Newmineryeah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 09, 2015, 10:53:42 PM |
|
So, I have a gawminer fury (not great I know) I was given it by a friend who is having a clear out and I almost gave up on mining. I would like to know as it is scrypt what could I mine with it. I cannot find any doge pools out there that I could use with cgminer and my gawminer, do you know of any active low networ hash for scrypt?
|
|
|
|
Quix0r
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2015, 06:25:44 PM |
|
I have a Zeusminer Blizzard now (1.2Mh - 1.4Mh). When I let it run on my local mpos installation, the miner is finding shares (I wonder if I can find blocks with this?). But when I setup litecoinpool.org as the pool, no hashes at all are being mined.
What causes this?
|
|
|
|
Newmineryeah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2015, 06:40:00 PM |
|
With 1.++Mh/s you will not find a block, your probability is like 14% likely to find one in 365 days seeing as pools now are in 97,480 MH/s. Is your cgminer saying accepted work or what. can I see ascreenshot?!
|
|
|
|
Quix0r
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2015, 07:33:00 PM |
|
Ah: Diff: 0 That is maybe why? I use bfgminer 4.2.0 with zeusminer branch (old, I know but seems to work at least with my pool). Here is the output: bfgminer version 4.2.0 - Started: [2015-05-12 21:31:06] - [ 0 days 00:02:28] [M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit Pool 0: litecoinpool.org Diff:0 +Strtm LU:[21:33:10] User:Quix0r.miner1 Block: ...b9f1c8d5 #779274 Diff:41.5k (296.8G) Started: [21:32:18] ST:202 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[ 53/ 5 B/s] E:0.00 I: 0.00 BTC/hr BS:0 1 | 0.35/ 1.02/ 0.00Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ZUS 0: | 2.35/ 0.99/ 0.00Mh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2015-05-12 21:30:49] Loaded configuration file /home/quix0r/.bfgminer/bfgminer.conf [2015-05-12 21:30:49] Probing for an alive pool [2015-05-12 21:31:06] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://litecoinpool.org:3333 alive [2015-05-12 21:31:06] Network difficulty changed to 41.5k (296.8G) [2015-05-12 21:31:06] API running in local read access mode on port 4028 [2015-05-12 21:31:07] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us [2015-05-12 21:31:39] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2015-05-12 21:32:18] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
|
|
|
|
Quix0r
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2015, 08:07:12 PM Last edit: May 12, 2015, 08:19:33 PM by Quix0r |
|
I upgraded to bfgminer version 5.1.0-36-g8b5d36b and it now works ... Well, okay. Never mind. :-)Nope, it doesn't mine anything again (like above). :-(
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
May 12, 2015, 08:14:33 PM |
|
I upgraded to bfgminer version 5.1.0-36-g8b5d36b and it now works ... Well, okay. Never mind. :-) Great to hear that. I was just about to suggest trying to upgrade the miner. BFGminer is (just like all cgminer forks) a rather complex piece of software, and you never know where the next bug is going to pop up. Ah: Diff: 0 That is maybe why?
Probably not. Older versions of BFGminer only display the integer part of the share difficulty, so 0 is expected if the difficulty is less than 1. (More info about BFGminer's way of formatting difficulty here.) Also, if the difficulty were really 0, you would be submitting a lot of (invalid) shares. And I see that your miner hasn't submitted a single share yet.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Quix0r
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2015, 08:22:55 PM |
|
Getting this on my mpos instance: 2015-05-12 22:21:04+0200 [Protocol,0,192.168.x.y] 2015-05-12 22:21:04,083 WARNING protocol # Failed message: Cannot decode mess,���C��r��M o���u"���Iu�\03gE9k�2@D8j�f/<A5=�' from 192.168.x.y It looks like the newer version has some trouble, 4.2.0 is mining again (only own pool).
|
|
|
|
Mister_Fix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2015, 12:30:15 PM |
|
It would be nice is the JSON API updated stats more often.
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2015, 12:44:46 PM |
|
It would be nice is the JSON API updated stats more often.
I agree. I have now decreased the minimum interval between updates of the user API from 1 minute to 10 seconds.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Mister_Fix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2015, 01:08:08 PM |
|
It would be nice is the JSON API updated stats more often.
I agree. I have now decreased the minimum interval between updates of the user API from 1 minute to 10 seconds. Oh wow, thank you very much! i use it for my java based program, here's a scrrenshot: https://i.imgur.com/pANbqJq.png
|
|
|
|
siouxscout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2015, 06:40:29 PM |
|
I can't seem to get my second worker's speed to update under the /account page, has anyone else had this issue? Perhaps I'm not leaving that working on long enough. I've got a couple spare miners running ~15Mh/s under the second workers name and password, so I guess ill just leave it and see.
Just worried ill leave them running for no reason.
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
May 28, 2015, 08:04:46 PM |
|
I can't seem to get my second worker's speed to update under the /account page, has anyone else had this issue? Perhaps I'm not leaving that working on long enough. I've got a couple spare miners running ~15Mh/s under the second workers name and password, so I guess ill just leave it and see.
Just worried ill leave them running for no reason.
If your miners show up as online but no shares are being submitted then I'm sorry but you are indeed running them for no reason. If that's the case, almost certainly something is wrong in your configuration.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2173
Merit: 1401
|
|
June 07, 2015, 04:02:45 PM |
|
whats the max diff your stratum server can take? Just tried setting a 131,072 diff but it knocked me down to 65,536. Do you have an asic specific server in the US?
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
June 07, 2015, 04:33:07 PM |
|
whats the max diff your stratum server can take? Just tried setting a 131,072 diff but it knocked me down to 65,536. Do you have an asic specific server in the US?
There was a soft limit at 65,536, I've bumped it to 131,072 now. If you need anything higher than that just send an email to support, but keep in mind that 65k was already pretty high. For a 500 MH/s miner, 131k corresponds to an average of one share every 17 seconds.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2173
Merit: 1401
|
|
June 11, 2015, 09:01:09 PM |
|
whats the max diff your stratum server can take? Just tried setting a 131,072 diff but it knocked me down to 65,536. Do you have an asic specific server in the US?
There was a soft limit at 65,536, I've bumped it to 131,072 now. If you need anything higher than that just send an email to support, but keep in mind that 65k was already pretty high. For a 500 MH/s miner, 131k corresponds to an average of one share every 17 seconds. Thanks...trying to get the Alcheminer 256 scrypt machines to work at full speed and seems like they like really high diffs, want to see what a 100k diff will do to the speed!
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
July 02, 2015, 12:58:42 PM |
|
Why pps 101%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
July 02, 2015, 01:01:58 PM |
|
Why pps 101%
Because the profitability of merged mining has gone down significantly in the last few days.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
July 03, 2015, 02:25:42 PM |
|
Come on
Put it up again
|
|
|
|
matt4054
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
|
|
July 05, 2015, 10:31:47 PM |
|
Is the pool OK regarding the recent security issue and mandatory, urgent upgrade to the latest version?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
July 06, 2015, 07:05:12 AM |
|
Is the pool OK regarding the recent security issue and mandatory, urgent upgrade to the latest version?
Yes, of course. We've also been among the first to switch to v3 blocks a few weeks ago.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
|