mitch87
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
April 11, 2014, 09:18:03 AM |
|
This was a bug from my side. Validating new usernames got stuck two days ago and I didn't notice. I restarted it and all new usernames were marked as valid/invalid BTC addresses and you should expect payouts today.
Thanks a lot for your work. :-)
|
|
|
|
jparsley
|
|
April 11, 2014, 10:10:44 AM |
|
Can i use cpu mining on this pool
You can, but you will certainly use more electricity than the few cents a day you'll earn. Even power efficient GPUs are barely turning a profit in most regions. i use cloudcpu for now. Il try set one cpu on the pool for a while.
|
please unban me.
|
|
|
UdjinM6
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
|
|
April 11, 2014, 12:21:07 PM |
|
You used 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj instead of 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh Zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj when connected for the first time and this is how your username was created. This was an invalid BTC address so payouts weren't made. I just renamed it and you should expect payout today. Just wondering. I've seen a lot of messages like this here. Why does someone actually type his address letter by letter instead of doing simple copy-paste action? Is there any meaningful reason?
|
DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
|
|
|
Achiel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 11, 2014, 12:24:30 PM |
|
You used 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj instead of 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh Zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj when connected for the first time and this is how your username was created. This was an invalid BTC address so payouts weren't made. I just renamed it and you should expect payout today. Just wondering. I've seen a lot of messages like this here. Why does someone actually type his address letter by letter instead of doing simple copy-paste action? Is there any meaningful reason? Copy-pasting a bitcoin address places it in computer memory, where it is accessible by the NSA. Memorizing your address avoids that risk.
|
|
|
|
edonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004
|
|
April 11, 2014, 01:55:26 PM |
|
You used 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj instead of 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh Zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj when connected for the first time and this is how your username was created. This was an invalid BTC address so payouts weren't made. I just renamed it and you should expect payout today. This seems to happen a lot. Maybe the "Start" instructions should indicate that BTC addresses are case sensitive. People should just copy and paste their BTC addresses anyway. Since they're complex and associated with money I don't know why anyone would try to type them by hand.
|
Was I helpful? BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
|
|
|
hashsss
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
April 11, 2014, 04:37:18 PM |
|
You used 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj instead of 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNh Zv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj when connected for the first time and this is how your username was created. This was an invalid BTC address so payouts weren't made. I just renamed it and you should expect payout today. This seems to happen a lot. Maybe the "Start" instructions should indicate that BTC addresses are case sensitive. People should just copy and paste their BTC addresses anyway. Since they're complex and associated with money I don't know why anyone would try to type them by hand. maybe they are using mobile wallet and don't know way to quick copy that to the PC
|
|
|
|
mrflibblehat
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
April 11, 2014, 10:59:56 PM |
|
Hi, I have 4.8Mh/s on this pool but the stats are only showing 691Kh/s for the past 3 hours, should I be concerned or does it just not update very well?
|
|
|
|
|
Burnie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2014, 12:17:19 AM |
|
Hi, I have 4.8Mh/s on this pool but the stats are only showing 691Kh/s for the past 3 hours, should I be concerned or does it just not update very well?
Where are you seeing those stats? There's no stats for "3 hour average". If you are seeing that number under "24 hour average" and have mined for only 3 hours, you can multiply that by 8. (3*8=24)
|
|
|
|
Burnie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2014, 12:25:16 AM |
|
Did you try entering that bitcoin address in the search field up to the right, or did you just not bother? BTW: he had 8GH/s 3-4 days ago... not today.
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
April 12, 2014, 02:48:02 AM |
|
This miner is the forum user sfire, aka the "Chinese Whale". Originally seen on middlecoin (and the middlecoin bitcointalk thread), and has recently had most of his hashing power on WafflePool. sfire moved most of their power over to ghash.io for most of the bonus week, and then moved the majority of power back to WafflePool. Looks like they are ramping up more power and putting some on CleverMining now.
|
|
|
|
koolkiwikat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2014, 05:05:31 AM |
|
Whale is an understatement.....his hashing power is out of this world!
|
|
|
|
murraypaul
|
|
April 12, 2014, 11:11:10 AM |
|
You used 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNhzv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj instead of 1B49qTqGUm6ukgNhZv7YNEdnj3h5k4JKoj when connected for the first time and this is how your username was created. This was an invalid BTC address so payouts weren't made. I just renamed it and you should expect payout today.
This seems to happen a lot. Maybe the "Start" instructions should indicate that BTC addresses are case sensitive. People should just copy and paste their BTC addresses anyway. Since they're complex and associated with money I don't know why anyone would try to type them by hand. Why not have the pool validate addresses when a miner connects, and refuse connection to invalid addresses? That way someone would know immediately that there was a problem, rather than finding out days later, and the pool op having to make manual fixes?
|
BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
|
|
|
elpsycongro
|
|
April 12, 2014, 08:18:51 PM |
|
What you want terk to hold your hands while you set up mining too? Copy and paste prevents these recent typo issues we are having with wrong wallet addresses .
|
|
|
|
Capttech08
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2014, 12:29:17 AM |
|
2 of my 3 rigs are working fine but 1 of them I am getting the error message below. I tried to go back and find another person with this error but didnt have such luck. I am writing this on that machine so the internet is working. This is the same batch file on my other 2 rigs as well. Any ideas would be great Thanks - Keep up the great work Terk!
|
BTC Tip Jar: 11tK3hF4KN9t2kZbRgqdafdcNMDyPW2ru LTC Tip Jar: LMCBpoiy86H5Gw5Evjt9fRRB6h6ipUCN9V
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2014, 01:59:50 AM |
|
CleverMining now on 0.00399btc/MH/day? 91% LTC.
Shockingly bad. There are coins out there doing nearly twice that!!!
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
|
April 13, 2014, 05:58:26 AM |
|
CleverMining now on 0.00399btc/MH/day? 91% LTC.
Shockingly bad. There are coins out there doing nearly twice that!!!
if you're talking today, you must mean USDe. it's top of the heap on coinwarz right now. however, notice two things about USDe: 1. only 2 exchanges trade USDe with a combined daily total volume of about 4 BTC. the amount of coins clevermining would obtain would flood and crash the market. 2. the network hashrate of USDe is ~220mhash. clevermining could fork the coin with 50x the entire USDe hashrate. in order for the switching pool to poop out bitcoins we need somewhere to sell them and someone to buy them.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
April 13, 2014, 07:46:54 AM |
|
I think CM should forget about scrypt mining and make the jump to X11 when Terk finishes his own stratum server. Scrypt is never going to rise again. With the current hashrate of 11 Gh/s, pool can split among all the relevant X11 coins like Hiro, Dark an whatever other coins will appear.
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2014, 09:11:52 AM |
|
if you're talking today, you must mean USDe. it's top of the heap on coinwarz right now.
I don't mean USDe. No coin on coinwarz is ever worth mining, it's a red herring. I think CM should forget about scrypt mining and make the jump to X11 when Terk finishes his own stratum server. Scrypt is never going to rise again. With the current hashrate of 11 Gh/s, pool can split among all the relevant X11 coins like Hiro, Dark an whatever other coins will appear.
It's a good idea. One of the coins doing better than CM's .00379btc/day is the X11 coin Munti, but there are others too, Scrypt coins.
|
|
|
|
suchspelunker
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
April 13, 2014, 03:46:38 PM |
|
I wanted to register to say thanks for your efforts. I have decided to move on to another pool but I will keep an eye on CM in the future and where it goes from here. I know it has been a rough couple of weeks in a number of respects. A bit more transparency and performance/profit are needed though.
|
|
|
|
|