moment moving forward but this just proves that the community of DASH is really thriving hard even if we are in this kind of market right now. i believe it is more that all others are using Bots and we are one of the only doing this with manual manpower ; ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NibiruHybrid
|
|
October 17, 2019, 10:11:34 AM |
|
eToro and The TIE Introduce Crypto Portfolio With Dash Comprising Largest Position eToro, the popular cryptocurrency trading website, is partnering with The TIE, a cryptocurrency information services firm, to implement a Twitter sentiments trading portfolio, which lists Dash as its largest position. |
|
|
|
|
|
ePesoInitiative
|
|
October 17, 2019, 11:21:44 AM |
|
The data provided in that article is quite astonishing. The portfolio's algorithm choose between 13 different coins (BTC, ETH, XRP, IOTA, BCH, NEO, ETC, DASH, EOS, XLM, LTC, ZEC and ADA) and the results are the following: the AI put 47.24% stake in DASH; 23.92% EOS; 21.86% XRP; 5.01% MIOTA; and 1.97% ETC. It is also important to take note that it rebalances every month depending on the outcome of its algorithm. This just means that the sentiment of Crypto Twitter heavily favors DASH as of the moment. This can change any moment moving forward but this just proves that the community of DASH is really thriving hard even if we are in this kind of market right now. Yeah, but as the article says, the eToro portfolio will be a plaything of notorious bots like the XRP army and the ETH giveaway bots. I don't know how it will differentiate real mentions from bots. Twitter is quite a mess. Maybe an advance AI could. |
|
|
|
|
|
hd49728
Legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1355
|
|
October 17, 2019, 12:57:47 PM |
|
The figure of active address on DASH network shows the fact that DASH has been popularly used, for most of the other altcoins. It just surpassed Litecoin recently but the figure for DASH's active addresses outweighs figures for BCH, BSV, for example. Months ago, I read in the topic that in Venezuela the total transaction of DASH even outweighs bitcoin transactions. I am not sure, but that is what I remembered from my memory, so I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
October 17, 2019, 02:57:18 PM |
|
A common explanation for the Dash "instamine" (fastmine is a more appropriate term) was that since Litecoin had a fastmine, Dash's fastmine could be attributed to a bug from the Litecoin code. This explanation, which is also featured in Dash's official summary here:https://dashpay.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OC/pages/19759164/Dash+Instamine+Issue+Clarificationwill need to be changed. Through my research I have discovered that there was another culprit responsible for Dash's fastmine.Tomorrow at 9:00PM UTC I will release my video documentary tackling the circumstances surrounding the Dash fastmine. I will clarify a lot of things that have been left open to interpretation, often leading to negative conclusions about the founder and the Dash project. Please tune in. Documentary title: Decentralized Deeper Thought: The Truth about Dash! Link to premiere page (don't forget to set a reminder): https://youtu.be/O39kWbOu11MTime and date of premiere: Friday, October 18th, at 9:00PM UTC. If you are open-minded and willing to learn or challenge your beliefs about what happened at Dash's launch in 2014, I hope to see you at the documentary! You will be able to comment and chat with others alongside the video when it airs. Kind regards, Christopher Carruthers (Tao Of Satoshi)
|
|
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1250
|
|
October 17, 2019, 03:08:19 PM
Last edit: October 17, 2019, 04:11:46 PM by qwizzie |
|
A common explanation for the Dash "instamine" (fastmine is a more appropriate term) was that since Litecoin had a fastmine, Dash's fastmine could be attributed to a bug from the Litecoin code.
This explanation, which is also featured in Dash's official summary here:https://dashpay.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OC/pages/19759164/Dash+Instamine+Issue+Clarificationwill need to be changed. Through my research I have discovered that there was another culprit responsible for Dash's fastmine. That was never a common explanation (i only ever heard it mentioned by 1 person) , nor is it described like that in Dash official summary. Let me quote Dash's official summary : XCoin as it was called at the time was based off of the Litecoin code base, which unbeknownst to the developers contained restrictions on the frequency and extent of adjustments which
the network could apply to mining difficulty.
Because of these restrictions, and the popularity of mining the coin, the network produced a large number of blocks with the maximum allowable coins in each block. This does not indicate a Litecoin fastmine to me, it just indicates the factors that played a role in Dash unique fastmine / instamine. As a reminder, Dash was first forked from Litecoin codebase and later on forked from Bitcoin code base. Just because Dash was originally forked from Litecoin and had a fastmine / instamine, does not mean Litecoin must have had a fastmine / instamine as well. I dont see anything that needs to be changed in the Dash official summary so far, unless you found something that completely invalidate above official quotation (which would surprise me). Also i dont like how some of your posts are formulated : Dash founder Evan Duffield, while having a brilliant mind, was an impetuous sort in 2014, prone to rushing his code releases in his eagerness and rush to launch.
Can this position be disproven based on available facts? It comes across as clickbait / readbait and can possibly make google search results focus on the (misleading) title alone. I can understand the drive to promote one's own documentary, but please be a little bit more carefull how you approach this promotion. |
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
October 17, 2019, 04:13:39 PM |
|
A common explanation for the Dash "instamine" (fastmine is a more appropriate term) was that since Litecoin had a fastmine, Dash's fastmine could be attributed to a bug from the Litecoin code.
This explanation, which is also featured in Dash's official summary here:https://dashpay.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OC/pages/19759164/Dash+Instamine+Issue+Clarificationwill need to be changed. Through my research I have discovered that there was another culprit responsible for Dash's fastmine. That was never a common explanation (i only ever heard it mentioned by 1 person) , nor is it described like that in Dash official summary. Let me quote Dash's official summary : XCoin as it was called at the time was based off of the Litecoin code base, which unbeknownst to the developers contained restrictions on the frequency and extent of adjustments which
the network could apply to mining difficulty.
Because of these restrictions, and the popularity of mining the coin, the network produced a large number of blocks with the maximum allowable coins in each block. This does not indicate a Litecoin fastmine to me, it just indicates the factors that played a role in Dash unique fastmine / instamine. As a reminder, Dash was first forked from Litecoin codebase and later on forked from Bitcoin code base. Just because Dash was originally forked from Litecoin and had a fastmine / instamine, does not mean Litecoin must have had a fastmine / instamine as well. I dont see anything that needs to be changed in the Dash official summary so far, unless you found something that completely invalidate above quotation (which would surprise me). The part of the explanation above (in bold and in red) is not entirely correct. I will surprise you. Also i dont like how some of your posts are formulated : Dash founder Evan Duffield, while having a brilliant mind, was an impetuous sort in 2014, prone to rushing his code releases in his eagerness and rush to launch.
Can this position be disproven based on available facts? It comes across as clickbait / readbait and can possibly make google search results focus on the (misleading) title alone. I can understand the drive to promote one's own documentary, but please be a little bit more carefull how you approach this promotion. I disagree with your assessment, but respect your opinion. Thanks for the feedback. |
|
|
|
|
