[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[dewdeded]

All tx hash is populated.

http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

looks like nodes not listed in darkcoin.io spent coin.

What does this mean?

[1714225439]

1714225439

[1714225439]

1714225439

[1714225439]

1714225439

[kaene]

Intended for the Darkcoin devs:

If people didn't have to risk 1000 Darkcoins, maybe people wouldn't be dumping it like crazy whenever the ROI is 3+ times what someone paid for them originally, when someone happens to get there Darkcoins stolen, or a hardfork goes wrong -- or worst case scenario, all three happen around the same time. Maybe, just maybe, you could allow people to act as masternodes with 100 Darkcoins.

Intended for Darkcoin investors:

I'm sure the Darkcoin devs would like you to think that the person that had his Darkcoins stolen was purely a user error (either it being a downed firewall and/or a poor wallet password), but the truth is, no one knows (though we will if people keep getting their masternode wallets stolen). Until Darkcoin has the proven reputation that Bitcoin has had with its security (which has proven to be flawed), I'm not sure why anyone would be willing to let $5,000+ dollars sit in the open waiting for some desperate hacker to find a flaw.

completley agree

I don't agree at all, you don't risk your 1000 DRKs by hosting a masternode. This is like saying that you risk your TV by owning a house, so did you leave the alarm disconnected and the door open?

If you follow the instructions as explained in this thread is technically impossible to get your coins stolen, and once cold-storage is an option it will be technically and physically impossible.

[Ozziecoin]

Sleepyx and others happy to help people who want to set one up for free.  Good if you know linux. Else, I do it for you for 10 Drks.

If anyone wants me to setup a Masternode for them, PM me.

If you want more than 3 MNs, it will be 8 drks each. More than 10, I'll do for 5 Drks each. More than 25, we should do a deal.

If you're worried about security, you keep your own wallet encryption passphrase secret. I never need to know it.  The passphrase cannot be hacked if more than 15 strings.  

You then change your server password. And I'll show you how to lock down your server.  

We will NEVER EVER install a keylogger or any malware on your fresh Ubuntu server. We make an honest living. You can do checks after the install, to ensure no malware.

If you're truly paranoid, contact DyslexicZombei and he may be able to do further hardening steps (note: we do not warrant their work). MN count increased to 375 from 371 yesterday.

Why setup a Masternode you ask?

Now, with the new 20% of block reward payment to MNs (starting from June 14th), below are the new estimated ROIs, (Masternode count on left and ROI on right):

374 = 56% p.a. (current Masternode count)
500 = 42% p.a.
750 = 28% p.a.
1000 = 21% p.a.
1500 = 14% p.a.
2000 = 10.5% p.a.

This is based on the price in Darks (or the USD/BTC at the time you buy the Darks to setup the Masternodes and assumes the price in USD/BTC does not change). You need 1000 Darks per Masternode.

Therefore, in time the system could level out to between 2000 and 4000 MNs for a 5 to 10% annual return.  However, this implies 2 to 4 Million darks, which is 50 to 93% of current coin supply.  This also implies the price of Darks are likely to rise, if people kept trying to setup MNs.

So get your MN setup and get regular income starting June 14!  This is a solid opportunity in my view.  I've setup 5 MNs already.

Just setup another one. MN count is now 376.  We do lockdowns of all ports with firewall and upgrade your openSSL to version 1.0.1g.  

Just done another one. MN count is now 377. Buy, buy, buy!  You will recoup setup costs in less than 10 days starting June 14th, I reckon.  

Just setup another 2 masternodes.  Count is 381 + 1 more to come.  We have found solution to the weird wallet.dat issue!  

382 MNs.

We think masternode payments will work because we've seen them working. We don't think the bad masternode problem is a serious issue. So, we're happy to keep setting up masternodes.

Just did another one.  But he hasn't started it yet. MN count is 383 + 1. Where can you find ROI of 40%+ ?  Think about it.

[Freckleg]

Whale hunting season is good today again ;-)

[chaeplin]

All tx hash is populated.

http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

looks like nodes not listed in darkcoin.io spent coin.

What does this mean?

 DO NOT POST SESC LINKS


I have tracked two masternode list.
1 from my server, 1 from darkcoin.io.

After Masternode payment stopped, No of NMs have changed slightly.



As initial download of Masternode list, client check several things.
If 1,000 DRK is spent, rejected.

Problem is updating of Masternode.
It has bug.

if spent, if time passed this is not working.

Inconsistency of masternode list is happened.
21 -22 nodes have moved coin.


I think it's core cause of last hassle.


And Dev is well aware of.

[nicepool]

Tryout our new nicepool.net DRK p2pool !

Server location : Paris, with super high speed connection (low DOA)
Security : Direct payment to your wallet address (p2pool), DDOS protection

Fee : 0.75 %

URL : drk.nicepool.net

[Moloch]

All tx hash is populated.

http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

looks like nodes not listed in darkcoin.io spent coin.

What does this mean?

 DO NOT POST SESC LINKS


I have tracked two masternode list.
1 from my server, 1 from darkcoin.io.

After Masternode payment stopped, No of NMs have changed slightly.



As initial download of Masternode list, client check several things.
If 1,000 DRK is spent, rejected.

Problem is updating of Masternode.
It has bug.

if spent, if time passed this is not working.

Inconsistency of masternode list is happened.
21 -22 nodes have moved coin.


I think it's core cause of last hassle.


And Dev is well aware of.

I noticed this too. I tried stopping my node and it still remained. I even moved coins out and it still remained. After removing coins I tried starting the node again with a new wallet. 371 nodes went down to around 300. which i think was a more accurate amount possibly.

I did this a few days after the problems, to troubleshoot.

[AlexGR]

I have tracked two masternode list.
1 from my server, 1 from darkcoin.io.

After Masternode payment stopped, No of NMs have changed slightly.

As initial download of Masternode list, client check several things.
If 1,000 DRK is spent, rejected.

Problem is updating of Masternode.
It has bug.

if spent, if time passed this is not working.

Inconsistency of masternode list is happened.
21 -22 nodes have moved coin.

I think it's core cause of last hassle.

And Dev is well aware of.

Nice, knowing the problem is halfway to resolving it. I guess it could be simulated on testnet to see if it can be adequate reason for causing a fork. If it's not, there must be something else. If that's the fault => fix the masternode update => get payments working.

Btw, the votes getting delayed at the start have anything to do with this?

[qwizzie]

Interesting article by Coindesk today :

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-price-turmoil-network-issues-emergency-fork/

[chaeplin]

I have tracked two masternode list.
1 from my server, 1 from darkcoin.io.

After Masternode payment stopped, No of NMs have changed slightly.

As initial download of Masternode list, client check several things.
If 1,000 DRK is spent, rejected.

Problem is updating of Masternode.
It has bug.

if spent, if time passed this is not working.

Inconsistency of masternode list is happened.
21 -22 nodes have moved coin.

I think it's core cause of last hassle.

And Dev is well aware of.

Nice, knowing the problem is halfway to resolving it. I guess it could be simulated on testnet to see if it can be adequate reason for causing a fork. If it's not, there must be something else. If that's the fault => fix the masternode update => get payments working.

Btw, the votes getting delayed at the start have anything to do with this?

Related.


Client disconected bad vote block relaying peer client.

[AlexGR]

Thanks for the update

[Joshuar]

PM him, if you want the code.

I don't interest in.

XC community should ask Dev.

If you do keep posting garbage, I will do exact same thing to your thread.

I warn you.

will not post any more on this thread.time will tell everything.

tell it in your god-damn thread. I am reporting your account.

will buy more darkcoin soon,thanks

I loled.

[Standhaft]

I have a question, does it even matter that the coin number has been reduced except in the super long term vision? It seems to reach 80 million coins at this speed considering the 7% reduced coins each would have taken centuries or did I overread anything?

[Ozziecoin]

Can someone provide a good description of how the voting system works exactly?

[thelonecrouton]

I have a question, does it even matter that the coin number has been reduced except in the super long term vision? It seems to reach 80 million coins at this speed considering the 7% reduced coins each would have taken centuries or did I overread anything?

Number of coins means nothing by itself, as they are for all practical purposes infinitely divisible.

[TanteStefana2]

Apologies if this has already been posted.

CoinDesk article covering the fork and aftermath.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-price-turmoil-network-issues-emergency-fork/

Thanks for pointing that out.  After yesterday's ridiculous trolling and arguing, which completely put me off the forum, I'm surprised they were so kind to us (well, maybe it was published before the chaos.)

Just logged on, but I hope I'll see a more civil thread today!

[hellyeahent]

Hi, Im using this: http://cryptomining-blog.com/2496-new-sgminer-fork-for-x11-mining-with-higher-performance/

with -darkcoin and 280x got nice boost and 290 too but 290 crashes badly after few hours (tried even 947/1250 and still). Any good coinfig for 290 ?

[chaeplin]

I have a question, does it even matter that the coin number has been reduced except in the super long term vision? It seems to reach 80 million coins at this speed considering the 7% reduced coins each would have taken centuries or did I overread anything?

Two graphs for you.

http://drk.poolhash.org/evermined.html
http://drk.poolhash.org/24hrdiff.html

Curve ~ Curve ~

[innergy]

Hi, Im using this: http://cryptomining-blog.com/2496-new-sgminer-fork-for-x11-mining-with-higher-performance/

with -darkcoin and 280x got nice boost and 290 too but 290 crashes badly after few hours (tried even 947/1250 and still). Any good coinfig for 290 ?

This: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623409.msg6911317#msg6911317 (x13mod.zip)

and

del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

sgminer -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://mining.darkcointalk.org:3333 -u ... -p ... -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 19 --gpu-engine 1030 --gpu-memclock 1350 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --temp-target 70

pause

3x 290, over 3.6MH/s each.

[thelonecrouton]

Hi, Im using this: http://cryptomining-blog.com/2496-new-sgminer-fork-for-x11-mining-with-higher-performance/

with -darkcoin and 280x got nice boost and 290 too but 290 crashes badly after few hours (tried even 947/1250 and still). Any good coinfig for 290 ?

I've had problems too with my three 270 rigs. One has been fine, one crashed twice but now seems OK (about 15hrs uptime) and the third crapped out every 30 minutes so it's back to the old version. Identical configs, stock clocks, at I13. Never had a single problem with sgminer-sph with exactly the same settings except kernel.