[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision

[ðºÞæ]

Anyone who says BSV isn’t “good tech,” is criticizing BTC from 2009 until late 2017. 
BSV simply didn’t add the technical bloat of Core. Today, BTC has exponential more lines of code, but  less than .01% of BSV’s throughput. THAT is “bad tech.”
The secret history of BitCoin.

[1714120628]

1714120628

[1714120628]

1714120628

[1714120628]

1714120628

[hv_]

Anyone who says BSV isn’t “good tech,” is criticizing BTC from 2009 until late 2017. 
BSV simply didn’t add the technical bloat of Core. Today, BTC has exponential more lines of code, but  less than .01% of BSV’s throughput. THAT is “bad tech.”
The secret history of BitCoin.

RBF crap is not part of BitCoin SV afaik

But good plot.

[ðºÞæ]

It gets bigger and better
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775

[hv_]

It gets bigger and better
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775

Good - more fees than coinbase reward after next halving.

Sustainable for eternity ?

 

[hv_]

Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."

The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.

Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already

If some ppl dont understand why and how that could work / have other ideas:  copy the code, alter it and build ur own coin

Wait, call it SegWitCoin ?

[hv_]

Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."

The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.

Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already

He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit.

Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud.

Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem

Here

Read

Stop whining

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611

[hv_]

Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."

The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.

Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already

He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit.

Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud.

Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem

Here

Read

Stop whining

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611

You're referring to a famous comment he left about the protocol, which has changed immensely since vers 0.1, with several changes made by Satoshi himself. Your code contains even more changes made by Bcash developers that aren't included in today's actual Bitcoin (BTC). The "core design" of bitcoin has been altered more by Bcash and BSV than it has in BTC.

Funny you linked that comment, because he also said this in it:

I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea.  So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network.  The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.

The main problem is your are relying on a proven fraud's definition of what "set in stone" refers to.

And why was need for change it - except for bug fix?

Agsin u know only af hominem.  Fine boy

[hv_]

Agsin u know only af hominem.  Fine boy

Calling Craig a proven fraud isn't an ad hominem attack, nor is calling you a liar. They are both demonstrable logically and pertain directly to your inability to make an honest argument.

What it boils down to is you are relying on a fraud's definition of what "set in stone" means. Let's look at the quote you are referencing:

The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime.

What about BTC has altered the "core design" of Bitcoin? The core features of Bitcoin work in today's BTC just as they did in Satoshi's 0.1 version of Bitcoin.

Craig has convinced you that his new fork of a fork is actually closer to Bitcoin because he says so -- not because the code says so. The BSV code says a bunch of things Satoshi never had in mind, just as BTC's code does as well.

If BSV is "set in stone" the way that Bitcoin 0.1 was, fire up a Bitcoin 0.1 client and try connecting to the BSV network with it. The reality is that you will only stand a chance of connecting the 0.1 client to the Bitcoin Network (BTC, the real bitcoin that you constantly troll with a passion).

the Goal is clear now - BSV will be able to run with 0.1

You might get that so far without ur funny style.

Best ignore all ur crappy stuff

[hv_]

Paymail might be one of the great killer apps for use of true BitCoin

https://mobile.twitter.com/_unwriter/status/1194283584879779842

Happy Using

 

[jbreher]

What about BTC has altered the "core design" of Bitcoin? The core features of Bitcoin work in today's BTC just as they did in Satoshi's 0.1 version of Bitcoin..

BTC today contains numerous alterations of the Bitcoin protocol. Changes that prevent core Bitcoin features of old working today. As but one example, RBF has totally broken the model where a direct P2P tx can be used, with settlement deferred to an arbitrary time in the future.

If BSV is "set in stone" the way that Bitcoin 0.1 was, fire up a Bitcoin 0.1 client and try connecting to the BSV network with it. The reality is that you will only stand a chance of connecting the 0.1 client to the Bitcoin Network (BTC, the real bitcoin that you constantly troll with a passion).

This assertion of yours directly contradicts the assertion you make above. Funny.

[hv_]

ETH and all other smart contract platforms getting trouble?


https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3257191B1/en

No.

ETH was on July 20th, 2015, well before the patent was filed.

What do you think is gonna happen? Craig is gonna sue Ethereum?

Spoiler alert: Vitalik already patented everything related to Ethereum back in 2014:

https://patents.google.com/scholar/7384049674951822602

Lol, nutiboy tries and tries, but cannot read / get it.

It is GRANTED

Put that idiot on ignore.

[hv_]

Independence day celebration incoming

Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers

A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream


https://mobile.twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1193876027019333634

Back to what simple and origin rules of BitCoin are


Happy days

[hv_]

Independence day celebration incoming

Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers

A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream

No you didn't. You broke away from Bcash to make an even bigger block version of Bcash. Way to try to rewrite history though. Have you ever said something that wasn't a lie?

Again you re wrong - ABC ppl enforced the split - and did a hell of funny protection into their code

BSV kept CLEAN on track to remove Magic numbers and refactor code

Are ur bags hurting that strong? Or u never start thinkin .... cannot fix that .


Easy lesson: Clean, stable - on purpose protocols are needed (most critical in finance) - easy risk assessed  and really used Long term

Tech dept and funny governance will kill  everything else  in the LONG run

[ðºÞæ]

November 15 marks #BitcoinIndependence Day. 
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!

[hv_]

November 15 marks #BitcoinIndependence Day.  
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!

Yes - we got lot's of things done, explained and developed (also on top of the protocol!)

Let's see if Jimmy could collect some nice presents

https://twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1194825739180351488

 

[hv_]

Very nice discussion here about money

https://twitter.com/zbingledack/status/1194954628892282880?s=19


And BitCoin

[jbreher]

Finally, well, I must admit that BSV is perfect!

I recommend BSV to everyone!

Careful - now Lauda will tag you with a scammer accusation.

[ðºÞæ]

Forward and up, BSV Year 1 Look-back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXfJNVGCZQs&feature=emb_logo

[hv_]

In BSV we have

biggest blocks

biggest thinkers

biggest stories

https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/australian-cfo-compelled-to-give-deposition-in-10-billion-bitcoin-lawsuit/


Winning Big Time

[hv_]

Finally, well, I must admit that BSV is perfect!

I recommend BSV to everyone!

Careful - now Lauda will tag you with a scammer accusation.

you're right, the guy has such an oversized ego that he did it. I lost my bet, I don't think he'd have the audacity to take on a name that doesn't belong to him. That's his flagrant misdemeanor! Identity crisis of the toilet vigilante.

At least it proves that "this guy and a certified perfect asshole that's why he doesn't have hemorrhoids".

 

Same for me ! he have copy my name and nutildah negative trust me but i'm the real Iamutut

Be vigilant there are many of them acting to try to make you believe that Satoshi is not Craig Wright

You both really do not need to come in here with your baby sock puppet accounts to finally admit you have learned the lesson