[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[Honk312]

I'm still not sure at this moment.... but....

I think that this is problem related to DAG size increase from ETC.
ETC block 4924220 jumped to next DAG few hours ago.
http://gastracker.io/block/4924220


ETC dag increases faster than ETH so their limit will come faster.
So it may caused some problem on maintaining two DAG from claymore. (It uses two DAG for main mining and devfee mining)

I would recommend you to restart the miner.
If it doesn't help, check if it works if -nofee 1 and --allcoins 0 option

Or maybe try other ETC pool from your hardware and tell me the result. I don't see similar error from my gpu, so I don't know what the problem is.

Did not help, it is nothing with the fee, because error comes on the first share. Also it looks like not all worker having this trouble.
Yesterday it helped me as I deleted the Worker on miningpool under Hub Workers

here the same error
https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/7g4kk7/constantly_hitting_this_errorplease_help/


Edit: I rebooted the miner computer, after it all normal

Edit2: Finally it did not help, a worker switched again into the state jobnotfound, only computer reboot helps here again, I don't know whats the error

1) Maybe extending your Virtual memory size would help?
2) Have you tried it on other ETC pool?

I will test it if a worker is going into that failed state again, currently all running

[banec]

+1
ETH: Received error: {"id":10,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}

ETC and Music

restart = ok

[mikbal]

Music also gives jobnotfound error.  Restart doesnt help.  Not all my rigs show the same issue tho.

[brunocrypto]

I m stopping mining on Mining hub Pool.


Because of the PPNLS System, i ve lost a lot.

NOWHERE on your website you specify you use PPLNS system, and what is it. ? Why do you hide this ?


I ve mined with 0,01 BTC with Nicehash, about 0,5 to 1mhs equihash for about 1 hours on BTG pool.
And has no block where find, then i get no reward ?

THAT'S UNFAIR.

SO on Mining Hub Pool, FINDERS / KEEPERS -> If you are not here at the EXACT moment the block is find, then you lost ALL your work !

That's so unfair ! I use Awesome miner, that's a really good program, but it's use PROFIT system, that frequently switch between pool for best rewards, they put YOUR pool in the switching system with is a sort of scam, because the program switch regulary (you program for 1 min to x min as you wish)

I was mining on your pool from many weeks with this feature, and i ve lost a lot with your PPNLS system.

It's really unfair to not at least put a warning on your repartition share system.

For my part, i m completly stopping working with your pool, and if you are like me using a profit switching pool, you should think about i said...


So i mine 90 min, block find at 60 min -> 30 min work lost (33% loss)
i mine 3 min, no block find -> 100% loss
i mine 5h, no block find -> 100% loss (possible on BTG pool)

PPNLS is a very unfair system. I m complaining here about the fact you don't put on your website the sharing system you use, and how it work.

I know you have put it on your first post here on Bitcointalk, but i was choose your pool, by passing though Awesome miner, and i never saw your repartition system, and i looked a lot your website.
I m not happy !

Question : Do you keep the people work that switch before the effective block find for you ? or do you share it with miners finders blocks ? How can you prove you share all the rewards with the finders, you could just pay the "people shared work that was not here before the block is find" to your adress ?

[Honk312]

I'm still not sure at this moment.... but....

I think that this is problem related to DAG size increase from ETC.
ETC block 4924220 jumped to next DAG few hours ago.
http://gastracker.io/block/4924220


ETC dag increases faster than ETH so their limit will come faster.
So it may caused some problem on maintaining two DAG from claymore. (It uses two DAG for main mining and devfee mining)

I would recommend you to restart the miner.
If it doesn't help, check if it works if -nofee 1 and --allcoins 0 option

Or maybe try other ETC pool from your hardware and tell me the result. I don't see similar error from my gpu, so I don't know what the problem is.

Did not help, it is nothing with the fee, because error comes on the first share. Also it looks like not all worker having this trouble.
Yesterday it helped me as I deleted the Worker on miningpool under Hub Workers

here the same error
https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/7g4kk7/constantly_hitting_this_errorplease_help/


Edit: I rebooted the miner computer, after it all normal

Edit2: Finally it did not help, a worker switched again into the state jobnotfound, only computer reboot helps here again, I don't know whats the error

1) Maybe extending your Virtual memory size would help?
2) Have you tried it on other ETC pool?

One worker was again in failed state, jobnotfound

I changed config to another pool all worked well share accepted

I changed back to miningpool jobnotfound

Edit: Reboot did not work, I let the miner 5 minutes offline and restart it, then it works again, some kind of a session?

[mikbal]

Music also gives jobnotfound error.  Restart doesnt help.  Not all my rigs show the same issue tho.

All failing rigs have been moved to another pool. Other pools work perfect.

[fynxgloire]

Hi,
I have mining almost a week now but I see the reported hashrates on the website for the zcoin that I am mining is really off.
It is reporting for one of my workers that I have 6 MH/s when in fact I am mining at 12.

Why is it displaying 1/2 my hashing rate?

Sure a few hours it goes up to 10 or whatnot, WHY THE INCONSISTENCY?

What the hell are you doing? Throttling data?

What miner are you using?

I am using the new ccminer from djm here:
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/

reporting hashrate: https://imgur.com/a/5okQc

Actual hashrate:  https://imgur.com/a/YUDya

Why am I losing 1/2 my hashrate?

Look at the daily graphs on MiningPoolHub instead as the pool estimates the speed from share submissions.

That's the best miner; they fixed the share submission problem but there is still a problem with what it's reporting.

Your shares are being sent to the pool but the miner is calculating something wrong.
Sgminer works fine so you need to keep reporting the bug to DJM34 regarding Ccminer.

Which executable is better for nvidia cards the ccminer.exe or the ccminer_cuda9.exe one?
( at the sane file location https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ ) ?

[Call_Me_Bambi]

I m stopping mining on Mining hub Pool.


Because of the PPNLS System, i ve lost a lot.

NOWHERE on your website you specify you use PPLNS system, and what is it. ? Why do you hide this ?


I ve mined with 0,01 BTC with Nicehash, about 0,5 to 1mhs equihash for about 1 hours on BTG pool.
And has no block where find, then i get no reward ?

THAT'S UNFAIR.

SO on Mining Hub Pool, FINDERS / KEEPERS -> If you are not here at the EXACT moment the block is find, then you lost ALL your work !

That's so unfair ! I use Awesome miner, that's a really good program, but it's use PROFIT system, that frequently switch between pool for best rewards, they put YOUR pool in the switching system with is a sort of scam, because the program switch regulary (you program for 1 min to x min as you wish)

I was mining on your pool from many weeks with this feature, and i ve lost a lot with your PPNLS system.

It's really unfair to not at least put a warning on your repartition share system.

For my part, i m completly stopping working with your pool, and if you are like me using a profit switching pool, you should think about i said...


So i mine 90 min, block find at 60 min -> 30 min work lost (33% loss)
i mine 3 min, no block find -> 100% loss
i mine 5h, no block find -> 100% loss (possible on BTG pool)

PPNLS is a very unfair system. I m complaining here about the fact you don't put on your website the sharing system you use, and how it work.

I know you have put it on your first post here on Bitcointalk, but i was choose your pool, by passing though Awesome miner, and i never saw your repartition system, and i looked a lot your website.
I m not happy !

Question : Do you keep the people work that switch before the effective block find for you ? or do you share it with miners finders blocks ? How can you prove you share all the rewards with the finders, you could just pay the "people shared work that was not here before the block is find" to your adress ?

If you don't know what PPNLS is then you should know that Google is your friend. PPNLS is the best method out there as it stops pool hoppers.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/

[Myth888]

I wonder if there is eletroneum, then it can be algo switch mining with monero.

I also want the electroneum to be added but at the moment it is not supported by the 3 exchanges that MPH supports. It can't be auto exchanged for now here. It might cause a few unhappy campers if it was activated by MPH for the less read miners. Hopefully in the near future more cryptonight algo is added. I prefer mining cryptonight over eth from time to time.

[aaronsace]

Hi,
I have mining almost a week now but I see the reported hashrates on the website for the zcoin that I am mining is really off.
It is reporting for one of my workers that I have 6 MH/s when in fact I am mining at 12.

Why is it displaying 1/2 my hashing rate?

Sure a few hours it goes up to 10 or whatnot, WHY THE INCONSISTENCY?

What the hell are you doing? Throttling data?

What miner are you using?

I am using the new ccminer from djm here:
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/

reporting hashrate: https://imgur.com/a/5okQc

Actual hashrate:  https://imgur.com/a/YUDya

Why am I losing 1/2 my hashrate?

Look at the daily graphs on MiningPoolHub instead as the pool estimates the speed from share submissions.

That's the best miner; they fixed the share submission problem but there is still a problem with what it's reporting.

Your shares are being sent to the pool but the miner is calculating something wrong.
Sgminer works fine so you need to keep reporting the bug to DJM34 regarding Ccminer.

Which executable is better for nvidia cards the ccminer.exe or the ccminer_cuda9.exe one?
( at the sane file location https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ ) ?

Every fork of Ccminer out there only work with NVidia cards.

Try the cuda 9 one; if it's not compatible then use the other one which works on older cuda versions.

[fynxgloire]

Hi,
I have mining almost a week now but I see the reported hashrates on the website for the zcoin that I am mining is really off.
It is reporting for one of my workers that I have 6 MH/s when in fact I am mining at 12.

Why is it displaying 1/2 my hashing rate?

Sure a few hours it goes up to 10 or whatnot, WHY THE INCONSISTENCY?

What the hell are you doing? Throttling data?

What miner are you using?

I am using the new ccminer from djm here:
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/

reporting hashrate: https://imgur.com/a/5okQc

Actual hashrate:  https://imgur.com/a/YUDya

Why am I losing 1/2 my hashrate?

Look at the daily graphs on MiningPoolHub instead as the pool estimates the speed from share submissions.

That's the best miner; they fixed the share submission problem but there is still a problem with what it's reporting.

Your shares are being sent to the pool but the miner is calculating something wrong.
Sgminer works fine so you need to keep reporting the bug to DJM34 regarding Ccminer.

Which executable is better for nvidia cards the ccminer.exe or the ccminer_cuda9.exe one?
( at the sane file location https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ ) ?

Every fork of Ccminer out there only work with NVidia cards.

Try the cuda 9 one; if it's not compatible then use the other one which works on older cuda versions.

Ok I am running the cuda_0 one on my multi rig.
After looking at the log, it seems to automatically set the difficulty stratum higher every time.
First it was 1, then it set it to 100, now it set it to 200, and now when it is at 200 it is not find shares in the log.  Also it is not showing any hashrates on the pool.
Why is it setting the difficulty higher automatically in the software program?
is this normal?

[aaronsace]

Hi,
I have mining almost a week now but I see the reported hashrates on the website for the zcoin that I am mining is really off.
It is reporting for one of my workers that I have 6 MH/s when in fact I am mining at 12.

Why is it displaying 1/2 my hashing rate?

Sure a few hours it goes up to 10 or whatnot, WHY THE INCONSISTENCY?

What the hell are you doing? Throttling data?

What miner are you using?

I am using the new ccminer from djm here:
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/

reporting hashrate: https://imgur.com/a/5okQc

Actual hashrate:  https://imgur.com/a/YUDya

Why am I losing 1/2 my hashrate?

Look at the daily graphs on MiningPoolHub instead as the pool estimates the speed from share submissions.

That's the best miner; they fixed the share submission problem but there is still a problem with what it's reporting.

Your shares are being sent to the pool but the miner is calculating something wrong.
Sgminer works fine so you need to keep reporting the bug to DJM34 regarding Ccminer.

Which executable is better for nvidia cards the ccminer.exe or the ccminer_cuda9.exe one?
( at the sane file location https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ ) ?

Every fork of Ccminer out there only work with NVidia cards.

Try the cuda 9 one; if it's not compatible then use the other one which works on older cuda versions.

Ok I am running the cuda_0 one on my multi rig.
After looking at the log, it seems to automatically set the difficulty stratum higher every time.
First it was 1, then it set it to 100, now it set it to 200, and now when it is at 200 it is not find shares in the log.  Also it is not showing any hashrates on the pool.
Why is it setting the difficulty higher automatically in the software program?
is this normal?

You are not meant to be getting streams of shares but you should be getting some.

When you submit shares the pool increases the difficulty. When you don't submit shares the pools lowers the difficulty.

[aaronsace]

LOL it says "PPLNS Target" at the top. That huge rant before...

[pikatju]

The multipoolminer window goes blank and stops switching miner. The miner just continues until I restart the program. Is there a known solution to this?

[aaronsace]

The multipoolminer window goes blank and stops switching miner. The miner just continues until I restart the program. Is there a known solution to this?

Not heard of that issue before, please report on GitHub and include your log.

[aaronsace]

Hello,

Could you please help me with calculation as per data below

PPLNS Target   63836
 
Round Shares Submitted shares since last found block (ie. round shares)
Est. Shares   271,170 (done: 321.66%)
Your Valid   84.4711
Your Invalid   0.9333 (1.09%)
 
XZC Estimates
Block   0.00385283
Fees   0.00003468
Donation   0.00000000
Payout   0.00381815
 
Network Info
Difficulty   16,948.09604798
Est. Avg. Time per Block   10 minutes 26 seconds
Current Block   63163


My share from all submitted is is 84/271179 = 0,031% 
Reward for found block is equal 40.

40*0,031% = 0,0124 XZC

Why does it estimate reward for my contribution to 0.00385283 XZC? What do I miss in my calculation. Seems I missed something obvious, sorry for noobish question

The round was longer than estimated: 321.66% instead of 100.00%.

0.0124/3.2166 = 0.00385283

[pikatju]

The multipoolminer window goes blank and stops switching miner. The miner just continues until I restart the program. Is there a known solution to this?

Not heard of that issue before, please report on GitHub and include your log.

Sure thing will do!

[Lordas]

Looking at all these problems reports I think I would like to say that I am very happy with this pool.
And saying big thanks to pool owners and support.

[pikatju]

The multipoolminer window goes blank and stops switching miner. The miner just continues until I restart the program. Is there a known solution to this?

Not heard of that issue before, please report on GitHub and include your log.

I have submitted the issue here: https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/issues/547

Thank you so much for the help!

[Honk312]

Only a report, no new jobnotfound errors here