Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2021, 10:18:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 131 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 76844 times)
1miau
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 3354


Evaluate if it's Coin or Shitcoin


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 12:54:29 AM
 #1521

It's not ready yet, but as a first result, these users on DT2 need looking into:
glen123 (1) (Trust: -32: -5 / +0)
winspiral (1) (Trust: -32: -5 / +0)

Both are included by this new DT1 member:
Quote
Trust list for: willi9974 (Trust: 4: -1 / +5) (DT1! (1) 34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-04-04_Thu_10.14h)
Back to index

Thanks for posting, I've removed him from my trust list for now and will tell him about the situation.

I added him to my trust list earlier because he is offering a trusted escrow in the German local board for very long and he left some feedback about the trades so I thought it would be good to have his ratings visible in the German community (DT2). He did also some group buys where he purchased miners for solo mining and splitted the profits to the investors (similar to LoyceV's 10 Altcoins challenge but for mining) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1348143.0

I wasn't aware that he set all the users he traded with on his personal trust list and that isn't how DT1 works to add everyone there. It doesn't look to me that he did so to push his trust rating, only a confusion of trust list and sent feedback.
Removed for now and will tell him to review it.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638483528
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638483528

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638483528
Reply with quote  #2

1638483528
Report to moderator
1638483528
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638483528

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638483528
Reply with quote  #2

1638483528
Report to moderator
1638483528
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638483528

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638483528
Reply with quote  #2

1638483528
Report to moderator
bill gator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1056



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 12:55:47 AM
Merited by The Pharmacist (2)
 #1522

You don't deserve to be on DT just by tagging scammers, or the opposite..

What exactly is the opposite of tagging scammers? Is it, being tagged by scammers?
Has anyone suggested that would be adequate criteria for DT selection?

The disagreement seemed to be about whether or not Satoshi would belong on DT1 if they were active; I guess the simple answer is that they would be treated the same way as anyone else under the new system. If I had to guess, it would be more their choice to be on DT1 or not (as we've seen with well-respected members already) because of the amount of inclusions and meeting the other criteria.
The Pharmacist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 4779


>>Proudly cycling merits for Team Foxpup<<


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 01:02:43 AM
Merited by Foxpup (3), TECSHARE (1), LoyceV (1)
 #1523

What exactly is the opposite of tagging scammers? Is it, being tagged by scammers?
Who knows.  The problem with people getting on DT by way of scam-busting is that it doesn't really prove how honest that person is, and even though that is (I think) the reason I was put on DT, I still believe that.  A member can easily just tag a lot of scammy accounts and work their way up to DT in order to pull off a really big scam.  I don't know if that has actually been done, but it's possible.  At least if you have a history of transactions involving money you could have scammed, there's some real basis for trust.

Assuming Satoshi was still around and hadn't scammed anybody, I have no doubt whatsoever that he'd be on DT1.  And under those conditions, he'd deserve to be.  If you can go 10 years without showing evidence of scamming behavior and you actually created bitcoin....yeah, that's DT material IMO.

eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1966


BTC or BUST


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 01:17:17 AM
 #1524


I don't get your point here..

you talked about freedom, and i explained that every member on the forum poses the same level of freedom regardless of their position and score in the trust system.
How about freedom from harassment? How about some recent cases such as..
Weather or not to tag all lenders who take collateral accounts?
Weather or not to tag all sellers of facebook, twitter, and youtube accounts?
Tagging sold accounts on what evidence?
Tagging accounts based on their affiliation with lemons?
Red tags greatly diminish a users ability to trade and therefore restricts their freedom to trade here..

The laws that are followed now came from old DT members , the majority of new DT1 and DT2 members are elected by old members, so if you trust their judgment then there is no reason to nag about new members.
The laws change here all the time, based on the current consensus of the community, now heavily DT1..
Their are current battles for/against new laws and will be into the future..
We need trusted freedom minded people to maintain just laws or the next thing you know DT will enforce KYC to have the privilege of a clear account..

Quote
Satoshi should most definitely be DT1.. Are you kidding?
Nop , i am not ! it's good to see you practice what you preach, just checked Satoshi's trust page and you have him in your trust list despite the fact that he has 0  feedback sent ,and most likely will never send any, you seem to be confusing trust list and DT to feedback and trustworthiness. having Satoshi in your trust list does nothing besides adding a new row into the forum's database.

but hey that's just my opinion,  if you still insist that only old members should be on DT , you may very well sort all users by user's ID and include the first 100/1000/5000 members in your list.

Satoshi is on my trust list for the novelty and to show respect. What about all the users who have sent merit to Satoshi or positive trust?
I do not believe I am confused..

I don't think I said that only very old members should be on DT, but rather that very new members should possibly not be on DT1, and to be cautious of those who currently are..


You don't deserve to be on DT just by tagging scammers, or the opposite..

I would (obviously) disagree..

At one time DT was filled with people who cared about bitcoin.
Now it is filling with people who care about making money with bitcoin.

I think this is a misunderstanding.. I doubt that you believe everyone that tags scammers deserves to be on DT1, only for tagging scammers, by that metric only and ignoring all other circumstances..
I agree with your last 2 lines..

What exactly is the opposite of tagging scammers? Is it, being tagged by scammers?
A DT member that is not an active scambuster.. I don't believe you have to be an active scambuster or redtagger to be on DT..

The problem with people getting on DT by way of scam-busting is that it doesn't really prove how honest that person is, and even though that is (I think) the reason I was put on DT, I still believe that.  A member can easily just tag a lot of scammy accounts and work their way up to DT in order to pull off a really big scam.  I don't know if that has actually been done, but it's possible.  At least if you have a history of transactions involving money you could have scammed, there's some real basis for trust.

Assuming Satoshi was still around and hadn't scammed anybody, I have no doubt whatsoever that he'd be on DT1.  And under those conditions, he'd deserve to be.  If you can go 10 years without showing evidence of scamming behavior and you actually created bitcoin....yeah, that's DT material IMO.
This..

Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
mikeywith
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1344
Merit: 3902


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 01:17:42 AM
 #1525

A member can easily just tag a lot of scammy accounts and work their way up to DT in order to pull off a really big scam.

well but that's the case with everyone else, some people trade with DT members just to get positive feedback "trust farming" and you can see many examples of feedback from DT members even for small deals.

escrow agents may also plan a large exist "scam" , people with higher ranks can also use their rank to scam , The risk is there in every corner of the internet.

besides, you do not need to trust a member to trust their feedback, when you buy something of amazon or ebay and you check the feedback, you don't need to trust the reviewers, I trust many people's feedback but probably only 1 or 2 of them with money, and i am sure that's the case with everyone else. so trust and feedback should really be treated separately IMO.

so if a newbie or member rank gets into DT and spend time and effort tagging scammers,and proves himself to be a good DT member, it does not mean one should trust him with money, that's a whole different subject.


1miau
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 3354


Evaluate if it's Coin or Shitcoin


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 01:36:04 AM
 #1526

What exactly is the opposite of tagging scammers? Is it, being tagged by scammers?
Who knows.  The problem with people getting on DT by way of scam-busting is that it doesn't really prove how honest that person is, and even though that is (I think) the reason I was put on DT, I still believe that.  A member can easily just tag a lot of scammy accounts and work their way up to DT in order to pull off a really big scam.  I don't know if that has actually been done, but it's possible.  At least if you have a history of transactions involving money you could have scammed, there's some real basis for trust.
Depends on how they are getting into DT. If they are only echoing other users negative feedback and are doing no own digging, I would consider them not worthy of being DT. It's somehow a "proof a work" if someone is spending much time for his reports about scams (such like ICOEthics for example).
It would be easier for scammers to get into DT (or at least to receive some positive feedbacks) by just making deals with highly trusted DT members. That would be a fast and low-risk method if they go always first, receive a few green ratings and finally pull their exit-scam when someone else has to go first. Similar to the marcotheminer issue where also trust was tried to build by trading. 

Scammers would most likely choose part two (trading) for their scams because part one (scammer research) takes too much time and effort.

eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1966


BTC or BUST


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 02:09:29 AM
Merited by TECSHARE (1)
 #1527

The problem with people getting on DT by way of scam-busting is that it doesn't really prove how honest that person is

The big point is that it does not prove this person's politics are good either..

Some seem to like the idea of a bunch of new rules so they can tag for more things, limiting users freedom, and some have terrible views on freedom of speech and freedom to be anonymous and have all sorts of crazy ideas to regulate anything they can think of..

I don't care how many scammers someone tags, if they disagree with the main principles of Bitcoin I don't think they should be on DT.
Bitcoin is the opposite of authority, censorship, and regulation.

This is not only voting for what tags show up, this is voting for the government..

Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
willi9974
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 1464


Escrow Treuhandservice


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 07:44:29 AM
 #1528

Good Morning all,

at first time a thanks to 1Miau, he has informed me about this post.

I'm sorry that I had so many in my trust list, but I was not aware in detail. In the first step, I cleared up my trust list and will spend more attention to it.

A little info about me
- Crypto is my biggest hobby besides geocacheing
- i organized group buys from china (Bitmaintech)
- Offer a free escrow service (protection against SCAM out of conviction and without profit)
- I was proposed in the German area as a moderator
- a live witout crypto is not possible for me  

I like to support the community and spend a lot of time. For that reason, I would be very happy if you removed the negative trust and some users distrusts (some user add mi als non trusted member).

For questions or further suggestions to my person or my trust list, just come to me and contact me.

PS: Sorry for my English, it's not the best :-)

Finally, I say thank you, that such errors are shown quickly and i have the possibillity to fix that.


Greetings from Bavaria, for me the best place in germany
Willi

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 9442


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 07:53:22 AM
 #1529

~and some users distrusts (some user add mi als non trusted member)
Excluding you from a trust list doesn't mean they don't trust you (in trades), it means they don't trust your judgement of other users. You probably had a misunderstanding of how the trust system works.
I'm curious to see your new Trust list, which I'll post tomorrow.

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1624
Merit: 7265


Observing No-Coiners.


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 09:48:59 AM
 #1530

~and some users distrusts (some user add mi als non trusted member)
Excluding you from a trust list doesn't mean they don't trust you (in trades), it means they don't trust your judgement of other users. You probably had a misunderstanding of how the trust system works.
I'm curious to see your new Trust list, which I'll post tomorrow.

Yeah, but if one distrusts you, then its just their opinion man, i'm distrusted as well by 2 members, and they will have their own reasons for it....
But I will never ask anyone to ADD or REMOVE me for their trust.... everybody is big enough to make their decisions for theirself.

XhomerX10 designed my nice avatar HATs!!!!!  Thanks Bro
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2604


Crypto Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 04:32:53 PM
Merited by TECSHARE (1)
 #1531

Assuming Satoshi was still around and hadn't scammed anybody, I have no doubt whatsoever that he'd be on DT1.  And under those conditions, he'd deserve to be.  If you can go 10 years without showing evidence of scamming behavior and you actually created bitcoin....yeah, that's DT material IMO.

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.


██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████▀▀▀        ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████▀    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ███████████████████████████████████████████████
█████    ▄█████████▌   ▐█████▀  ▐███████████████▌  ▀██████████████████
████▌   ▐██████████    █████    ████████████████    ██████████████████
████▌   ▐█████████▄▄▄▄█████▌   ▐███████████████▌   ▐███▀▀█████████████
█████    ▀███████████████▀▀        ▄███████████    ██▀   ▐████████████
██████▄     ▀▀███████▀▀         ▄▄███▀▀▀▀█████▌   ▐▀   ▄███▀▀   ▀█████
█████████▄▄     ▀▀███▄  ▄▄    ████▀    ▄   ███       ▄███▀   ▄█  ▐████
█████████████▄▄     ▀████▌   ▐███▀   ███   ██▌      ████    ██▀  █████
██████▀▀   ▀█████▄    ███    ████   ███▌  ▐██    ▌  ▐██▌      ▄▄██████
█████    ▄████████    ▐██    ██▀▀   ██▀   ▐▀    ▐█   ██▌   ▀██▀▀  ████
████▌   ▐████████▀    ███▄     ▄▄▄     ▄    ▄   ▐██   ██▄      ▄▄█████
████▌   ███████▀    ▄███████████████████████████████▄  ▀▀██████▀▀ ████
█████    ▀▀▀▀     ▄█████████▀    ▀█▀    ▀█       ▀████▄▄         ▄████
██████▄▄    ▄▄▄▄████████████  █████  ██  █  █  █  ████████████████████
█████████████████████████  █▄    ▄█▄    ▄█  █  █  ████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀▐▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀    ▄▀█████▀     ▀█▄
▄█▄    █        ▀▄   ███▄
▄████▀▀▀▀▄       ▄▀▀▀▀▀███▄
████      ▀▄▄▄▄▄▀       ███
███     ▄▄███████▄▄     ▄▀█
█  ▀▄ ▄▀ ▀███████▀ ▀▄ ▄▀  █
▀█   █     ▀███▀     ▀▄  █▀
▀█▄▄█▄      █        █▄█▀
▀█████▄ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄▄ ▄▄███▀
▀█████        ████▀
▀▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀▀
● OVER 1000 GAMES
● DAILY RACES AND BONUSES
● 24/7 LIVE SUPPORT
The Pharmacist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 4779


>>Proudly cycling merits for Team Foxpup<<


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:36:31 PM
Merited by Flying Hellfish (10), suchmoon (9), Lauda (4), Foxpup (2)
 #1532

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2604


Crypto Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 04:38:56 PM
 #1533

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

My point exactly.


██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████▀▀▀        ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████▀    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ███████████████████████████████████████████████
█████    ▄█████████▌   ▐█████▀  ▐███████████████▌  ▀██████████████████
████▌   ▐██████████    █████    ████████████████    ██████████████████
████▌   ▐█████████▄▄▄▄█████▌   ▐███████████████▌   ▐███▀▀█████████████
█████    ▀███████████████▀▀        ▄███████████    ██▀   ▐████████████
██████▄     ▀▀███████▀▀         ▄▄███▀▀▀▀█████▌   ▐▀   ▄███▀▀   ▀█████
█████████▄▄     ▀▀███▄  ▄▄    ████▀    ▄   ███       ▄███▀   ▄█  ▐████
█████████████▄▄     ▀████▌   ▐███▀   ███   ██▌      ████    ██▀  █████
██████▀▀   ▀█████▄    ███    ████   ███▌  ▐██    ▌  ▐██▌      ▄▄██████
█████    ▄████████    ▐██    ██▀▀   ██▀   ▐▀    ▐█   ██▌   ▀██▀▀  ████
████▌   ▐████████▀    ███▄     ▄▄▄     ▄    ▄   ▐██   ██▄      ▄▄█████
████▌   ███████▀    ▄███████████████████████████████▄  ▀▀██████▀▀ ████
█████    ▀▀▀▀     ▄█████████▀    ▀█▀    ▀█       ▀████▄▄         ▄████
██████▄▄    ▄▄▄▄████████████  █████  ██  █  █  █  ████████████████████
█████████████████████████  █▄    ▄█▄    ▄█  █  █  ████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀▐▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀    ▄▀█████▀     ▀█▄
▄█▄    █        ▀▄   ███▄
▄████▀▀▀▀▄       ▄▀▀▀▀▀███▄
████      ▀▄▄▄▄▄▀       ███
███     ▄▄███████▄▄     ▄▀█
█  ▀▄ ▄▀ ▀███████▀ ▀▄ ▄▀  █
▀█   █     ▀███▀     ▀▄  █▀
▀█▄▄█▄      █        █▄█▀
▀█████▄ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄▄ ▄▄███▀
▀█████        ████▀
▀▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀▀
● OVER 1000 GAMES
● DAILY RACES AND BONUSES
● 24/7 LIVE SUPPORT
Qulian
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:51:22 PM
Merited by Lauda (1)
 #1534

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

My point exactly.
You were a "target" there for making absurd claims showing your own ego doesn't correspond with reality, not because you're a "successful long term member"
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1954


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 08:46:36 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1)
 #1535

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

My point exactly.
You were a "target" there for making absurd claims showing your own ego doesn't correspond with reality, not because you're a "successful long term member"

Yes, everyone listen to the obvious sock puppet of another member here without the balls to speak using their main username. This is a perfect demonstration of what he was talking about. People who operate openly and rank up in this system via time and effort are inherently targets of those who manipulate these systems for their own gain. The decent people doing things the right way then have their overt operations and effort used as leverage against them, while the abusers operate in the dark to increase their own control by displacing them. This is again why I advocate for a standard of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before leaving negative ratings, because without objective substantiation the trust system simply becomes a tool of extortion of the few people left trying to do it the right way.
Qulian
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 10:12:57 PM
 #1536

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

My point exactly.
You were a "target" there for making absurd claims showing your own ego doesn't correspond with reality, not because you're a "successful long term member"

Yes, everyone listen to the obvious sock puppet of another member here without the balls to speak using their main username. This is a perfect demonstration of what he was talking about. People who operate openly and rank up in this system via time and effort are inherently targets of those who manipulate these systems for their own gain. The decent people doing things the right way then have their overt operations and effort used as leverage against them, while the abusers operate in the dark to increase their own control by displacing them. This is again why I advocate for a standard of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before leaving negative ratings, because without objective substantiation the trust system simply becomes a tool of extortion of the few people left trying to do it the right way.

Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say  Roll Eyes
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.

You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1954


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2019, 12:23:21 AM
 #1537

Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say  Roll Eyes
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.

You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.

Man, that obvious sock puppet is totes making me feel marginalized right now. You know what is embarrassing? Nutless little turds like you who can't even stand by their own words so they need to use socks.
Qulian
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 06, 2019, 02:39:41 AM
 #1538

Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say  Roll Eyes
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.

You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.

Man, that obvious sock puppet is totes making me feel marginalized right now. You know what is embarrassing? Nutless little turds like you who can't even stand by their own words so they need to use socks.
I see you're out of arguments now. Sure. Let's ignore everything because this may not be my main account  Roll Eyes
What an overwhelming (and original) reasoning  Undecided
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1954


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2019, 02:53:53 AM
 #1539

Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say  Roll Eyes
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.

You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.

Man, that obvious sock puppet is totes making me feel marginalized right now. You know what is embarrassing? Nutless little turds like you who can't even stand by their own words so they need to use socks.
I see you're out of arguments now. Sure. Let's ignore everything because this may not be my main account  Roll Eyes
What an overwhelming (and original) reasoning  Undecided

I don't need any other arguments because by you appearing here and using your sock to take potshots you are simply reinforcing my point that people who operate openly and honestly simply have their reputations used as leverage against them by sad little turds like you who see this community as a tool of self enrichment rather than something to be protected. I am willing to back my words up with my reputation, you are here only for self enrichment and a compulsive need to control others as you hide in the shadows playing your little nutless games. You like most unscrupulous people mistake your lack of principles for being smart like you invented the lie. You aren't smart you are just willing to fuck people to serve yourself. That is the difference between you and me.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 2201

Lets go Brendon


View Profile
April 06, 2019, 03:00:32 AM
 #1540

I think if he was around he’d be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated.  Hence why we’re becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.

My point exactly.
You were a "target" there for making absurd claims showing your own ego doesn't correspond with reality, not because you're a "successful long term member"
I think OgN speaking out against a certain group of people has made him a target...
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 131 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!