wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
|
October 31, 2014, 08:36:30 PM |
|
I decided it was about time I retire to an island somewhere in the Bahamas... or a CPPSRB failsafe, which is much more likely. lol
Reward system is catching up, no worries. Manual payout soon after.
|
|
|
|
RealMalatesta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
|
|
October 31, 2014, 08:43:05 PM |
|
I decided it was about time I retire to an island somewhere in the Bahamas...
Don't you dare.....!
|
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
|
October 31, 2014, 08:44:22 PM |
|
I decided it was about time I retire to an island somewhere in the Bahamas...
Don't you dare.....! Yeah, I don't have time for that. lol. Anyway, looks like stats should be caught back up in about an hour.
|
|
|
|
GrapeApe
|
|
October 31, 2014, 10:34:27 PM |
|
I just read the news about BTCGuild. I know we are small as well I hope we don't suffer the same fate...
|
|
|
|
yakuza699
|
|
November 03, 2014, 07:12:51 PM |
|
Hello Luke-Jr and wizkid057, I heard that Eligius did implemented the child pays for parent feature but I recently made this https://blockchain.info/tx/ad870af22eb05a85c4660db9ba29c7fedef37933611e5a171265f1955e68ee47 there have been mined a few blocks by Eligius but none of them included that transaction.My questions are did Eligius really implemented Child pay for parent? If yes than why that transaction didn't appeared in blocks? And if Eligius did implemented it than how does the transaction should look like I mean how much btc should it pay as a fee?If next time I would push this kind of transaction directly here http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php would it fix the problem? EDIT: I just tried to spend this transaction https://blockchain.info/tx/3f5497c1ab9973b8b51f13d9c1b4c8d989101c5f5298f337c18008f70b71fc87 with this one, this is it's raw 010000000187fc710bf70880c137f398525f1c1089d9c8b4c1d9131fb5b87399abc197543f010000006a4730440220698c2fb147cf7dbec10b8d41d4c913a97b54291f8cf85025a208cb5729cc96ac0220172973332ddbcf5bae07d61038fad059d81a5e7c340a3a5f92385e0f5c7f7357012103d6d14809877d01d0d6696e6f03eaf076302c3efb3b2196511b4f29e3e3f6c169ffffffff0210270000000000001976a914551f77fa76877ae763c9d12342d96043cc10a77688ac00000000000000001976a91468c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e6388ac00000000 { "lock_time":0, "size":225, "inputs":[ { "prev_out":{ "index":1, "hash":"3f5497c1ab9973b8b51f13d9c1b4c8d989101c5f5298f337c18008f70b71fc87" }, "script":"4730440220698c2fb147cf7dbec10b8d41d4c913a97b54291f8cf85025a208cb5729cc96ac0220172973332ddbcf5bae07d61038fad059d81a5e7c340a3a5f92385e0f5c7f7357012103d6d14809877d01d0d6696e6f03eaf076302c3efb3b2196511b4f29e3e3f6c169" } ], "version":1, "vin_sz":1, "hash":"e9d38afa428bc3f9ca672248c9cc07a76c678d824ece07ddd29ca680be2ea463", "vout_sz":2, "out":[ { "script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 551f77fa76877ae763c9d12342d96043cc10a776 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "address":"18m68ndnYc3cDFHaEjFv6P6Nfz61vqS89G", "value":10000, "script":"76a914551f77fa76877ae763c9d12342d96043cc10a77688ac" }, { "script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 68c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e63 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "address":"1AZ1zxCE6e4GT74Fu8EPM5sRxgN9Y7Luyv", "value":0, "script":"76a91468c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e6388ac" } ] } As you can see it is non-standard as it has a 0btc output and spend unconfirmed coins from transaction 3f5497c1ab9973b8b51f13d9c1b4c8d989101c5f5298f337c18008f70b71fc87 this transaction is only 225bytes and the previous transaction is 3682bytes in total that is just 3907bytes so a simple 0.0004fee would be enough but that transaction uses a 0.0029fee but still I got this when I tried to push it directly to Eligius Trying to send... array(3) { ["result"]=> NULL ["error"]=> array(2) { ["code"]=> int(-22) ["message"]=> string(11) "TX rejected" } ["id"]=> string(1) "1" } Response = 0 Why does Eligius rejects that transaction is that because it spends an unconfirmed transaction which is a low priority tx and Eligius doesn't keep them at their memory pool or is there any other reason? Strange but this transaction somehow got taken by DiscusFish so I did exactly the same tx like before(just different inputs). Raw 010000000168dc54eb479a9945f2fff1f28058f7bb78b8789dde0854259d13261717b9823f010000006b483045022100bb9ad9c5d4b73f4bf31112b86db4e794afe9995d80a020e264224982ac69406e02203873f97937a935955431eda1872423671114e05fa62e6847b0ac9e281d1fbe38012102ce9c2af4abf7e3e915649282c43705e08578cfdad23ca21507f6487c75a787dfffffffff0270170000000000001976a91475ddd209f213114be160d9217c9a25f2fd3f745588ac00000000000000001976a91468c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e6388ac00000000 { "lock_time":0, "size":226, "inputs":[ { "prev_out":{ "index":1, "hash":"3f82b9171726139d255408de9d78b878bbf75880f2f1fff245999a47eb54dc68" }, "script":"483045022100bb9ad9c5d4b73f4bf31112b86db4e794afe9995d80a020e264224982ac69406e02203873f97937a935955431eda1872423671114e05fa62e6847b0ac9e281d1fbe38012102ce9c2af4abf7e3e915649282c43705e08578cfdad23ca21507f6487c75a787df" } ], "version":1, "vin_sz":1, "hash":"d27f9942e9f9c6e67440eeadc593f726f2b408f680121fdcdec3cd214369fa03", "vout_sz":2, "out":[ { "script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 75ddd209f213114be160d9217c9a25f2fd3f7455 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "address":"1BkDnoQv4PmrxSjA4xyyL6VwWGDyixZBG2", "value":6000, "script":"76a91475ddd209f213114be160d9217c9a25f2fd3f745588ac" }, { "script_string":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 68c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e63 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "address":"1AZ1zxCE6e4GT74Fu8EPM5sRxgN9Y7Luyv", "value":0, "script":"76a91468c746e27282b076aafe4131a8df6f0a857d7e6388ac" } ] } When pushed to Eligius Trying to send... array(3) { ["result"]=> NULL ["error"]=> array(2) { ["code"]=> int(-22) ["message"]=> string(11) "TX rejected" } ["id"]=> string(1) "1" } Response = 0 Same question as before why Eligius doesn't mine this transaction?
|
|
|
|
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
|
November 03, 2014, 07:19:26 PM |
|
Same question as before why Eligius doesn't mine this transaction? Do not ask Eliguis. Ask yourself - why should Eligius mine your transaction? Every pool has own rules. Eliguis can mine non-standard transactions but not obliged to do it.
|
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
|
November 03, 2014, 07:22:20 PM |
|
Most common reject cause is because it is already in the memory pool. If Discus Fish picked it up then it likely was relayed pretty normally and we already had it when you pushed.
|
|
|
|
yakuza699
|
|
November 03, 2014, 07:36:38 PM |
|
Most common reject cause is because it is already in the memory pool. If Discus Fish picked it up then it likely was relayed pretty normally and we already had it when you pushed.
Well http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php was the first place where I pushed it but still transaction was rejected and not relayed, why so?
|
|
|
|
macbook-air
|
|
November 04, 2014, 12:02:07 AM |
|
Most common reject cause is because it is already in the memory pool. If Discus Fish picked it up then it likely was relayed pretty normally and we already had it when you pushed.
Well http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php was the first place where I pushed it but still transaction was rejected and not relayed, why so? i picked it up here by hand thanks for the fee enough for my morning coffee lol
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
November 04, 2014, 06:08:05 AM |
|
Most common reject cause is because it is already in the memory pool. If Discus Fish picked it up then it likely was relayed pretty normally and we already had it when you pushed.
Well http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php was the first place where I pushed it but still transaction was rejected and not relayed, why so? CPFP is only implemented for the mining policy, not the mempool. This means your parent transaction need to pass the mempool's checks on its own before it will be considered for CPFP prioritisation.
|
|
|
|
mavericklm
|
|
November 04, 2014, 03:01:15 PM |
|
was there a small bump? like few minutes ago?
|
|
|
|
kodiak1120
|
|
November 06, 2014, 01:01:52 AM |
|
I unplugged my miners a month and a half ago, but my stats page is still show 0.02093685 BTC pending in the payout queue... it says it will be paid out 4 days if I remain inactive. I had thought that all of my payouts were complete. Is that normal to take that long to payout?
|
|
|
|
GrapeApe
|
|
November 06, 2014, 01:08:59 AM |
|
I unplugged my miners a month and a half ago, but my stats page is still show 0.02093685 BTC pending in the payout queue... it says it will be paid out 4 days if I remain inactive. I had thought that all of my payouts were complete. Is that normal to take that long to payout?
When the pool is lucky you get paid for shelved shares and if that happens your inactive time period will start over. Your payouts probably were complete you may have even been at or close to zero balance.
|
|
|
|
kodiak1120
|
|
November 06, 2014, 01:17:08 AM |
|
Got it... thanks.
|
|
|
|
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 1248
Owner at AltQuick.com & FreeBitcoins.com
|
|
November 09, 2014, 05:45:04 PM |
|
Is it this pool and F2Pool that merge mines Huntercoin?
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
November 11, 2014, 03:47:04 PM |
|
Hi everyone, I've been mining on Eligius now for approximately one week. I started mining Bitcoin September 22, 2014. So, I'm new to Bitcoin and mining. I'm enjoying this pool and I like it a lot! I have sixteen (16) Bitmain Antminer S3's (7.2 Th/s). I just purchased my first S4 [Another 2 Th/s; for a total of 9.2 Th/s] in the wee hours early this morning. The goal is to have a minimum of 25 Bitmain Antminer S4's (50 Th/s) here at the house. I plan to order my 2nd S4 in approximately 3 more weeks. I'm like a little boy on christmas waiting for this first S4 to get here from bitmaintech.com. I really want to contribute to Pool Management, Stats Development and Pool Hosting. I like what you have going on here. I'm using a Mac. I have 4 Mac's in my house and no PC. I do have Parallel's with Window's 7 installed. However, I would rather not use Window's if I do not have to. I do have a Coinbase account/wallet. I would imagine Coinbase has a means of setting up donations the way Eligius support page is suggesting when using Bitcoin-qt. This is what I have thus far in my "message" to copy and paste into whatever I would use on Coinbase to implement the message: My Eligius - 2014-11-11 15:30:30 UTC - Nickname=Proud%20Clown Minimum_Payout_BTC=.50000001 Donate_Pool=.5 Donate_Stats=.5 Donate_Hosting=.5I just need someone to point out to me where and/or what on Coinbase I need to use to get this message going with a proper signature to implement the message? Any help someone could provide would be appreciated. Like I said, I'm NEW to bitcoin and mining bitcoin. Please forgive my ignorance... Thank you, David
|
|
|
|
Morblias
|
|
November 11, 2014, 08:04:43 PM Last edit: November 11, 2014, 08:17:39 PM by Morblias |
|
Looks like the pool is down? For some reason bfgminer won't kick over to my backup pool either.
|
Tips / Donations accepted: 1Morb18DsDHNEv6TeQXBdba872ZSpiK9fY
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
November 11, 2014, 08:07:02 PM |
|
Yep, I just got a notification of a block found from GHash, which meant that Eligius had to be down. So, I checked my hash rate on GHash and I see all 16 of my S3's are pointed at GHash.
According to the shifts on GHash, my miners have been there approximately 18 minutes. So, we've been down at least 18 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
November 11, 2014, 08:22:35 PM |
|
still dead since approximately 7:50. It is 8:22 now.
|
|
|
|
|