[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[georgem]

I wished I weren't so low on DRKs!! love 'em!! Keep 'em coming dude!

Thanks, I appreciate it... I also appreciate every donation, no matter how small... 

[1714467952]

1714467952

[1714467952]

1714467952

[1714467952]

1714467952

[1714467952]

1714467952

[1714467952]

1714467952

[GhostPlayer]

I wished I weren't so low on DRKs!! love 'em!! Keep 'em coming dude!

Thanks, I appreciate it... I also appreciate every donation, no matter how small...  

F*ck it... bread crumbs, marinated with heaps load of (booby) love.

Tip sent!

[georgem]

F*ck it... bread crumbs, marinated with heaps load of (booby) love. Sent!
Tip sent!

Thank you, sir.
I love the darkcoin community... full of friendly booty-loving people!
It's like I found my lost tribe or something.  

[dotnetmin]

I have found that EnableHotColdMasterNode log is repeated every 5 min.

Code:

"CDarkSendPool::EnableHotColdMasterNode() - Enabled! You may shut down the cold daemon." 

do grep. check your log.

Code:

grep EnableHotColdMasterNode .darkcoin/debug.log 

What does that mean chaeplin ?

[dotnetmin]

I have checked the last 100 paymentadresses which were choosed to get payed.

I found 11 adresses that was choosed 2 times and 1 adress that was choosed 4 times.

That can not be a normal behavior, like a random choose.
For me there is something wrong with election.



This adress was choosed 4 x over the last 6 hours.

XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy - http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy.htm

Paied was block 94769. Block 94822, 94832 and 94849 was not paid

funny, 94849 is not found yet, but the next to be found and already into the list


Devs, any idea what wrong. This can´t be random choice

[theskillzdatklls]

Y'all should look into darkdice.net as one simple way to help spur the economy.

Cheers.

[splawik21]

Just look here: http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html
There are many unknown pools which dont pay 20% x MN. But!
There are many KNOWN pools!
These are last 12h:
* HASHFASTER - INFORMED
* BLACKCOINPOOL - INFORMED
* MULTIPOOLUS
* COINKINGIO
* COINOTRONCOM
* GHASHIO
* DRKCIF8COM - UPDATED
* DEDICATEDPOOLCOM

Can somebody from Team Development write to the rest? I was thinking about you TanteStefana as our linguist if you dont mind...

If someone found who are pools unknowed we are happy to know too.

[chaeplin]

I have checked the last 100 paymentadresses which were choosed to get payed.

I found 11 adresses that was choosed 2 times and 1 adress that was choosed 4 times.

That can not be a normal behavior, like a random choose.
For me there is something wrong with election.



This adress was choosed 4 x over the last 6 hours.

XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy - http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy.htm

Paied was block 94769. Block 94822, 94832 and 94849 was not paid

funny, 94849 is not found yet, but the next to be found and already into the list


Devs, any idea what wrong. This can´t be random choice

That's how Getblocktemplate works.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Getblocktemplate

Decentralization
The original getwork mining protocol simply issues block headers for a miner to solve. The miner is kept in the dark as to what is actually in this block, and has no influence over it. In effect, the authority of the miner to decide which transactions are accepted, etc, is all transferred blindly to the pool operator. A corrupt (or compromised) pool operator could use the combined hash power of all the miners to execute double spend attacks or other similar attacks.

getblocktemplate moves block creation to the miner, while giving pools a way to set down the rules for participation. While pools can do just as much as they could before by expressing it in these rules, miners can not be kept in the dark and are enabled to freely choose what they participate in mining. This improves the security of the Bitcoin network by making blocks decentralized again.

And just 100 ?  make it at least 1000.


And Evan's calulation.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/masternode-payment-variance.1636/

Code:

----- ONE DAY OF MASTERNODE PAYMENTS ----
107 masternodes were paid 0 times
151 masternodes were paid 1 times
87 masternodes were paid 2 times
39 masternodes were paid 3 times
11 masternodes were paid 4 times
5 masternodes were paid 5 times
1 masternodes were paid 6 times   <-------------
0 masternodes were paid 7+ times





----- ONE YEAR OF MASTERNODE PAYMENTS ----
1 masternodes were paid 406 times
1 masternodes were paid 421 times
1 masternodes were paid 424 times
1 masternodes were paid 425 times
2 masternodes were paid 426 times
2 masternodes were paid 427 times
2 masternodes were paid 428 times
1 masternodes were paid 433 times
3 masternodes were paid 434 times
1 masternodes were paid 435 times
2 masternodes were paid 436 times
3 masternodes were paid 437 times
1 masternodes were paid 438 times
2 masternodes were paid 439 times
3 masternodes were paid 440 times
8 masternodes were paid 441 times
3 masternodes were paid 442 times
2 masternodes were paid 443 times
2 masternodes were paid 444 times
3 masternodes were paid 445 times
2 masternodes were paid 446 times
6 masternodes were paid 447 times
8 masternodes were paid 449 times
2 masternodes were paid 450 times
6 masternodes were paid 451 times
4 masternodes were paid 452 times
5 masternodes were paid 453 times
3 masternodes were paid 454 times
4 masternodes were paid 455 times
4 masternodes were paid 456 times
4 masternodes were paid 457 times
9 masternodes were paid 458 times
10 masternodes were paid 459 times
6 masternodes were paid 460 times
3 masternodes were paid 461 times
7 masternodes were paid 462 times
11 masternodes were paid 463 times
8 masternodes were paid 464 times
6 masternodes were paid 465 times
8 masternodes were paid 466 times
6 masternodes were paid 467 times
6 masternodes were paid 468 times
10 masternodes were paid 469 times
4 masternodes were paid 470 times
12 masternodes were paid 471 times
6 masternodes were paid 472 times
10 masternodes were paid 473 times
6 masternodes were paid 474 times
12 masternodes were paid 475 times
5 masternodes were paid 476 times
7 masternodes were paid 477 times
11 masternodes were paid 478 times
10 masternodes were paid 479 times
10 masternodes were paid 480 times
11 masternodes were paid 481 times
3 masternodes were paid 482 times
3 masternodes were paid 483 times
8 masternodes were paid 484 times
4 masternodes were paid 485 times
4 masternodes were paid 486 times
4 masternodes were paid 487 times
10 masternodes were paid 488 times
6 masternodes were paid 489 times
6 masternodes were paid 490 times
4 masternodes were paid 491 times
4 masternodes were paid 492 times
5 masternodes were paid 493 times
1 masternodes were paid 494 times
5 masternodes were paid 495 times
2 masternodes were paid 497 times
5 masternodes were paid 498 times
4 masternodes were paid 499 times
2 masternodes were paid 500 times
3 masternodes were paid 501 times
2 masternodes were paid 502 times
3 masternodes were paid 503 times
7 masternodes were paid 504 times
2 masternodes were paid 505 times
3 masternodes were paid 506 times
2 masternodes were paid 507 times
1 masternodes were paid 508 times
2 masternodes were paid 509 times
2 masternodes were paid 512 times
1 masternodes were paid 513 times
1 masternodes were paid 514 times
1 masternodes were paid 516 times
1 masternodes were paid 518 times
1 masternodes were paid 520 times
1 masternodes were paid 521 times
1 masternodes were paid 526 times
1 masternodes were paid 529 times

[KryptoFoo]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

[minerjav]

I have checked the last 100 paymentadresses which were choosed to get payed.

I found 11 adresses that was choosed 2 times and 1 adress that was choosed 4 times.

That can not be a normal behavior, like a random choose.
For me there is something wrong with election.



This adress was choosed 4 x over the last 6 hours.

XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy - http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy.htm

Paied was block 94769. Block 94822, 94832 and 94849 was not paid

funny, 94849 is not found yet, but the next to be found and already into the list


Devs, any idea what wrong. This can´t be random choice

I'm not an expert in statistics and I'm not 100% sure that I understand all the details about the MN payment mechanism, but from a miner point of view, looks normal (I saw many times when inside a rig of 6 cards, one card has up to 3x success rate than other card in the same rig at specific times). Considering than the Rig is a very small universe (only 6 cards), your example of 4 times doesn't look too bad. If you include the fact that some nodes are not paying, the chances are even higher.

Suggestion 1: Check if the 4x address was paid from the same node. If this is the case, you have something in your hands really important.
Suggestion 2: Create a table: payment address receiver vs payment ip address (pools). If you find a pattern, something is not going well.

Edit:
I assembly a quick table to find patterns, didn't find anything. Everything looks OK.

[eltito]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

The official sources are only useful if you choose to use them .

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482224555704848385

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482011593891262464


Edit: Is there a legitimate lack of understanding as to where to obtain official information?  If so, I apologize as I didn't think there was, and I will make a concerted effort this week to make it more clear for everyone.

[ddink7]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

Lots of people know--the ones that actually read Evan's announcements:

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-development-and-path-going-forward.1604/

Namely:

Each round, a winning Masternode is chosen to carry out Darksend transactions. This process is carried out by the individual nodes across the network independently using the masternode election algorithm. This algorithm chooses a winning node for Darksend, but there is also a runner up, third, forth, fifth place, etc.

Utilizing this code, we can make a deterministic list of the “top 10 masternodes” with the winning scores. These will be the same nodes accross the network and they will vote on who they believe should get paid for that round. The winning Masternode will be the one with the most votes (up to 10 votes) and the network will reject blocks not containing that payment entry.

[mattmct]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

The official sources are only useful if you choose to use them .

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482224555704848385

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482011593891262464


Edit: Is there a legitimate lack of understanding as to where to obtain official information?  If so, I apologize as I didn't think there was, and I will make a concerted effort this week to make it more clear for everyone.

Maybe the front page thread should be updated.

Also, this is way overdue to an update.

DarkSend Progress Reports:
Feb 20th #6: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5259501#msg5259501
Feb 26th: Press Release: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinPRStatement.pdf
March 3rd, Beta V2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5510754#msg5510754
March 6th, Beta V3: http://darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendv3.pdf
March 27th, Beta V5: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5937228#msg5937228
April 7th, Beta V6: https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/darksend-beta-v6.226/
April 17th, RC1.1: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendDocumentation.pdf
June 20th, Hard Fork to pay Masternodes

[Noahcoin]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

The official sources are only useful if you choose to use them .

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482224555704848385

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482011593891262464


Edit: Is there a legitimate lack of understanding as to where to obtain official information?  If so, I apologize as I didn't think there was, and I will make a concerted effort this week to make it more clear for everyone.

Maybe the front page thread should be updated.

Also, this is way overdue to an update.

DarkSend Progress Reports:
Feb 20th #6: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5259501#msg5259501
Feb 26th: Press Release: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinPRStatement.pdf
March 3rd, Beta V2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5510754#msg5510754
March 6th, Beta V3: http://darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendv3.pdf
March 27th, Beta V5: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5937228#msg5937228
April 7th, Beta V6: https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/darksend-beta-v6.226/
April 17th, RC1.1: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendDocumentation.pdf
June 20th, Hard Fork to pay Masternodes

You're right.

[salmion]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

The official sources are only useful if you choose to use them .

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482224555704848385

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482011593891262464


Edit: Is there a legitimate lack of understanding as to where to obtain official information?  If so, I apologize as I didn't think there was, and I will make a concerted effort this week to make it more clear for everyone.

There is a lack of further information. The previous releases you could see test net progress on darkcointalk. The RC4 statement is rather vague. I understand it is all secret squirrel (and rightly so - RC4 is the BIG one really) but something concrete would really help.

I don't have much and I'm hodling. But in this ridiculously over populated crypto world it's easy to be forgotten. And while now is a good time to buy the market isn't exactly buoyant. And stability, preferably growth is as important as RC4.

If you are worried about over hyping, news is news. The truth isn't hype.

[salmion]

And while the correct versions are there for download it still says RC2 on darkcoin.io

[splawik21]

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/just-had-an-idea-for-us-miner-collectively-help-drk-before-next-fork.1662/page-2
scroll down to yidakee long post
reading this I feel better

[ddink7]

Did Evan said he was reworking the voting system?

Who the hell knows. There is too much confusion and uncertainty about development status.

Apparently if you have time to hang out on IRC all day you are privy to material information that comes from Evan in snippets. Otherwise you are stuck guessing and interpreting out of context quotes and other third or fourth hand information.

Markets don't like uncertainty. Evan should post a few sentences about current status and current plans here or on twitter.

Dammit why don't we have an useful official source of develoment info for this community

The official sources are only useful if you choose to use them .

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482224555704848385

https://twitter.com/DarkcoinCrypto/status/482011593891262464


Edit: Is there a legitimate lack of understanding as to where to obtain official information?  If so, I apologize as I didn't think there was, and I will make a concerted effort this week to make it more clear for everyone.

Maybe the front page thread should be updated.

Also, this is way overdue to an update.

DarkSend Progress Reports:
Feb 20th #6: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5259501#msg5259501
Feb 26th: Press Release: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinPRStatement.pdf
March 3rd, Beta V2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5510754#msg5510754
March 6th, Beta V3: http://darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendv3.pdf
March 27th, Beta V5: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5937228#msg5937228
April 7th, Beta V6: https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/darksend-beta-v6.226/
April 17th, RC1.1: http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendDocumentation.pdf
June 20th, Hard Fork to pay Masternodes

You're right.

Agreed. if nothing else, we need a part-time PR person to keep the OP updated.

[CryptoPleb]

Is it unreasonable to have Evan or someone in the know to post here (or twitter and replicated here) every 2 days, around the same time, about what hes worked on and what hes working on? Would shut everyone up  

[splawik21]

And while the correct versions are there for download it still says RC2 on darkcoin.io

You are absolutely right.
There should be another person better two who has editing access of darkcoin.io and bitcointalk.org thread. So Evan can do the more importand things than these...what doesn't mean they shouldn't have to be up to date.