[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[luke997]

Strong troll force today... Ignore button works magic.

[stilgars]

I don't have access to my cold wallets hosting the 1000 DRK at the moment. if I update the darkcoind on my masternode servers, would it break the binding and deregister my nodes?
Thanks

BUMP

[Freckleg]

Strong troll force today... Ignore button works magic.

Yes indeed. It is sad they did not get the affection and attention from their parents, and now live in some shit hole without friends, girlfriend.... So sad. Let start a foundation to help the trolls. the TrollFoundation Coin, they must love that.

[chaeplin]

Strong troll force today... Ignore button works magic.

"Ignore button works magic"

Newbie troll ~



I think my detection code for Masternode payment is fixed.
http://drk.poolhash.org/
http://drk.poolhash.org/graph.html
http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html

Next : new block bell, stats for Masternode payment.

[CryptoPleb]

Is everything OK with the Masternode voting system.?
One masternode was paid six times in 24h. I got nothing...
I have updated to 0.10.11.5

Im in the same boat as you, almost 24 hours
Anyone know many masternodes have been paid at least one time?

Renew your MN privkey, then check your payment address or IP here: http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html and see if it's listed all green.

Yeah done that, its all green

I'm getting stuff like this in my debug log:

Code:

2014-06-27 06:38:28 received getdata for: block 000000000006b30a9c2aa4a951607b2e6eda93d96356bcb735f8c9c923d57da1 peer=246
2014-06-27 06:38:35 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:37 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:38 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:55 received getdata for: block 00000000000a0ed3b90352bcb05460b176396c9b950f5fba4afc7d870c0863ca peer=246
2014-06-27 06:39:11 Got bad masternode address signature
2014-06-27 06:39:11 Misbehaving: 192.99.184.49:9999 (60 -> 80)

So I'm going to try updating to 10.11.05 to see if that helps??

Im on 10.11.05 with similar things in my log

Code:

2014-06-27 07:22:24 dsee - Rejected masternode entry
2014-06-27 07:22:24 dsee - Got NEW masternode entry 54.185.233.211:9999
2014-06-27 07:22:24 ERROR: CTxMemPool::acceptableInputs() : inputs already spent
2014-06-27 07:22:24 dsee - Rejected masternode entry
2014-06-27 07:22:24 dsee - Got NEW masternode entry 54.185.233.211:9999
2014-06-27 07:22:24 ERROR: CTxMemPool::acceptableInputs() : inputs already spent
2014-06-27 07:22:24 dsee - Rejected masternode entry

Code:

2014-06-27 07:29:32 peer=84 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 07:29:38 AcceptToMemoryPool: 66.55.90.47:9999 /Satoshi:0.10.11.5/ : accepted 22687a6a68ca469545f63dba3e37f82f9fa1242ffd10dc5f1549d7ae48e9f1f5 (poolsz 6)
2014-06-27 07:30:10 peer=84 says we are misbehaving 20

Code:

2014-06-27 07:30:44 Got bad masternode address signature
2014-06-27 07:30:44 ProcessMessage(dseep, 116 bytes) FAILED

[chaeplin]

I don't have access to my cold wallets hosting the 1000 DRK at the moment. if I update the darkcoind on my masternode servers, would it break the binding and deregister my nodes?
Thanks

BUMP

No, but make a new genkey for precaution.

[TanteStefana2]

I really honestly don't get it.  We have a developer who had an idea on how to make bitcoin better.  It grew out of him from all the recent (at that time) scandals and realizations that Bitcoin wasn't at all private.  So being the brilliant young man that was anxious to get started, he starts an experiment here.  People see what he is doing and start supporting him.  It starts to get serious, with serious money being spent, so he realizes people are counting on him, so he gets serious and promises to dedicates 2 years of his life to this project.

In the mean time, not everything went as planned.  The original 24 hours spilled unintentionally, much coin.  But it was launched, and he had a group of people on board.  To stop at that point (about a week later when the block chain explorer was created and he could see what happened and how much was spilled) was not really an option.  Those people would have gotten pissed and left.  In hind sight, all those coins were sold, very cheap, spreading the investment in darkcoin to many other people.  Cheap "instamined" coins actually gave Darkcoin a fantastic distribution.  In fact, as time went on, I'm now convinced it is one of the reasons Darkcoin took off in the first place.  As people found out about the project, and it's exciting developer, they also found investing in some coins wasn't expensive and dove in on a leap of faith.  Then discovered they didn't want to leave the project and stayed.

But back to this John Lennon song.  I assume you are saying that the DarkCoin project has bad karma.  Honestly, I can't see why anyone would say that.  It's been a great project with real innovation and will make a huge difference in this world, even if another future coin takes off with Evan's Darkcoin ideas.  Karma works both ways you know

Needless to say, my ignore list continues to grow.  

[illodin]

I don't have access to my cold wallets hosting the 1000 DRK at the moment. if I update the darkcoind on my masternode servers, would it break the binding and deregister my nodes?
Thanks

BUMP

No, but make a new genkey for precaution.

Without the cold wallet?

[chaeplin]

Is everything OK with the Masternode voting system.?
One masternode was paid six times in 24h. I got nothing...
I have updated to 0.10.11.5

Im in the same boat as you, almost 24 hours
Anyone know many masternodes have been paid at least one time?

Renew your MN privkey, then check your payment address or IP here: http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html and see if it's listed all green.

Yeah done that, its all green

I'm getting stuff like this in my debug log:

Code:

2014-06-27 06:38:28 received getdata for: block 000000000006b30a9c2aa4a951607b2e6eda93d96356bcb735f8c9c923d57da1 peer=246
2014-06-27 06:38:35 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:37 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:38 peer=474 says we are misbehaving 20
2014-06-27 06:38:55 received getdata for: block 00000000000a0ed3b90352bcb05460b176396c9b950f5fba4afc7d870c0863ca peer=246
2014-06-27 06:39:11 Got bad masternode address signature
2014-06-27 06:39:11 Misbehaving: 192.99.184.49:9999 (60 -> 80)

So I'm going to try updating to 10.11.05 to see if that helps??

*** VERSIONS 9.11.5 AND 10.11.5 ARE AVAILABLE ***


The network has been experiencing some odd banning behavior caused by bad masternode signatures. I removed the code that bans the other party when this happens will I'll find the underlying cause and fix it in RC4. Please update if you're experiencing any problems or run a masternode.

Thanks,

The Darkcoin Team

----------------------------------

Download at:

https://www.darkcoin.io/getstarted.html
 

Banning on "bad masternode signatures" is temporary removed.
This will help other nodes and yours.


example of banned

Code:

2014-06-26 15:34:29 Got bad masternode address signature
2014-06-26 15:34:29 Misbehaving: other-server:52571 (80 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
2014-06-26 15:34:29 disconnecting node other-server:52571
2014-06-26 15:47:44 connection from other-server:59028 dropped (banned)

[TanteStefana2]

Strong troll force today... Ignore button works magic.

Yes indeed. It is sad they did not get the affection and attention from their parents, and now live in some shit hole without friends, girlfriend.... So sad. Let start a foundation to help the trolls. the TrollFoundation Coin, they must love that.

Aw, you're such a giving person, I'll join you with 56 kh of my computing power to help save the trolls.  Wonderful idea!  LOL

[chaeplin]

I don't have access to my cold wallets hosting the 1000 DRK at the moment. if I update the darkcoind on my masternode servers, would it break the binding and deregister my nodes?
Thanks

BUMP

No, but make a new genkey for precaution.

Without the cold wallet?

Oh my mistake -.-

[TanteStefana2]

I don't have access to my cold wallets hosting the 1000 DRK at the moment. if I update the darkcoind on my masternode servers, would it break the binding and deregister my nodes?
Thanks

BUMP

No, but make a new genkey for precaution.

Well, that kind of defeats the purpose of not having to put your cold masternode wallets back up, LOL.  I guess if you run into trouble not getting voted on, or showing up on the list, the masternodeprivkey is the likely culprit.  It helped me to learn that from chaeplin after a night of fudging my one masternode... when I finally found his post, LOL.  Fixed it this morning.

[Populus]

My wallet was working fine, then suddenly it was not.
I get this message when I try to start darkcoin-qt.exe, normally, as administrator and in compatibility mode for Windows XP.

"This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information."

Lets see here - your a NEWBIE
and your running ANYTHING in XP Mode

Seriously just turn off your computer
Give it to somebody else.

I'm not sure your ready for this.....ugh

Thanks, the constructive feedback is appreciated. However I missed the part where you gave constructive feedback. Would you like to kindly try again?
I'm simply trying to access the wallet, not setup a node. So I don't see why you're being a superior elitist.
Thanks in advance to any help!

[Terzo]

Sell all of your darkcoins to me !!! RC4 is coming in two weeks !

[Haggisahh]

Been mining darkcoin lately, but I'm starting to question it, especially if masternodes will now eat into my profit?
What do you guys think about this?
I guess the multipools would be substantially more profitable, although I do think they are harmful to altcoins in general.

[Divorcion]

Hi,

sorry for the maybe stupid question but:

i have a cold wallet which i made, is it in any way affected by the recently hard fork, should i do something or can the wallet stay cold as it actually is? I saw same coin-swaps where you had to transfer your coins to exchanges and so on, therefore the question, because i'm not sure what is the difference between a hard-fork and a coin-swap-fork.

thank you

[TanteStefana2]

My wallet was working fine, then suddenly it was not.
I get this message when I try to start darkcoin-qt.exe, normally, as administrator and in compatibility mode for Windows XP.

"This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information."

Thanks, the constructive feedback is appreciated. However I missed the part where you gave constructive feedback. Would you like to kindly try again?
I'm simply trying to access the wallet, not setup a node. So I don't see why you're being a superior elitist.
Thanks in advance to any help!

Are you using XP or have your wallet running in xp compatibility mode?  I'm a little confused by the question.  I don't think the windows binary was compiled in 32bit.  There might be a 32 bit version available, but I don't recall...  it's getting a little old to use.  However, honestly, Ubuntu is an easy to use 64bit system, if your computer can do 64 bit.... just an idea. 

I don't know how to compile on windows, so I can't really help there, sorry

[CTRLX]

I really honestly don't get it.  We have a developer who had an idea on how to make bitcoin better.  It grew out of him from all the recent (at that time) scandals and realizations that Bitcoin wasn't at all private.  So being the brilliant young man that was anxious to get started, he starts an experiment here.  People see what he is doing and start supporting him.  It starts to get serious, with serious money being spent, so he realizes people are counting on him, so he gets serious and promises to dedicates 2 years of his life to this project.

In the mean time, not everything went as planned.  The original 24 hours spilled unintentionally, much coin.  But it was launched, and he had a group of people on board.  To stop at that point (about a week later when the block chain explorer was created and he could see what happened and how much was spilled) was not really an option.  Those people would have gotten pissed and left.  In hind sight, all those coins were sold, very cheap, spreading the investment in darkcoin to many other people.  Cheap "instamined" coins actually gave Darkcoin a fantastic distribution.  In fact, as time went on, I'm now convinced it is one of the reasons Darkcoin took off in the first place.  As people found out about the project, and it's exciting developer, they also found investing in some coins wasn't expensive and dove in on a leap of faith.  Then discovered they didn't want to leave the project and stayed.

But back to this John Lennon song.  I assume you are saying that the DarkCoin project has bad karma.  Honestly, I can't see why anyone would say that.  It's been a great project with real innovation and will make a huge difference in this world, even if another future coin takes off with Evan's Darkcoin ideas.  Karma works both ways you know

Needless to say, my ignore list continues to grow.  

I really have no problem with either Evan or his ambition, I wholeheartedly support innovation and someone who tries to deliver. I do however have a problem with Darkcoin's fanbase, viciously attacking other coins that offer similar or better technology. The FUDstorm you lot created in the threads of other coins was terrible. So here I am whispering Sic Transit Gloria Mundi in your ears.

By the way I am not even invested in any coin that offer anon functionality, I am long on BTC and LTC

[TanteStefana2]

Hi,

sorry for the maybe stupid question but:

i have a cold wallet which i made, is it in any way affected by the recently hard fork, should i do something or can the wallet stay cold as it actually is? I saw same coin-swaps where you had to transfer your coins to exchanges and so on, therefore the question, because i'm not sure what is the difference between a hard-fork and a coin-swap-fork.

thank you

It should be fine, no need to open it in a newer version of the wallet until you want to access your coins.  The wallet.dat file doesn't change.

Of course if you use your coins a lot, moving them around, etc... you'll want to update your wallet.dat file more often, but if it's just in cold storage, there is no need to worry about saving new account numbers being used, etc...

[TanteStefana2]

Been mining darkcoin lately, but I'm starting to question it, especially if masternodes will now eat into my profit?
What do you guys think about this?
I guess the multipools would be substantially more profitable, although I do think they are harmful to altcoins in general.

Well, mining has been hard for a long time now and the price has not kept up at all.  Regarding the sharing of profits, the masternodes are also performing a service that is the backbone of the coin.  If I were you, I'd find the most profitable place to mine and convert that to the coin you want to invest in.  Eventually, mining "should" find it's balance.